<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-extends-timeline-debenture-trustees-compliance-non-sebi-activities-532097</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T19:57:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Extends Deadline For Debenture Trustees To Segregate Non-Regulated Activities To October 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Debenture Trustees, Timeline Extension, Compliance Deadline, Non-SEBI Activities, Separate Business Units, SEBI (Debenture Trustees) Regulations 1993, Operational Framework, Investor Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666983-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-dismisses-gamco-appeal-in-customs-dispute-says-imported-marble-slabs-were-actually-limestone-532095</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T19:47:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Dismisses Gamco Appeal In Customs Dispute, Says Imported Marble Slabs Were Actually Limestone]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai, Marble Import, Limestone Misdeclaration, Customs Confiscation, Advance Licence, Geological Survey of India, Redemption Fine, Customs Penalty, Notification 203/92, Import Classification]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652622-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-hc-removes-paxil-trademark-from-trademarks-register-over-20-years-of-non-use-532093</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T19:29:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Removes 'PAXIL' Mark From Trade Marks Register Over 20 Years Of Non-Use]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Glaxo Group Limited, Shreya Life Sciences, PAXIL Trademark, Section 47 Trade Marks Act, Trademark Cancellation, Non-use of Trademark, Person Aggrieved, Trademark Squatting, Hoarding Trademarks, GSK, Rallis India, Justice Arif S. Doctor, Pharmaceutical Class 5]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/16/668015-justice-arif-doctor-and-bombay-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclat-dismisses-sras-appeal-says-cirp-surplus-not-in-resolution-plan-must-be-distributed-among-creditors-532092</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T19:15:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Dismisses SRA's Appeal, Says CIRP Surplus Not In Resolution Plan Must Be Distributed Among Creditors]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Surplus , CIRP ,Resolution Plan ,Resolution Applicant, NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667768-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/jammu-kashmir-high-court-ruling-limitation-objection-arbitration-reference-532089</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T18:55:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T18:55:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Limitation No Ground To Refuse Arbitration Reference Unless Claim Is Clearly Time- Barred: J&K&L High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jammu Kashmir High Court, Section 11(6) of Arbitration Act, limitation objection, arbitration reference]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670439-justice-sanjay-dhar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/bombay-high-court-quashes-municipal-cess-assessment-orders-against-hpcl-over-10-year-delay-532082</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T18:40:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Municipal Cess Assessment Orders Against HPCL Over 10-Year Delay]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., cess assessment, delayed adjudication, unreasonable delay, natural justice, municipal cess, Form-H notice, assessment order quashed]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655072-justice-gs-kulkarni-and-justice-aarti-sathe-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/sebi-imposes-8-lakh-penalty-on-golden-tobacco-cfo-for-certifying-misleading-financial-statements-532079</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T18:20:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Imposes ₹8 Lakh Penalty On Golden Tobacco CFO For Certifying Misleading Financial Statements]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/19/657042-sebi-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-vlcc-case-arbitral-award-rental-loss-damages-rent-arrears-532077</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T18:07:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside Rental Loss In Arbitral Award Against VLCC In Lease Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, VLCC Health Care Limited, arbitral award, Section 37 Arbitration Act, Section 34 Arbitration Act, lease dispute, rental loss, damages, arrears of rent, ex parte award, natural justice, service of notice, re appreciation of evidence, patent illegality, arbitration law India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670493-madras-high-court-vlcc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/taxpayer-must-be-heard-even-if-they-opt-out-of-personal-hearing-under-gst-law-gujarat-high-court-532076</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T17:53:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Taxpayer Must Be Heard Even If They Opt Out Of Personal Hearing Under GST Law: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Personal Hearing, GST order, Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652572-gujarat-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/telangana-high-court-has-upheld-the-restriction-of-royalty-on-export-sales-to-1-for-gulf-oil-corporation-ltd-dismissing-its-appeals-challenging-disallowance-of-excess-royalty-paid-to-its-associated-enterprise-532072</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T17:32:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Upholds 1% Royalty Cap On Export Sales, Dismisses Gulf Oil Appeals]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[260A of the Income Tax Act, Royalty, Transfer Pricing Officer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670449-gulf-oil.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-arbitral-award-in-samsungptc-dispute-over-unilateral-arbitrator-appointment-532070</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T17:28:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T17:27:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award In Samsung–PTC Dispute Over Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, unilateral appointment, invalid award, Section 12(5), waiver, mould agreement, Section 34 challenge, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/25/535940-samsung.