Loss On Confiscation Of Smuggled Items By DRI Officials Cannot Be Claimed As ‘Business Loss’ Under Income Tax Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices M. R. Shah and M.M. Sundresh has set aside the Rajasthan High Court’s order of allowing the loss claimed by the assessee on account of confiscation of silver bars by the Customs department, as ‘business loss’ under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Justice M. R. Shah reckoned that the assessee was carrying on a legitimate business of dealing in silver and in an attempt to make larger profits, he indulged into smuggling of silver. ...

Income Tax Act- AO Can’t Make Additions to Completed Assessments In Absence Of Incriminating Materials: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that no additions can be made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132 A, in respect of completed /unabated assessments. The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and Sudhanshu Dhulia remarked that block assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act is linked with the search and requisition under ...

Without Corroborating Evidence, Addition Can’t Be Made On The Basis Of A Declaration Made U/s 132(4) Of The Income Tax Act: ITAT

The Guwahati Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that without corroborating evidence, an addition ought not to be made on the basis of a declaration made under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act.The bench of Rajpal Yadav (Vice President) and Manish Borad (Accountant Member) has observed that apart from the disclosure statement, no other document is being referred to by the Assessing Officer. No doubt, the disclosure or admission made under Section 132(4) of the Act...

Non-Resident Shareholders Can’t Take Benefit Of Lower Tax Rate Prescribed In DTAAs For Taxation Of Dividend Where DDT Is Applicable: ITAT

The Mumbai Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that non-resident shareholders cannot take advantage of the lower tax rate prescribed in Double Tax Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) for taxation of dividends where Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is applicable.The bench of G. S. Pannu (President), N.V. Vasudevan (Vice President), and Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member) has observed that the DDT rate shall prevail on dividends paid by Indian companies to non-resident...

AO Cannot Make Ad-Hoc Disallowance Of Expenses For Want Of Supporting For Each Expense, Without Pointing Defect In Vouchers: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the AO cannot make an ad hoc disallowance of expenses for want of support for each expense, without pointing to defects in vouchers on a sample basis furnished by the assessee.The bench of Yogesh Kumar US (Judicial Member) and B. R. R. Kumar (Accountant Member) has observed that the assessee has furnished copies of invoices and vouchers on a sample basis, and it is stated that the assessing officer did not find any defects...

Transfer Pricing | High Courts Not Precluded From Scrutinising ITAT’s Determination Of Arm’s Length Price : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that the High Court is not precluded from considering the determination of the arm’s length price determined by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), in exercise of its powers under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Dismissing the proposition that in every case where the Tribunal determines the arm’s length price, the same shall attain finality, the bench of Justices M.R. Shah and M.M. Sundresh remarked that there cannot be any absolute proposition of law...

Adjustment Of Difference In Depreciation To The Profits Eligible For Income Tax Exemption: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that adjustment of the difference in depreciation to the profits makes them eligible for income tax exemption.The bench of Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy S. (Accountant Member) has observed that the adjustment of the difference in depreciation to the profits eligible for exemption under Section 10A will not result in any addition to total income. This is so because any increase or decrease to the profit due to...

Once Additions Made Under Black Money Act The Same Addition Cannot Be Made Under Income Tax Act: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that once additions have been made under the Black Money Act, the same additions cannot be made under the Income Tax Act on the same set of facts.The bench of C.N. Prasad (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) has upheld the order of the CIT(A), in which it was held that the addition so made by the AO amounts to double addition and, therefore, it should be deleted.A search and seizure operation was carried out...

ITAT Disallows Income Tax Deduction On Employees’ Contribution To PF & ESI Beyond The Due Dates

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has disallowed income tax deduction on employees’ contributions to PF and ESI beyond the due dates.The bench of Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member) has observed that the auditor in the audited accounts only pointed out the date of payment and the due date prescribed under the PF and ESI Act, and it is incumbent upon the assessee that, while computing the income, he has to disallow the said payment...

Expenditure Made On Ice Boxes Are Capital Expenditure: ITAT Upholds Disallowance Against Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the expenditure made on ice chests or ice boxes was made for acquiring or bringing into existence an asset for the enduring benefit of the business and was of the nature of capital expenditure.The two-member bench of Anubhav Sharma (Judicial Member) and N.K. Billaiya (Accountant Member) has observed that if the expenditure is made for acquiring or bringing into existence an asset or advertisement for the enduring benefit...

ITAT Quashes Penalty Notice Which Was Silent On Specification Of Charges

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the penalty notice, which was silent on the specification of charges.The bench of Astha Chandra (a judicial member) and Shamim Yahya (an accountant member) has observed that no specification of charge in the penalty notice leads to the same becoming void, and the penalty on that count is to be deleted.The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was levied upon the assessee on account of additions for...

S. 80-IB Of Income Tax Act - Assessee Not Entitled To Deduction Under On Profit Derived From DEPB And Duty Drawback Schemes: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under Section 80- IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the amount received / profit derived from the Duty Entitlement Pass Book Scheme (DEPB) and the Duty Drawback Schemes.The bench of Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna held that the profit from DEPB and the Duty Drawback claims cannot be said to be an income “derived from” the industrial undertaking. The court added that even otherwise, such an income is chargeable to...