Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Against GST Registration Cancellation Over Failure To Reply To Show Cause Notices

The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a firm's GST registration, noting that the assessee had failed to respond to show cause notices issued to it.Petitioner had approached the Court challenging the order cancelling its GST registration, the subsequent order rejecting its application for revocation of cancellation, and the appellate order passed under Section 107 of the CGST Act.The GST registration was cancelled after the firm was found to...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Based On Show Cause Notice Uploaded Only On GST Portal

The Delhi High Court recently set aside an ex-parte order passed against a taxpayer under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, noting that the show cause notice had been uploaded only on the GST portal.The Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar remitted the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication in terms of the directions passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh &...

Delhi High Court Allows Delhi Airport To Approach Adjudicating Authority For ITC Claim In Light Of Safari Retreats

The Delhi High Court has disposed of two connected writ petitions, including one filed by Delhi International Airport Ltd, challenging the denial of input tax credit (ITC) under Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.The division bench of Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar granted it liberty to approach the Adjudicating Authority for consideration of its claim in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and...

Advocates Acting As Insolvency Professionals Must Register Under GST, Pay Under Forward Charge: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court on Thursday held that advocates rendering services as insolvency professionals must obtain GST registration, ruling that such services are subject to the forward charge mechanism and not the reverse charge mechanism applicable to legal services provided by advocates. A bench of Justices Pratibha M. Singh and Shail Jain passed the judgment on a petition filed by advocate Kanwal Chaudhary challenging an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) order dated March 9,...

Supreme Court Notice On GST Department Plea Against HC Order Quashing Arrest Over Failure To Serve Grounds

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice on the GST Department's plea challenging an Allahabad High Court order that set aside the remand of a person arrested under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The High Court had found that the grounds of arrest were not shown to have been served before his production before the Magistrate. The High Court also found that the arrest memo did not mention any annexure containing the grounds of arrest. The court relied on the January 13, 2025...

Kerala High Court Grants Wild Planet ITC Benefit, Says Delay Cannot Defeat Statutory Right

The Kerala High Court on 28 July held that a taxpayer cannot be denied the statutory benefit of input tax credit (ITC) under Section 16(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act merely because it failed to file a rectification application within the deadline prescribed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC). Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. allowed the petition filed by Wild Planet Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the order denying the company ITC, holding that Section 16(5)...

No Supply Of Service In Building Plan Sanction Process, GST Cannot Be Levied: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that Goods and Services Tax (GST) cannot be levied on charges collected for sanctioning a building plan, as the process does not involve any supply of goods or provision of services. Justice R. Nataraj on 21 July, partly allowed a petition filed by Sai Sravanthi Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. and others against the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and other authorities, holding that the authorities lacked statutory authority to impose several charges while...

Order Authorising Arrest Under GST Law Must Be Communicated Before Arrest: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that an order authorising arrest under the GST law must be communicated to the person concerned before the authorities proceed with the arrest.“To ensure that anyone who is facing the apprehension of arrest is not left in a position of irreparable damage, we have said that Section 69 [CGST Act] order has to be communicated,” a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu held.The court made the observation while setting aside a Bombay High Court...

Evidentiary Value Of Kachcha Parchis, Electronic Data Must Be Examined By GST Appellate Authority: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that questions concerning the admissibility, authentication and evidentiary value of electronic data and handwritten 'kachcha parchis' relied upon in a GST case should be raised before the statutory appellate authority rather than examined in writ proceedings.The division bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain was dealing with a batch of writ petitions challenging orders passed under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act against several entities...

Delhi High Court Rejects Challenge To CGST Proceedings As SGST Notices Came Later

The Delhi High Court has rejected a challenge to Central GST proceedings after finding that the corresponding State GST notices were issued later. The division bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Shail Jain made the ruling while dealing with a writ petition filed by a partnership firm challenging CGST proceedings as being barred under Section 6(2)(b). The provision provides that where a proper officer under the State GST law has initiated proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Release Of JK Cement GST Refund Despite Revenue Appeal

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Revenue to release a GST refund to JK Cement Works, holding that the company cannot be denied the refund merely because the Revenue has challenged the refund order before the Appellate Tribunal.The Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor passed the order on a petition filed by the cement manufacturer, which has a manufacturing unit at Jharli, Haryana.The company had secured an order allowing...

Madras High Court Directs Reconsideration Of Indian Bank's Maharashtra GST Waiver Claim

The Madras High Court on 31 July directed GST authorities to reconsider Indian Bank's application seeking waiver of interest and penalty in respect of its Maharashtra operations. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that when a single order under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 covers operations in multiple States, the proper officer cannot reject a waiver claim under Section 128A of the Act for one State on the ground of lack of jurisdiction if no other officer is...