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-hatsun-arokya-milk-trademark-suit-against-patanjali-aarogya-biscuit-brand-532065</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T16:56:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds Dismissal Of Hatsun 'Arokya' Trademark Suit Against Patanjali 'Aarogya']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Hatsun Agro Product Ltd, Patanjali Ayurved, Patanjali Biscuits, Arokyia Trademark, Aarogya Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Summary Judgment, Order XIII-A CPC, Class 29 vs Class 30, Section 28(3) Trade Marks Act, Well-known mark, Dairy products litigation, Justice P. Velmurugan, JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670450-arokya-hatsun-patanjali-aarogya-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/stamp-duty-is-a-fiscal-measure-to-secure-revenue-cannot-be-used-to-defeat-creditors-claims-supreme-court-532064</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T16:54:45+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T16:53:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Stamp Duty Is A Fiscal Measure To Secure Revenue; Cannot Be Used To Defeat Creditors' Claims: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Corporate Guarantees, Maharashtra Stamp Act, Stamp Duty, Reliance Infratel Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655259-supreme-court-sc-llbiz-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/calcutta-high-court-bidder-who-faced-technical-glitch-at-his-own-end-cannot-seek-re-entry-into-concluded-e-auction-532058</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T16:34:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bidder Cannot Reopen Concluded E-Auction Due To Own Technical Glitch: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tender, Bidder, Technical Glitch, E-Auction, Calcutta High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/20/662837-750x450652652-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-rules-counsels-conviction-license-suspension-nondisclosure-under-ibbi-regulations-bar-representation-of-liquidator-in-cethar-liquidation-matter-532057</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T16:25:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Conviction And Bar Suspension Disqualify Counsel From Appearance In Liquidation Matters: NCLAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Counsel, IBC, Liquidator]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667768-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/recruitment-fees-collected-by-iim-bangalore-from-corporates-during-campus-placements-are-liable-to-service-tax-under-manpower-recruitment-or-supply-agency-services-532053</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T16:02:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IIM Bangalore Campus Recruitment Fees Taxable As Manpower Recruitment Services: CESTAT Bangalore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Management Consultant Services, manpower recruitment, supply agency services]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670443-iimb.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-court-directs-saregama-to-pay-5-lakh-to-singer-anamika-over-song-takedown-in-copyright-dispute-532050</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T15:44:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi Court Directs Saregama To Pay ₹5 Lakh To Singer Anamika Over Song Takedown In Copyright Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Saket Court, Anamika Sood, Saregama India Ltd, Ferrareee song, Copyright infringement, Sound recording ownership, Section 27 Copyright Act, Naya Daur film, Reshmi Salwar Kurta Jali Da, YouTube takedown, Folk song public domain, Nominal damages, District Judge Neelam Singh, Illegal copyright strike, Section 2(d)(v) Copyright Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670445-anamika-sood-saregama-saket-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-upholds-write-off-on-failed-foreign-subsidiary-investment-says-recovery-efforts-need-not-be-proven-532048</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T15:42:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mumbai ITAT Allows ₹13.59 Cr Write-Off On Overseas Subsidiary Investment As Business Loss]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[itat, itat mumbai, foreign subsidiary write off, business loss, Mumbai ITAT ruling, recovery efforts not required, failed investment tax loss, write off deduction ITAT, irrecoverable investment loss, foreign subsidiary tax case, business expenditure claim, income tax litigation India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-delhi-flats-allotted-against-legal-fees-not-financial-debt-rejects-law-firms-claim-for-flats-532046</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T15:37:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Financial Debt Where Flats Given In Lieu Of Legal Fees: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, IBC, Financial Debt, Legal fees, Law Firm]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652483-nclat-05.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera-overrides-contract-act-homebuyers-can-claim-interest-for-delay-despite-continued-payments-maharashtra-reat-532042</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T15:13:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[RERA Overrides Contract Act, Homebuyers Can Claim Interest for Delay Despite Continued Payments: Maharashtra REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, delayed possession, interest to allottees, waiver, Section 55 Contract Act, Section 18 RERA, Section 89 RERA, builder liability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652505-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-addition-as-cash-paid-directly-to-developer-by-buyers-as-sellers-unexplained-income-532040</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T15:07:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Upholds Deletion Of ₹18.63 Crore, Says Direct Payment To Developer Not Unexplained Cash]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT cash addition, developer payment buyers, unexplained income deleted, property sale cash dispute, direct payment to developer, seller tax addition, ITAT relief assessee, real estate tax ruling, unexplained cash credits, income