<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-department-cannot-wait-for-certified-copy-when-digitally-signed-court-order-is-available-bombay-high-court-554081</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T19:28:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Department Cannot Wait For Certified Copy When Digitally Signed Order Is Available: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Section 153, Special Audit, Limitation Period, Digitally Signed Court Orders]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/ed-moves-supreme-court-against-delhi-hc-order-quashing-fir-ed-case-against-newsclick-founder-over-alleged-foreign-funding-554080</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T19:11:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ED Moves Supreme Court Against Order Quashing FIR, ED Case Against NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Enforcement Directorate, Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha, foreign funding, money laundering, FIR quashed, foreign direct investment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705728-whatsapp-image-2026-10-10-at-184531.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/mahindra-holidays-need-not-treat-entire-158-cr-membership-fees-as-income-in-year-of-receipt-554078</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T18:44:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Rules In Favour Of Mahindra Holidays On ₹158 Crore Membership Fees, Software Licence Tax Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[membership fees, Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, Section 194J of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705724-madras-hc-mahindra-holidays-and-resorts-india-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/freshly-manufactured-goods-cannot-replace-re-imported-goods-for-customs-duty-exemption-554077</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T18:27:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Freshly Manufactured Goods Cannot Replace Re-Imported Goods For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Crescent Foundry Company, Notification No. 158/95-Cus., Customs Duty, Re-Imported Goods, Freshly Manufactured Goods, Shipping Bill, Customs Act, Section 112(a), Confiscation, Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702298-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-toyota-financials-2320-crore-claim-against-blu-smart-over-150-undelivered-vehicles-554072</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:56:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Toyota Financial's ₹23.20 Crore Claim Against Blu-Smart Over 150 Undelivered Vehicles]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Blu-Smart Fleet Private Limited., NCLT Ahmedabad,Toyota Financial Services India Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680206-blu-smart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-extends-injunction-on-thunder-15000-beer-to-delhi-importer-supar-sip-traders-in-inbrew-trademark-suit-554071</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:45:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Extends 'THUNDER 15000' Beer Trademark Injunction To Importer Supar SIP Traders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Inbrew Beverages Private Limited, Kinjore Brewery, Justice Tejas Karia, CS COMM 491 2026, THUNDER 15000 Beer Trademark, Supar SIP Traders LLP, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment, Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Amendment, Injunction Extension Beer Trademark, Mittal Electronics v Sujata Home Appliances, Delhi Excise Department License, Downstream Beer Distributor Injunction, Ad Interim Injunction Extension, Trademark Infringement Beer Brand, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Section 151 CPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/18/694689-delhi-hc-thunderbolt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-penalty-can-be-waived-even-in-cases-of-misreporting-after-2026-amendment-bombay-high-court-554069</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:41:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty Can Be Waived Even In Cases Of Misreporting After 2026 Amendment: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty, Section 270AA, Finance Act 2026, Misreporting Of Income]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/ahmedabad-entities-agree-before-bombay-high-court-to-stop-using-7-drug-names-in-sun-pharma-suit-554068</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:31:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Ahmedabad Entities Agree Before Bombay High Court To Stop Using 7 Drug Names In Sun Pharma Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Nectar Life Care, Kashmik Formulations, Justice Madhav J Jamdar, Commercial IP Suit 28038 2025, HISTAC Trademark Infringement, OMESEC Trademark Suit, Consent Terms Decree Bombay HC, L HISTACT M Injunction, OMENEC Passing Off Suit, Class 5 Pharmaceutical Trademark India, SNIZACT Trademark Withdrawal, EZACT PREDMET LUMIA NEZACT Marks, Pharmaceutical Brand Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705703-bombay-hc-nectar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-admits-sharanam-infraproject-to-cirp-over-1035-crore-debt-rejects-restructuring-plea-554067</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:23:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits Sharanam Infraproject To CIRP Over ₹10.35 Crore Debt, Rejects Restructuring Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sharanam Infraproject and Trading Limited, CIRP, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705676-nclt-ahmedabad-sharanam-infraproject-and-trading-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-religious-significance-of-annapurna-does-not-bar-trademark-protection-554066</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:17:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Religious Significance Of 'Annapurna' Does Not Bar Trademark Protection: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Madras High Court, GEF Foods India, Annapurna Swadisht, Justice AD Maria Clete, ANNAPOORNA Trademark Suit, CS Comm Div 223 2026, Phonetic Identity Trademark Infringement, Section 29 2 Trade Marks Act, Allied and Cognate Food Goods, Order 39 Rule 4 CPC Vacate Application, Sree Annapoorna Foods Coimbatore, Class 30 Trademark Registration India, Goddess Annapurna Trademark Protection, Sathish Parasaran Senior Advocate, Arun C Mohan Advocate, NSE Listed Company Trademark Dispute, Commercial Origin Likelihood Confusion, Section 34 Prior User Defense, Trademark Opposition Proceedings Acquiescence, August 5 2026 Injunction Absolute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/01/703816-madras-hc-justice-a-d-maria-clete.