<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/freshly-manufactured-goods-cannot-replace-re-imported-goods-for-customs-duty-exemption-554077</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T18:27:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Freshly Manufactured Goods Cannot Replace Re-Imported Goods For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Crescent Foundry Company, Notification No. 158/95-Cus., Customs Duty, Re-Imported Goods, Freshly Manufactured Goods, Shipping Bill, Customs Act, Section 112(a), Confiscation, Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702298-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-toyota-financials-2320-crore-claim-against-blu-smart-over-150-undelivered-vehicles-554072</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:56:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Toyota Financial's ₹23.20 Crore Claim Against Blu-Smart Over 150 Undelivered Vehicles]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Blu-Smart Fleet Private Limited., NCLT Ahmedabad,Toyota Financial Services India Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680206-blu-smart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-extends-injunction-on-thunder-15000-beer-to-delhi-importer-supar-sip-traders-in-inbrew-trademark-suit-554071</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:45:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Extends 'THUNDER 15000' Beer Trademark Injunction To Importer Supar SIP Traders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Inbrew Beverages Private Limited, Kinjore Brewery, Justice Tejas Karia, CS COMM 491 2026, THUNDER 15000 Beer Trademark, Supar SIP Traders LLP, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment, Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Amendment, Injunction Extension Beer Trademark, Mittal Electronics v Sujata Home Appliances, Delhi Excise Department License, Downstream Beer Distributor Injunction, Ad Interim Injunction Extension, Trademark Infringement Beer Brand, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Section 151 CPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/18/694689-delhi-hc-thunderbolt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-penalty-can-be-waived-even-in-cases-of-misreporting-after-2026-amendment-bombay-high-court-554069</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:41:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty Can Be Waived Even In Cases Of Misreporting After 2026 Amendment: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty, Section 270AA, Finance Act 2026, Misreporting Of Income]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/ahmedabad-entities-agree-before-bombay-high-court-to-stop-using-7-drug-names-in-sun-pharma-suit-554068</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:31:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Ahmedabad Entities Agree Before Bombay High Court To Stop Using 7 Drug Names In Sun Pharma Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Nectar Life Care, Kashmik Formulations, Justice Madhav J Jamdar, Commercial IP Suit 28038 2025, HISTAC Trademark Infringement, OMESEC Trademark Suit, Consent Terms Decree Bombay HC, L HISTACT M Injunction, OMENEC Passing Off Suit, Class 5 Pharmaceutical Trademark India, SNIZACT Trademark Withdrawal, EZACT PREDMET LUMIA NEZACT Marks, Pharmaceutical Brand Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705703-bombay-hc-nectar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-admits-sharanam-infraproject-to-cirp-over-1035-crore-debt-rejects-restructuring-plea-554067</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:23:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits Sharanam Infraproject To CIRP Over ₹10.35 Crore Debt, Rejects Restructuring Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sharanam Infraproject and Trading Limited, CIRP, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705676-nclt-ahmedabad-sharanam-infraproject-and-trading-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-religious-significance-of-annapurna-does-not-bar-trademark-protection-554066</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:17:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Religious Significance Of 'Annapurna' Does Not Bar Trademark Protection: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Madras High Court, GEF Foods India, Annapurna Swadisht, Justice AD Maria Clete, ANNAPOORNA Trademark Suit, CS Comm Div 223 2026, Phonetic Identity Trademark Infringement, Section 29 2 Trade Marks Act, Allied and Cognate Food Goods, Order 39 Rule 4 CPC Vacate Application, Sree Annapoorna Foods Coimbatore, Class 30 Trademark Registration India, Goddess Annapurna Trademark Protection, Sathish Parasaran Senior Advocate, Arun C Mohan Advocate, NSE Listed Company Trademark Dispute, Commercial Origin Likelihood Confusion, Section 34 Prior User Defense, Trademark Opposition Proceedings Acquiescence, August 5 2026 Injunction Absolute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/01/703816-madras-hc-justice-a-d-maria-clete.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/conditional-arbitration-clause-requiring-fresh-consent-cannot-be-converted-into-unconditional-one-karnataka-high-court-554062</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:01:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Clause Requiring Fresh Mutual Consent Is Not Binding: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Agreement, Mutual Consent, Conditional Arbitration Clause, Appointment of Arbitrator, Section 7, Section 11(6), Contractual Interpretation, Party Autonomy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/21/668985-justice-h-t-narendra-prasad-karnataka-high-court-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/directors-cannot-be-held-liable-for-company-debt-merely-by-their-designation-delhi-high-court-554059</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:51:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Directors