Assessee Explained The Source Of The Excess Stock Found During The Course Of Survey: ITAT Deletes Addition

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the assessee has explained the source of the excess stock found during the course of the survey.The bench of Aby T. Varkey (Judicial Member) and Manjunatha (Accountant Member) has observed that when the assessee has explained that the source of excess stock found during the course of the survey is income generated from current-year business and the explanation offered by the assessee is plausible, then income offered...

Section 10AA Deduction Can’t Be Denied Merely Not Receiving Convertible Foreign Exchange On The Deemed Exports: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the Section 10AA deduction cannot be denied merely on the reasoning that the assessee did not receive the convertible foreign exchange on the deemed exports.The bench of Madhumita Roy (Judicial Member) and Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member) has observed that there was no condition applicable for the Assessment Year 2015-16 to bring foreign exchange into India on account of the exports of sales.The respondent/assessee is...

Without Corroborating Evidence, Addition Can’t Be Made On The Basis Of A Declaration Made U/s 132(4) Of The Income Tax Act: ITAT

The Guwahati Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that without corroborating evidence, an addition ought not to be made on the basis of a declaration made under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act.The bench of Rajpal Yadav (Vice President) and Manish Borad (Accountant Member) has observed that apart from the disclosure statement, no other document is being referred to by the Assessing Officer. No doubt, the disclosure or admission made under Section 132(4) of the Act...

Non-Resident Shareholders Can’t Take Benefit Of Lower Tax Rate Prescribed In DTAAs For Taxation Of Dividend Where DDT Is Applicable: ITAT

The Mumbai Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that non-resident shareholders cannot take advantage of the lower tax rate prescribed in Double Tax Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) for taxation of dividends where Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is applicable.The bench of G. S. Pannu (President), N.V. Vasudevan (Vice President), and Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member) has observed that the DDT rate shall prevail on dividends paid by Indian companies to non-resident...

AO Cannot Make Ad-Hoc Disallowance Of Expenses For Want Of Supporting For Each Expense, Without Pointing Defect In Vouchers: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the AO cannot make an ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of support for each expense, without pointing to defects in vouchers on a sample basis furnished by the assessee.The bench of Yogesh Kumar US (Judicial Member) and B. R. R. Kumar (Accountant Member) has observed that the assessee has furnished copies of invoices and vouchers on a sample basis, and it is stated that the assessing officer did not find any defects...

Adjustment Of Difference In Depreciation To The Profits Eligible For Income Tax Exemption: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that adjustment of the difference in depreciation to the profits makes them eligible for income tax exemption.The bench of Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy S. (Accountant Member) has observed that the adjustment of the difference in depreciation to the profits eligible for exemption under Section 10A will not result in any addition to total income. This is so because any increase or decrease to the profit due to...

Once Additions Made Under Black Money Act The Same Addition Cannot Be Made Under Income Tax Act: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that once additions have been made under the Black Money Act, the same additions cannot be made under the Income Tax Act on the same set of facts.The bench of C.N. Prasad (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) has upheld the order of the CIT(A), in which it was held that the addition so made by the AO amounts to double addition and, therefore, it should be deleted.A search and seizure operation was carried out...

ITAT Disallows Income Tax Deduction On Employees’ Contribution To PF & ESI Beyond The Due Dates

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has disallowed income tax deduction on employees’ contributions to PF and ESI beyond the due dates.The bench of Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member) has observed that the auditor in the audited accounts only pointed out the date of payment and the due date prescribed under the PF and ESI Act, and it is incumbent upon the assessee that, while computing the income, he has to disallow the said payment...

Expenditure Made On Ice Boxes Are Capital Expenditure: ITAT Upholds Disallowance Against Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the expenditure made on ice chests or ice boxes was made for acquiring or bringing into existence an asset for the enduring benefit of the business and was of the nature of capital expenditure.The two-member bench of Anubhav Sharma (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) has observed that if the expenditure is made for acquiring or bringing into existence an asset or advertisement for the enduring benefit...

ITAT Quashes Penalty Notice Which Was Silent On Specification Of Charges

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the penalty notice, which was silent on the specification of charges.The bench of Astha Chandra (a judicial member) and Shamim Yahya (an accountant member) has observed that no specification of charge in the penalty notice leads to the same becoming void, and the penalty on that count is to be deleted.The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was levied upon the assessee on account of additions for...

Income Tax Exemption On The Voluntarily Payment Made By The Employer To The Employee Out Of Appreciation: ITAT

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the payment has been made voluntarily by them out of appreciation for the employee and thus falls outside the rigours of Section 17(3)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.The two-member bench of R.S. Syal (Vice President) and Partha Sarathi Chaudhury (Judicial Member) has observed that the department could not produce any documents or evidence on record to show that the payment received from the employer was coupled with some legal...

Non-Compete Fee Related To Profession Is Made Taxable Only w.e.f. AY 2017-18: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a non-compete fee related to a profession is made taxable only with effect from AY 2017–18, and the non-compete fee in relation to a profession for periods prior to AY 2017–18 would be treated as a capital receipt.The bench of Astha Chandra (Judicial Member) and Shamim Yahya (Accountant Member) has decided in favor of the Assessee-doctor holding that the department has erred in looking beyond the service agreement entered...