Exported Goods Cannot Be Confiscated Under Section 113 Of Customs Act: CESTAT Hyderabad

The Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that Section 113 of the Customs Act only provides for confiscation of goods that are to be exported and not for goods which have already been exported. The Bench, consisting of P.K. Choudary (Judicial Member) and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Technical Member), held that the purpose of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 is not to regulate exports, but only to regulate the import, manufacture, sale and...

Unsubstantiated Show Cause Notice And Cancellation Of Licence: CESTAT Restore Customs Broker's Licence

The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) headed by Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has restored the customs broker's licence as the show cause notice or the inquiry report lacked details about the non-existence of the exporter. The appellant, M/s. Perfect Cargo and Logistics, is licenced as a customs broker under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018 (CBLR). The appellant's licence was revoked by...

Whether Nikon Eligible For Custom Duty Exemption Under Information Technology Agreement: Question Referred To Larger Bench

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) consisting of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V.Subba Rao (Technical Member) has referred the issue of eligibility to avail the benefit of the exemption of Basic Custom Duty (BCD) under Information Technology Agreement (ITA)on Digital Still Image Video Cameras imported by Nikon to the larger bench.Nikon has been engaged in the import and trade of various electronic products, including digital still image...

Gold Was Freely Importable By Normal Importer prior to DGFT Notification Dated 18 December, 2019: CESTAT

The Banglore Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that gold was freely importable by the normal importer prior to the restrictions imposed by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) vide Notification dated 18 December 2019.The two-member bench of Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) and C. J. Mathew (Technical Member) has ruled that the appellant imported the goods as a normal importer. Therefore, the restrictions contained in Notification No. ...