Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Against Millennium Beer Industries Over ₹21.92 Cr Service Tax

The Bombay High Court on 3 September dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the setting aside of a Rs. 21.92 crore demand against Millennium Beer Industries Ltd., holding that the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked to raise a service tax demand without establishing fraud, collusion or suppression of facts with an intent to evade tax, and A Division Bench of Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasaheb D. Shinde also held that the Revenue cannot take different stands in substantially...

Airport Entry-Ticket Licensee Liable For Service Tax Only From June 1, 2007: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has ruled that an airport entry-ticket licensee was liable to pay service tax only from June 1, 2007, and not for the earlier period.The court observed that the law was amended from that date to specifically bring the renting of immovable property within the service tax net. For the period before June 1, 2007, it noted that the Delhi High Court had ruled that service tax did not apply to the rental/licence fee in question.“...the appellant is liable to pay service tax as an...

Patna High Court Refuses To Interfere With ₹60.88 Lakh Service Tax Demand Against FCI Contractor

The Patna High Court on 28 August refused to interfere with a Service Tax demand of Rs. 60.88 lakh, along with interest and penalties, raised against a contractor engaged by the Food Corporation of India (FCI). A Division Bench of Justices Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Ramesh Chand Malviya dismissed the writ petition filed by Anjani Kumar Singh, while granting him liberty to pursue the statutory remedy available under law. It observed: “We have noticed that neither before the competent...

CESTAT Taxability Appeals Lie Before Supreme Court U/S 35L Of Central Excise Act: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has held that an appeal against a Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order involving the taxability or classification of a service lies before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, and not before the High Court under Section 35G. A Division Bench comprising Justices P. Sam Koshy and Narsing Rao Nandikonda dismissed an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Customs against Mars International...

Transitioned CENVAT Credit Valid For Service Tax Appeal Pre-Deposit: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court on 4 August held that CENVAT credit transitioned to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime can be used to meet the mandatory pre-deposit requirement for a service tax appeal. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and K. Manmadha Rao set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order rejecting a pre-deposit of Rs.79,77,301 made by debiting the Electronic Credit Ledger through Form GSTR-3B. The judges held: "The mandatory pre-deposit...

Conversion Of Bare Structures Into Retail Showrooms Is Taxable As “Original Works”: CESTAT New Delhi

On 6 August, the New Delhi Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), held that converting bare commercial structures into fully functional retail showrooms constitutes “original works” under the service tax law and not merely completion and finishing services, while also ruling that service tax cannot be levied on forfeited customer advances or insurance compensation received for goods destroyed in a fire. A Bench of Judicial Member Ashok Jindal and Technical Member P.V....

Six Month Limitation For Service Tax Refund Starts From SIPCOT Certificate Date: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court on 14 July held that the six-month limitation period for claiming service tax refund under Section 104 of the Finance Act, 2017 must be calculated from the date on which the taxpayer receives the mandatory certificate from the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), and not from the date on which the Finance Act received Presidential assent. A Division Bench comprising Justices Dr. G. Jayachandran and N. Mala allowed the taxpayer's appeal, set aside...

Financial Crisis Reasonable Cause To Waive Service Tax Penalty: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court on 27 July held that penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be imposed where a taxpayer proves a genuine financial crisis as a reasonable cause for delayed payment of service tax, ruling that a Tribunal's finding of financial incapacity based on material on record cannot be interfered with in appeal. A Division Bench of Justices G. Jayachandran and N. Mala dismissed two appeals filed by the GST and Central Excise Department against the CESTAT order that waived...

Refund Of Service Tax Cannot Be Decided Before Determining Nature Of Contract: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 27 July held that the question of refund or adjustment of Service Tax cannot be decided before the Assessing Authority determines whether the underlying contract is a works contract or a service contract, as the nature of the contract determines the applicable tax liability. A Division Bench of Justices Devan Ramachandran and Basant Balaji partly allowed the appeals filed by Gaiagen Technologies Private Limited (formerly Pest Control India Private Limited) and set aside...

Revenue's Appeal Against CESTAT's Service Taxability Ruling Lies Before Supreme Court: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that an appeal against a CESTAT order determining the taxability of a particular service is not maintainable before the High Court and must instead be filed before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944.A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain relied on Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Delhi South v. M/s Spicejet Ltd., SERTA 2/2024 to conclude,“where the CESTAT determines the taxability of a particular service,...

Madras High Court Upholds 2014 Notification Granting Pan-India Powers To DGCEI Officers In Service Tax Cases

The Madras High Court has upheld a 2014 notification that authorised officers of the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (now the Directorate General of GST Intelligence) to investigate service tax cases and issue show cause notices across India, regardless of where the taxpayer was located. The court held that the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) was empowered to confer all-India jurisdiction on Central Excise officers through notifications issued under the Finance...

Karnataka High Court Rejects Deccan Mining's Refund Claim, Holds Pay Slips Qualify As Consignment Notes

The Karnataka High Court on 8 July held that transportation services provided by individual truck owners can be treated as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services if the documents issued for transportation contain the essential features of a consignment note. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and Rajesh Rai K dismissed an appeal filed by Deccan Mining Syndicate (P) Ltd., holding that the "pay slips" issued by the transporters fulfilled the requirement of consignment notes under Section...