Cannot Be Held Liable For Company Debt Merely By Their Designation: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Corporate Debt, Personal Liability of Directors, Arbitration Agreement, Severability of Arbitral Awards, Venture Capital Assistance, Notice of Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703302-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-bharat-parashar-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-closed-morgan-securities-contempt-plea-against-bpl-limited-alleged-violation-asset-restraint-order-554054</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:01:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Closes Morgan Securities' Contempt Plea Against BPL Over Alleged Property Encumbrance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Morgan Securities and Credits, BPL Limited, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Asset Encumbrance, Asset Attachment, Share Capital Dilution, Restraint Order, Creation of Third-Party Interest, Justice Jayant Banerji, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705686-bpl-with-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-restrains-misuse-of-actor-vijay-deverakonda-personality-rights-orders-takedown-554052</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:51:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects Actor Vijay Deverakonda's Personality Rights Against AI Deepfakes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Vijay Sai Deverakonda, Justice Vikas Mahajan, CS COMM 1098 2026, Personality Rights AI Deepfake Injunction, Vijay Deverakonda John Doe Lawsuit, Swathi Sukumar Senior Advocate, Meta Google X Takedown Order, Rowdy Brand Passing Off Injunction, Arjun Reddy Character Personality Rights, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, MeitY DoT Website Blocking Directive, E Commerce Unauthorized Merchandise Takedown, Face Morphing Generative AI Injunction, Rowdy Wear RWDY Brand Dispute, Celebrity Publicity Rights Protection India, February 2026 Marriage Deepfake Case, Domain Name Registrar Lock Order, Intermediary Takedown 72 Hours, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/08/705127-delhi-hc-actor-vijay-devarkonda.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-allows-colgate-to-submit-six-renewed-trademark-certificates-in-suit-against-anchor-554051</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-10T14:47:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:46:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Allows Colgate To Submit Six Renewed Trademark Certificates In 1996 Suit Against Anchor]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Colgate Palmolive Company, Anchor Health and Beauty Care, Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, Chamber Summons 1085 2019, Commercial IP Suit 18 1996, Trademark Legal Proceedings Certificate, Renewed Trademark LPC Evidence, Section 31 Trade Marks Act 1999, Section 137 Trade Marks Act 1999, Ghia Full Bench Precedent, Reconstructed Trade Marks Registry Records, Evidence Act Marking Exhibits, Rashmin Khandekar Advocate, Dinesh Purandare Senior Advocate, Oral Evidence Court Commissioner, 30 Year Old Trademark Lawsuit, Probative Value vs Admissibility, Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC, Commercial Division]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705694-bombay-hc-colgate-palmolive-anchor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-admits-cirp-against-gujarat-toolroom-over-a-default-of-rs-2620-crore-554050</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:31:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits Insolvency Plea Against Gujarat Toolroom Over ₹26.20 Crore Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat Toolroom Limited, NCLT Ahmedabad, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705677-nclt-ahmedabad-gujarat-toolroom-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-grants-actor-amitabh-bachchan-time-to-finalise-settlement-in-personality-rights-suit-warns-he-must-appear-in-person-if-it-fails-554048</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-10T14:22:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T14:13:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs Amitabh Bachchan To Personally Appear If Settlement Fails In Personality Rights Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Amitabh Bachchan, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Personality Rights Lawsuit, CS COMM 819 2022, Amitabh Bachchan Personal Appearance Order, Rajat Nagi Defendant, Order X Rule 2 CPC, Order V Rule 3 CPC, Section 168 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, Ex Parte Injunction November 2022, Celebrity Publicity Rights India, Mediation Settlement Formalities, Dhruv Anand Advocate, Delhi HC Personal Presence Mandate, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Celebrity Image Rights Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705692-delhi-high-court-amitabh-bachchan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-approves-amalgamation-of-adani-electricity-mumbais-subsidiaries-into-it-554047</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:46:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Approves Merger Of Two Adani Electricity Mumbai Subsidiaries Into It]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Superheights Infraspace Private Limited, Pointleap Projects Private Limited, Adani Electricity Mumbai Limited, Merger, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705678-nclt-ahmedabad-adani-electricity-mumbai-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/calcutta-high-court-declines-to-hear-plea-alleging-torture-by-dri-official-says-matter-falls-under-revenue-bench-554046</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:40:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Declines To Hear Plea Alleging Torture By DRI Officials, Says Matter Falls Under Revenue Bench]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[roster, revenue matters, independent investigation, Section 108 of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705674-justice-krishna-rao-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/maharera-imposes-10-lakh-penalty-on-sai-enterprises-super-construction-for-failing-to-comply-with-flat-allotment-order-554044</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:23:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Maharashtra RERA Imposes ₹10 Lakh Penalty On Developers For Failing To Allot Flat]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MahaRERA, Flat Allotment, Sethia Imperial Avenue, Delayed Possession, Non-Compliance, Developer Penalty, Interest Recovery, Recovery Warrant]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529368-rera-maharashtra.