Supreme Court & High Courts
Madras High Court Restrains Illegal Broadcast Of Bollywood Film 'Dhurandhar: The Revenge' Ahead Of Release
The Madras High Court has protected the streaming rights of Reliance Industries Limited (Jio Studios), granting an interim injunction against dozens of internet service providers and cable operators to prevent the unlawful broadcast of the film 'Dhurandhar The Revenge'.On March 18, 2026, Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that such preventive measures are necessary to avoid irreversible injury to the creators just before the movie's scheduled theatrical release. Dhurandhar The Revenge,...
Bombay High Court Rejects Rynox Gears' Interim Plea To Injunct Steelite From Using 'RHYNOX' Mark
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused interim relief to motorcycle gear company Rynox Gears in its trademark dispute with Steelite India, holding that the firm made false statements on oath and failed to establish a case for either infringement or passing off. Rynox had sought to stop the rival from using the mark “RHYNOX” for helmets. In an order dated March 17, 2026, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh said the pleadings were based on “false statements on oath” and observed that a party seeking...
NCLT Technical Member Moves Delhi HC Against Acting President Appointment, Claims He Is Senior-Most
NCLT Technical Member Kaushalendra Kumar Singh on Wednesday moved the Delhi High Court, challenging the appointment of Justice Bachu Venkat Balaram Das as Acting President of the National Company Law Tribunal.The petition challenges the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notification dated March 16, 2026, which appointed Member (Judicial) Bachu Venkat Balaram Das as acting president after the completion of the term of then Acting President Deep Chandra Joshi.The matter arises after a vacancy occurred...
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Anannya Agro Products In 'GERMINATOR' Trademark Row, Orders 4-Week Status Quo
The Bombay High Court on Monday granted interim injunction in a trademark dispute over the mark “GERMINATOR” but directed the parties to maintain the status quo for four weeks to allow the defendants to challenge the ruling.A Division Bench of Justice R. I. Chagla and Justice Advait M. Sethna restrained Anannya Agro Products and Avishkar Agro Chem from using the mark “GERMINATOR” or any deceptively similar trade dress in a suit filed by Dr. Bawaskar Technology (Agro) Pvt. Ltd. The direction to...
Failure To Deny Pleadings, No Cross-Examination: Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against Proto Developers
The Delhi High Court has upheld an arbitral award directing Proto Developers and Technologies Ltd. to pay over Rs 12 crore to Antriksh Realtech Pvt. Ltd., holding that where a party fails to specifically deny a claim and does not cross-examine the opposing witness on a crucial issue, the arbitral tribunal is entitled to treat the evidence as unrebutted and the claim as established.Rejecting Proto Developers' challenge to the Rs 9-crore counterclaim, the Court noted that the tribunal treated the...
'Tale Of Two Countries': Delhi High Court Says Peru, Chile Both Linked To PISCO, Refuses Exclusive GI To Peru
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday affirmed that Peru cannot claim the exclusive, standalone “PISCO” geographical indication (GI) for its national spirit in India, holding that the name is historically associated with alcoholic beverages produced in both Peru and Chile and granting Peru sole rights would lead to consumer confusion. Calling the dispute a “Tale of Two Countries,” a Division Bench of Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Om Prakash Shukla was dealing with an appeal filed by the...
Bombay High Court Flags Misuse Of IBC By Borrowers To Stall SARFAESI Recovery After Auction Sale
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday flagged a disturbing trend of defaulting borrowers invoking provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to frustrate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, even after auction rights had crystallised in favour of auction purchasers. A Division Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat was hearing a writ petition filed by auction purchasers challenging a November 26, 2025 order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Mumbai, which had halted further...
Delhi High Court Refers Legends League Cricket Media Rights Dispute Between Jiostar And Absolute Legends To Mediation
The Delhi High Court refrained from granting interim relief to Jiostar India Pvt. Ltd. in its dispute with Absolute Legends Sports Pvt. Ltd., the company that runs the Legends League Cricket tournament, over media and commercial rights linked to the league. A single-judge bench of Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar instead asked the parties to attempt a settlement through mediation after both the parties agreed to the same. "Acceding to the same, the matter is referred to Delhi High Court...
Karnataka High Court Holds Pre‑Winding-Up Lease By Mysore Kirloskar Ltd To KIAMS Fraudulent
The Karnataka High Court on 17 February held that a lease executed by the erstwhile management of Mysore Kirloskar Ltd in favour of Kirloskar Institute of Advanced Management Studies (KIAMS) was a fraudulent and sham transaction intended to defeat creditors and was therefore void from inception. A Division Bench of Justices D.K. Singh and Venkatesh Naik T heard an appeal by the official liquidator, challenging the Company Court's 21 July 2015 order that had rejected a request to cancel the...
Diversion Of Preferential Issue Funds For Undisclosed Purpose Amounts To Fraud Under PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that diversion of funds raised through a preferential issue for purposes not disclosed in the notice of the Extraordinary General Meeting (EoGM) convened to approve the allotment amounts to a violation of securities law and constitutes fraudulent conduct under the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations (PFUTP). A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan made the ruling while allowing appeals filed by the Securities...
Writ Petition Against GST Show Cause Notice Not Maintainable: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on 27 February dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by Trillion Lead Factory Pvt. Ltd., which challenged the Telangana High Court's refusal to interfere with a show cause notice proposing cancellation of its GST registration. A Division Bench comprising Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Prasanna B. Varale held: “It is trite law that no writ lies against the issuance of a show cause notice, and such a writ petition would not be maintainable.” The case arose from a show...
Indemnity Bond Not Required When Succession Certificate Is Filed Under IEPF Rules: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court on 9 March held that where a claimant has already furnished a valid succession certificate under the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF) Rules for transfer of shares, an indemnity bond cannot be insisted upon. Justice Hemant M Prachchhak observed that the requirement to furnish an indemnity bond arises only in the absence of documents such as a succession certificate, and authorities cannot impose additional conditions not contemplated under the Rules. He noted:...












