<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/tehsildars-possession-letter-cannot-be-treated-as-sarfaesi-measure-for-computing-limitation-drt-chandigarh-537403</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T16:27:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T16:22:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tehsildar's Possession Letter Cannot Be Treated As SARFAESI 'Measure' For Computing Limitation: DRT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRT Chandigarh. SARFAESI Act, Limitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410181-debt-recovery-tribunal-drt.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-chennai-ocean-freight-mark-up-earned-by-freight-forwarder-not-liable-to-service-tax-537401</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:56:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mark-Up On Ocean Freight Cannot Be Taxed Merely Because It Exceeds Actual Freight Paid: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ocean Freight, Freight Forwarder, Freight Mark-Up, Steamer Agent Service, Service Tax Demand, Freight Charges, Taxable Value, Valuation, Finance Act 1994, CESTAT Chennai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678997-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-133654.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/service-tax-not-payable-on-one-time-water-infrastructure-charges-collected-by-sipcot-from-industrial-allottees-cestat-chennai-537400</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T16:05:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:55:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SIPCOT Water Infrastructure Charges Exempt From Service Tax Under Section 104: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax exemption, SIPCOT, water supply infrastructure charges, water capital cost, one-time upfront amount, Section 104 Finance Act, industrial development corporation, long-term lease of industrial plots, support services, service tax demand, CESTAT Chennai, industrial allottee, water infrastructure cost, taxability of upfront charges, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679066-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-134457.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/taxpayer-entitled-to-seek-gst-registration-revival-by-filing-pending-returns-paying-dues-537394</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:35:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Registration Can Be Restored On Filing Pending Returns, Clearing Dues Under Rule 22(4): Gauhati HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[non-filing of returns, restoration of registration, furnishing pending returns, Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules 2017, cancellation of GST registration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678984-justice-kardak-ete.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-consolidated-remuneration-disclosures-amc-employees-537391</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T15:34:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:32:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Consolidated Pay Disclosures For Mutual Fund AMCs, Flags Privacy Concerns]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Asset Management Companies, AMC, Executive Remuneration, Remuneration Disclosure Framework, Consolidated Remuneration Disclosure, Fund Manager Remuneration, Mutual Funds, Association of Mutual Funds in India, AMFI, Investor Protection, Transparency, Employee Privacy, Unitholders, Consultation Paper, Public Comments, Disclosure Norms, AMC Employees, Scheme-Level Disclosure, Mutual Fund Regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/low-income-of-share-applicants-alone-cannot-justify-addition-under-section-68-itat-delhi-537384</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:18:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 68 Addition Unsustainable Where Identity and Creditworthiness Are Proven: ITAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income , Share Applicant, ITAT Delhi,ITAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-lift-injunction-against-ks-agros-rice-packaging-over-similarity-to-zarda-king-537383</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:17:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Lift Injunction Against KS Agro's Rice Packaging Over Similarity To Zarda King]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GRM Foodkraft, Zarda King, Zarda Special, Basmati Rice, Trade Dress Infringement, Passing Off, Justice Jyoti Singh, KS Agro Impex, Double Chabi, Deceptive Similarity, Golden Sella Rice, Initial Interest Confusion, FMCG IP Litigation, Packaging Imitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679022-zarda-king-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-customs-cannot-classify-imported-dolomite-blocks-as-marble-by-relying-on-test-reports-of-other-importers-537382</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:14:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Cannot Reclassify Dolomite as Marble Based on Other Importers' Test Reports: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Classification, Rough Dolomite Blocks, Rough Marble Blocks, Customs Tariff Act, CTH 2518 1000, CTH 2515 1210, DRI Investigation, Chemical Test Report, Laboratory Report, Misclassification, Differential Duty Demand, Confiscation, Customs Penalty, Burden of Proof, Classification Dispute, Import of Stones, Dolomite Imports, Marble Imports, Customs Duty Exemption, Evidence in Classification Cases]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652517-cestat-01-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/drt-mumbai-dismisses-borrowers-review-plea-seeking-to-reopen-issues-already-decided-537381</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:57:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DRT Mumbai Dismisses Borrower's Review Plea Seeking To Reopen Issues Already Decided.]