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-cheque-issued-for-time-barred-debt-can-attract-liability-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-554042</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T13:10:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cheque For Time-Barred Debt Can Still Invite Prosecution If Dishonoured: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Cheque Bounce, Time-Barred Debt, Legally Enforceable Debt, Revival of Debt, Cheque Dishonour, Criminal Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/supplier-cannot-automatically-recover-gst-from-recipient-without-contractual-basis-kerala-high-court-554034</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T12:42:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supplier Cannot Automatically Recover GST From Recipient Without Contractual Basis: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Liability, tax burden, reimbursement, fees]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/01/677284-kerala-high-court-justice-raja-vijayaraghavan-justice-kv-jayakumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/kerala-high-court-quashes-gst-notice-issued-before-audit-findings-were-finalised-554030</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:59:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Quashes GST Notice Issued Before Audit Findings Were Finalised]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Audit, Show Cause Notice, Section 65 CGST Act, Rule 101(4), Natural Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/01/23/455152-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/banks-are-custodians-cannot-assume-coercive-powers-over-customers-transactions-delhi-high-court-554028</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:47:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Banks Are Custodians, Cannot Assume Coercive Powers Over Customers' Transactions: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, UCO Bank, Justice Jasmeet Singh, bank account freeze, RBI KYC Directions, Clause 54, suspicious transaction reports, customer due diligence, banking restrictions]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/12/07/508380-justice-jasmeet-singh-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-14-sarafesi-act-possession-order-cannot-be-enforced-immediately-45-days-stayed-if-borrower-intends-to-approach-drt-554024</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:33:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Possession Orders Must Be Kept On Hold For 45 Days If DRT Challenge Is Planned: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 14 SARFAESI Act, Section 17 SARFAESI Act, Debts Recovery Tribunal, DRT, Secured Creditors, Physical Possession, Borrower Rights, 45-Day Limitation Period, Grihum Housing Finance Limited, Justice G.R. Swaminathan, Justice M.D. Sumathi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703522-justice-gr-swaminathan-and-justice-md-sumathi-with-madurai-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/nclt-mumbai-suspends-one-court-due-to-vacancies-redistributes-pending-cases-554017</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T11:05:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Suspends One Court Due To Vacancies, Redistributes Pending Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, Mumbai Bench, Court No. VI, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Section 7 IBC, Section 9 IBC, Section 10 IBC, Section 95 IBC, transfer of pending matters]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705621-whatsapp-image-2026-10-10-at-102626.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/mere-pendency-of-ibc-proceedings-financial-distress-warrants-asset-protection-pending-arbitration-bombay-high-court-554005</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T10:19:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Pending Insolvency Proceedings, Financial Distress Can Warrant Asset Protection Pending Arbitration: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Ingram Micro India, Best Hawk Infosystems, insolvency proceedings, asset protection, Section 9 Arbitration Act, diminution of assets, ₹32.60 crore claim]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-09-2026-553989</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T03:16:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658697-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-8.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/service-tax-payable-on-actual-receipts-not-accruals-553960</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T18:42:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Service Tax On Construction Services Payable On Actual Receipts, Not Accruals: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax Liability, Receipt Basis, Accrual Basis, Commercial or Industrial Construction Service, Works Contract Service, Abatement, Re-quantification, Remand, Britannia Engineering Ltd.