tax tribunal India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/gstat-directs-transfer-of-wrongly-files-appeal-to-ghaziabad-bench-from-principal-bench-532035</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T14:38:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GSTAT Transfers Marvel Vinyls Appeal To Ghaziabad Bench, Orders Seamless Digital Handover]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[gstat, gstat appeal filed before wrong bench, gst, GSTAT appeal transfer, Ghaziabad Bench GSTAT, wrongly filed appeal, principal bench appeal transfer, GST appellate tribunal India, GST appeal procedure, jurisdiction transfer GSTAT, appeal filing error, GST litigation India, tribunal appeal transfer order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652660-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-quashes-duty-demand-upholds-seat-parts-classification-in-shiroki-case-532034</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T14:28:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT New Delhi Allows Toyota Boshoku's Appeal, Holds Seat Components As 'Parts Of Seats']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[section 28AA of the Customs Act, section 114A of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670396-toyota-boshoku.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/patna-high-court-temporarily-injuncts-johnson-paints-pvt-ltd-in-trademark-row-recognising-1987-prior-use-by-johnson-paints-co-532033</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T14:27:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Patna High Court Temporarily Restrains Local Company From Using 'Johnson' Mark For Paint Products]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Patna High Court, Johnson Paints Co, Johnson Paints Private Limited, Trademark infringement, Passing off, Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR, Prior user rights, Section 34 Trade Marks Act, Assignment deeds, Commercial Dispute, Johnsoncem, Red oxide, Cement, paint, Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670425-johnson-paints-patna-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-upholds-award-rejecting-327-crore-time-barred-claims-against-hcl-declines-to-exclude-time-spent-in-insolvency-proceedings-532032</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T14:24:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Award For HCL Technologies, Rejects Time Extension From Earlier Proceedings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, limitation, time-barred claims, minimum running guarantee, insolvency proceedings, exclusion of time, commercial dispute, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666865-justice-subramonium-prasad-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/bombay-high-court-auditors-internal-audit-remark-not-adverse-quashes-prosecution-directors-532018</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T12:39:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Company Auditor's General Observation Not Adverse Remark, Can't Trigger Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Goa Bench, Justice Ashish S Chavan, Companies Act 1956 Section 217, Section 217(3) Companies Act, Section 217(5) Companies Act, auditor’s report observation, internal audit system needs to be strengthened, Registrar of Companies prosecution, RoC complaint quashed, criminal liability of directors, auditor qualification vs observation, Board’s report obligations, time barred complaint Companies Act, non-application of mind Magistrate, cognizance order set aside, summoning order quashed, abuse of process of law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670386-bombay-high-court-justice-ashish-s-chavan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-denying-distributors-loss-of-profit-claim-against-bausch-lomb-532014</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T12:16:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Denying Distributor's Loss Of Profit Claim Against Bausch & Lomb]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitral award upheld, distributorship agreement, loss of profits claim, unsold inventory dispute, delayed evidence rejection, arbitration procedure, Section 34 challenge, business losses]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666865-justice-subramonium-prasad-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-delhi-hc-ruling-which-upheld-arbitral-award-in-aakash-franchise-dispute-532011</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T11:57:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With ₹66.31 Lakh Award In Favour Of Aakash In Coaching Franchise Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Aakash Educational Services, Franchise Agreement Dispute, Arbitration Award Challenge, Section 37 Arbitration Act, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670352-whatsapp-image-2026-04-28-at-092722.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/markolines-settles-sebi-proceedings-over-ipo-disclosure-lapses-532005</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T11:41:04+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T11:40:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Markolines Settles SEBI Proceedings Over IPO Proceeds Disclosure Lapses, Pays ₹12.35 Lakh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Settlement Order, Section]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666984-750x450652549-sebi-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/lawfirms/sng-partners-launches-gift-city-office-532004</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T11:38:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SNG & Partners Launches Gift City Office]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SNG & Partners]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670380-whatsapp-image-2026-04-28-at-113708.