<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-dismisses-exemployees-challenge-to-jet-airways-aircraft-sale-547074</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-24T11:08:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT New Delhi Upholds Jet Airways Aircraft Sale, Dismisses Ex-Employees' Challenge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Jet Airways]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692435-nclat-jet-airways.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/high-courts-cant-re-appreciate-evidence-or-substitute-their-views-when-reviewing-settlement-commission-orders-delhi-high-court-547070</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-24T10:55:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Judicial Review Cannot Re-Appreciate Settlement Commission Evidence: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/08/29/652292-363794-delhi-high-court-4.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-varun-beverages-from-using-smooth-mark-in-parle-agro-smoodh-trademark-suit-547062</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-24T10:41:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Holds Varun Beverages' 'SMOOTH' Deceptively Similar To 'SMOODH', Restrains Use]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Parle Agro, Varun Beverages, Justice Jyoti Singh, Smoodh Trademark, Calpis Smooth, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Dairy Brand Dispute, Smart Copying, Class 29 Trademark, Class 32 Trademark, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Varun Dhawan Smoodh, Dulquer Salmaan Smoodh, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Pre Institution Mediation, CS COMM 897 2026, Indian Beverage Market]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695525-delhi-hc-smoodh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/lending-customs-broker-licence-and-dongle-for-money-prohibited-under-cblr-delhi-high-court-547057</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-24T10:30:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Lending Customs Broker Licence And Dongle For Money Prohibited Under CBLR: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/fresh-information-is-not-tangible-material-where-it-only-seeks-reconsideration-of-an-examined-issue-547039</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-24T10:08:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[AO Can't Reopen Scrutinised Issue On Mere Change Of Opinion Without Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 148, Section 143(3), reassessment, change of opinion, fresh tangible material, Prissm Remedies, share split, capital loss, ₹3.06 crore capital loss, scrutiny assessment, escaped income, suppression of material facts, reopening of assessment, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