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702298-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-sphinx-worldbiz-from-using-shrm-pro-mark-in-trademark-suit-by-shrm-553956</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T18:20:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Sphinx Worldbiz From Using “SHRM PRO” Mark In Trademark Suit By SHRM]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Society for Human Resource Management, Sphinx Worldbiz Ltd, Justice Vikas Mahajan, SHRM Trademark Infringement, CS COMM 1073 2026, Ex Parte Injunction SHRM PRO, GoDaddy App Store Play Store Takedown, HRMS Software Trademark Lawsuit, SHRMpro Geo App Removal, Abandoned Trademark Application Section 135, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Blue and White Trade Dress Infringement, Cease and Desist Notice Non Compliance, Human Resource Management Software Dispute, Neeraj Bhardwaj Advocate, Class 42 Software Trademark Suit, Passing Off Injunction HR Platform, Intermediary Takedown Order App Store, Commercial Suit Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/12/655729-shrm-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/tds-borne-by-indian-company-on-payments-to-foreign-service-provider-not-liable-to-service-tax-cestat-bangalore-553955</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T18:15:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[TDS Paid By Indian Company For Foreign Service Provider Not Taxable As Service Value: CESTAT Bangalore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), Foreign Service Provider, Taxable Value, Technical Know-How, GTA Services, Advance Service Tax Adjustment, CENVAT Credit, Section 67 of Finance Act 1994.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702296-cestat-bangalore.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/sarkari-result-trademark-suit-allahabad-high-court-says-jurisdiction-objection-must-be-decided-before-plaint-amendment-553954</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T19:47:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T18:09:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Court Must Decide Jurisdiction Before 'Sarkari Result' Trademark Suit Amendment: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Allahabad High Court, M s I Think Apps Pvt Ltd, Anugya Gupta, Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, Sarkari Result Trademark Suit, Order VII Rule 10 CPC Return of Plaint, Order VII Rule 11 CPC Rejection of Plaint, Order VI Rule 17 CPC Amendment of Plaint, Commercial Courts Act 2015 Specified Value, Section 134 Trade Marks Act 1999, Commercial Court Varanasi Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction Coram Non Judice, Harshad Chiman Lal Modi Precedent, HSIL Ltd v Imperial Ceramic Precedent, Vivienda Luxury Homes LLP Precedent, sarkariexam com Domain Dispute, Article 227 Writ Petition Dismissed, 2026 AHC 210691 Judgment, Plaint Valuation Amendment Commercial Suit, Judicial Authority Subject Matter Jurisdiction India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705533-allahabad-hcjustice-rohit-ranjan-agarwal.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/karnataka-high-court-same-sex-partners-gift-tax-plea-centre-says-petitioners-should-challenge-marriage-laws-not-income-tax-act-553953</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T18:01:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Same-Sex Partners Must Challenge Marriage Laws, Not Income Tax Act For Gift Tax Exemption: Centre To Karnataka HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Same-Sex Couples, Karnataka High Court, Income Tax Act, Section 56(2)(x), Gift Tax Exemption, Spousal Status, Same-Sex Relationships, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Special Marriage Act, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, ASG K. Arvind Kamath, Dr. Dhruv Janssen Sanghvi, Anurag Kalia, Akhilesh Godi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705513-karnataka-high-court-lbbtq-flag-two-rings-income-tax-act.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-refuses-blanket-warranty-coverage-for-gensol-engineerings-tata-ev-fleet-directs-vehicle-wise-verification-553952</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T17:54:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Refuses Blanket Warranty Coverage For Gensol's Tata EV Fleet, Orders Vehicle-Wise Verification]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited, Gensol Engineering Limited, NCLT Ahmedabad,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705510-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-23653-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/karnataka-high-court-dismisses-bhels-appeal-against-110-cr-award-in-sterling-bio-energy-meter-reading-project-dispute-553946</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T17:41:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Refuses To Interfere With ₹1.10 Crore Arbitral Award Against BHEL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against ₹1.10 Crore Arbitral Award Against BHEL In Pilot Project Expense Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705505-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-155310.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-refuses-to-recall-order-excluding-property-eviction-delay-from-resolution-plan-timeline-553945</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T17:37:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Refuses To Recall Order Excluding Property Eviction Delay From Resolution Plan Timeline]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, SRA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652666-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-shareholder-meetings-in-gatil-properties-ganesh-housing-merger-dispenses-with-creditor-meetings-553944</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T17:32:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Directs Ganesh Housing To Convene Shareholders' Meeting For Merger With Gatil Properties]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gatil Properties Private Limited, Ganesh Housing