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRT Mumbai, Mercury Apparel Ltd, Union Bank of India, Review Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410181-debt-recovery-tribunal-drt.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/high-court-cannot-order-recall-of-order-appointing-arbitrator-remedy-under-inherent-powers-allahabad-high-court-537378</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:39:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 11 Arbitration Orders Not Reviewable, Article 215 Powers Limited: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[High Court,Arbitrator, Remedy , Inherent Powers ,Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/27/658762-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-high-court-orders-no-coercive-action-against-anil-ambani-pending-challenge-to-black-money-act-537377</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T14:40:23+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:35:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders No Coercive Action Against Anil Ambani Pending Challenge To Black Money Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Anil Ambani, Black Money Act, Constitutional Challenge, Interim Protection, Prosecution Stay, Penalty Proceedings, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679010-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-141325.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/composite-gst-show-cause-notice-covering-more-than-one-assessment-year-is-legally-unsustainable-and-cannot-form-the-basis-of-adjudication-537373</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:04:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Quashes GST Notice Issued For Multiple Assessment Years Through Single Proceeding]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[consolidated notice for multiple assessment years, assessment years, composite notices]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/01/23/455152-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-holds-four-odisha-truck-associations-liable-price-fixing-restricting-market-access-537371</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T13:58:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Finds Four Odisha Truck Associations Guilty Of Cartelisation, Orders Cease-And-Desist]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Indian Steel Association, Odisha Truck Owners' Associations, Cartelisation, Freight Rate Fixation, Price Fixing, Mineral Transportation, Anti-Competitive Conduct, Independent Transporters, Market Access Restriction, Transportation Services, State Transport Authority, STA, Odisha Mining Sector, Section 3(1) Competition Act, Section 3(3)(a) Competition Act, Section 3(3)(b) Competition Act, Section 48 Competition Act, Cease and Desist Order, Office Bearers Liability, Competition Law, Freight Charges, Truck Associations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/17/656504-cci-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/patent-illegality-ground-unavailable-to-challenge-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitrations-bombay-hc-537363</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T12:52:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Patent Illegality Ground Unavailable To Challenge Awards In International Commercial Arbitrations: Bombay HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[International Commercial Arbitration, ONGC, Sapura Fabrication, Patent Illegality, Mumbai High South Field, Additional Works, Offshore Contract, Section 34 Challenge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/03/671422-750x450654895-justice-sandeep-marne-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-restrains-use-of-ai-cloned-voice-of-ayurvedic-guru-acharya-manish-in-personality-rights-suit-537361</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T12:31:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Relief To Acharya Manish Against AI-Generated Fake Endorsements]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Acharya Manish, Manish Grover, Personality Rights, Publicity Rights, AI Voice Cloning, Deepfakes, John Doe, Meta Platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Ayurveda, Jeena Sikho Lifecare, Justice Saurabh Banerjee, Integrated Healthcare]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678959-manish-grover-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/mere-criminal-overtones-or-claimed-public-overtones-do-not-make-dispute-non-arbitrable-bombay-high-court-537358</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T11:55:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere 'Criminal Overtones' Or Claimed 'Public Overtones' Do Not Make Dispute Non-Arbitrable: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 8, Share Subscription-cum-Shareholders Agreement, Film Production Company, Fraud Allegations, Arbitrability, Forgery, Shareholder Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/610214-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-awards-against-guarantors-despite-ibc-moratorium-on-debt-537355</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T11:37:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Awards Against Guarantors Despite IBC Moratorium On Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Abhyudaya Co operative Bank, IBC Moratorium, Guarantor Liability, Arbitration Award Set Aside, Cross Examination Rights, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Nirmangold Group]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/678946-sharmila-deshmukh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-holds-difc-penal-notice-and-certificate-satisfy-cpc-requirement-for-foreign-decree-execution-537347</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T09:42:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Holds DIFC Penal Notice And Certificate Satisfy CPC Requirement For Foreign Decree Execution]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Fimbank P.L.C., DIFC Court Judgment, Foreign Decree Execution, Section 44A CPC, Bhatia Traders Co. LLC, Bombay High Court, Dubai Decree]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/09/26/494761-justice-abhay-ahuja-and-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-june-09-2026-537343</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T09:19:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: June 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658696-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-7.