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-kolkata-refuses-to-exclude-stay-period-for-liquidators-fee-calculation-amid-misconduct-allegations-532003</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T11:25:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kolkata Refuses To Exclude Stay Period For Liquidator's Fee Calculation Amid Misconduct Allegations]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Liquidator , Stay Period , Misconduct,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652586-nclt-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/sbi-back-in-reliance-infratel-coc-as-supreme-court-sets-aside-nclat-order-excluding-consortium-lenders-532002</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T10:59:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SBI Back In Reliance Infratel CoC As Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT Order Excluding Consortium Lenders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, State Bank of India, Corporate Guarantee Dispute, Committee of Creditors, IBC, Doha Bank, Reliance Infratel]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670308-750x450662489-justices-ps-narasimha-and-alok-aradhe-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/coparcenary-claim-does-not-confer-right-to-intervene-in-section-95-proceedings-against-personal-guarantor-nclat-chennai-532001</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T10:49:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Coparcener Claiming Guarantor's Property Cannot Intervene In Guarantor's Insolvency Case: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Coparcenary ,  Right To Intervene , Personal Guarantor, NCLAT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/being-a-government-authority-no-ground-to-avoid-deposit-for-stay-of-arbitral-award-orissa-high-court-531996</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T10:09:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Being A Government Authority No Ground To Avoid Deposit For Stay Of Arbitral Award: Orissa High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration award, stay of enforcement, deposit condition, government liability, equal treatment, Section 36 Arbitration Act, Commercial Court, arbitral challenge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/20/668794-750x450652487-orissa-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-on-plea-against-delhi-hc-ruling-that-patent-revocation-plea-survives-expiry-531987</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T10:14:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T09:35:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling That Patent Revocation Plea Survives Expiry]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Boehringer vs Macleods case
Linagliptin patent dispute, Patent infringement litigation India, Section 64 Patents Act India, Invalidity defence patent law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670274-whatsapp-image-2026-04-27-at-184007.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-april-27-2026-531979</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T09:03:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: April 27, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Business Law Daily Round-Up,Corporate Law Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/internal-epfo-communication-cannot-substitute-statutory-assessment-for-claim-in-cirp-nclat-new-delhi-531972</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T09:01:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-28T09:00:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Rejects EPFO Claim In Dhruv Wellness CIRP, Finds Internal Communication Without PF Assessment Insufficient]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[EPFO , Statutory Assessment , CIRP, NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-orders-suspension-of-website-hosting-obscene-content-via-qr-codes-on-lupin-pharmaceutical-packaging-531971</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T10:04:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T21:21:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Suspension of 'ebai.org' Over Lupin QR Codes Redirecting To Porn Content]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Lupin Limited, CSR initiative, Eye Bank Association of India, EBAI, QR code piracy, Trademark reputation, Pornographic content, Domain name suspension, Justice Jyoti Singh, Punarjyoti campaign, Eye donation pledge, Pharmaceutical packaging, Ex-parte injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670362-lupin-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/election-disputes-not-arbitrable-delhi-high-court-refuses-to-halt-20262031-national-office-bearers-elections-of-akhil-bhartiya-agrawal-sammelan-531970</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T21:01:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Society Election Disputes Involve Collective Rights, Not Arbitrable: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[election dispute, arbitration, non-arbitrable disputes, society elections, internal tribunal, injunction, election process, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/20/657345-750x450652672-delhi-high-court-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/offences-under-ibc-can-only-be-tried-by-the-special-courts-with-competent-jurisdiction-madhya-pradesh-high-court-531959</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T19:54:16+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T19:53:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Offences Triable Only By Special Court Where Company's Registered Office Is Located: Madhya Pradesh HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC , Special Court, Jurisdiction,Madhya Pradesh High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652488-gwalior-bench-mp-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/ibc-auction-purchaser-not-liable-for-past-electricity-dues-telangana-hc-sets-aside-264-lakh-demand-531945</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T19:20:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Auction Purchaser Not Liable For Past Electricity Dues: Telangana HC Sets Aside ₹2.64 Lakh Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC , Telangana HC ,Clean Slate Doctrine,Justice Renuka Yara.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/11/06/403578-telanganahigh-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-homebuyers-insolvency-threshold-section-7-ibc-ozone-projects-rera-refund-allottees-531942</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:56:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Homebuyers With RERA Refund Orders Still 'Allottees', Must Meet IBC Threshold: NCLT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Section 7 IBC, homebuyers insolvency, allottee threshold, real estate insolvency, Ozone Projects case, RERA refund orders, financial creditors homebuyers, CIRP dismissal, minimum threshold allottees, 10 percent rule IBC, Metrozone Chennai project, NCLT homebuyers ruling, insolvency petition not maintainable]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652583-nclt-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-the-inc-magazine-for-infringing-us-based-mansueto-ventures-inc-trademark-531938</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:24:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains 'The Inc Magazine' Operator From Using Mansueto Ventures' 'Inc.' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Mansueto Ventures LLC, Inc. Magazine, Inc. 5000, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, theincmagazine.com, Prime View Media, Business Media Piracy, Ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Class 16 Trademark]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670251-mansueto-inc-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-531936</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:02:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: April 20 - April 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Roundup IPR]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670134-750x450663198-weekly-round-up-ipr-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/tripura-high-court-orders-rs-221-crore-gst-reimbursement-under-work-contract-clause-with-12-interest-531934</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:00:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tripura High Court Orders Rs 2.21 Crore GST Reimbursement Under Work Contract Clause With 12% Interest]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 4(3) of the Tripura VAT Act 2004, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 142(10) of the TSGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670221-chief-justice-ms-ramachandra-rao-and-justice-biswajit-palit.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-delhi-clears-first-motion-in-spice-moneydigispice-merger-orders-shareholder-meeting-of-transferee-company-531931</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T17:39:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Clears First Stage Of Digispice Merger With Subsidiaries, Orders Equity Shareholder Meet]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi. First Motion, Digispice, Company Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652668-nclt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-msme-promoter-resolution-plan-coc-approval-insolvency-code-cirp-delayed-submission-531929</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T17:31:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Suspended Director Cannot Reopen CIRP Process After Repeated Eligibility Defaults: NCLT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CIRP, Committee of Creditors, CoC commercial wisdom, resolution plan, MSME promoter, suspended director, EMD default, Earnest Money Deposit, Expression of Interest rejection, late resolution plan submission, CIRP delay, Resolution Professional, value maximisation, CoC approved plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-deletes-addition-accepts-cash-received-in-agricultural-land-sale-as-explained-transaction-531928</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T17:27:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cash Receipt In Agricultural Land Sale Not 'Unexplained' Where Duly Explained: ITAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[cash addition deleted ITAT, agricultural land sale cash, ₹75 lakh addition, explained transaction tax, cash receipt land sale, ITAT relief assessee, unexplained cash credit, land transaction tax dispute, income tax tribunal ruling]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/17/647614-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-refusal-of-kama-casa-mark-531927</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T17:19:34+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T17:19:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Refusal Of 'KAMA CASA' Trademark, Says Composite Marks Cannot Be Dissected]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Registrar of Trade Marks, Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, Composite Mark, Trademark Refusal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670210-justice-tushar-rao-gedela-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-shareholder-creditor-meetings-for-meghmani-group-amalgamation-531925</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:58:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Orders Shareholder & Creditor Meetings For Meghmani Group Amalgamation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Amalgamation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655533-nclt-ahmedabad-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/developer-liable-to-fix-non-structural-defects-if-reported-within-five-years-tn-rera-531922</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:41:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Developer Liable To Fix Non-Structural Defects Reported Within Five Years: TN RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, non-structural defects, poor workmanship, homebuyer rights, developer liability, construction defects, seepage issues, real estate dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652621-rera-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/prior-approval-granted-by-an-additional-commissioner-of-income-tax-is-sufficient-compliance-with-statutory-requirements-for-imposing-penalties-clarifying-the-scope-of-the-term-joint-commissioner-under-the-income-tax-act-531921</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:39:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Approval By Additional Commissioner Valid As “Joint Commissioner” Under Income Tax Act: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 274(2) of the Income Tax Act, section 2(28C) of the Income Tax Act, Joint Commissioner, Additional Commissioner]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/11/09/443392-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/jharkhand-high-court-refuses-tata-steels-writ-against-gst-demand-says-appeal-is-proper-remedy-531919</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:26:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Jharkhand High Court Refuses Tata Steel's Writ Against GST Demand, Says Appeal Is Proper Remedy]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST appeal remedy, Article 226, alternate remedy, Section 74 CGST Act, Tata Steel, writ petition, input tax credit, natural justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410863-358082-tatasteel-ko1f-621x414livemint.