<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/no-mrp-doesnt-mean-imported-pet-food-isnt-put-up-for-retail-sale-if-its-consumer-ready-bombay-high-court-542645</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T22:07:37+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T22:01:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No MRP Doesn't Mean Imported Pet Food Isn't 'Put Up For Retail Sale' If It's Consumer-Ready: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Orange Pet Nutrition, Customs Classification, Pet Food, Retail Sale, Bulk Packaging, Repacking, Customs Tariff, Advance Ruling, CAAR, Imported Goods, Legal Metrology Rules, Dog Food, Cat Food, Retail Packaging, Customs Duty, Tariff Interpretation, Import Classification, Royal Canin, CTH 2309 1000]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/17/680441-bombay-high-court-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-firdosh-phiroze-pooniwalla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/sulphuric-acid-cleared-under-conditional-excise-exemption-not-exempted-goods-rule-6-cenvat-credit-reversal-not-applicable-cestat-hyderabad-542638</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T20:21:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Cenvat Credit Reversal On Sulphuric Acid Supplied Duty-Free To Fertilizer Manufacturers: CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Hyderabad, Rule 6 Cenvat Credit Rules, Rule 6(3) CCR, Rule 2(d), Exempted Goods, Conditional Exemption, Notification No. 12/2012-CE, Sulphuric Acid, Cenvat Credit Reversal, Central Excise, Concessional Rate of Duty, Fertilizer Manufacturers, Hindustan Zinc, Extended Period of Limitation, Interest and Penalty, Judicial Discipline, Indirect Tax, Excise Law, Cenvat Credit, Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/683945-cestat-hyderaba.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-simplifies-standardises-framework-transmission-of-securities-circular-542633</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T22:08:00+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T19:56:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Simplifies Transmission Of Securities, Introduces Fast-Track Process For Low-Value Claims]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Transmission of securities, Transmission framework, Ease of Doing Investment, Ease of Doing Business, Quick Transmission Processing, QTP, Simplified documentation, Risk-based framework, Listed companies, Registrars and Transfer Agents, RTA, Depositories, Depository Participants, Asset Management Companies, AMC, Probate of Will, Affidavit-cum-NOC, QR code-enabled death certificates, Foreign death certificates, Investor protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672420-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/fssai-alone-can-certify-imported-food-safety-customs-can-sample-for-classification-calcutta-high-court-542632</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T19:44:23+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T19:40:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[FSSAI Alone Can Certify Imported Food Safety; Customs Can Sample For Classification: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 144 of the Customs Act, Section 89 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, detention charges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/23/675879-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/nfac-must-provide-video-conferencing-if-assessee-seeks-personal-hearing-delhi-high-court-542631</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T19:18:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T19:18:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NFAC Must Provide Video Conferencing If Assessee Seeks Personal Hearing: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[National Faceless Appeal Centre, NFAC, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), CBDT, Income Tax Act, faceless appeals, tax appeals, virtual hearing, video conferencing, personal hearing, principles of natural justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-closes-case-against-zomato-limited-platform-fee-higher-online-food-prices-eternal-limited-542630</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T19:04:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Closes Antitrust Complaint Against Zomato Over Higher Food Prices, Platform Fee]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Eternal Limited, Zomato, Online food delivery platforms, Abuse of dominant position, Competition Act, 2002, Section 3, Section 4, Section 26(2), Platform fee, Delivery charges, Online food prices, Drip pricing, Excessive commissions, Unfair pricing, Multi-sided platforms, Restaurant commissions, Competition law, Exploitative pricing]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688949-cci-zomato.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-14-new-rogue-websites-in-betway-trademark-suit-directs-blocking-within-36-hours-542629</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T18:50:20+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T18:48:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains 14 More Websites From Using 'BETWAY' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Merryvale Limited, BETWAY, Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Rogue Websites, Betting Services, Domain Name Registrars, DNR, MeitY, DoT, ISP Blocking, Justice Jyoti Singh, John Doe, Digital Fraud]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688922-delhi-hc-betway.