Waiver Under Maharashtra Settlement Of Arrears Of Tax Act Available Only On Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad has recently held that under the First Phase of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fee Act, 2019, one hundred percent of undisputed tax must be paid and no waiver is available on such amount, dismissing a writ petition filed by a sugar manufacturing co-operative. A Division Bench of Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar held, “for undisputed tax, amount to be paid is 100% of the amount in column B i.e....

ITAT Mumbai Upholds Fresh Examination of Ambuja Cements' AY 2019–20 Assessment For Lack Of Inquiry

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed Ambuja Cements Limited's appeal against a revision order that had set aside its completed tax assessment for fresh verification, holding that the original assessment was passed “without due examination and verification.” The company had challenged the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order under Section 263 revising and setting aside its Assessment Year 2019–20 assessment on the ground that the Assessing Officer...

ITAT Delhi Quashes Tax Revision Against Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi For AY 2020–21

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on Monday quashed a revision order passed against Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi for Assessment Year 2020–21, holding that the Income Tax Department lacked material to exercise its revision powers for an assessment of Rs.133.46 crore. Section 263 allows a senior tax officer to revise a completed assessment if it is found to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. In Rohatgi's case, the Tribunal held that these...

GST Authorities Cannot Enforce IGST Demand Against SREI Finance During Moratorium: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on 12 February held that Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities cannot pursue coercive recovery of tax dues against a corporate debtor during the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A Bench of Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Ajay Digpaul, set aside a demand of Rs. 67.5 lakh of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST), including a penalty of 100% of the tax demand, raised on SREI Equipment Finance Limited (SEFL), observing that the GST...

CESTAT Kolkata Affirms CBEC Circular, Reiterates Sub-Contractor Independently Liable For Service Tax

The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 6 February clarified that after the issuance of CBEC Master Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST dated 23 August 2007, a sub-contractor is independently liable to pay Service Tax on the services rendered by it, even where the main contractor has already discharged the Service Tax liability on the same project. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member K. Anpazhakan, was examining the legality of...

Only Commissioner Can Decide If Delay In Income Tax Refund Is Attributable to Taxpayer, Not AO: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that the question whether delay in processing TDS refund is attributable to the assessee/taxpayer, for the purpose of denying interest under Section 244A(2) of the Income Tax Act, can be decided only by the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner and not by the Assessing Officer (AO).A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“Looking at the language used in sub-section (2) of Section 244A of the Act of 1961, we are of the firm opinion...

GST Appeal Cannot Be Entertained Beyond Statutory Limit Of 120 Days: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has held that delay in filing an appeal against cancellation of GST registration cannot be condoned beyond the statutory maximum period of 120 days (3+1 months) prescribed under Section 107 of the CGST Act. A Bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi, in a judgment dated 22 January 2026, dismissed a writ petition filed by Rajesh Industries, a proprietorship firm, holding that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked to override...

Delhi High Court Slams IT Officer For Relying On Set-Aside Order, Directs Issue Of Nil TDS Certificate

The Delhi High Court has strongly criticised the Income Tax Department for relying on a long-set-aside assessment order to deny withholding tax relief, holding that such an approach amounts to a revenue-driven exercise contrary to law and judicial discipline.A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar set aside the order passed under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which had directed deduction of tax at 15% instead of issuing a nil withholding certificate to a a UK-based...

Income Tax | Duty Drawback Not Eligible for 80-IC Relief ; Taxes on Raw Materials Must Be Set Off: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that while duty drawback receipts are not eligible for deduction under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act, the excise and customs duties paid by a taxpayer on raw materials are required to be deducted/subsumed from the duty drawback while recomputing income in the facts of the case.A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar partly allowed the appeal filed by Narayan Industries against ITAT order denying its claim for deduction under Section 80-IC in...

Reassessment Must Be Based On AO's Independent 'Reason To Believe,' Not Borrowed: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeals against NTPC Ltd., holding that reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated merely on the basis of an audit objection and that the statutory requirement of “reason to believe” must be from independent satisfaction of the Assessing Officer (AO).A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“the provision expressly used the language 'reason to believe' and the same has been interpreted by Hon'ble the...

Delhi High Court Grants Bail In NDPS Case, Says Customs Detention Without Magistrate's Authorisation Illegal

The Delhi High Court has recently granted bail to a foreign national accused in a narcotics smuggling case, holding that once contraband was partially recovered at the airport, Customs authorities were bound to arrest him and produce him before a Magistrate, and that his continued detention without judicial authorisation rendered the subsequent arrest illegal.Justice Manoj Jain observed, “The contraband contained in 19 capsules, suspected to be cocaine, was seized, and thus offence stood...

Customs Act | Once SCN States Market Value Of Seized Goods, Burden Lies On Noticee To Disprove It: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that once the market value of goods seized by the Customs is specified in a show cause notice, the burden lies on the one who recieved notice to disprove the valuation with cogent material, and a mere denial is insufficient to seek interference in appellate proceedings.A division bench of Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul was hearing an importer's appeal challenging concurrent findings of the Customs adjudicating authority and CESTAT,...