Limited, Merger, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705480-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-21639-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/bombay-high-court-restrains-dune-collective-from-creating-third-party-ip-rights-in-film-snap-on-vvaa-films-plea-ahead-of-arbitration-553938</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T17:01:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Restrains DUNE From Creating Third-Party Rights In 'SNAP', Protects VVAA's 40% IP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, VVAA Films, DUNE Collective, Justice Amit Borkar, Film SNAP Co Production Dispute, Section 9 Arbitration Act Injunction, Section 14 d Specific Relief Act, Contract Determinability Test India, 30 Day Cure Notice Requirement, 36 Hour Termination Email Invalid, Rashmin Khandekar Advocate, Chirag Mody Senior Advocate, 40 Percent Joint IPR Film Copyright, KS Manjunath Supreme Court Precedent, MSRDC v Plus BKSP Toll Precedent, Zee Entertainment Assignment Fee Escrow, Feature Film Co Production Agreement, Arbitration Petition L 25744 2026, Interim Protection Joint Ownership Copyright, Film Production Vendor Invoice Default Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-restrains-chakr-innovation-from-using-pirated-solidworks-software-in-dassault-copyright-suit-553933</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T16:42:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Chakr Innovation From Using Unlicensed SolidWorks Software On 12 Computers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Delhi High Court, Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp, Chakr Innovation Private Limited, Justice Vikas Mahajan, CS COMM 1080 2026, Phone Home Technology Copyright, Exalead Portal Infringement Hits, Software End User Piracy Injunction, MAC Address Log Preservation Order, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Section 51 a i Copyright Act 1957, Section 40 International Copyright Order, CLOSA Software License Agreement, Pravin Anand Advocate, 3D CAD CAM Software Piracy, Order 39 Rule 3 CPC Compliance, Cleantech Firm Software Lawsuit, Ex Parte Ad Interim Order Delhi HC, Section 63B Copyright Act Computer Software, Software Piracy RAM Copying Infringement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666988-dassault-systemes-solidworks-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/companies-not-bound-by-original-rera-order-cannot-be-added-during-its-enforcement-tamil-nadu-reat-553931</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T16:30:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Companies Not Bound By Original RERA Order Cannot Be Added During Its Enforcement: Tamil Nadu REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA Execution Proceedings, Impleadment of Parties, Selene Estates Limited, Ozone Projects, Promoter Directors, Enforcement of RERA Orders, Apartment Owners Association, Execution Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/24/649236-reat-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-allows-real-time-blocking-of-new-f1-italian-grand-prix-piracy-websites-sought-by-fancode-553930</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T16:23:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T16:23:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Allows Real-Time Blocking Of New F1 Italian Grand Prix Piracy Websites Sought By FanCode]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Sporta Technologies, FanCode Live Sports Piracy, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Dynamic Plus Injunction Live Sports, CS COMM 989 2026, Broadcast Reproduction Rights Infringement, Formula 1 Pirelli Gran Premio Streaming, Cloudflare Pages Dev Rogue Domains, IncogNET Domain Lock Order, John Doe Anti Piracy Injunction, Real Time Website Blocking Order, UTV Software Rogue Website Test, Universal City Studios Dynamic Injunction, Star India Jiolive Precedent, Streamzy To Intermediary Balance, Department of Telecommunications Blocking Order, MeitY Intermediary Takedown, Internet Service Provider ISP Blocking, FANCODE Trademark Infringement Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705491-delhi-hc-f1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/interest-between-indian-branch-and-overseas-head-office-not-taxable-under-principle-of-mutuality-553925</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T16:15:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Interest Between Indian Branch And Overseas Head Office Not Taxable: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[American Express Bank, Head Office Interest, Overseas Branches, Section 14A Disallowance, NOSTRO Accounts, Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts, Revaluation Loss, Section 44C, Global System Charges, VRS Expenditure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/17/680569-american-express-bank-ltd-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/arbitral-tribunal-cannot-be-constituted-where-parties-never-agreed-to-arbitrate-madras-high-court-553919</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T15:33:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Requires Independent Decision-Maker And Parties' Consent To Be Bound: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, BGR Energy Systems, TANGEDCO, arbitration agreement, Section 11, Section 16, Arbitration Act, Clause 94]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705459-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-140340.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/service-tax-refund-cannot-be-claimed-without-challenging-self-assessment-cestat-rules-against-sodexo-india-553915</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T15:19:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tax Refund Cannot Be Claimed Without Challenging Or Modifying Self-Assessment: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai, Sodexo India, Service Tax Refund, Self-Assessment, Limitation Period, Unjust Enrichment, CBEC Clarification, Educational Institutions, Credit Notes, Section 11B.