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-sets-aside-extended-limitation-against-boat-maker-in-bluetooth-earphones-classification-dispute-542627</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T18:37:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Sets Aside Extended Limitation Against boAt Maker In Bluetooth Earphones Customs Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai, Imagine Marketing, boAt, Bluetooth Earphones, Customs Classification, Extended Limitation, Section 28 Customs Act, Wireless Earbuds, Customs Duty, Larger Bench]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688947-ceboat-maker-imagine-marketing-stat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-directs-stakeholder-meetings-kinder-women-hospital-kindorama-healthcare-merger-scheme-542620</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T18:11:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Orders Stakeholder Meetings For Kinder Women's Hospital–Kindorama Healthcare Merger]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, National Company Law Tribunal, Kinder Women's Hospital and Fertility Centre Private Limited, Kindorama Healthcare Private Limited, merger scheme, scheme of merger, first motion application, Sections 230 to 232 Companies Act, Companies Act 2013, shareholders' meeting, creditors' meeting, secured creditors, unsecured creditors, conditional no-objection certificate, HDFC Bank, dispensation of meetings, amalgamation, corporate restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688903-nclt-kochi-kinder-womens-hospitals.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-mumbai-holds-lease-rentals-collected-by-asian-paints-for-tinting-machines-not-liable-to-service-tax-542619</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T18:07:14+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T18:05:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Holds Lease Rentals Collected By Asian Paints For Tinting Machines Not Liable To Service Tax]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax, Lease Rental, Tinting Machines, Asian Paints, Deemed Sale, Transfer of Right to Use Goods, Article 366(29A)(d), Supply of Tangible Goods for Use, STGU, Finance Act 1994, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., VAT, Operating Lease, CESTAT Mumbai, Negative List Regime, Service Tax on Leasing, Right to Use Goods.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688931-asian-paints.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-reassessment-over-102-crore-cash-payment-for-land-purchase-542617</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T17:44:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Assessing Officer Not Deemed to Have Noticed Facts Disclosed in Wealth Tax Return: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 147, Section 148, reassessment, unexplained investment, cash payment, wealth tax return, immovable property, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688908-supehia-vaibhavi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/report-of-expert-board-constituted-by-consent-cannot-be-executed-as-arbitral-award-delhi-high-court-542616</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T17:24:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Report Of Expert Board Constituted By Consent Cannot Be Executed As Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[expert determination, arbitral tribunal, execution petition, consent order, technical committee, service charges, Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway, executable order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/02/653368-justice-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-review-not-maintainable-after-appeal-supreme-court-withdrawn-without-liberty-seek-review-542615</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T17:20:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Review Before Tribunal Barred After Withdrawing Supreme Court Appeal Without Liberty: SAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SAT, Securities Appellate Tribunal, Supreme Court, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, CAT Technologies Limited, review application, statutory appeal, Section 15Z SEBI Act, Section 15U SEBI Act, doctrine of merger, maintainability of review, withdrawal of appeal, appellate jurisdiction, express liberty to seek review, SEBI penalty, review jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652545-sat-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/gujarat-hc-quashes-reassessment-against-company-sold-under-ibcs-clean-slate-principle-542610</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:53:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Bars Vimal Oil Reassessment Over Past Tax Liability, Cites IBC Clean Slate Principle]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 148, reassessment, Section 148A, IBC, clean slate, Vimal Oil, CIRP, Section 41(1), Ghanshyam Mishra, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688845-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gst-refund-interest-must-be-calculated-from-original-refund-application-542608</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:37:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Refund Interest Must Run From Original Application Date After Illegal Rejection: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST refund, refund interest, Section 56 CGST Act, original refund application, Kuehne Nagel, Gujarat High Court, delayed refund, GST]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688845-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-to-hear-vedantas-appeal-against-refusal-of-gujarat-offshore-oil-block-psc-extension-on-monday-542605</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T16:32:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:31:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Hear Vedanta's Appeal Against Refusal Of Gujarat Offshore Oil Block PSC Extension On Monday]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vedanta Limited, Delhi High Court, Gujarat Oil Block, Production Sharing Contract, Single Judge order, Division bench]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688612-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-144259.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/ibc-moratorium-does-not-extinguish-directors-criminal-liability-for-cheque-dishonour-punjab-haryana-hc-542603</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:20:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Moratorium Won't Extinguish Directors' Criminal Liability For Cheque Bounce: Punjab & Haryana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punjab and Haryana HC, Moratoriun, Dishonour of Cheque, Director]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688868-punjab-and-haryana-hc-with-justice-manish-batra.