Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Builder's Plea To Confine Insolvency Process To Single Real Estate Project
The Supreme Court recently dismissed an appeal seeking to confine Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Spaze Towers Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) to a single real estate project of the company located in Gurugram.A bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih dismissed an appeal against the decision of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi rejecting an application to confine the CIRP of the corporate debtor to a single...
'IBC A Complete Code' : Supreme Court Disapproves Of High Court Exercising Writ Jurisdiction To Interdict CIRP
Disapproving a High Court's order interdicting a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Supreme Court recently observed that the IBC is a complete code in itself, having sufficient checks and balances, and thus, the exercise of supervisory and judicial review powers by High Courts demands rigorous scrutiny and judicious application.Allowing the appeal of a successful resolution applicant against Karnataka High Court's interdicting of...
IBC | Moratorium Does Not Extinguish Claim : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that a moratorium declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 will not extinguish a claim. The Court stated that Section 14 bars the institution/continuation of legal proceedings against the corporate debtor, transfer of assets, enforcement of security interest etc."If the argument that the claims of all the creditors of the Corporate Debtor are extinguished once the moratorium comes into force is accepted, no creditor would be able to file a...
IBC | Financial Creditor Can Submit Claim Even If There Is No Default Of Debt : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has observed a default is not necessary for a debt to become a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. A bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih held that under Section 5(7) of the IBC, any person to whom financial debt is owed becomes a Financial Creditor even if there is no default in payment of debt. "Therefore, for submitting the claim by a Financial Creditor, there is no requirement of actual default," the Court...
Timely Implementation Of Resolution Plan Is Crucial To Achieve IBC's Objective Of Protecting Assets Dissipation: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra held that unnecessary delay caused in implementation of the Resolution Plan would also lead to the assets of the corporate debtor diminishing in value. Therefore, there is no doubt that the timely implementation of the Resolution Plan is also one of the underlying objectives of the IBC, 2016. Importance Of Timely Implementation Of The Resolution Plan The IBC was...
Supreme Court Orders Liquidation Of Jet Airways On Failure Of Resolution Plan
The Supreme Court invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to order the liquidation of Jet Airways in view of the "peculiar and alarming" circumstance that the resolution plan has not been implemented for five years.The Court set aside the NCLAT Order which allowed the cash-strapped Jet Airways' ownership transfer to the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) without complete payment in accordance with the resolution plan. The Court directed the NCLT Mumbai...
'IBC Prevails Over SEZ Act', Supreme Court Rejects Noida SEZ's Claim
The Supreme Court dismissed the Noida Special Economic Zone's (NSEZ) plea challenging the NCLAT's decision to approve a resolution plan that granted Rs. 50 Lacs against NSEZ's admitted claim of about Rs. 6 Crore.The NCLAT reduced the claim amount, partly due to penalties related to the renewal of the sub-lease and transfer charges.The bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih ruled that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) prevails over the SEZ Act due to Section 238...
Inherent Powers Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules Cannot Be Used To Circumvent Procedure To Withdraw CIRP Under S.12A IBC & R. 30A: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court Bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra held that 'inherent powers' cannot be used to subvert legal provisions, which exhaustively provide for a procedure. To permit the NCLAT to circumvent this detailed procedure by invoking its inherent powers under Rule 11 would run contrary to the carefully crafted procedure for withdrawal. In the Impugned Judgement, the NCLAT does not provide any reasons for deviating from this procedure...
IBC | No Compulsion To Specify Names Of Creditors In Balance Sheet, General Entry Acknowledging Debt Sufficient To Initiate CIRP : Supreme Court
Observing that there's no compulsion for the companies to specify the names of every secured/unsecured creditor in their balance sheet, the Supreme Court dismissed the plea of a corporate debtor's suspended director against the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”). In other words, the bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta observed that when debt entries exist in the corporate debtor's balance sheet, the debtor could not deny its liability merely on...
Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT Order Which Closed Insolvency Process Against Byju's Based On Settlement With BCCI
The Supreme Court today (October 23) set aside the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal which closed the insolvency proceedings against ed-tech company Byju's (Think and Learn Pvt Ltd) accepting a settlement between it and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for about Rs 158 crores.The Court held that the NCLAT erred in allowing the withdrawal of the insolvency application by invoking its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016. When there is a specific...
'Breaches Discipline Of Law Laid Down In IBC' : Supreme Court Disapproves Of HC Deferring CIRP Under Article 226
The Supreme Court recently took exception to the Telangana High Court ordering the deferring of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in the exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution.The Bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud , Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, held that the High Court was not justified in deferring the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) when the main relief sought in the writ petition uto consolidate the CIRP of two...