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/conditional-arbitration-clause-requiring-fresh-consent-cannot-be-converted-into-unconditional-one-karnataka-high-court-554062</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-11T23:43:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:01:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Clause Requiring Fresh Mutual Consent Is Not Binding: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Agreement, Mutual Consent, Conditional Arbitration Clause, Appointment of Arbitrator, Section 7, Section 11(6), Contractual Interpretation, Party Autonomy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/21/668985-justice-h-t-narendra-prasad-karnataka-high-court-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/directors-cannot-be-held-liable-for-company-debt-merely-by-their-designation-delhi-high-court-554059</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:51:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Directors Cannot Be Held Liable For Company Debt Merely By Their Designation: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Corporate Debt, Personal Liability of Directors, Arbitration Agreement, Severability of Arbitral Awards, Venture Capital Assistance, Notice of Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703302-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-bharat-parashar-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-closed-morgan-securities-contempt-plea-against-bpl-limited-alleged-violation-asset-restraint-order-554054</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:01:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Closes Morgan Securities' Contempt Plea Against BPL Over Alleged Property Encumbrance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Morgan Securities and Credits, BPL Limited, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Asset Encumbrance, Asset Attachment, Share Capital Dilution, Restraint Order, Creation of Third-Party Interest, Justice Jayant Banerji, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705686-bpl-with-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-restrains-misuse-of-actor-vijay-deverakonda-personality-rights-orders-takedown-554052</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:51:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects Actor Vijay Deverakonda's Personality Rights Against AI Deepfakes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Vijay Sai Deverakonda, Justice Vikas Mahajan, CS COMM 1098 2026, Personality Rights AI Deepfake Injunction, Vijay Deverakonda John Doe Lawsuit, Swathi Sukumar Senior Advocate, Meta Google X Takedown Order, Rowdy Brand Passing Off Injunction, Arjun Reddy Character Personality Rights, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, MeitY DoT Website Blocking Directive, E Commerce Unauthorized Merchandise Takedown, Face Morphing Generative AI Injunction, Rowdy Wear RWDY Brand Dispute, Celebrity Publicity Rights Protection India, February 2026 Marriage Deepfake Case, Domain Name Registrar Lock Order, Intermediary Takedown 72 Hours, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/08/705127-delhi-hc-actor-vijay-devarkonda.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-allows-colgate-to-submit-six-renewed-trademark-certificates-in-suit-against-anchor-554051</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-10T14:47:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:46:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Allows Colgate To Submit Six Renewed Trademark Certificates In 1996 Suit Against Anchor]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Colgate Palmolive Company, Anchor Health and Beauty Care, Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, Chamber Summons 1085 2019, Commercial IP Suit 18 1996, Trademark Legal Proceedings Certificate, Renewed Trademark LPC Evidence, Section 31 Trade Marks Act 1999, Section 137 Trade Marks Act 1999, Ghia Full Bench Precedent, Reconstructed Trade Marks Registry Records, Evidence Act Marking Exhibits, Rashmin Khandekar Advocate, Dinesh Purandare Senior Advocate, Oral Evidence Court Commissioner, 30 Year Old Trademark Lawsuit, Probative Value vs Admissibility, Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC, Commercial Division]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705694-bombay-hc-colgate-palmolive-anchor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-admits-cirp-against-gujarat-toolroom-over-a-default-of-rs-2620-crore-554050</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:31:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits Insolvency Plea Against Gujarat Toolroom Over ₹26.20 Crore Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat Toolroom Limited, NCLT Ahmedabad, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705677-nclt-ahmedabad-gujarat-toolroom-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-grants-actor-amitabh-bachchan-time-to-finalise-settlement-in-personality-rights-suit-warns-he-must-appear-in-person-if-it-fails-554048</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-10T14:22:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:13:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs Amitabh Bachchan To Personally Appear If Settlement Fails In Personality Rights Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Amitabh Bachchan, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Personality Rights Lawsuit, CS COMM 819 2022, Amitabh Bachchan Personal Appearance Order, Rajat Nagi Defendant, Order X Rule 2 CPC, Order V Rule 3 CPC, Section 168 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, Ex Parte Injunction November 2022, Celebrity Publicity Rights India, Mediation Settlement Formalities, Dhruv Anand Advocate, Delhi HC Personal Presence Mandate, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Celebrity Image