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/cbic-forms-working-group-to-examine-pan-based-centralised-gst-administration-for-multi-gstin-taxpayers-542600</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:13:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CBIC Forms Working Group To Examine PAN-Based Centralised GST Administration For Multi-GSTIN Taxpayers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CBIC, Single GSTIN, Multiple GST Registrations, CBIC working group, centralised GST administration, multiple GSTIN taxpayers, GST compliance India, centralised GST assessment, GST registration multiple states, CBIC GST reform, GST administration framework, multi state taxpayers GST, GST policy update]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/gst-4.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-reserves-verdict-in-edelweiss-appeal-challenging-sat-order-directing-reinstatement-of-client-securities-542597</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T16:05:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Reserves Verdict In Appeals Against Order On Client Securities Sold To Recover Anugrah Stock Broking's Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Edelweiss Custodial Services, NSE Clearing Ltd, Securities Appellate Tribunal, Supreme Court, Securities Law, Share Market]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/21/688260-sc-nse-clearing-limited-edelweiss.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-allows-handwriting-analysis-cheques-negotiable-instruments-act-complainant-claims-accused-filled-them-542593</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:52:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Allows Handwriting Test Of Disputed Cheques In PTB Chits Cheque Dishonour Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice G. Girish, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, cheque dishonour, cheque bounce case, handwriting analysis, forensic examination of cheque, expert opinion, disputed cheque, execution of cheque, Section 139 NI Act, presumption under NI Act, specimen handwriting, PTB Chits Pvt. Ltd., Judicial First Class Magistrate Taliparamba]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/11/17/504445-justice-g-girish-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-chennai-cenvat-credit-on-cleaning-insurance-event-management-services-available-to-banks-extended-limitation-not-invocable-in-interpretational-disputes-542592</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T16:19:16+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:47:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Allows CENVAT Credit To Citibank For Cleaning And Event Services After 2011 Amendment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit, Input Service, Rule 2(l), CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, Service Tax, Citibank, Banking and Financial Services, Cleaning Services, General Insurance Services, Event Management Services, Convention Services, Mandap Keeper Services, Club Membership Services, Outdoor Catering, Rent-a-Cab, Tour Operator Services, Extended Period of Limitation, Suppression of Facts, Penalty, Interest, Interpretational Dispute, Rule 14, Service Tax Litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688885-cestat-chennai-citibank.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-stays-ibbi-order-barring-insolvency-professional-from-other-cirps-despite-alleged-misconduct-in-one-case-542587</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:38:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Stays IBBI Order Barring Insolvency Professional From Other CIRPs Despite Alleged Misconduct In One Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, IBBI, RP. CoC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/01/31/408618-nclat11.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-authorities-cannot-reject-emas-gold-and-diamonds-cross-examination-request-on-mere-assumptions-542586</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T16:03:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:37:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Right To Cross-Examination Cannot Be Denied Over Unretracted GST Statements: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 74 of the CGST Act, violation of natural justice,  GST adjudication order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688841-kerala-high-court-emas-gold-and-diamonds.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/suspended-director-has-locus-to-flag-violations-of-ibc-and-cirp-regulations-nclt-chandigarh-542571</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:07:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Suspended Director Can Flag CIRP Violations But Not Question CoC's Commercial Wisdom: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, CIRP Regulations, IBC, Suspended Director]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/18/681009-ncltchandigarh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-delhi-restaurant-from-using-lama-kitchen-mark-542570</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T15:05:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Delhi Restaurant From Using 'LAMA KITCHEN' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Satinder Singh Sarna, LAMA KITCHEN, Himalayan Cook-house, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Hauz Khas Village, Tibetan Cuisine, Device Mark, ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Section 28 Trade Marks Act, Restaurant Industry, Instagram Page, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688865-delhi-hc-lama.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/business-transfer-and-jda-disputes-belong-before-commercial-courts-not-rera-tamil-nadu-rera-542564</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T14:58:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu RERA Holds JDA Disputes Outside RERA Jurisdiction, Rejects Bennett Property's Complaint]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Joint Development Agreement (JDA), Construction Agreement, Business Transfer Agreement, Commercial Court jurisdiction, TNRERA jurisdiction, Section 31 RERA, Maintainability of complaint, Development rights, Commercial dispute, Corporate entities, Commercial arrangements, Allottee rights, Business transfer, RERA complaint, Tamil Nadu REAT, Aura Boulevard, Aura Skyline, Aura Grande]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/13/533750-rera-tamil-nadu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/itc-refund-cannot-be-denied-merely-because-principal-input-and-output-attract-same-gst-rate-542557</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T14:33:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Grants