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/more/kerala-high-court-complainant-who-admitted-father-advanced-loan-cannot-claim-ni-act-presumptions-without-his-evidence-537332</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T21:12:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T21:11:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Evidence Of Person Without Direct Knowledge Insufficient In Cheque Bounce Case: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Cheque Dishonour, Cheque Bounce Case, Sections 118 and 139 NI Act, Statutory Presumptions, Presumption of Consideration, Acquittal, Direct Knowledge of Transaction, Proof of Loan Transaction, Burden of Proof, Execution of Cheque, Passing of Consideration, Complainant, Father Advanced Loan, Competent Witness, Evidence, Witness Examination, Documentary Evidence, Dishonoured Cheque, Cheque Bounce Prosecution, Underlying Transaction, NI Act Presumptions, Failure to Prove Transaction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-sanlam-emerging-markets-acquisition-shriram-life-insurance-537325</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T19:57:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Proposed Acquisition Of 2.8% Stake In Shriram Life Insurance By Sanlam Emerging Markets]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, Combination Approval, Merger Control, Sanlam Emerging Markets (Mauritius) Ltd, SEMM, Shriram Life Insurance Company Limited, SLIC, Sanlam Group, Shriram Group, Share Acquisition, Preferential Issue, Equity Capital, Stake Acquisition, Life Insurance Sector, Insurance Industry, IRDAI, South Africa, Mauritius Entity, Foreign Investment, Corporate Transactions, Mergers and Acquisitions, Competition Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670609-cci.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/calcutta-high-court-tenant-cannot-claim-rights-under-lease-created-after-sarfaesi-proceedings-commenced-537324</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T08:40:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T19:33:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Holds No Title Passed Under Tenancy Created After SARFAESI Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 13(2) SARFAESI Act, Section 13(13) SARFAESI Act, Section 17 SARFAESI Act, Section 34 SARFAESI Act, Tenancy Agreement, Lease After SARFAESI Notice, Secured Creditor, Auction Purchaser, E-Auction Sale, Sale Certificate, Registered Sale Deed, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Civil Court Jurisdiction, Bar of Civil Suit, Interim Injunction, Status Quo Order, Possession, Non-Performing Asset, NPA, Boon Realtors Pvt Ltd, Julien Educational Trust, Secured Asset, Recovery Proceedings, Injunction Application, Property Dispute, Tenancy Rights, SARFAESI Auction, Jurisdictional Bar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678929-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-082529.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-delhi-quashes-antriksh-group-assessments-over-mechanical-search-assessment-approval-537321</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:41:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Quashes Antriksh Group Assessments Over Mechanical Search Assessment Approval]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Common Approval ,Application Of Mind ,Search Assessment,ITAT Delhi,ITAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-hc-denies-anticipatory-bail-to-eee-md-in-931-crore-bescom-payment-diversion-case-537320</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T18:25:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:24:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To EEE MD In ₹9.31 Crore BESCOM Payment Diversion Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Anticipatory Bail, Economic Fraud, Escrow Account, BESCOM, Forged Purchase Order, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678868-750x450652670-delhi-high-court-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/more/former-tihar-jailer-sues-over-defamation-in-black-warrant-book-delhi-high-court-issues-notice-537319</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:15:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Issues Summons In Former Tihar Jail Officer's Defamation Suit Against 'Black Warrant' Authors]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, L.P. Nirmal, Sunil Gupta, Black Warrant, Tihar Jail, Defamation Suit, Permanent Injunction, Mandatory Injunction, Rendition of Accounts, Tihar Jail No. 4, Deputy Superintendent, Justice Subramonium Prasad, Audible, Lallantop, Tihar Jailer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678875-black-warrant-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/promoters-cannot-evade-rera-mofa-obligations-by-terming-flat-payments-interest-free-deposits-maharashtra-rera-537318</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:04:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Promoters Cannot Evade RERA, MOFA Obligations By Terming Flat Payments 'Interest-Free Deposits': Maharashtra RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MahaRERA, allottee status, interest-free deposit, delayed possession, successor promoter liability, agreement for sale, Section 18 RERA, MOFA, homebuyer rights, promoter-allottee relationship, joint and several liability, Godrej Avenue Eleven, execution of sale agreement, deficiency in service, real estate regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529368-rera-maharashtra.