Tax
Failed To Comply With S.23(4) Of MVAT Act Along With Non-Application Of Mind & Legal Malafide: Bombay HC Quashes Assessment, Imposes 50K Cost On Dept
While considering a case where the Commercial tax department has flagrantly breached the statutory provisions of Sec 23(4) of the MVAT Act, the Bombay High Court ruled that assessment order passed by Commissioner of Sales tax is vitiated by total non-application of mind. Since a strong prima facie case is made out about manipulating the date of passing the assessment order, the High Court found that such manipulation was to create an impression that the order was made within the...
S. 68 Of Income Tax Act Not Attracted When There Is No Unexplained Amount In Bank Statement: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court stated that there cannot be any income escapement by the assessee if there is no unexplained amount in the bank statement on record. The Bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Mauna M. Bhatt observed that “the reason given by the Assessing Officer for alleged escapement of Rs.3,25,00,000/- is not sustainable since there is no unexplained amount in the bank statement on record since the assessee did not retain the amount of Rs.3,25,00,000/- and as such the...
Credit Cannot Be Blocked In Electronic Credit Ledger If Sufficient Balance Not Available: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court stated that there cannot be any blocking of the credit in electronic credit ledger if there is no sufficient balance available. The Division Bench, comprising Justices Bhargav D. Karia and Niral R. Mehta, was hearing a case where the assessee contested the blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to ₹2,44,05,567 in its electronic credit ledger. Rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017 empowers the Commissioner or authorized officer to restrict debit of fraudulently...
Exporter Is Eligible For Duty Drawback Once Export Proceeds Are Realized Within Stipulated Period As Per FEMA: Delhi HC
Finding that the payments were received by the bank from third parties, specifically named in the tripartite agreement, which was backed by a firm irrevocable purchase order, the Delhi High Court ruled that duty drawback could not be denied to an exporter. Since the e-BRCs were issued by the DGFT after verification from the bank confirming the receipt of payments, the High Court held that payments made to local supplier through banking channels, could not be regarded as non-existence, ...
S.27A Customs Act | Interest On Delayed Refund Is Payable After Three Months Of Date Of Refund Application, Not From Date Of Order: Bombay HC
Pointing that the Department has delayed the refund on customs duty that was due & payable to assessee for almost ten years, the Bombay High Court ruled that such action of Department in avoiding the payment of interest on delayed refund by raising frivolous pleas, cannot be sustained. Referring to Supreme Court decision in Union of India Vs. Hamdard (Waqf) Laboratories [AIR 2016 SC 1124], the High Court reiterated that the liability of the Revenue to pay the interest u/s 11BB, ...
Revenue Shared With Franchise Doesn't Attract TDS Liability U/S 194-I If No Actual Services Were Rendered: Delhi ITAT
The Delhi ITAT ruled that TDS u/s 194-I has no application on the franchise fee, if the franchisee/collaborator does not render any service, and claim of expenditure is nothing but sharing of revenue in accordance to the agreement undertaken by the parties. Section 194I of Income tax Act imposes an obligation for TDS deduction on persons (other than individual/HUF who are not subject to audit) making rental payments to resident Indians above a specified limit i.e., 2.40 lacs in a year. ...
HC Upholds J&K Govt's Decision To Withdraw Budgetary Support Scheme 2018 For Reimbursement Of IGST To Manufacturing Units
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has upheld the UT government's decision to withdraw the 'Budgetary Support Scheme', notified in the year 2018 for providing budgetary support to manufacturing units in the UT, by reimbursement of Integrated Goods and Service Tax. A division bench of Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Rajesh Sekhri observed that the Scheme did not create any legitimate expectation in the units nor did it attract promissory estoppel on the government. It reasoned that the...
Assessee Who Forgot To Claim 'Long Term Capital Loss' In Income Tax Return Can Seek Revision U/S 264: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court recently allowed an assessee, who failed to claim 'Long Term Capital Loss' in its Income Tax return, to seek revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A division bench of Justices Bhargav D. Karia and Mauna M. Bhatt also reiterated that a Commissioner has to decide an assessee's revision application under Section 264, on merits. The provision empowers the Income Tax Commissioner to revise certain orders. This revision can be initiated by the...
Deduction U/S 80-IA Is Eligible For Industrial Undertakings Even If Infrastructural Development Is Performed With State's Nodal Agency: Calcutta HC
The Calcutta High Court recently confirmed the deduction u/s 80IA(4) to an Infrastructural development company, regarding development of a mechanised port handling system by entering into an agreement with a nodal agency recognised by the Andhra Government. The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya observed that deduction u/s 80IA(4) is legislated to promote industrial undertaking engaged in the infrastructural development, and ...
Taxpayer Can't Be Denied ITC For Merely Filing GST Form Manually If Functionality Issues Are Attributable To Dept: Bombay High Court
Recently, an issue cropped up, where it was emphasized that technicalities created by the Department and not the taxpayer, should not be put forth by the department to defeat the statutory rights and entitlement of the taxpayers.The Bombay High Court ruled that concerned Revenue officials (Respondent) cannot deny the benefits of accrued ITC (input tax credit) to the assessee (Petitioner) only because the prescribed forms were not filed electronically but were filed manually.Just because the GST...
S. 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act | Gujarat HC Directs Commissioner To Avoid Pedantic Approach, Condone One Year Delay In Filing Return
The Gujarat High Court recently allowed the petition preferred by a woman seeking to condone over one year delay in filing of her income tax return for an assessment year. A division bench of Justices Bhargav D. Karia and Mauna M. Bhatt also criticized the “pedantic approach” in deciding Petitioner's application under section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The provision empowers CBDT to direct Income Tax authorities to allow refund/ deduction claims or any other relief under...
Assessee Can't Claim ITC For Transportation If Costs Aren't Included In Assessable Value Of Goods For Payment Of Central Excise Duty: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court stated that assessee cannot claim input tax credit for transportation services if transportation costs are not included in assessable value of goods for payment of central excise duty. The Division Bench of Justices A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Syam Kumar V.M. observed that “………the assessee did not include the transportation costs in the assessable value of the goods for the purposes of payment of Central Excise duty. Under such circumstances, the assessee cannot...