ITC Refund To Vindhya Spinning Mills, Says Same Input Rate Can't Deny Relief]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[refund rejection order, GST department, Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, Section 54(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688816-vindhya-spinning-mills-private-limited-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/gujarat-hc-quashes-4153-crore-excise-recovery-notice-against-jindal-saw-542556</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T15:49:49+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T14:32:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Quashes ₹41.53 Cr Excise Notice Against Jindal Saw, Backs Finality Of HPC Certificates]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jindal Saw, High Powered Committee, excise refund, show cause notice, jurisdiction, Notification 39/2001-CE, Central Excise Act, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688908-supehia-vaibhavi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/karnataka-high-court-clears-release-of-boss-movie-rejects-darshans-plea-over-renukaswamy-murder-case-similarities-542553</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T13:53:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Clears Release Of 'BOSS' Movie, Rejects Darshan's Plea Over Renukaswamy Murder Case Similarities]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Darshan Srinivas, Vijayalakshmi Darshan, Siri Productions, BOSS Movie, Renukaswamy Murder Case, Sub-judice, Article 19(1)(a), Right to Privacy, Fair Trial, CBFC Certification, Super Censor Board, Sandalwood, Fictional Expression, Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur, personality rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688852-karnataka-hc-darshan-thoogudeepa.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/piracy-must-be-dealt-with-a-heavy-hand-delhi-high-court-grants-sony-relief-against-14-rogue-websites-542551</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T13:25:46+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T13:24:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Piracy Must Be Dealt With A Heavy Hand': Delhi High Court Grants Sony Relief Against 14 Rogue Websites]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Sony Pictures Networks India, Commonwealth Games 2026, Australian Open 2027, Copyright Infringement, Broadcast Reproduction Rights, Dynamic Injunction, Rogue Websites, Cricgo.pro, Justice Jyoti Singh, Media Rights, Digital Piracy, Live Streaming, John Doe Order, Section 37 Copyright Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688830-delhi-hc-sony-sports-network.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-restrains-former-jk-paper-employees-from-using-companys-confidential-report-542534</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T12:40:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Former JK Paper Employees From Using Company's Confidential Report]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, JK Paper Limited, Subhendu Kesh, Intelvations LLP, Trade Secrets, Data Theft, Confidential Information, Purta Report, En-masse Resignation, IT Department, Forensic Audit, Grant Thornton Bharat, Copyright Infringement, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Section 12A]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688821-delhi-hc-jk-paper.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-dismisses-sunday-trademark-renewal-plea-finds-notice-properly-dispatched-542529</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T16:30:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T12:20:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Dismisses 'SUNDAY' Trademark Renewal Plea, Finds Notice Properly Dispatched]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Raju Patel, Matra Mobili, SUNDAY Trademark, Section 25(3), Trademark Renewal, O-3 Notice, RG-3 Notice, Trademark Registry, Section 27 General Clauses Act, Outward Register, Proof of Service, India Post, Trademark Restoration, Trade Marks Rules 2017, Acting Chief Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge, Justice Gautam A. Ankhad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688919-bombay-hc-acting-chief-justice-ravindra-v-ghuge-and-justice-gautam-a-ankhad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/karnataka-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-cancelling-jda-over-mutual-breach-by-developer-and-landowners-542526</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T12:03:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Cancelling JDA Over Mutual Breach By Developer And Landowners]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Joint Development Agreement, JDA cancellation, mutual breach, specific performance, arbitral award, Section 37 Arbitration Act, real estate development dispute, Karnataka High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/10/15/626120-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-c-m-poonacha-karnatakahc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-temporarily-restrains-niravi-from-using-sapat-trademark-for-tea-542518</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T11:16:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Temporarily Restrains Niravi From Using 'SAPAT' Trademark For Tea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, SAPAT International Private Limited, NIRAVI Consumer LLP, Sapat & Co. Nashik, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Class 30, Initial Interest Confusion, Family Arrangement, Assignment of Trademark, Loose Tea, Signages, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh, Intellectual Property, Reseller]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688792-bombay-high-court-sapat-tea.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/kerala-high-court-orders-registrar-to-decide-trademark-applications-pending-for-over-a-decade-in-three-months-542511</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T10:56:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Orders Registrar To Decide Trademark Applications Pending For Over A Decade In Three Months]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Trademark Registration, Administrative Delay, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, Section 18 Trade Marks Act, Intellectual Property Registry, Writ Petition, Time-bound Disposal, Pendency, Trademark Application, Statutory Duty, IP Backlog, Kerala Judiciary, Legal Redress, 2012 Application]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688785-kerala-hcjustice-bechu-kurian-thomas.