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-orders-removal-of-fake-indiamart-websites-blocks-whatsapp-accounts-537315</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T17:42:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Removal Of Fake IndiaMart Websites, Blocks WhatsApp Accounts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, IndiaMart, Ashok Kumar, John Doe, Phishing Scam, Trademark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Website Cloning, Vercel, Netlify, GitHub, WhatsApp, Justice Jyoti Singh, OTP Interception, B2B Marketplace]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/18/674685-indiamart-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-section-18-pre-deposit-mandatory-appeals-against-rejection-of-delay-condonation-application-537314</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T17:33:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rules Section 18 SARFAESI Pre-Deposit Mandatory, Bars Complete Waiver By DRAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 18 SARFAESI Act, Mandatory Pre-Deposit, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, DRAT, Debts Recovery Tribunal, DRT, Delay Condonation, Limitation, Borrower, Secured Creditor, HDFC Bank, Auction Purchaser, Aloukik Construwell LLP, Auction Sale, Sale Certificate, Secured Asset, Securitisation Application, Pre-Deposit Waiver, Complete Waiver Impermissible, Per Incuriam, Gadekar Ginning and Pressing Pvt Ltd v. Canara Bank, Narayan Chandra Ghosh v. UCO Bank, Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Vinay Container Services Pvt Ltd v. Axis Bank, Status Quo Order, Interim Relief, Recovery Proceedings, Non-Performing Asset, NPA, E-Auction, Debt Recovery]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/31/652963-justice-manish-pitale-and-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-konaflex-from-using-mark-deceptively-similar-to-pvc-pipe-maker-koanaflex-537313</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T17:31:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Finds 'Konaflex' Deceptively Similar To 'Koanaflex', Grants Injunction To PVC Pipe Maker]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Modern Pipe Industries, Raj Kumar Maurya, KOANAFLEX, KONAFLEX, Trademark Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Water Storage Tanks, Prior User, Deceptive Similarity, Territorial Jurisdiction, Interactive Website, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, Artistic Work]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678813-koanaflex-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-hc-reiterates-reasoned-and-plausible-tribunal-findings-cannot-be-revisited-under-section-34-upholds-award-in-paharpursiemens-dispute-537310</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T17:17:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Upholds Award In Paharpur–Siemens Dispute, Reaffirms Limited Scope Of Section 34]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 34, Siemens Ltd., Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd., risk-purchase claims, liquidated damages, bank guarantees, Advance Payment Bank Guarantee, Performance Bank Guarantee, patent illegality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/610214-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-orders-takedown-of-social-media-posts-alleging-amul-supplies-cow-meat-537308</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T17:03:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of Social Media Posts Alleging Amul Supplies Cow Meat]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Amul, GCMMF, Kaira District Cooperative, Trademark Infringement, Disparagement, Cow Meat, Phishing, Social Media, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, X, Justice Jyoti Singh, Ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Beef]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678857-amul-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-hc-denies-lilavati-trust-interim-relief-in-1000-crore-defamation-case-against-hdfc-bank-ceo-537306</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T17:11:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T16:25:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Denies Lilavati Trust Interim Relief in ₹1000 Crore Defamation Case Against HDFC Bank, CEO]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Lilavati Trust, HDFC Bank, Prashant Mehta, Rs 1,000-Crore Defamation Suit, Sashidhar Jagdishan, Free Speech, Interim Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678849-bombay-hc-hdfcjpg.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/drat-kolkata-officers-retirement-recovery-department-relocation-internal-lapses-not-sufficient-cause-to-condone-delay-us-5-of-limitation-act-537299</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:53:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DRAT Kolkata Holds Administrative Lapses Not 'Sufficient Cause', Dismisses Karur Vysya Bank Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRAT Kolkata, Karur Vysya Bank Limited, Condonation of Delay]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678834-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-32825-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/refund-of-service-tax-paid-on-input-services-used-for-export-of-services-cannot-be-denied-merely-because-cenvat-credit-was-initially-availed-and-later-reversed-or-due-to-procedural-lapses-such-as-delayed-filing-of-declarations-537297</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T15:42:06+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:40:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Allows SPI Technologies' ₹2.47 Crore Refund On Export Services Despite CENVAT Reversal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Exported services, IT-enabled services, audit reports, refund claims, Notification No. 12/2005-ST]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678838-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-154036.