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702300-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bank-guarantee-can-be-encased-without-specifying-exact-recovery-amount-in-notice-delhi-high-court-553912</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T14:57:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bank Guarantee Invocation Valid Even Without Specifying Recoverable Amount: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bank Guarantee, Performance Bank Guarantee, Encashment, Arbitration, Contract Termination, Invocation Notice, Interim Injunction, Unconditional Bank Guarantee]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705488-justice-manoj-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/depositor-cant-be-impleaded-over-apprehension-of-recovery-being-affected-in-secured-creditors-writ-madras-high-court-553910</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T14:42:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Depositor's Apprehension Of Recovery Can't Justify Impleadment In Creditor's Writ: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Axis Bank, K. Karunanithi, depositor, secured creditor, TNPID Act, SARFAESI Act, impleadment, mortgaged properties]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705446-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-130939.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/patent-application-cannot-be-refused-on-a-ground-not-put-to-the-applicant-delhi-high-court-revives-glisten-gemstone-coating-plea-553899</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T14:21:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Glisten LLC's Patent Refusal, Says Grounds Must Be Notified Before Hearing]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Patent, Delhi High Court, Glisten LLC, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, CA COMM IPD PAT 21 2026, Section 117A Patents Act, Indian Patent Application 202017005875, Gemstone Coating Patent, Section 2 1 ja Inventive Step, Section 14 Hearing Notice Patents Act, Section 15 Patent Refusal, Audi Alteram Partem Patent Examination, Natural Justice Patent Controller, Perkinelmer Precedent, Phillip Morris Products Precedent, Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, Patent Application Revival Order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/06/598730-justice-purushaindra-kumar-kaurav.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/madras-high-court-constitutes-three-member-tribunal-to-adjudicate-lts-97-crore-rajkot-smart-city-project-dispute-553894</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T14:06:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Constitutes 3-Member Arbitral Tribunal In L&T's ₹74.36 Cr. Rajkot Smart City Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajkot Smart City, Larsen & Toubro, Radhe Krishna Infrastructure, arbitration, competing arbitration clauses, three-member tribunal, construction contract, Madras High Court Arbitration Centre]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703466-madras-high-court-with-chief-justice-sushrut-arvind-dharmadhikari.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-pil-seeking-probe-into-overseas-funds-flowing-into-indian-equities-adani-deals-553891</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T22:40:49+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T13:49:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Probe Into Overseas Funds Flowing Into Indian Equities, Adani Deals]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ketan Tirodkar, Offshore Entities, Adani Group, SEBI, Reserve Bank of India, Public Sector Bank Loans, Enforcement Directorate, Serious Fraud Investigation Office, CBI Investigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/02/703986-whatsapp-image-2026-10-02-at-115555.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-requests-ph-hc-to-expedite-hearing-radico-khaitans-challenge-to-injunction-in-kashmyr-trademark-dispute-553879</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T13:16:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Asks P&H HC To Expedite Radico Khaitan's Challenge To Injunction On 'The Spirit Of Kashmyr' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Piccadily Agro Industries, Radico Khaitan, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, CASHMIR Vodka, CASHMERE Trademark, Spirit of Kashmyr, Territorial Jurisdiction, Karnal Commercial Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/02/703986-whatsapp-image-2026-10-02-at-115555.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-sets-aside-order-allowing-chanda-kochhar-to-inspect-icici-bank-secretarial-portal-553875</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T13:19:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T12:49:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Sets Aside Order Allowing Chanda Kochhar Access To ICICI Bank's Internal Portal In Videocon Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ICICI Bank, Chanda Kochhar, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, SEBI, Videocon Group, Secretarial Portal, Conflict of Interest, Show Cause Notice, ICICI Bank-Videocon Case, Review Application, Third-Party Confidentiality, Access to Documents]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705419-sat-icici-bank-chanda-kocchar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-bars-fake-medical-videos-using-dr-devi-shettys-name-flags-public-health-risk-553873</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T12:39:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Bars Fake Medical Videos Using Dr Devi Shetty's Persona, Flags Public Health Risk]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Dr Devi Prasad Shetty, Narayana Hrudayalaya Ltd, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Personality Rights, Deepfake, Injunction, CS COMM 1053 2024, AI Deepfake Fake Medical Advice, Narayana Health Trademark Infringement, N 1 Device Mark Registration, Meta Platforms Defendant, Google LLC YouTube Intermediary, Order 8 Rule 10 CPC Decree, Type 2 Diabetes Fake Remedy Video, Hypertension Deepfake Video Takedown, Public Health Threat Fake Medical Advice, Anil Kapoor Personality Rights Precedent, Rajat Sharma Deepfake Precedent, John Doe Ashok Kumar Injunction, Ex Parte Commercial Decree Delhi, Section 29 Trade Marks Act Infringement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705401-delhi-hc-dr-devi-shetty.