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-writ-against-gold-chain-confiscation-cites-alternate-remedy-under-customs-act-531917</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T16:10:40+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:10:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses Writ Against Gold Chain Confiscation, Cites Alternate Remedy Under Customs Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court gold confiscation, Customs Act 1962 writ petition, Article 226 alternate remedy India, IGI Airport gold seizure case, Delhi HC writ dismissed customs appeal remedy, gold chain confiscation India law, customs penalty ₹1 lakh case, writ jurisdiction alternate remedy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/16/656437-justice-nitin-sambre-justice-ajay-digpaul-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-gst-refund-rejection-passed-without-considering-foreign-inward-remittance-certificate-orders-fresh-hearing-531914</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T12:02:41+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:04:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Refund Cannot Be Rejected Without Considering Documents Already On Record: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST refund, Bombay High Court, FIRC, Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate, refund rejection, remand, speaking order, export services, Assistant Commissioner, refund claim]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655072-justice-gs-kulkarni-and-justice-aarti-sathe-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/cgst-act-bars-parallel-proceedings-by-state-central-gst-authorities-only-for-same-subject-matter-delhi-hc-531912</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T16:01:13+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T16:00:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CGST Act Bars Parallel Proceedings By State, Central GST Authorities Only For Same Subject Matter: Delhi HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court GST ruling, CGST Act Section 6(2)(b), parallel proceedings GST law, GST parallel proceedings bar, state vs central GST proceedings, Section 73 vs Section 74 CGST, input tax credit fraud GST, GST litigation India, GST show cause notice parallel proceedings, GST adjudication Delhi High Court,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/16/656437-justice-nitin-sambre-justice-ajay-digpaul-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/depreciation-cannot-be-availed-in-earlier-years-when-coa-revived-for-indexation-benefits-itat-531911</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:51:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Depreciation Cannot Be Combined With Revival Of Original Cost For Indexation Benefit: ITAT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[itat, itat ahmedabad, depreciation indexation ITAT, cost of acquisition tax, capital gains indexation, depreciation benefits dispute, ITAT capital gains ruling, indexed cost calculation, depreciable asset sale tax, income tax tribunal ruling, long term capital gains tax, tax litigation India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/17/647614-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-home-of-diagnostics-from-using-hod-trademark-in-house-of-diagnostics-suit-531910</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:46:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Home Of Diagnostics From Using 'HOD' Trademark In House Of Diagnostics Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, House of Diagnostics, Home of Diagnostics, HOD Trademark, H.O.D. Label, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, Ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Medical Diagnostics, Pathology Services, Section 11(1) Trade Marks Act, IndiaMart, Instagram]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670141-house-of-diagnostics-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-cuts-8042-lakh-addition-to-6847-lakh-says-taxpayers-claim-was-relied-on-despite-rejection-531909</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T15:36:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:35:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Cuts ₹80.42 Lakh Addition To ₹68.47 Lakh, Says Taxpayers' Claim Was Relied On Despite Rejection]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court tax ruling, cash seizure income tax case India, addition to income unexplained cash, assessing officer rejected explanation case, taxpayer explanation rejected income tax India, income tax addition reduced by court, unexplained income cash seizure judgment, Delhi HC income tax decision 2026, reliance on rejected explanation tax law, income tax appeal case India, unexplained cash addition reduced judgment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/28/649826-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-vinod-kumar-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/individual-notice-to-each-creditor-not-necessary-under-ibc-allahabad-high-court-531908</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:31:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Public Announcement Under IBC Sufficient, Individual Notice Not Required: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Individual Notice, Creditor,IBC, Allahabad High Court ,Notice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/12/16/641286-allahabad-high-court-1280720.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-upholds-amazon-retail-assessment-over-lack-of-inquiry-into-expenses-related-party-payments-531905</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:16:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Upholds Revision Order Against Amazon Retail Over Lack of Inquiry Into Expenses, Related Party Payments]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[itat, itat delhi, amazon retail india, Amazon Retail ITAT, revision assessment expenses, related party payments tax, section 263 revision, lack of inquiry AO, Amazon tax case India, ITAT upholds revision, expense verification issue, related party transaction tax, income tax litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670170-itat-amazon.