INCOME TAX
ITAT Delhi Allows Hasbro SA To Submit Evidence For TDS Credit, Holds Technical Lapse Cannot Deny Claim
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that an assessee should not be penalised for a technical lapse in filing evidence and allowed Swiss-based Hasbro SA to submit additional evidence in support of its claim for TDS credit. It remanded the matter to the assessing officer for fresh consideration. A Bench comprising Accountant Member Ramit Kochar and Judicial Member Raj Kumar Chauhan passed the order in an appeal filed by Hasbro SA against the Commissioner of...
Merely Uploading Notice On Portal Without Mobile Alert Vitiates Tax Reassessment: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court on 20 January held that merely uploading income tax notices on the portal, without issuing a real-time alert to the taxpayer's registered mobile number, is insufficient to sustain reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, as it violates the principles of natural justice. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai set aside the reassessment proceedings against Basu Tea Pvt. Ltd., the taxpayer and legally unsustainable. The Bench held that the it had been...
Gujarat High Court Reaffirms Mandatory Draft Order In Transfer Pricing Officer Assessments
The Gujarat High Court has held that failure to issue a draft assessment order under Section 144C in cases involving Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) adjustments renders the final assessment order void. The Court emphasised that an “eligible assessee” must be issued a draft order in terms of Section 144C, including cases with TPO adjustments, and that skipping this step deprives the assessee of the statutory right to approach the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). A Division Bench comprising Justice...
Ten-Year Limitation Bars Reopening Assessment For AY 2015-16: Gujarat High Court
The Gujarat High Court on 5 January held that a notice to reopen an assessment is barred by limitation if issued beyond ten years from the end of the relevant assessment year A Division Bench of Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi was hearing a case which included four different but legally identical writ applications. It clarified that under Section 153A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the “relevant assessment year” must be computed backwards from the end of the search year....
Kingfisher Airlines Employee Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit For Employer's Default: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that an employee can't be penalised for the failure of its employer to deposit tax deducted at source (TDS) with the Revenue.The bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar was dealing with a writ petition filed by a former employee of Kingfisher Airlines, whose salary had suffered TDS deductions, but the employer failed to deposit the deducted amount with the Income Tax Department. As a result, the department denied TDS credit to the petitioner and raised a tax...
ITAT Pune Upholds ₹6 Lakh Professional Fees Disallowance For Lack of Evidence
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance of Rs. 6 lakh claimed as professional fees for the assessment year 2017-18, noting that the payment was not supported by sufficient evidence such as the recipient's income tax return, Form 26AS (annual tax statement), or bank statements.The Bench, comprising Accountant Member Dr Dipak P. Ripote and Judicial Member Vinay Bhamore, reaffirmed that expenses claimed as professional fees must be substantiated...
Tax Authority Must Consider 'Genuine Hardship' to Condone Filing Delays: Orissa High Court
The Orissa High Court has reiterated that tax authorities must exercise their power to condone a delay in filing income tax returns to address "genuine hardship" and not reject such requests mechanically. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman set aside an order of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (PCCIT), Odisha Region, which had refused to condone the delay in filing income tax returns by The Reserve Bank Employees Co-operative...
Ease Of Doing Business Must Reflect In Tax Orders: Delhi High Court Quashes 10% TDS Certificate For Irish Entity
The Delhi High Court has criticised the Income Tax Department for adopting a revenue-driven approach while issuing tax deduction at source (TDS) certificates, holding that the government's “ease of doing business” policy must translate into fair and reasoned tax orders.A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar observed,“Ease of doing business cannot be confined to slogans and Government policies; it has to percolate down in executive actions and quasi judicial orders. Passing...
Supreme Court Quashes Gujarat HC Order To Modify Income Tax Software To Prevent TDS-Default Demands Against Deductee
The Supreme Court on January 12, 2026, set aside directions issued by the Gujarat High Court requiring the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to modify the income-tax department's software. The court, however, left untouched the relief granted to the taxpayer on merits. A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Vijay Bishnoi was hearing an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against a Gujarat High Court order passed in favour of Shobhan Shantilal Doshi, an individual taxpayer. The Court...
Bombay High Court Grants Relief to Y-NOT Films, Disallows Income Tax Refund Adjustment Beyond 20% Of Disputed Demand
Granting relief to Y-NOT Films LLP, the Bombay High Court reiterated that the Income Tax Department could not take the entire tax refund of a later year to recover an earlier tax demand that is still under appeal. The court said that in such situations, the tax department can normally adjust only 20% of the disputed amount, unless senior tax authorities specifically approve a higher recovery. A Division Bench of Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Firdosh P. Pooniwalla was hearing a petition filed...
Live Cricket Broadcast Fees Not Royalty: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Against Sri Lanka Cricket
The Delhi High Court has reiterated that payments received for granting the right to live telecast international cricket matches in a specific series do not constitute “royalty” under the Income Tax Act, 1961.A Division Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar thus upheld the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favour of Sri Lanka Cricket, ruling that consideration received for providing live broadcast feeds of cricket matches cannot be taxed as royalty under Section...