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/works-contract-services-provided-for-the-construction-of-educational-institutions-were-not-liable-to-service-tax-during-the-relevant-period-prior-to-1-july-2012-537296</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:35:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Construction of Educational Institutions Not Taxable Before 1 July 2012: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Periyar Maniammai University, Periyar Teacher Training Institute, Deemed University, Government educational institution, CBEC Circular No. 80/10/2004-ST]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654282-cestat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/chandigarh-airport-taxi-licence-not-exclusive-cci-closes-complaint-against-nanuan-travels-operator-537295</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:34:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Chandigarh Airport Taxi Licence Not Exclusive, CCI Closes Complaint Against Nanuan Travels Operator]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI ,Nanuan Travels,Shaheed Bhagat Singh International Airport, Chandigarh International Airport Limited (CHIAL)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678833-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-32347-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-dismisses-personal-guarantor-plea-nclt-delhi-insolvency-proceedings-want-of-jurisdiction-537294</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:32:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Dismisses Writ Against NCLT New Delhi Insolvency Proceedings, Cites No Jurisdiction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Personal Guarantor, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, IBC, Section 95 IBC, Section 60 IBC, National Company Law Tribunal, NCLT New Delhi, Territorial Jurisdiction, Article 226(2) Constitution of India, Writ Petition, Cause of Action, Personal Insolvency Proceedings, Dhanlaxmi Bank, Real Video Impact Pvt Ltd, Corporate Debtor, Registered Office, Insolvency Resolution Process, Maintainability of Writ Petition, Alternative Remedy, Jurisdiction under IBC, Personal Guarantor Insolvency]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-permits-sale-of-40-crore-elito-battery-inventory-partly-modifies-exide-trade-dress-injunction-537290</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:17:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Permits Sale Of ₹40 Crore ELITO Battery Inventory, Partly Modifies Exide Trade Dress Injunction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Exide Industries, Amara Raja Energy & Mobility, ELITO Batteries, Trade Dress Passing Off, Calcutta High Court Injunction, Red Colour Packaging, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678822-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-140030.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-hc-refers-tata-capitals-36-crore-recovery-dispute-to-arbitration-says-valid-arbitration-clause-cannot-be-defeated-by-procedural-technicalities-537289</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:08:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Refers Tata Capital's ₹36.10 Crore Loan Dispute With Priyanka Communications To Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration agreement, Section 8 Arbitration Act, Section 5 Arbitration Act, loan recovery dispute, Working Capital Demand Loan Agreement, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, commercial summary suit, arbitral reference]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/09/26/494761-justice-abhay-ahuja-and-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/cbdt-remands-retrospective-trust-registration-owing-to-extension-circular-by-cbdt-537288</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:07:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala HC Directs CIT To Reconsider Registration Of Trust From 2021, Examines CBDT Circular 7/2024]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala HC, Income Tax, CBDT Circular, Wrong Section Code in Trust Application, Trust Application, CBDT circular wrong section code, Kerala High Court trust case, trust application remand, income tax exemption trust, wrong section code filing, CBDT circular interpretation, charitable trust tax relief, Kerala HC tax ruling, trust registration dispute, income tax litigation India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/02/677491-justice-devan-ramachandran-and-justice-basant-balaji.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/itc-distribution-without-isd-registration-kerala-hc-quashes-gst-demand-537287</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T15:05:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala HC Holds ISD Optional Before 2024 Amendment; Quashes ₹1.31 Cr. GST Demand Against Intertek]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, GST, ISD registration GST, ITC distribution without ISD, Kerala High Court GST, GST demand quashed, input tax credit distribution, pre 2024 GST compliance, ISD mechanism GST, Kerala HC tax ruling, GST litigation India, input service distributor dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/11/09/443392-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-notice-uploaded-only-on-portal-after-cancellation-of-registration-invalid-uttarakhand-high-court-quashes-demand-order-537286</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T13:34:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T14:58:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Uttarakhand HC Quashes GST Demand, Says Portal-Only Service Invalid After Registration Cancellation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Notice, GST Portal, Section 169 CGST Act, Section 75(4) CGST Act, Natural Justice, Personal Hearing, GST Registration Cancellation, Adjudication Order, Service of Notice, Indirect Tax, Uttarakhand High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/uttarakhand-hc-1.