<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/mere-non-payment-of-outstanding-amount-does-not-amount-to-contempt-without-wilful-disobedience-nclt-ahmedabad-553178</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T17:59:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Non-Payment Of Money Under Tribunal's Order Not Contempt Without Wilful Disobedience: NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Wilful Disobedience, Contempt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652481-nclt-copy-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclat-holds-directions-in-quashed-nclt-order-cannot-continue-independently-553168</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T17:14:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Directions In Quashed NCLT Order Cannot Survive Or Be Enforced Independently: NCLAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, NCLT, Company Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652479-nclat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/shareholder-is-not-an-aggrieved-person-to-challenge-resolution-plan-approval-under-ibc-nclat-cites-park-energy-553166</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T17:12:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Shareholder Is Not An “Aggrieved Person” To Challenge Resolution Plan Approval Under IBC: NCLAT Cites Park Energy]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Aggrieved person, Resolution plan, Shareholder]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/removal-of-promoter-director-in-quasi-partnership-company-can-amount-to-oppression-nclt-mumbai-553164</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T17:06:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Removal Of Promoter-Director In Quasi-Partnership Company Can Amount To Oppression: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Removal , Promoter,Director ,Quasi-Partnership Company , Oppression,NCLT Mumbai,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/11/678562-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141820-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-entire-bank-account-cannot-be-frozen-for-2252-rupees-disputed-transaction-axis-bank-limited-553162</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:56:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Entire Bank Account Cannot Be Frozen For ₹2,253 Disputed Transaction: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Axis Bank, Sohel Molla, Bank Account Freeze, De-freezing of Bank Account, Cybercrime Investigation, Section 106 BNSS, Bank Account Lien, ₹2,253 Disputed Transaction, Cyber Crime Wing, Banking Law, Blanket Account Freeze, Police Investigation, Bank Account Freezing]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704391-calcutta-hc-axis-bank.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/orissa-high-court/orissa-high-court-quashes-air-pollution-case-against-tata-steel-limited-citing-section-32a-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-553161</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:50:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Orissa High Court Quashes Air Pollution Case Against Tata Steel Over Bhushan Steel's Pre-CIRP Offences]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Orissa High Court, Tata Steel Limited, Bhushan Steel Limited, Tata Steel BSL Limited, Section 32A IBC, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP, Resolution Plan, Resolution Applicant, Pre-CIRP Offences, Criminal Liability, Criminal Prosecution, Air Act, Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, State Pollution Control Board Odisha, Environmental Offences, Change in Management, NCLT, Section 482 CrPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/11/15/504023-justice-sibo-sankar-mishra-orissa-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/homebuyer-need-not-start-fresh-recovery-after-builders-appeal-fails-rera-deposit-can-be-released-mahareat-553160</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:48:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Promoter's Pre-Deposit Can Be Released To Homebuyer After Promoter's Appeal Fails: Maharashtra REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA pre-deposit, homebuyer recovery, promoter appeal, condonation of delay, execution proceedings, recovery warrant, withdrawal of deposit, MahaREAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/06/564555-mahareat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/reuse-e-way-bills-cannot-be-presumed-proof-earlier-journey-completion-gstat-lucknow-553159</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:44:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GSTAT Lucknow Quashes ₹6.62 Lakh Demand Against Jai Enterprises, Says Suspicion Can't Prove Tax Evasion]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GSTAT, GST, e-way bill, e-way bill reuse, GSTAT Lucknow, e-way bill violation, earlier journey proof, vehicle location GST, GST tax evasion, e-way bill penalty, GSTAT ruling, presumption of tax evasion, GST compliance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/11/25/632796-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-kolkata-sets-aside-7045-lakh-service-tax-demand-on-government-grants-to-indian-chamber-of-commerce-553155</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T16:37:09+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:36:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside ₹70.45 Lakh Service Tax Demand On Government Grants To Indian Chamber Of Commerce]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax, Government Grants, Grants-in-Aid, Consideration, Reimbursement, Business