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/ibc-prevails-over-electricity-act-allahabad-high-court-531899</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T15:02:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Overrides Electricity Act In Conflict, Pre-CIRP Dues Cannot Be Enforced: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC , Electricity Act,Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/05/01/537204-allahabad-high-court-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/subsequent-demand-notices-cannot-create-fresh-cause-of-action-against-personal-guarantor-nclt-mumbai-531898</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:48:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Subsequent Demand Notices Cannot Create Fresh Cause Of Action Against Personal Guarantor: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Demand Notice, Cause Of Action , Personal Guarantor, NCLT Mumbai,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652553-nclt-mumbai-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-april-20-april-26-2026-531897</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:48:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: April 20 - April 26, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Direct Tax Weekly Digest, Weekly Roun-Up, Direct Tax, Income Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652649-weekly-digest-direct-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/drat-can-recall-appeal-dismissed-for-pre-deposit-non-compliance-patna-high-court-531895</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:41:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DRAT Can Recall Appeal Dismissed For Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Patna High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal , Adjudicatory Body,Patna HC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670162-patna-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/statutory-orders-of-development-authority-cannot-be-challenged-before-nclt-under-ibc-nclat-new-delhi-531893</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:31:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Cannot Entertain Challenge To Statutory Development Authority Orders Under IBC: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Statutory Order, Development Authority ,NCLT , IBC, NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/12/03/367455-nclat-05.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-dismisses-time-barred-customs-appeals-says-delay-beyond-statutory-limit-cannot-be-condoned-531892</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:21:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delay Beyond 90 Days Not Condonable Under Customs Act: CESTAT Mumbai Reiterates]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai, Customs Appeal Limitation, Section 128 Customs Act, Delay Condonation, Time Barred Appeal, Customs Penalty, Parekh Cranes, Singh Enterprises]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652519-cestat-copy-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/supreme-court-stays-arbitration-in-3653-crore-ap-e-challan-dispute-involving-digi-yatra-developer-date-evolve-531889</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T14:16:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays Arbitration In ₹36.53 Crore AP E-Challan Dispute Involving Digi Yatra Developer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration stay, Supreme Court interim order, e-challan dispute, Andhra Pradesh Police contract, arbitrator appointment challenge, settlement of accounts dispute, contract expiry dispute, Dataevolve Solutions]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652538-supreme-court-of-india-sc-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/no-service-tax-can-be-levied-on-alumni-fee-collected-by-a-university-in-the-absence-of-any-corresponding-service-531884</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T13:48:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Service Tax On Alumni Fee Collected By University In Absence of Service: CESTAT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tution Fee, Gross taxable value, Commercial Training and Coaching Service]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670189-whatsapp-image-2026-04-27-at-134723.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclt-asking-parties-to-explore-settlement-not-a-reference-to-mediationnclat-531880</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T13:27:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T13:27:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Asking Parties To Explore Settlement Not A Reference To Mediation: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT,Amicable Settlement, Mediation Reference,NCLAT ,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/11/05/366234-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/admission-of-defective-supply-and-compensation-offer-establish-pre-existing-dispute-nclat-new-delhi-531876</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T13:01:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Emails Admitting Defects, Compensation Offers Prove Dispute: NCLAT Dismisses CIRP Plea Against Amod Stampings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Defective Supply ,Compensation , Pre-Existing Dispute,NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652478-nclat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-stays-nclat-ruling-that-set-aside-ccis-clean-chit-to-chettinad-coal-terminal-issue-notice-531875</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T12:46:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T12:43:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays NCLAT Ruling That Set Aside CCI's Clean Chit To Chettinad Coal Terminal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Coal Terminal Services, Supreme Court, CCI, NCLAT, Chennai Port, Abuse of Dominance, Ennore Coal Terminal, Kamarajar Port]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670114-whatsapp-image-2026-04-27-at-093648.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclat-upholds-cirp-against-prayag-polytech-says-nocs-for-specific-charges-dont-wipe-out-entire-debt-531871</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T12:33:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Upholds CIRP Against Prayag Polytech, Says NOCs For Specific Charges Don't Wipe Out Entire Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[No Dues Certificate, Debt, NCLAT, Insolvency Plea ,Prayag Polytech ,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652483-nclat-05.