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-issues-notice-on-producer-amit-jani-plea-challenging-territorial-jurisdiction-in-salman-khan-kala-hiran-suit-553869</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T12:28:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Salman Khan's 'Kala Hiran' Suit: Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Producer Amit Jani's Jurisdiction Challenge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Salman Khan, Amit Jani, Kala Hiran movie, Delhi High Court, Justice Tejas Karia, personality rights suit, Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, territorial jurisdiction, return of plaint, Sameer Wankhede judgment, Twitter handle dissemination, movie release injunction, Justice Jyoti Singh, film title dispute, celebrity personality rights, social media jurisdiction, civil procedure code, December 16 hearing, film producer Amit Jani]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/06/684542-salman-khan-delhi-hc-kala-hiran-movie.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/sra-must-allow-set-off-of-operational-creditors-entire-claim-in-arbitration-after-9928-haircut-supreme-court-553867</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T12:17:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Allows Creditor Who Suffered 99.28% Haircut In CIRP To Claim Full Set-Off In Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CIRP, Operational Creditor, Successful Resolution Applicant, 99.28% Haircut, Clean Slate Principle, Set-Off, Arbitration, Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-seeks-project-wise-completion-timelines-for-16-supertech-housing-projects-553861</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T11:57:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Seeks Project-Wise Completion Timelines For 16 Supertech Housing Projects]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Supertech Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/05/01/360469-supertech.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-on-birla-sun-life-insurances-plea-against-service-tax-on-life-insurance-charges-553855</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T11:38:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On Birla Sun Life Insurance's Plea Against Service Tax On Life Insurance Charges]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Birla Sun Life Insurance, CESTAT Mumbai, Service Tax, Surrender Charges, Discontinuation Charges, Foreclosure Charges, Reinstatement Charges, Finance Act 1994]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705379-whatsapp-image-2026-10-09-at-102500.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/companies-must-clear-the-way-before-launching-processes-that-may-infringe-patents-calcutta-high-court-553851</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T14:35:34+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T11:31:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Companies Must Clear The Way Before Launching Processes That May Infringe Patents: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Patent, Calcutta High Court, NOCIL Ltd, Finorchem Ltd, Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur, GA COM 1 2024, IP COM 25 2024, 4 ADPA Patent Infringement, Chemical Process Patent India, Section 104A Patents Act, Non Disclosure Agreement Breach, Trade Secrets Misappropriation, Pith and Marrow Test Patent, Indian Patent 341922, Indian Patent 366559, Indian Patent 389262, Clear The Way Patent Doctrine, Environmental Impact Risk Assessment Report, Interim Injunction Chemical Patent, Ex Employee NDA Violation, Rubber Chemical Antioxidant Patent]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699635-justice-ravi-krishan-kapur-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-gulpy-orange-maker-from-using-redesigned-bottle-similar-to-coca-cola-minute-maid-pulpy-orange-bottle-553840</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T11:00:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains 'Gulpy Orange' Maker From Using Bottle Similar To Coca-Cola's 'Pulpy Orange']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Coca Cola Company, Chhabee Nutricos Industries, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Minute Maid Pulpy Orange, Gulpy Orange Drink, Bottle Shape Trade Dress Infringement, Deceptively Similar Bottle Design, Registered Bottle Device Injunction, Intellectual Property Litigation India, Trademark and Trade Dress Lawsuit, Interim Injunction, Beverage Packaging Infringement, Disobedience Application September 2026, Trademark Passing Off Suit, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Distinctive Bottle Device Registration, Side By Side Comparison Test, Beverage Brand Protection India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705376-minute-maid-and-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-sets-aside-bombay-stock-exchange-fine-calcom-vision-limited-missing-pages-report-chartered-accountant-553836</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T10:52:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T10:51:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Sets Aside ₹35,400 BSE Fine On Calcom Vision Over Missing Audit Report Pages]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SAT, Calcom Vision Limited, BSE Fine, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SEBI LODR Regulations, Regulation 33, Limited Review Report, Bona Fide Inadvertence, Financial Results Filing, Chartered Accountant