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-defective-appeals-cannot-be-filed-to-circumvent-ibc-timelines-right-to-appeal-ends-once-scr-re-filing-period-lapses-537284</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T14:43:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Can Litigants Circumvent IBC Limitation By Filing Defective Appeals? Supreme Court's Answer Is A Resounding 'No']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Section 62 Appeal, Supreme Court Rules, Re-Filing Delay, Limitation Period, Defective Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655258-supreme-court-sc-llbiz2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-allows-cenvat-credit-on-returned-goods-even-if-re-manufactured-machine-sold-to-different-customer-537282</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T14:37:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rule 16 Does Not Require Return Of Remade Goods To Original Buyer To Avail CENVAT Credit: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Grafica Flextronica, CESTAT Mumbai, Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules 2002, returned goods, CENVAT credit, remanufactured machine, reconditioned goods, excise duty, credit on returned goods, clearance to different customer, CBEC Circular dated 21.06.2001, inadmissible credit, refund of duty, show cause notice, Commissioner Appeals, manufacture, scrap clearance, excise litigation, indirect tax, GST & Central Excise.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/bengaluru-court-dismisses-us-based-pathways-foundation-rs-2-crore-copyright-suit-against-indian-app-developer-537281</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T14:27:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bengaluru Court Dismisses US Non-Profit Pathways Foundation's ₹2 Crore Copyright Suit Against App Developer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bengaluru Commercial Court, Pathways Foundation, Arpit Roy, Copyright Infringement, Baby Milestones App, Punitive Damages, YouTube URLs, App Store, Voluntary Takedown, Pediatric Development, Digital Piracy, Commercial Dispute, Section 63 BSA, Literary Modules, Arjun S. Mallur]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678797-pathways-bengaluru-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/commercial-court-did-not-have-jurisdiction-to-decide-section-34-proceedings-arising-from-land-acquisition-proceedings-chhattisgarh-high-court-537274</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T14:06:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Court Cannot Hear Challenge To Railways Land Acquisition Award: Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Commercial Court ,Jurisdiction , Land Acquisition Proceedings , Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/02/12/370173-chattisgarh-hc.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-chandigarh-issues-notice-to-gridlogic-games-private-limited-on-a-sec-9-application-by-phonepe-537272</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T13:38:53+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T13:37:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh Issues Notice To Gridlogic Games On PhonePe's ₹3.93 Crore Insolvency Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, Gridlogic Games Private Limited, PhonePe Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678796-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-11604-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-hc-makes-absolute-injunction-against-utsaha-tea-finds-packaging-prima-facie-copy-of-umang-label-537270</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T13:24:16+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T13:18:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Makes Absolute Injunction Against 'Utsaha' Tea, Finds Packaging Prima Facie Copy Of 'Umang' Label]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Anil Srichand Kundnani, UMANG Tea, UTSAHA, Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Trade Dress, Artistic Work, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh, Deceptive Similarity, Elaichi Tea, Section 45 Copyright Act, Bhagyalaxmi Tea Centre, Commercial IP Suit, Label Mark]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678798-umang-tea-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-declines-to-interfere-with-sat-order-exonerating-biocon-vp-in-insider-trading-case-537269</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T13:00:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With SAT Order Clearing Biocon VP Of Insider Trading Charge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Shreehas P. Tambe, Biocon-Sandoz Collaboration, Insider Trading, UPSI (Unpublished Price Sensitive Information), Securities Appellate Tribunal, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678785-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-115123.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-hc-grants-relief-to-adtrack-says-housing-federation-tried-to-wriggle-outof-hoarding-deal-537265</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T12:43:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Grants Relief To Adtrack, Says Housing Federation Tried To 'Wriggle Out' Of Hoarding Deal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Adtrack Media LLP, Happy Valley Homes CHS Federation Ltd., digital advertisement hoarding, interim relief, Section 9 petition, arbitration agreement, Secretary's authority, afterthought defence, No Objection Certificates (NOCs), indoor management doctrine, hoarding location dispute, contractual obligations, cooperative housing society, Bombay High Court, arbitration proceedings.