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclat-dismisses-cirp-plea-by-durgapur-corporation-against-aryan-ispat-cites-pre-existing-dispute-531863</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T12:15:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T12:14:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Dismisses CIRP Plea By Durgapur Corporation Against Aryan Ispat, Cites Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Profit-Sharing, O&M Agreement,Operational Debt,IBC, NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-weekly-digest-april-20-april-25-2026-531860</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T11:47:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: April 20- April 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[weekly round-up, digest, arbitration, arbitration act, section 34, section 37]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/second-charge-holder-can-be-treated-as-secured-creditor-even-without-roc-registration-nclat-531856</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T11:36:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Upholds Secured Creditor Status Of Second Charge Holder Despite Non-Registration In Mirage Ceramics CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Second Charge Holder ,Secured Creditor  RoC ,Registration, NCLAT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652666-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-allows-release-of-seized-drone-parts-says-separate-consignments-not-complete-drones-531840</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T10:36:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T10:35:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Allows Release Of Seized Drone Parts, Says Separate Consignments Not Complete Drones]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Drone import, Customs seizure, Provisional release, CKD/SKD imports, DGFT notification, Drone components, Customs classification, National security, Section 110A Customs Act, CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652622-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/non-registration-of-modified-charge-post-restructuring-does-not-extinguish-original-security-interest-cersai-registration-sufficient-to-prove-security-nclat-531836</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T10:16:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Loan Restructuring Need Not Be Treated As Modification Of Charge; Original Security Remains Valid: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Non-Registration , Security Interest, CERSAI Registration , Security, NCLAT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/deemed-receipt-of-arbitral-award-triggers-limitation-even-if-party-avoids-service-bombay-high-court-531828</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T12:02:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:50:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Award Sent To Last Known Address Is Valid Service; Limitation Runs From Attempted Delivery: Bombay HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award , Limitation , Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/02/27/524793-justice-sharmila-u-deshmukh-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-delhi-deletes-105-crore-addition-on-dissolved-firm-says-income-taxed-in-surviving-partners-hands-531824</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T09:46:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:45:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Deletes ₹1.05 Crore Addition On Dissolved Firm, Says Income Taxed In Surviving Partner's Hands]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Partnership firm, TDS, Maruti Suzuki, non-existent partnership]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/13/527764-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-high-court-sets-aside-cap-on-export-unit-tax-deduction-based-on-sister-concern-profits-531827</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-28T12:01:40+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:34:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Sets Aside Cap On Export Unit Tax Deduction Based On Sister Concern Profits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 10B deduction, Section 80IA(10), Export Oriented Unit, artificial profits, related party transactions, ITAT, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/16/667995-justices-ms-karnik-and-sm-modak-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-reference-to-district-valuation-officer-cannot-be-used-to-initiate-assessment-proceedings-telangana-hc-531823</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T12:24:20+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:30:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax | Reference To District Valuation Officer Cannot Be Used To Initiate Assessment Proceedings: Telangana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 133A of the Income Tax Act 1961, Section 142A of the Income Tax Act, Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, valuation report]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670169-justice-p-sam-koshy-and-justice-suddala-chalapathi-rao.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/interest-earned-by-co-operative-credit-society-on-bank-deposits-eligible-for-tax-deduction-telangana-hc-531822</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T09:15:37+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:15:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Interest Earned By Co-operative Credit Society On Bank Deposits Eligible For Tax Deduction: Telangana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, Income from Other Sources, Co-operative Society]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652542-telangana-hc-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/revenue-cannot-demand-interest-on-delayed-duties-yet-deny-it-on-refund-telangana-high-court-531821</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-27T12:25:14+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-27T09:00:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Revenue Cannot Demand Interest On Delayed Duties Yet Deny It On Refund: Telangana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 11BB of Central Excise Act 1944, CESTAT,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670169-justice-p-sam-koshy-and-justice-suddala-chalapathi-rao.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
