Bombay High Court Allows Videography Of GST Summons Proceedings After Taxpayer Undertakes to Bear Cost

Taking note that a director of Tuesonpower International Pvt. Ltd. is undergoing treatment for cancer and has expressed willingness to cooperate with the investigation, the Bombay High Court permitted videography of summons proceedings under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It also allowed his advocate to remain present at a visible but not audible distance during recording of the statement. The Court clarified that the relief is confined to the facts of the case,...

Objection To Arbitral Tribunal's Constitution Cannot Be Raised After Filing Defence: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad has dismissed the State of Maharashtra's challenge to an arbitral award of Rs. 596.60 lakhs, holding that objections to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal cannot be raised after filing of the written statement, counter-claim and commencement of evidence.A Division Bench of Justices Arun R. Pedneker and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav on February 16, 2026, upheld the Commercial Court's May 6, 2022, order refusing to set aside the award dated February 11, 2018. ...

Khamosh! Bombay High Court Protects Shatrughan Sinha's Catchphrase, Personality Rights

The Bombay High Court has granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction to veteran actor and politician Shatrughan Sinha, restraining the unauthorised commercial exploitation of his personality rights. The Court also restrained use of his signature catchphrase “Khamosh” and his distinctive vocal mannerisms, observing that the expression, delivered in his unique and distinct style, is associated exclusively with his persona.Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh on February 16, 2026, stated that Sinha's name,...

Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Against SEBI NOC for NSE IPO, Says Remedy Lies Before SAT

The Delhi High Court has recently dismissed a plea challenging the No Objection Certificate granted by SEBI to the National Stock Exchange in relation to its proposed Initial Public Offering. Justice Jasmeet Singh observed that the petition appeared to have been filed only to stall the IPO. “I am of the view that the present petition seems to have been filed only to interdict the IPO of respondent No. 2,” the Court held. The plea was filed by retail investor K.C. Aggarwal, who stated that he...

Madras High Court Restrains Unauthorised Broadcast Of Zee's 'Do Deewane Seher Mein' On Release Date

On the date the film “DO DEEWANE SEHER MEIN” was slated for release, the Madras High Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining unlawful broadcast of the movie in a suit alleging apprehended infringement of copyright. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the order on Friday in two applications filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, the producers of the film, which has arrayed 33 defendants, including Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and others. The court recorded that the suit...

Madras High Court Restrains Unauthorised Broadcast Of Taapsee Pannu Starrer 'Assi' On Release Day

The Madras High Court on Friday restrained the unauthorised broadcast of the Taapsee Pannu-starrer Bollywood film 'Assi' on the day of its release, granting ad-interim relief to its producer. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, by order dated February 20, 2026, observed that “in matters of this nature, it is likely that irreversible injury will occur unless unlawful broadcast is prevented.” At the same time, the Court noted that “in view of the expansive nature of the relief claimed, it is...

"Unexplained Delay": Rajasthan High Court Quashes Service Tax Order Passed Nine Years After Show Cause Notices

The Rajasthan High Court has recently set aside a service tax demand raised nearly nine years after issuance of show cause notices, holding that revival of proceedings after prolonged administrative dormancy amounts to an arbitrary exercise of power and defeats the statutory discipline prescribed under the Finance Act. A Division Bench of Justice Arun Monga and Justice Yogendra Kumar Purohit quashed an order dated October 24, 2019 passed by the Joint Commissioner, Central Excise and Goods and...

S.130 CGST | GST Law Does Not Allow Provisional Release of Goods Seized During Confiscation Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on Friday held that GST authorities cannot release seized goods during confiscation proceedings merely because the trader pays the fine proposed in a show cause notice. Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. ruled that Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act permits payment of a fine in lieu of confiscation only after a final confiscation order is passed. “Mere notice to initiate confiscation proceedings will not amount to authorisation for confiscation,” the court...

Finality Of SARFAESI Auction Is Matter Of Public Policy: Delhi High Court Bars Recovery Of Pre-Sale Dues

Holding that the finality of a statutory auction is a matter of public policy, the Delhi High Court has ruled that an auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act cannot recover pre-sale statutory dues after unconditionally accepting the sale certificate. Allowing such recovery, the Court said, would render the “as is where is” clause meaningless and create uncertainty for secured creditors. Setting aside the Commercial Court's January 31, 2023 judgment, a Division Bench of Justices Anil...

No Absolute Right Of Appeal Under SARFAESI Without Pre-Deposit: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently upheld the dismissal of a DRAT appeal for failure to comply with the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act. A Division Bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Renu Bhatnagar held that the statutory right of appeal is conditional. The court observed that “the said right is not absolute.” The case arose after the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a securitisation application filed by Renu Goyal challenging measures taken by Edelweiss Asset...

No Concluded Contract, No Interim Relief: Delhi High Court Dismisses Developer's Plea Against ARCIL

The Delhi High Court has dismissed Parsvnath Developers' plea seeking enforcement of an alleged Rs. 750 crore restructuring agreement against Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, holding that courts cannot compel parties to honour a settlement that never matured into a concluded contract. Justice Jasmeet Singh held that the draft restructuring agreement remained at a negotiatory stage. Although drafts were exchanged, essential terms were unsettled. The schedules were marked preliminary...

Civil Courts Cannot Preempt SARFAESI Action, Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Injunction Against SBI

The Karnataka High Court has recently set aside an interim injunction that had restrained the State Bank of India from enforcing a corporate guarantee against Patel Engineering Limited. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha held that the Commercial Court in Bengaluru could not have injuncted SBI from proceeding under the SARFAESI Act or the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act. The bench noted that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act bars courts from...