Exhibition Service, Reverse Charge Mechanism, Extended Period of Limitation, Revenue Neutrality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702298-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/resignation-as-director-does-not-extinguish-personal-guarantee-liability-nclt-indore-553154</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:36:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Resignation As Director Does Not Extinguish Personal Guarantee Liability: NCLT Indore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, Guarantor, Director]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652668-nclt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/revenue-cannot-retain-service-tax-paid-by-mistake-on-exempt-service-cestat-allows-refund-with-12-interest-553145</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:19:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Allahabad Says Revenue Can't Retain Tax Paid By Mistake, Orders ₹36.92 Lakh Refund To SAF Yeast]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax Refund; Mistake of Law; Section 11B; GTA Services; Exemption Notification; Revenue Deposit; Article 265; 12% Interest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702304-cestat-allahabad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/gst-order-passed-445-days-after-section-129-notice-gstat-ernakulam-quashes-penalty-553142</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:11:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GSTAT Ernakulam Holds 7-Day Limit Mandatory For Penalty Orders, Quashes Order Passed After 445 Days]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GSTAT, GST, GST order delayed, Section 129 GST, GSTAT Ernakulam, 445 days delay, GST penalty quashed, detention of goods GST, GST demand order, delayed adjudication GST, Section 129 penalty, GSTAT ruling]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/11/25/632796-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/pre-deposit-for-gst-appeal-has-no-automatic-effect-on-rule-86a-itc-block-553136</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T16:01:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Has No Impact On ITC Blocking Under Rule 86A Of CGST Rules: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 107(7) of the GST Act, Electronic Cash Ledger, Input Tax Credit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/608674-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/no-patent-illegality-in-forfeiting-developers-advance-after-seven-years-of-inaction-karnataka-high-court-553131</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T15:45:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Upholds Forfeiture Of Developer's Advance After 7-Year JDA Delay]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Joint Development Agreement, forfeiture of advance, arbitral award, developer default, Section 34, Section 37, patent illegality, public policy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652627-karnataka-hc-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/quarterly-digests/livelaw-indirect-tax-quarterly-digest-july-september-2026-553122</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T15:03:41+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T15:01:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Quarterly Digest: July - September, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Digest, Quarterly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/04/09/595150-indirect-tax-quarterly.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-directs-state-bank-of-india-refund-83-lakh-says-foreclosure-charge-must-be-part-of-contract-553118</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T14:44:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs SBI To Refund ₹83.41 Lakh Foreclosure Charges To Campari Exports]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, State Bank of India, SBI, Campari Exports, Foreclosure Charges, Pre-payment Charges, Loan Agreement, Contractual Terms, Unilateral Alteration of Contract, Banking Law, MSMED Act, Loan Facility, Article 226, Writ Petition, Commercial Law, Banking Disputes]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704363-delhi-hc-sbi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-authorities-cannot-raise-pre-resolution-dues-not-included-in-approved-resolution-plan-553115</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T14:25:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Quashes ₹1.68 Crore GST Demand Against SREI Equipment Finance After CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SREI Equipment Finance Limited, corporate insolvency resolution process, GST authorities, Input Tax Credit, Section 88 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704361-calcutta-hc-srei.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/star-health-data-breach-supreme-court-refuses-to-quash-criminal-proceedings-against-cybersecurity-expert-553113</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T17:08:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T14:12:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Star Health Data Breach: Supreme Court Refuses To Quash Criminal Case Against Cybersecurity Expert]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Himanshu Pathak, Star Health, Cybersecurity Researcher, Cyber Crime, Criminal Proceedings, Bail, Ethical Hacking, Data Breach]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/04/704286-whatsapp-image-2026-10-04-at-203940.