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-directs-meta-to-remove-zees-copyrighted-content-from-14-facebook-pages-542506</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T10:45:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs Meta To Remove Zee's Copyrighted Content From 14 Facebook Pages]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, Meta Platforms Inc, Facebook, Copyright Infringement, Broadcast Reproduction Rights, John Doe, Ad-interim Injunction, Takedown Order, Content Monetization, MeitY, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Bhagya Lakshmi, Kumkum Bhagya, Digital Piracy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688778-delhi-hc-zee-meta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/uniqueness-not-a-statutory-test-for-refusing-trademark-registration-delhi-high-court-542499</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-23T10:39:46+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T10:31:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Uniqueness' Not A Statutory Test For Refusing Trademark Registration: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, ADS Spirits, OFFER Trademark, Section 9(1)(a), Registrar of Trade Marks, Distinctive Character, Arbitrary Mark, Class 33, Alcoholic Beverages, Justice Jyoti Singh, Quasi-Judicial Authority, Reasoned Order, Trade Marks Act 1999, Uniqueness Test, Remand Order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688776-delhi-hc-ads-group.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-imposes-4-lakhs-penalty-pace-stock-broking-compliance-lapses-axis-mf-front-running-542491</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T10:11:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty On Pace Stock Broking For Compliance Lapses In Axis MF Front Running Probe]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Jai Sebastian, Pace Stock Broking Services Pvt. Ltd., Axis Mutual Fund, front-running investigation, front running, stock broker, trader-wise IP logs, IP address records, CTCL ID, user ID, Kaleeswaran Pandian, Rajeev Ranjan, National Stock Exchange, dealer credentials, incorrect information, regulatory compliance, Stock Brokers Regulations, SEBI adjudication order, SEBI penalty, Section 15A, Section 15HB, securities market regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-22-2026-542477</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-23T09:27:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 22, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-hc-allows-sc-hc-judges-to-show-judicial-allowances-as-receipts-not-in-nature-of-income-under-new-tax-regime-542461</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T22:14:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T22:10:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi HC Allows SC, HC Judges To Show Allowances As 'Receipts Not In Nature Of Income' Under New Tax Regime]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court judges income tax return, High Court judges income tax return, judicial allowances, receipts not in the nature of income, Section 115BAC, Income Tax Act, CBDT Office Memorandum, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Delhi Tax Bar Association, Justice Dinesh Mehta, Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, judges tax benefits, judicial allowances under new tax regime]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/calcutta-high-court-quashes-criminal-case-against-bajaj-finserv-md-says-loan-recovery-dispute-was-purely-civil-542456</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T21:41:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Bajaj Finserv MD, Holds Loan Dispute Civil in Nature]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Bajaj Finserv, Loan Recovery, Civil Dispute, Forgery, Section 464 IPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688709-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-203548.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-mumbai-deletes-bogus-ltcg-addition-says-genuine-share-transactions-cant-be-rejected-merely-on-suspicion-542453</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T21:15:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai Grants LTCG Relief To Taxpayer, Rejects Revenue's Claim That Scrip Was Penny Stock]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai, Long-Term Capital Gains, LTCG Exemption, Section 10(38), Section 68, Section 69C, Bogus LTCG, Penny Stock, Shree Shaleen Textile Ltd., Genuine Share Transactions, Accommodation Entries, Banking Channels, Demat Account, Securities Transaction Tax (STT), SEBI, BSE, Income Tax Act, Judicial Consistency, Binding Precedent, Shell Company, Income Tax Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680236-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-ruling-holding-paytm-nightstay-gst-itc-dispute-arbitrable-542448</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T20:43:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Ruling Holding Paytm-Nightstay GST ITC Dispute Arbitrable]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, One97 Communications (Paytm), NightStay App, Nasr Ullah Khan, Nightstay Travels Pvt. Ltd., Arbitration, GST Refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688695-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-182457.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/nse-moves-supreme-court-against-delhi-hc-ruling-declaring-it-public-authority-under-rti-act-542421</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T18:53:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NSE Moves Supreme Court Against Delhi High Court Ruling Declaring It Public Authority Under RTI Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, National Stock Exchange (NSE), Right to Information Act, Public Authority, Section 2(h), SEBI, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, RTI Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688663-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-181957.