<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-delhi-hc-order-holding-godaddy-domain-registration-fees-not-taxable-in-india-under-india-us-dtaa-547848</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:54:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Delhi HC Order Holding GoDaddy Domain Registration Fees Not Taxable In India Under India-US DTAA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GoDaddy.com LLC, India-USA DTAA, Domain Name Registration Fees, Income Tax, Section 197, Nil TDS Certificate, Withholding Tax, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/696940-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-115544.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-dismisses-reddy-pharmaceuticals-review-petition-upholds-injunction-in-favour-of-dr-reddys-laboratories-over-reddy-mark-547847</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:50:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Reddy Pharmaceuticals' Review Plea In 'REDDY' Trademark Dispute With DRL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Dr Reddys Laboratories, Reddy Pharmaceuticals, Justice Om Prakash Shukla, Justice C Hari Shankar, Trademark Passing Off, Review Petition Dismissed, DW1 Witness Admission, Section 57 Trade Marks Act, IPAB Rectification Order, Brihan Karan Sugar, Mosaic of Evidence, Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, Tainted Trademark Adoption, Class 5 Trademark, Ameerpet Packaging Address, Chander M Lall, Swathi Sukumar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674865-dr-reddys-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-rera-cases-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547846</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:41:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, REAT, Promoter Liability, Delayed Possession, Conciliation Proceedings, Allottee Rights, Housing Association, Consumer Law Principles, Project Amenities, RERA Complaints]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/05/07/538436-rera-cases-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-august-24-august-30-2026-547844</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:35:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 30, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/10/692889-ipr-weekly-digest.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-restrain-digesto-plus-maker-in-trademark-dispute-over-haslab-digesto-547842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:25:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Trademark Appeal Over “DIGESTO PLUS”, Says Mark Common To Trade]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Hahnemann Scientific Laboratory, Meera Rastogi, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Justice V Kameswar Rao, Haslab Digesto, Digesto Plus, Trademark Passing Off, Classic Trinity, Goodwill Misrepresentation Damage, Class 5 Trademark, Wander v Antox, Borse Brothers, Condonation of Delay, Homeopathic Medicine Trademark, Publici Juris, Disclaimer Trade Marks, Pernod Ricard v Karanveer, Drug Controller]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/13/686241-justice-v-kameswar-rao-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-stays-allahabad-hc-order-quashing-940-crore-nhai-contract-termination-against-tata-projects-547841</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:25:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays Allahabad HC Order Quashing ₹940 Crore NHAI Contract Termination Against Tata Projects]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tata Projects Ltd., NHAI, NH-709A, EPC Agreement, Contract Termination, Hindrance-Free Land, Article 226, Garhmukteshwar, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/697027-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-111633.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/calcutta-high-court-refuses-interim-injunction-against-publisher-in-copyright-dispute-over-bengali-english-grammar-textbooks-547839</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Rejects Injunction Against New Central Book Agency After Years Of Inaction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Calcutta High Court, Pares Chandra Das, New Central Book Agency, Justice Krishna Rao, Copyright Infringement, Applied English Grammar, Section 19 Copyright Act, Co-Publishing Agreement, Novation of Contract, Section 62 Contract Act, Abhijit Das, Amitava Das, Sima Das, Katha-o-Kahini, City Civil Court Calcutta, Termination of License, Non-Joinder of Parties, Malhotra International, GA 1 of 2023, IP COM 11 of 2024]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-in-canara-banks-plea-against-nclat-order-setting-aside-insolvency-admission-of-equinox-india-developments-547838</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:00:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice In Canara Bank's Plea Against NCLAT Order Setting Aside Insolvency Admission Of Equinox India Developments]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Canara Bank, Equinox India Developments, Corporate Guarantee, Section 5(8) IBC, Section 7 IBC, Section 10A IBC, Financial Debt, NCLAT, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/696934-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-112714.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547836</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:57:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitrator Appointment, International Commercial Arbitration, MSMED Arbitration, Arbitral Seat, Interim Relief, Foreign Award Enforcement, Arbitrator Ineligibility, Partnership Disputes, Arbitral Award Challenge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/madras-high-court-rejects-film-archive-copyright-claim-over-aval-appadithan-production-stills-547835</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:54:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Rejects Film Archive's Copyright Claim Over 'Aval Appadithan' Production Stills]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Madras High Court, Cinema Resource Centre, Ganga Rudraiah, Justice P Velmurugan, Aval Appadithan, C Rudraiah, Copyright Infringement, Physical Possession vs Copyright, Adverse Possession IP, Section 17 Copyright Act, Moore Market Chennai, Scrap Dealer Film Photos, Film Archive Litigation, Original Side Appeal, CS 674 2017, OSA CAD 17 2022, Intangible Property Law, Indian Film Copyright, Sruti Harihara Subramaniam, Lalgudi G Jayaraman, Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/lvelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547832</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:43:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697014-whatsapp-image-2026-08-31-at-102316.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-pre-deposit-must-be-refunded-to-extent-taxpayer-succeeds-in-appeal-bombay-high-court-547831</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:38:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders ₹3.14 Cr Pre-Deposit To IBM, Says Pending Appeal Can't Affect Dropped Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Pre-Deposit, Refund, Partial Success In Appeal, GST Appeal, Section 107 MGST Act, GST Appellate Tribunal, Tax Demand, Article 265, Statutory Refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696817-ibm-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-revenue-cannot-treat-services-as-non-export-only-to-deny-cenvat-refund-without-demanding-service-tax-allows-flipkarts-appeals-547829</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:24:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Says Revenue Can't Take Contrary Stands On Same Services, Allows Flipkart CENVAT Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Flipkart Internet, CESTAT Mumbai, Export of Services, CENVAT Credit Refund, Rule 5 CENVAT Credit Rules, Business Auxiliary Services, Export of Services Rules 2005, Section 73 Finance Act 1994, Service Tax, Revenue Cannot Take Contrary Stands, CBEC Circular]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/25/663759-cestat-flipkart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
