REAT
LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Monthly Digest: September 2026
HIGH COURTSCalcutta High CourtCalcutta High Court Directs WB Chief Secretary To Give Timeline For Filling RERA, REAT VacanciesCase Title Rahul Parasrampuria v. The State of West Bengal & OthersCase Number WPA (P) 427 of 2026Citation 2026 LLBiz HC( CAL) 219On Tuesday, 15 September, the Calcutta High Court directed the West Bengal Chief Secretary's office to specify a timeline for filling vacancies in the West Bengal Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) and the West Bengal Real Estate...
Rajasthan REAT Stays RERA Order Granting Interim Relief Not Prayed For By Allottee
The Rajasthan Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has stayed an ex-parte interim order that prevented the Rajasthan Housing Board from proposing any increase over the ₹99.86 lakh tentative cost of flats in its AIS Residency Phase-II project in Jaipur. The order had also restrained the Board from demanding additional payments from the allottees.A bench comprising Chairperson Justice Madan Gopal Vyas and Judicial Member Yudhisthir Sharma observed that “the ex-parte interim-order was passed despite the...
LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: September 21 - September 27, 2026
NOMINAL INDEXJP Builders and Developers v. Santosh Amarsingh Sandhu, 2026 LLBiz HC(BOM) 532Arun Excello Constructions LLP v. Meenakshi S., 2026 LLBiz REAT (TN) 72Seema Devi & Ors. v. Ravi Surya Affordable Homes Pvt. Ltd., 2026 LLBiz RERA (RJ) 140Sridhar Bagaluri & Anr. v. M/s Janapriya Projects Pvt. Ltd., 2026 LLBiz RERA (TS) 141Dr. Bhuvanagiri Radha Madhavi & Ors. v. M/s. Anjani Projects & Ors., 2026 LLBiz RERA (AP) 142Mrs. Shashi Rastogi & Anr. v. M/s S.S. Group Pvt. Ltd.,...
TNREAT Upholds ₹2.36 Lakh Refund Against Arun Excello, Reiterates Promoter Cannot Sell Stilt Parking
The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (TNREAT) on 16 September reiterated that a promoter cannot sell or separately charge for a reserved car parking space in the stilt area of a residential building. A Bench comprising Chairperson Justice M. Duraiswamy and Judicial Member K. Babu upheld Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority's (TNRERA) direction requiring Arun Excello Constructions LLP to refund Rs. 2.36 lakh collected from homebuyer Meenakshi S. towards covered parking in its...
LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: September 14-September 20 , 2026
NOMINAL INDEXRahul Parasrampuria v. The State of West Bengal & Others, 2026 LLBiz HC(CAL) 219Sunstar Homes v. The State of Goa & Ors., 2026 LLBiz HC(CAL) 218Trendset Jayabheri Projects LLP and Others v. Neelima Vanguru, 2026 LLBiz REAT (TS) 69M/s Vasavi Realtors LLP v. Taru Trivedi & connected matters, 2026 LLBiz REAT (TS) 66Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. v. Ketan Ashokrao Nage & Connected Matters, 2026 LLBiz REAT (MH) 71RA Residences Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v....
Maharashtra REAT Allows Homebuyers To Withdraw Pre-Deposit Over Prolonged Possession Delay, EMI-Rent Burden
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) has recently allowed two homebuyers to withdraw amounts deposited by Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. as the mandatory pre-deposit for its appeals, after finding that prolonged possession delays had left them paying both EMIs and rent.In one case, the project remained incomplete for more than four years. In the other, possession was due by December 31, 2014, while the homebuyer had paid 92.8% of the consideration through an HDFC Bank...
Maharashtra REAT Penalises RA Associates 2% Of Project Cost For Altering Plan Without Allottees' Consent
On 16 September, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) penalised RA Associates and its partners, promoters of the “RA Residences” project in Mumbai, with a penalty equivalent to 2% of the project cost for altering the disclosed project plan and increasing the Floor Space Index (FSI) of the commercial building without obtaining the prior informed consent of the allottees. A Bench comprising Chairperson Justice S.S. Shinde and Administrative Member Shrikant M. Deshpande also...
Telangana REAT Upholds ₹27.5 Lakh Penalty Over Extra Clubhouse Floor, Revised Plan
The Telangana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) has upheld a ₹27.50 lakh penalty imposed on Trendset Jayabheri Projects LLP for constructing an additional floor in the clubhouse without obtaining the consent of two-thirds of the allottees and failing to upload the revised building plan on the RERA website.A bench comprising Chairperson Justice A. Santhosh Reddy, Judicial Member P. Pradeep Kumar Reddy, and Administrative Member Vemula Sreekar dismissed the appeal filed by the promoter and two...
Co-op Society Without Land Or Layout For Real Estate Project Not Promoter Under RERA: Karnataka REAT
The Karnataka Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) has held that a housing co-operative society that had not acquired any land for development and had no project in existence could not be treated as a “Promoter” under RERA. A complaint seeking relief under the Act was therefore not maintainable before Karnataka RERA.A Bench of Chairperson Justice J.M. Khazi and Judicial Member Santhosh Kumar Shetty N. made the observation while dismissing an appeal against the BSNL Employees Welfare House...
Builder Cannot Compel Registration Of Time-Barred Agreement For Sale: Karnataka REAT
The Karnataka Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has held that a promoter cannot require the Sub-Registrar to register an Agreement for Sale presented beyond the four-month period prescribed under Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908.A Bench of Chairperson Justice J.M. Khazi and Judicial Member Santhosh Kumar Shetty N observed, “in view of the statutory bar contained in section 23 of the Registration Act, the Promoter cannot compel the Sub-Registrar to register an Agreement to Sell if it is...
Telangana REAT Says Promoter Cannot Alter Possession Date, Dismisses 31 Appeals By Vasavi Realtors
The Telangana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) on 9 September held that extension of a real estate project's registration does not automatically extend the possession timeline agreed with homebuyers, and a promoter cannot unilaterally alter the contractual possession date without their consent. A Bench comprising Chairperson Justice A. Santhosh Reddy, Judicial Member P. Pradeep Kumar Reddy and Administrative Member Vemula Sreekar dismissed 31 appeals filed by Vasavi Realtors LLP against...
Builder Can't Terminate Allotment For Non-Payment Without Executing Agreement For Sale: MahaREAT
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MHREAT) on 7 September held that a builder cannot accept more than 10% of the consideration for a flat without first executing and registering an Agreement for Sale under Section 13 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act). A Bench comprising Chairperson Justice S.S. Shinde and Member Shrikant M. Deshpande further held that a builder cannot terminate a homebuyer's allotment for non-payment when the builder itself has...