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/03/671422-750x450654895-justice-sandeep-marne-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-flipkart-insolvency-plea-alleged-marketing-service-dues-537264</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T12:22:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Flipkart Faces Fresh Insolvency Plea Before NCLT Bengaluru Over ₹1.69 Crore Marketing Services Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd, Applabs Media Pvt Ltd, Section 9 IBC, Insolvency Application, Operational Creditor, Operational Debt, Marketing Agreement, Cost Per Transaction Campaigns, Unpaid Invoices, ₹1.69 Crore Claim, Section 8 Demand Notice, Pre-Existing Dispute, Admission of Debt, Reconciliation Statement, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Corporate Debtor, Digital Marketing Services, Debt Recovery Dispute, Notice Issued, NCLT Notice, Netambit Value First Services Pvt Ltd, E-commerce Sector, Insolvency Proceedings, Invoice Dispute, Marketing Services Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678775-nclt-bengaluru-flipkart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/us-court-says-trumps-100000-h-1b-levy-was-a-tax-not-visa-fee-537263</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T12:09:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[US Court Strikes Down Trump's $100,000 H-1B Levy, Says It Was A Tax, Not Visa Fee]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[H-1B Visa Fee, Donald Trump Proclamation, Executive Taxing Power, Immigration and Nationality Act, Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Massachusetts Federal Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678770-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-105345.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/bombay-hc-denies-interim-relief-to-russian-company-eurochem-in-19500-crore-enforcement-suit-against-tecnimont-537260</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T12:19:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T11:48:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Denies Interim Relief To Russian Company In ₹19,500 Crore Enforcement Suit Against Tecnimont]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[EuroChem North-West-2, Tecnimont S.P.A., Russian Judgment, ICC Arbitration, Bombay High Court, Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/18/668349-justice-gauri-godse.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/bombay-hc-orders-release-of-mpid-attached-property-after-approval-of-steel-companys-resolution-plan-537242</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T10:23:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Orders Release Of MPID-Attached Property After Approval Of Steel Company's Resolution Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Abhirama Steels Ltd., MPID Act, Resolution Plan, Clean Slate Principle, Dwarka Iron Industries, Property Attachment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/31/652963-justice-manish-pitale-and-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-approves-greensward-enterprise-18120-crore-resolution-plan-for-frost-international-ltd-537237</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T09:48:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Approves Greensward Enterprise' ₹181.20 Crore Resolution Plan For Frost International Ltd]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai, Frost International, Resolution Plan, IBC, Greenward Enterprise]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/11/678562-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141820-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-june-08-2026-537231</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T09:14:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: June 08, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658697-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-8.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/high-court/bombay-hc-upholds-mrt-orders-holds-rera-appellate-tribunal-not-established-by-appointment-of-members-alone-537223</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T21:50:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay HC Upholds MRT Orders, Holds RERA Appellate Tribunal Not Established By Appointment Of Members Alone]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, MahaREAT, delayed possession, homebuyers, Section 18 RERA, appellate jurisdiction, Runwal Infinity]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/04/653862-750x450652575-bombay-hc-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-high-court-quashes-centres-retrospective-one-time-spectrum-charge-on-airtel-vodafone-idea-537201</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T19:32:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Centre's Retrospective One-Time Spectrum Charge On Airtel, Vodafone Idea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea, National Telecom Policy 1999, One-Time Spectrum Charge, Indian Telegraph Act 1885, Retrospective Levy, Spectrum Allocation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/08/678687-whatsapp-image-2026-06-08-at-182251.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/right-to-interest-for-delayed-possession-cannot-be-waived-through-consent-letter-punjab-rera-537197</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T18:36:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Right To Interest For Delayed Possession Cannot Be Waived Through Consent Letter: Punjab RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punjab RERA ,ATS Estates ,Interest , Buyer,  Possession , ATS Golf Meadows-5,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/13/533754-rera-punjab.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refers-jindal-poly-films-minority-shareholder-class-action-dispute-to-arbitration-537190</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-08T18:24:55+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T18:11:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refers Jindal Poly Films Minority Shareholder's Class Action Dispute To Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jindal Poly Films Ltd., Section 245 Class Action, Minority Shareholders, Related-Party Transactions, NCLAT, Arbitration, Companies Act 2013]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/08/678665-whatsapp-image-2026-06-08-at-170707.