UDIN]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652545-sat-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-orders-suspension-of-over-120-jio-lottery-websites-in-reliance-industries-trademark-suit-553832</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T10:42:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Suspension Of Over 120 "JIO LOTTERY" Websites In Reliance Industries' Trademark Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Reliance Industries Limited, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, JIO Trademark Infringement, JIO Lottery Rogue Websites, JIO Lottery Game Injunction, Domain Registrar Suspension Order, jiolotteryi com Takedown, wwwjiokbcindia blogspot com Removal, Rogue Website Test India, Deceptive Similarity JIO Mark, Ad Interim Injunction Delhi HC, November 30 2026 Hearing, Joint Registrar December 10 2026, Trademark Dilution Gaming Sites, Reliance JIO Litigation, Cyber Fraud Lottery Sites India, Online Gaming Trademark Dispute, Intermediary Blogger Takedown, Intellectual Property Rights Protection India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705367-jio-lottery-and-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-directs-registration-first-information-report-on-materials-forwarded-by-enforcement-directorate-emrl-exalogic-case-553828</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-09T15:16:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T10:32:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Orders FIR Against Pinarayi Vijayan, Daughter In CMRL-Exalogic Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, CMRL-Exalogic Case, Pinarayi Vijayan, Veena Vijayan, Mohammed Riyas, Enforcement Directorate, ED, FIR Registration, Prevention of Corruption Act, K.M. Shajahan, Exalogic Solutions, Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited, Preliminary Enquiry, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705391-kerala-hc-pinarayi-vijayan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-creditors-claim-after-resolution-plan-approval-despite-civil-court-decree-553808</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T09:53:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Creditor's Claim After Resolution Plan Approval Despite Civil Court Decree]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Creditor ,Resolution Plan, Approval ,CIRP, NCLT Ahmedabad,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655535-nclt-ahmedabad-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/company-can-enter-cirp-despite-winding-up-order-if-no-irreversible-steps-taken-nclt-delhi-553800</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-09T09:39:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Company Can Enter CIRP Despite Winding-Up Order If No Irreversible Steps Taken: NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Winding-Up Proceedings ,CIRP ,NCLT New Delhi,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/12/03/367450-nclt-01.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-08-2026-553793</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-08T23:58:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 08, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up,LiveLawBiz: Business Law Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658700-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/57th-gst-council-meeting-recommends-removal-gst-arrest-offence-other-reforms-553781</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-08T20:50:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-08T20:49:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Council Recommends Dropping Arrest Powers, Raising Prosecution Threshold To ₹5 Crore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[57th GST Council Meeting, GST, GST Council Meeting, GST arrest powers, GST offence reform, Section 69 CGST Act, GST reforms, GST compliance, GST Council recommendations, GST tax reforms, GST law changes, GST administration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/gst-4.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/commercial-courts-can-order-interim-security-if-defendant-prima-facie-loses-commercial-credibility-calcutta-high-court-553768</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-08T19:58:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Court Can Secure Claim At Interm Stage If Party's Commercial Credibility Is In Doubt: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Justice Aniruddha Roy, Pulak Modi, Jitendra Agarwal, Commercial Courts Act, Section 151 CPC, Interim Security, Share Sale Contract, Steel Plant]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/647305-justice-aniruddha-roy-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-gives-income-tax-dept-final-chance-to-credit-365-crore-advance-tax-to-92-year-old-assessee-553761</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-08T19:39:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Gives Income Tax Dept Final Chance To Credit ₹3.65 Crore Advance Tax To 92-Year-Old Assessee]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax Department, advance tax, ₹3.65 crore, 92-year-old assessee, tax credit, income tax, capital gains tax, AY 2016-17, AY 2018-19, Subramonium Prasad, Renu Bhatnagar, tax dispute, interest on tax amount]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/15/412177-390552-delhi-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/gta-service-tax-cannot-be-demanded-from-transporter-if-recipient-paid-under-rcm-cestat-kolkata-553759</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-08T19:32:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GTA Service Tax Cannot Be Demanded From Transporter If Recipient Paid Under RCM: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Goods Transport Agency, Notification No. 30/2012-ST, Reverse Charge, Service Tax, Freight, Income Tax Return, Extended Limitation, Section 78 Penalty, Section 77 Penalty, Pre-Show Cause Consultation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654281-cestat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