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/madras-high-court-sets-aside-part-of-arbitral-award-against-tuticorin-port-trust-over-water-charges-542420</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T18:52:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T18:51:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside Part Of Arbitral Award Against Tuticorin Port Trust Over Water Charges]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[rbitral award, Tuticorin Port Trust, TWAD Board, water tariff, other beneficiaries, domestic water usage, patent illegality, arbitration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-examine-gst-liability-on-diagnostic-services-directs-petitioner-to-aar-542418</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T18:43:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Examine GST Liability On Diagnostic Services, Directs Petitioner To AAR]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST on diagnostic services, 18% GST, diagnostic services GST, Authority for Advance Ruling, AAR, advance ruling, CGST Act 2017, Section 97 CGST Act, GST exemption, GST liability, taxability of diagnostic services, Article 226]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/04/671745-anil-kshetarpal-amit-mahajan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/no-service-tax-payable-on-certain-services-rendered-to-indian-railways-542416</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T18:28:43+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T18:27:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside Service Tax Demand On Railway Cleaning and Housekeeping Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Notification No. 25/2012-ST, extended limitation period, ST-3 returns]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688628-cestat-chennai-khagaul-loco-labour-co-operative-society.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-development-rights-joint-development-agreement-form-part-of-corporate-debtor-asset-base-542415</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T18:10:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T18:09:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi Holds Kerala Trade Centre Project; Developmental Rights Form Part Of KCCI's CIRP Assets]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Development Rights, Joint Development Agreement (JDA), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 3(27) IBC, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), Resolution Professional, Information Memorandum, Corporate Debtor, Kerala Trade Centre, Cherupushpam Films Private Limited, NCLT Kochi, Property under IBC, Asset Base, Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia, General Power of Attorney, Resolution Plan, Insolvency Resolution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652585-nclt-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/later-employment-agreement-doesnot-automatically-end-arbitration-clause-in-earlier-contract-bombay-high-court-542412</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T17:46:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Fresh Employment Agreement Doesn't Automatically End Arbitration Clause In Earlier Contract: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Justice Amit Borkar, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 9, Section 16, Employment Agreement, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Clause, Fresh Employment Agreement, Novation of Contract, Complete Substitution, Continuity of Employment, Corporate Restructuring, Confidential Information, Proprietary Information, Trade Secrets, Intellectual Property, Non-Solicitation, Interim Injunction, Ex Parte Ad Interim Order, Court Receiver, Electronic Evidence, Former Employee, Former Managing Director, Misuse of Confidential Information, Client Solicitation, Prima Facie Findings, Arbitral Tribunal, Jurisdictional objection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/05/19/472964-justice-amit-borkar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/rp-cannot-revive-a-lease-coc-resolved-to-terminate-nclt-indore-542408</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T17:30:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Indore Holds Resolution Professional Cannot Revive Lease Terminated By CoC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, RP, CoC, Lease]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/government-cannot-be-held-ransom-delhi-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-vedantas-oil-block-contract-extension-bid-542405</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T17:33:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T17:16:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Government Cannot Be Held Ransom': Delhi High Court Upholds Rejection Of Vedanta's Oil Block Contract Extension Bid]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Vedanta Ltd., Production Sharing Contract (PSC), Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG), Extension Policy 2017, Public Trust Doctrine, Profit Petroleum]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688612-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-144259.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/telangana-high-court-restores-relief-to-radiant-digital-solutions-says-bona-fide-lapse-cant-deny-benefit-542404</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T17:03:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Restores Relief To Radiant Digital Solutions, Says Bona Fide Lapse Can't Deny Benefit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, Section 115BAA of the Income Tax Act, concessional corporate tax regime, procedural lapse]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688598-telangana-hc-radiant-digital-solutions.