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-settles-proceedings-kotak-india-growth-fund-delay-in-winding-up-fund-537189</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:59:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kotak India Growth Fund Pays ₹10.87 Lakh To Settle SEBI Proceedings Over 5-Year Delay In Winding Up Scheme]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Kotak India Growth Fund II, Venture Capital Fund, SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations, 1996, Settlement Proceedings, SEBI Settlement Regulations, Delay in Winding Up, Distribution of Liquidation Proceeds, Investor Proceeds, Venture Capital Scheme, Suo Motu Settlement Application, High Powered Advisory Committee, Settlement Amount, Enforcement Proceedings, Fund Liquidation, Alternative Investment Funds]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/himachal-pradesh-hc-vacates-injunction-against-safex-chemicals-in-patent-infringement-suit-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-537188</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:48:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh High Court Vacates Injunction Against Safex Chemicals In Patent Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh High Court, Safex Chemicals, SML Limited, Patent Infringement, Territorial Jurisdiction, Section 48 Patents Act, Section 20 CPC, Interim Injunction, Trap Purchase, Fertilizer (Control) Order 1985, Aladdin Brand, Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Division Bench, Authorized Dealer, Intellectual Property Litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/08/678660-safex-chemicals-hp-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/haryana-rera-orders-elan-limited-to-refund-commercial-unit-buyers-caps-forfeiture-at-10-of-sale-consideration-537187</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:35:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Haryana RERA Orders Elan Limited To Refund Commercial Unit Buyers, Caps Forfeiture At 10% Of Sale Consideration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Haryana RERA,  Elan Developers , Refund ,Commercial Unit, Buyer,  Cancellation ,Forfeiture, Sale ,Consideration,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529364-rera-haryana.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/private-confidentiality-obligations-cannot-override-court-ordered-disclosure-bombay-hc-537186</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:24:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure Of Bhutan Contract In Xcalibur–Oil Field Exclusivity Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Exclusivity clause, Non-compete obligation, Confidentiality clause, Disclosure obligations, Joint venture agreement, Bhutan survey contract, Section 37 appeal, Commercial arbitration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/610214-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-weekly-digest-june-1-june-6-2026-537184</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:18:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: June 1 - June 6, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, section 34, section 37, section 11, section 9, section 17, arbitral tribunal, arbitral mandate, arbitral award, challenge to award, appointment of arbitrator, settlement, appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-court-monitored-probe-into-alleged-1537-crore-jkm-infra-bank-fraud-and-arc-settlements-537182</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:14:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[PIL In Supreme Court Seeks Court-Monitored Probe Into JKM Infra's ₹1,537 Crore Debt Settlement Through ARCs]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[JKM Infra Projects Ltd., Rs 1,537 Crore Bank Fraud, Court-Monitored Investigation, Asset Reconstruction Companies, Loan Diversion Allegations, Ernst & Young Forensic Audit, Public Sector Banks]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/08/678650-whatsapp-image-2026-06-08-at-161708.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/standardized-cybersecurity-software-offerings-are-not-taxable-as-fees-for-technical-services-itat-delhi-537181</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T17:11:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Standardized Cybersecurity Software Offerings Are Not Taxable As Fees For Technical Services: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cybersecurity Software , Taxable , Technical Service,ITAT Delhi,ITAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/goods-imported-before-publication-of-restrictive-notification-must-be-cleared-under-earlier-policy-delhi-high-court-537179</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T16:55:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Cannot Deny Clearance For Goods Imported Before DGFT Notification: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Restrictive Notification ,Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/05/678055-justice-nitin-sambr-justice-ajay-digpaul-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/adani-group-wins-before-cestat-as-tribunal-rejects-customs-departments-overvaluation-claims-537178</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-08T16:43:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Bars Customs From Rejecting Declared Value, Upholds Relief For Adani Entities]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRI Allegations, Customs Department, Section 138C of the Customs Act, Rule 12 of the 2007 Valuation Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/08/678635-photo-2026-06-08-15-56-38.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