Rights Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705692-delhi-high-court-amitabh-bachchan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-approves-amalgamation-of-adani-electricity-mumbais-subsidiaries-into-it-554047</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:46:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Approves Merger Of Two Adani Electricity Mumbai Subsidiaries Into It]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Superheights Infraspace Private Limited, Pointleap Projects Private Limited, Adani Electricity Mumbai Limited, Merger, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705678-nclt-ahmedabad-adani-electricity-mumbai-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/calcutta-high-court-declines-to-hear-plea-alleging-torture-by-dri-official-says-matter-falls-under-revenue-bench-554046</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:40:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Declines To Hear Plea Alleging Torture By DRI Officials, Says Matter Falls Under Revenue Bench]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[roster, revenue matters, independent investigation, Section 108 of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705674-justice-krishna-rao-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/maharera-imposes-10-lakh-penalty-on-sai-enterprises-super-construction-for-failing-to-comply-with-flat-allotment-order-554044</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:23:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Maharashtra RERA Imposes ₹10 Lakh Penalty On Developers For Failing To Allot Flat]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MahaRERA, Flat Allotment, Sethia Imperial Avenue, Delayed Possession, Non-Compliance, Developer Penalty, Interest Recovery, Recovery Warrant]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529368-rera-maharashtra.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-cheque-issued-for-time-barred-debt-can-attract-liability-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-554042</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:10:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cheque For Time-Barred Debt Can Still Invite Prosecution If Dishonoured: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Cheque Bounce, Time-Barred Debt, Legally Enforceable Debt, Revival of Debt, Cheque Dishonour, Criminal Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/supplier-cannot-automatically-recover-gst-from-recipient-without-contractual-basis-kerala-high-court-554034</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T12:42:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supplier Cannot Automatically Recover GST From Recipient Without Contractual Basis: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Liability, tax burden, reimbursement, fees]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/01/677284-kerala-high-court-justice-raja-vijayaraghavan-justice-kv-jayakumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/kerala-high-court-quashes-gst-notice-issued-before-audit-findings-were-finalised-554030</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:59:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Quashes GST Notice Issued Before Audit Findings Were Finalised]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Audit, Show Cause Notice, Section 65 CGST Act, Rule 101(4), Natural Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/01/23/455152-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/banks-are-custodians-cannot-assume-coercive-powers-over-customers-transactions-delhi-high-court-554028</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:47:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Banks Are Custodians, Cannot Assume Coercive Powers Over Customers' Transactions: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, UCO Bank, Justice Jasmeet Singh, bank account freeze, RBI KYC Directions, Clause 54, suspicious transaction reports, customer due diligence, banking restrictions]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/12/07/508380-justice-jasmeet-singh-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-14-sarafesi-act-possession-order-cannot-be-enforced-immediately-45-days-stayed-if-borrower-intends-to-approach-drt-554024</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:33:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Possession Orders Must Be Kept On Hold For 45 Days If DRT Challenge Is Planned: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 14 SARFAESI Act, Section 17 SARFAESI Act, Debts Recovery Tribunal, DRT, Secured Creditors, Physical Possession, Borrower Rights, 45-Day Limitation Period, Grihum Housing Finance Limited, Justice G.R. Swaminathan, Justice M.D. Sumathi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703522-justice-gr-swaminathan-and-justice-md-sumathi-with-madurai-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/nclt-mumbai-suspends-one-court-due-to-vacancies-redistributes-pending-cases-554017</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:05:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Suspends One Court Due To Vacancies, Redistributes Pending Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, Mumbai Bench, Court No. VI, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Section 7 IBC, Section 9 IBC, Section 10 IBC, Section 95 IBC, transfer of pending matters]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705621-whatsapp-image-2026-10-10-at-102626.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/mere-pendency-of-ibc-proceedings-financial-distress-warrants-asset-protection-pending-arbitration-bombay-high-court-554005</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T10:19:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Pending Insolvency Proceedings, Financial Distress Can Warrant Asset Protection Pending Arbitration: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Ingram Micro India, Best Hawk Infosystems, insolvency proceedings, asset protection, Section 9 Arbitration Act, diminution of assets, ₹32.60 crore claim]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-09-2026-553989</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T03:16:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658697-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-8.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