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-delhi-rejects-tv-todays-213-crore-transitional-cenvat-credit-refund-holds-one-day-delay-in-filing-revised-st-3-return-cannot-be-treated-as-mere-procedural-lapse-542402</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T16:56:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[One-Day Delay In Revised Service Tax Return Filing Bars Refund Claim Under CGST Act: CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[TV Today Network Limited, Principal Commissioner of CGST Delhi South, Transitional CENVAT Credit, CENVAT Credit Refund, Section 142(9)(b) CGST Act, Section 142 CGST Act, GST Transitional Provisions, Revised ST-3 Return, Rule 7B Service Tax Rules, Rule 7C Service Tax Rules, One-Day Delay, Limitation, Procedural Lapse, Mandatory Time Limit, Cash Refund, TRAN-1]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688572-cestat-delhi-tv-today-network-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/nclt-ahmedabad-holds-removal-of-nominee-director-without-vested-rights-not-oppressive-conduct-542392</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T16:33:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T16:30:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Holds Removal Of Nominee Director Without Vested Rights Not Oppressive Conduct]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Directorship, Director, Oppression]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655535-nclt-ahmedabad-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/claim-for-cenvat-credit-could-not-be-rejected-on-grounds-that-were-never-raised-in-the-original-show-cause-notice-542391</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T16:29:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Directs SVLDRS Relief To SB Aditya Power Projects In CENVAT Credit Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit Rules, Designated Committee, discharge certificate, Rule 9 of the CENVAT Credit Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688579-madras-hc-sb-aditya-power-projects.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/appellate-tribunal/pmla-appellate-tribunal-sets-aside-eds-rs-1613-crore-attachment-in-alleged-unitech-homebuyer-fraud-case-542385</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T16:16:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T16:15:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Unitech Case: PMLA Appellate Tribunal Sets Aside ₹16.13 Crore Attachment Over 2004 Payment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), PMLA, Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Proceeds of crime, provisional attachment, Enforcement Directorate, ED, Unitech, homebuyer, fraud, scam, ED attachment, fixed deposit, money laundering, homebuyer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688614-pmla-unitech-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-519-crore-amp-adjustment-on-fujifilm-india-by-rejecting-bright-line-test-542383</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T15:58:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Deletes ₹5.19 Crore AMP Adjustment Against Fujifilm India Following Sony Ericsson Ruling]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Fujifilm India, Bright Line Test, AMP expenses, transfer pricing, Sony Ericsson, Casio India, associated enterprise, ITAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/wifes-failure-to-disclose-husband-was-co-borrower-in-home-loan-not-material-suppression-bombay-high-court-542380</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T15:49:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Wife's Failure To Disclose Husband As Home Loan Co-Borrower Not Material Suppression: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, NSEL Scam, MPID Act | Co-Borrower, Material Suppression, Punjab National Bank, Property Attachment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/04/653862-750x450652575-bombay-hc-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-delhi-upholds-inclusion-of-downloaded-software-licence-value-in-imported-dongles-customs-value-542378</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T17:35:19+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T15:36:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi Upholds Inclusion Of Downloaded Software Licence Value In Imported Dongles' Customs Value]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[HASP dongles, DCM software, customs valuation, downloaded software, assessable value, Hewlett Packard, Section 14, CESTAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/uttarakhand-hc-upholds-compensation-award-for-sitarganjkhatima-national-highway-land-acquisition-despite-tribunals-valuation-errors-542377</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T16:08:13+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T15:24:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitrator Must Consider 3-Yr Deeds To Fix Land Value Under 2013 Land Acquisition Act: Uttarakhand High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sitarganj–Khatima National Highway (NH-125), National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Land acquisition compensation, Section 26, RFCTLARR Act, 2013, Comparable sale deeds, Market value determination, Circle rate, Arbitral award, Patent illegality, Section 37 appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688603-uttarakhand-hc-justice-ravindra-maithani.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-chandigarh-rights-of-creditor-in-cirp-determined-by-code-not-by-quantum-of-claim-542373</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T17:05:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T15:03:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rights Of Creditor In CIRP Are Determined By The IBC, Not The Quantum Of Claim: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd., Resolution Plan Disclosure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/departmental-penalty-alone-not-enough-to-continue-criminal-trial-542370</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T14:49:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Excise Evasion Prosecution Cannot Rest Solely On Departmental Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[show cause notice, central excise duty evasion, criminal trial, criminal charges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688570-himachal-pradesh-hc-justice-rakesh-kainthla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-bangalore-holds-cisco-indias-services-to-overseas-group-companies-are-export-of-services-not-taxable-as-intermediary-services-542367</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T15:45:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T14:38:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cisco India's Support Services To Overseas Affiliates Are Export, Not Intermediary: CESTAT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Bangalore, Cisco Systems India Pvt. Ltd., Export of Services, Intermediary Services, Service Tax, Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, Rule 2(f), Principal-to-Principal, Cost Plus Mark-up, Marketing Support Services, Technical Support Services, Business Support Services, SEZ, CBIC Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST, Foreign Exchange, Service Tax Demand, Service Tax Appeal.