CUSTOMS
Chilly Seeds Imported For Sowing Cannot Be Classified As 'Spices': CESTAT
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi has held that chilly seeds imported exclusively for sowing cannot be treated as “spices” under the Customs Tariff and must instead be classified as seeds used for sowing under Chapter 12. A coram led by President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member Hemambika R. Priya set aside a 2016 order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that had upheld a higher duty on such imports. For context, spices attract a 70% basic...
CESTAT Delhi Allows Importer To Claim Tax-Free Imports From Least Developed Countries Despite Licence Terms
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Customs authorities cannot deny duty-free benefits available to imports from Least Developed Countries merely because an import licence issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade refers to a separate concessional duty notification. A coram of President Justice Dilip Gupta and Technical Member P.V. Subba Rao set aside a customs duty demand, along with interest, penalty, and redemption fine,...
CESTAT Mumbai Reiterates 10% Customs Duty Benefit On Enterprise Ethernet Switches
Reiterating that customs authorities cannot deny a concessional duty without objective evidence, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed Digisol Systems' appeal and extended the benefit of 10% customs duty on imported enterprise Ethernet switches and transceivers.A bench comprising Judicial Member S.K. Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Prathiban was hearing an appeal filed by Digisol Systems, a provider of IT networking solutions and consultancy...
Delhi High Court Gives Customs One Last Chance Over ₹5,000 Costs In Touch Screen Tariff Case
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday (January 6) gave the Customs Department one last chance to clear objections to its plea seeking recall of Rs 5 thousand in costs imposed for not filing replies in a batch of petitions challenging a customs duty hike on Interactive Flat Panel Displays.The court warned that if the objections are not removed within a week, the recall application will stand rejected automatically.A division bench of Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Ajay Digpaul noted that the...
Belated Detection Of Importer's Misuse Of Duty-Free Imports Cannot Be Attributed To Customs Broker: CESTAT
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has set aside the revocation of the Customs Broker licence of Aggressive Shipping & Logistics Pvt. Ltd. It held that diversion or misuse of duty-free imports by an importer, detected later by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), cannot automatically be attributed to the Customs Broker. A coram of Judicial Member S K Mohanty and Technical Member M.M. Parthiban was hearing an appeal against an order of the...
Can Customs Reopen Decade-Old Duty Drawback Claims? Delhi High Court To Examine
In March, the Delhi High Court is set to examine whether customs authorities can revive decade-old export transactions through belated show cause notices (SCNs) without running afoul of the doctrine of delay and laches.On December 9, 2025, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain heard a batch of petitions concerning the validity of SCNs issued in relation to the availment of duty drawback. The issue arose from the issuance of SCNs to the...
Mere Apprehension of Business Loss In State Does Not Confer Writ Court Territorial Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has recently held that a petitioner's mere apprehension of business loss in West Bengal is not enough to invoke the court's territorial jurisdiction in a writ petition. A single-judge bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai, while dismissing a plea filed by a Kuwait company said that it is the infringement of a legal right that gives rise to a cause of action."The lis before this Court is only with regard to the violation of the petitioner's right to fair treatment and fair...
Mandatory Pre-Deposit For Customs Appeal Cannot Be Waived For Financially Sound Appellant: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has held that the mandatory pre-deposit required to pursue a customs appeal cannot be waived for a financially sound appellant/importer. In a recently uploaded order pronounced on November 7, 2025, Justice M. Nagaprasanna said the pre-deposit under Section 129-E of the Customs Act does not deny access to justice. “It is a statutory discipline that applies uniformly to all appellants. The statute's mandate endures, subsists and is unyielding, until constitutional...
Customs Officials Acting In Official Capacity Not Liable To Cross-Examination As Matter Of Right: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that Customs officials discharging their duties in an official capacity are not liable to be cross-examined as a matter of right during adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act.A Division Bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain made the observation while partially allowing a writ petition challenging denial of Petitioner's request to cross-examine certain persons in a customs duty evasion case.As per the show cause notice, Petitioner was involved in...
Customs | ELISA Kits For Food Testing Qualify As 'Diagnostic' For Exemption: Delhi High Court Grants Interim Relief To Importer
The Delhi High Court, in a matter involving claim of Customs Duty exemption on import of Enzyme linked Immuno Absorbent Assay (ELISA) Kits for antibiotic testing in food as 'diagnostic kits' will hear the plea by food safety importers in January 2026. Recently, a Division Bench comprising, Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain were hearing an appeal by the importer against denial of the exemption by Delhi, Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Delhi...
Customs | Mere Location Of DRI Or Central Revenues Control Lab In Delhi Doesn't Confer Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that merely because DRI headquarters or Central Revenues Control Laboratory (CRCL) are located in Delhi does not confer jurisdiction upon it to deal with Customs disputes arising in Tamil Nadu.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Renu Bhatnagar made the observation while dealing with the case of Petitioners, situated in Chennai, but challenging seizure memos in Delhi on the ground that its goods were tested at CRCL, Delhi.The judges observed,“The...