ITC Cannot Be Denied For Bona Fide GSTIN Reporting Mistake: Tripura High Court

The Tripura High Court on 27 July held that a taxpayer cannot be denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to a genuine mistake in reporting invoices under the wrong Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN), when the error does not result in any loss of revenue to the Government. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Biswajit Palit allowed the writ petition filed by Ashutosh Bandyopadhay and directed the GST authorities to permit rectification of Forms...

New 10% GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Not Applicable If SCN Issued Before October 1, 2025: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the amended provision requiring a 10% pre-deposit of the penalty for filing appeals against penalty-only orders under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act cannot be applied to adjudicatory proceedings that were initiated before the amendment came into force on October 1, 2025.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Shail Jain held that the petitioners' right to appeal vested when the show cause notice (SCN) was issued on June 25, 2025, and...

Karnataka High Court Rules Secret Commission Claims Need Evidence, Upholds ₹53.48 Lakh Disallowance

The Karnataka High Court on 9 July held that a taxpayer cannot claim deduction for alleged secret commission payments as business promotion expenditure without proving the claim through adequate evidence, and upheld the disallowance of Rs. 53.48 lakh claimed as a business deduction. A Division Bench of Justices S.G. Pandit and K.M. Manmadha Rao dismissed Rampur Arvind's (taxpayer) appeal and upheld the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the...

S.107 CGST Act | GST Appellate Authority Can Conduct Further Inquiry, Permit Cross-Examination: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 is empowered to conduct such further inquiry as may be necessary while deciding an appeal and, in an appropriate case, can permit cross-examination of witnesses, notwithstanding the statutory bar on remanding matters to the adjudicating authority.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain made the observation while refusing to entertain a writ...

Delhi High Court Declines Writ Against Ex Parte GST Order, Cites Statutory Appeal

The Delhi High Court has declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an ex parte GST adjudication order. It observed that disputed questions of fact relating to the validity and sufficiency of service of notices under Section 169 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, are more appropriately examined by the statutory appellate authority. A division bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan was hearing a challenge to an order that imposed a penalty of over ₹2.39 crore on...

GST Penalty Order Passed Beyond 7 Days Of Show Cause Notice Is Invalid: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High court has held that the seven-day timeline prescribed under Section 129(3) of the Jammu & Kashmir Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for passing a penalty order is mandatory. It ruled that a penalty order passed even a day beyond the statutory period cannot be sustained. A Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Kumar and Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani observed that where the legislature has used the word "shall" while prescribing timelines for the...

Telangana High Court Upholds Mayuri Film's Tax Benefit, Says Unrescinded Notification Can't Be Overridden

The Telangana High Court on 24 July held that a tax concession granted through a Government notification cannot be withdrawn merely because a new entry is introduced in a tax schedule, unless the notification granting the benefit is expressly withdrawn, superseded or rescinded. A Division Bench of Justices P. Sam Koshy and Suddala Chalapathi Rao upheld the concessional sales tax benefit claimed by Mayuri Film Distributors on the sale of audio cassettes, holding that the Government Order...

CGST Act Has No Provision To Exempt Mandatory Pre-Deposit For Appeal: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has recently held that there is no provision under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, to exempt an assessee from the mandatory pre-deposit required for filing a statutory appeal.A division bench of Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Shail Jain thus declined to entertain a trader's writ petition challenging cancellation of a GST registration.According to the petitioner, its GST registration had been cancelled on the allegation that the firm was non-existent and...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Detention Over Expired E-Way Bill After Vehicle Breakdown

The Andhra Pradesh High Court on 16 July held that GST authorities cannot invoke detention proceedings merely because an e-way bill had expired when the delay in delivery of goods was caused by a vehicle breakdown and there was no evidence of tax evasion. A Division Bench of Justices Ninala Jayasurya and T.C.D. Sekhar allowed the writ petition filed by SLV Elite Spaces LLP and directed the GST authorities to drop further proceedings initiated under Section 129 of the GST Act (which provides for...

Madras High Court Upholds ₹2.66 Cr GST Recovery Against Former Director Of CBIGS Advertising

The Madras High Court on 7 July held that tax dues of a private company in liquidation can be recovered from its former director under Section 88(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, unless the director proves that the non-recovery was not due to gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty. Justice C. Saravanan dismissed three connected writ petitions filed by CBIGS Apparels and Jewels, its partner Mrs. N. Seetha, and Yantur Manufacturing Private Limited challenging GST...

Absence Of Audit Not A Ground To Reject KVAT Return Revision: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court on 15 July held that a taxpayer's request to revise returns under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act cannot be rejected solely because its accounts were not audited under Section 42 of the Act. A Bench of Justice Harisankar V. Menon allowed the petition filed by Bhima Enterprises, holding: “A reading of the aforesaid order would show that it pertains to the transportation of certain gold jewellery allegedly not supported by the documents required under the statute. In...

Rajasthan High Court Quashes GST Penalty Orders After Same Officer Approved Investigation and Adjudicated Case

The Rajasthan High Court has recently held that the a taxpayer's reasonable apprehension of bias could not be ignored where the Additional Commissioner who approved the investigation report leading to prosecution also adjudicated the proceedings arising from the same facts. The division bench of Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Praveer Bhatnagar consequently quashed the orders imposing penalties and the appellate order upholding them and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.The...