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688600-cestat-bangalore-cisco-systems-india-pvt-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-cirp-cannot-withdrawn-solely-basis-one-time-settlement-union-bank-fined-one-lakh-542364</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T16:59:56+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T14:25:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi Dismisses Union Bank's Plea To Withdraw CIRP, Says IBC Section 12A Procedure Is Mandatory]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Union Bank of India, Air Travel Enterprises India Ltd., Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP withdrawal, Section 12A IBC, Rule 11 NCLT Rules, One Time Settlement, OTS, Committee of Creditors, CoC approval, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, withdrawal of insolvency proceedings, bilateral settlement, inherent powers, Resolution Professional, insolvency law, NCLT order, casual pleadings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclat-dismisses-appeals-arising-out-of-finolex-share-transfer-dispute-allows-amendment-of-petition-filed-in-2016-542362</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T14:08:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Delhi Dismisses Finolex Share Dispute Appeals, Says Subsequent Events Pleadable By Amendment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Finolex Group, Share Transfer Dispute, Amendement of Petition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688548-nclat-finolex-insutries.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-delhi-remands-partners-capital-waiver-addition-directs-ao-to-specify-charging-provision-542337</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T12:43:06+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T12:42:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Remands Partnership Firm's Reassessment, Faults Authorities' Cryptic Orders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[partner's capital waived off, reassessment, retired partner, Section 147, Section 41(1), Section 28(iv), ITAT Delhi, Accurate Pressings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679647-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/voluntary-flat-booking-cancellation-does-not-end-homebuyers-allottee-status-until-full-refund-telangana-reat-542333</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T12:20:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Voluntary Flat Booking Cancellation Does Not End Homebuyer's Allottee Status Until Full Refund: Telangana REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allottee Status, Voluntary Cancellation of Flat Booking, Cancellation Deed, Refund of Booking Amount, Homebuyer Rights, Section 2(d) RERA, Section 44 RERA Appeal, Telangana REAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652505-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-revises-certification-requirements-distribution-specialized-investment-funds-542331</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T12:08:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Revises Certification Requirements For Distribution Of Specialized Investment Funds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Specialized Investment Funds, SIF, Mutual Funds, NISM, NISM Series V-D, NISM Series V-A, NISM Series XIII, Certification Requirements, Mutual Fund Distributors, SIF Distributors, Asset Management Companies, AMFI, SEBI Master Circular, Securities and Exchange Board of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672733-sebi-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-nbfc-from-using-zepto-and-zepto-finance-marks-542326</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-22T11:51:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T11:50:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains NBFC From Using 'Zepto' And 'Zepto Finance' Marks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Zepto, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, Zepto Finance, trademark infringement, passing off, interim injunction, Sachin Mittal, Naman Finleys, Zepto Cash, exploitative interest rate, quick-commerce unicorn, fraudulent loans, ZeptoFinance.com, predatory lending]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688515-delhi-hc-zepto.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-delayed-appeal-against-nclat-judgment-in-nagpur-mumbai-expressway-cda-cartel-case-542320</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T11:16:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses Delayed Appeal Against NCLAT Judgment In Nagpur-Mumbai Expressway CDA Cartel Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Competition Commission of India, NCLAT, Apaar Infratech, Maharashtra State Road Development, Penetron India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688469-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-060049.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-21-2026-542285</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-22T09:08:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 21, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/cybersecurity-expert-moves-supreme-court-against-madras-hc-refusal-to-direct-action-over-alleged-star-health-data-vulnerabilities-542281</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-21T22:14:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Star Health Data Breach | Cybersecurity Expert Moves Supreme Court Against Madras HC Order Refusing Probe]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cybersecurity, Star Health, Supreme Court, MeitY, Data Breach, Madras High Court, Himanshu Pathak]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/21/688428-whatsapp-image-2026-07-21-at-212433.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
