Supreme Court Sets Aside GST Notice Against Tata Steel, Says 'Suppression' Must Have Factual Basis

The Supreme Court has set aside a GST show cause notice issued to Tata Steel Limited and the consequential Order-in-Original dated 26 December 2025, holding that the Department could not invoke the extended limitation period under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), merely by using the words “suppression of facts” without setting out the foundational facts supporting the allegation. A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran held that where the...

Supreme Court Holds Port Trust Liable For Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods After Custodian Approval

The Supreme Court on 25 August upheld the validity of a notification approving the Mumbai Port Trust as a custodian under Section 45(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, empowers the Commissioner of Customs to approve a person or entity as custodian of imported goods pending their clearance.A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Manmohan held that the Commissioner of Customs was justified in approving the Trust as a custodian, and set aside the Bombay High Court's finding that the Commissioner...

Kerala High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Regional Sports Centre's Building Tax Exemption Claim

The Kerala High Court on 18 August set aside the Kerala Government's rejection of the Regional Sports Centre, Kochi's claim for exemption from building tax and directed it to reconsider the claim afresh. Justice Harisankar V. Menon passed the order after finding that the Government had failed to properly consider material showing that the Centre provided free sports coaching to several students and trainees. He held: "The Government to reconsider the claim for exemption raised by the...

CESTAT Ahmedabad Holds ₹54 Lakh Recovery Against Panasonic Time-Barred, Faults Department's Inaction

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad on 24 August set aside recovery of Rs. 54,00,034 from Panasonic Life Solutions India, holding that the Department's show cause notice issued nearly six years after the credit was taken was barred by limitation. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha and Technical Member Satendra Vikram Singh held that recovery of irregular or excess credit under Notification No. 39/2001-CE is subject to the...

DDA's Statutory Status Does Not Exempt Its Commercial Leasing From Service Tax: CESTAT New Delhi

The New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 24 August held that the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) statutory status does not exempt its commercial leasing activities from Service Tax. Also, receipts from leasing Government or Nazul land against lease premium, ground rent or other considerations are taxable when they are not compulsory statutory levies. A Bench comprising Judicial Member Dr. Rachna Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao dismissed two...

Deferred Annuity Payments To Road Companies Under NHAI Contracts Taxable Under GST: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court on 17 August upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on annuity payments received by road construction companies under concession agreements with the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), holding that such deferred payments for works contract services cannot claim exemption merely because they are paid as annuities. A Division Bench of Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Praveer Bhatnagar dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by Nagaur Mukundgarh...

Taxpayer Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit For Deductor's Failure To Deposit Tax: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on 5 August held that TDS credit cannot be denied to a taxpayer merely because the person who deducted the tax failed to deposit it with the Central Government, once actual deduction of tax from the income or payment is established. A Division Bench of Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Firdosh P. Pooniwalla observed that the default of the deductor cannot prejudice the deducted and directed the Income Tax Department to verify claims and grant TDS credit where actual deduction...

Kerala High Court Holds MRF Eligible For Tax Exemption On 'Compound Rubber'

The Kerala High Court on 14 August held that MRF Limited is entitled to tax exemption under S.R.O. No. 1729/1993 for “compound rubber” manufactured by the company. It stated exemption cannot be denied by treating the product as covered by the negative list introduced through S.R.O. No. 38/1998 Justice Harisankar V. Menon allowed MRF's petition challenging the State Level Committee on Sales Tax Exemption's decision, which had denied the company exemption in respect of compound rubber. He held: ...

ITC Blockage Cannot Continue Beyond One Year Under CGST Rules: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court on 21 August held that a restriction on the use of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86A of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Rules cannot continue beyond one year. Justice S. Raveekumar directed the authorities to unblock the ITC of Metal Trade Incorporation, which had remained blocked for more than two-and-a-half years. He held: “the restriction was imposed on 27.01.2023 and more than 2 ½ years have passed. In view of the same, the restrictions on the blockage ceased to...

Vodafone Idea's Five-Year Delay Cannot Curtail Statutory Interest On Pre-Deposit: CESTAT New Delhi

On 24 August, the New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed Vodafone Idea Ltd.'s appeal against the denial of interest on its service tax pre-deposit. A Bench comprising Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao held that interest under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act is payable from the date of deposit until the date of actual refund, regardless of the reason for the delay. He held: “As per Section 35FF interest has to be paid from the date of payment of the...

12% Interest Payable On Redemption Fine Deposits From Date Of Deposit: CESTAT Chandigarh

The Chandigarh Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 21 August held that interest at 12% per annum is payable on redemption fine amounts deposited by an importer for securing release of goods, from the date of deposit until the date of actual refund, holding that such interest is compensatory in nature. A Bench comprising Judicial Member S.S. Garg allowed two appeals filed by Hindustan Distributors seeking interest on refunds of Rs. 18 lakh and Rs. 27 lakh representing...

Supreme Court Says Extended GST Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Mechanically, Quashes G.R. Infra Notice

The Supreme Court on 19 August held that the extended limitation period under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 cannot be invoked merely by mechanically using expressions such as “fraud”, “wilful misstatement” or “suppression of facts” in a show cause notice. A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran allowed an appeal filed by G.R. Infra Projects Limited, Ratlam, observing that the show cause notice itself must specify the allegations and circumstances...