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/ao-required-examine-expenditure-fmv-itat-ahmedabad-deletes-18-76-lakh-commission-disallowance-553110</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T14:07:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes ₹18.76 Lakh Disallowance On Herbalife Distributor's Commission To Wife's Firm]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ITAT, Income Tax, ITAT Ahmedabad, Section 40A(2)(b), Herbalife commission, related party commission, commission disallowance, income tax disallowance on commission, excessive expenditure, income tax itat case. Herbalife itat case]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652541-income-tax-01-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/quarterly-digests/livelaw-direct-tax-quarterly-digest-july-september-2026-553106</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T15:04:01+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T13:53:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Quarterly Digest: July - September, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Digest, Quarterly Digest,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/10/21/626994-direct-tax-quarterly-digest.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-declares-ds-group-a-well-known-trademark-grants-permanent-injunction-against-fake-rajnigandha-dealership-website-553104</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T13:46:58+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T13:46:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Declares “DS Group” And Logo Well-Known Trademarks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, DS Intellectual Properties, Dharampal Satyapal Limited, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, CS COMM 897 2022, Rajnigandha Trademark Infringement, DS Group Well Known Trademark, Section 2 1 zg Trade Marks Act, Section 11 6 Trade Marks Act, Fake Distributorship Fraud, Domain Name Takedown Order, Copyright Infringement Privacy Policy, Vaishali Mittal Advocate, Permanent Injunction Order, Catch Pulse Pass Pass House Mark, Rolex SA Precedent, Tata Sons Dilution Doctrine, Onlinerajnigandharetail Domain, Bank Account Freeze Order, Ex Parte Commercial Suit Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704382-delhi-hc-ds-group.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/writ-court-cannot-appoint-arbitrator-where-contract-mandates-statutory-tribunal-patna-high-court-553103</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T13:46:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T13:45:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Writ Court Cannot Appoint Arbitrator Where Contract Mandates Statutory Mechanism: Patna High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Joint Development Agreement, Arbitration Clause, Sole Arbitrator, G'Corp Buildwell, Apartment Possession, Service Tax and GST, Bengaluru Real Estate, Section 11(5)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704369-justice-sudhir-singh-and-justice-rajesh-kumar-verma-with-patna-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/calcutta-high-court-quashes-pre-ibc-resolution-income-tax-proceedings-against-binani-cement-553093</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T13:02:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Quashes Pre-IBC Resolution Income Tax Proceedings Against Binani Cement]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Refund, Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, outstanding demand]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704351-calcutta-hc-ultra-tec.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/trade-mark-agent-authorisation-before-registry-must-carry-stamp-duty-like-a-power-of-attorney-kerala-high-court-553090</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T12:30:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Trade Mark Agent Authorisation Must Be Stamped Like Power Of Attorney: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, John Vadassery, Section 145 Trade Marks Act 1999, Form TM M Stamp Duty, Trade Marks Registry Chennai, Power of Attorney Stamp Duty, Rule 19 Trade Marks Rules 2017, WP C 17 2026, 2026 KER 76394, Trademark Agent Authorization, DPIIT Ministry of Commerce, Section 2 j Kerala Stamp Act, Section 2 p Power of Attorney Definition, Court Fees Act Non Applicability Registrar, ICAI v Union of India Precedent, Stamp Duty Fiscal Revenue Instrument, Registrar of Trade Marks Officer Status, Vakalathnama vs Agent Authorization, Intellectual Property Agent Representation India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688785-kerala-hcjustice-bechu-kurian-thomas.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/bombay-high-court-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-samantha-ruth-prabhus-persona-orders-takedowns-of-infrining-content-553073</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T11:35:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T11:35:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Restrains Unauthorised Use Of Actor Samantha Prabhu's Persona, Orders Takedowns]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Samantha Ruth Prabhu, Bombay High Court, Justice Madhav J Jamdar, Personality Rights, Injunction, Deepfake, Copyright, IA L 29905 of 2026, Article 21 Privacy Rights, Section 38B Performer Rights, Generative AI Deepfake Injunction, John Doe Ashok Kumar Injunction, Meta Platforms Defendant, Google LLC YouTube Injunction, Amazon India Seller Takedown, SpicyChat AI Chatbot Order, SeaArt AI Deepfake Portal, IT Rules 2021 Intermediary Duty, Shruti Haasan Precedent, Preity Zinta Precedent, Voice Cloning Misappropriation, Pornographic Deepfake Takedown Order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/05/704344-samantha-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/no-timeframe-for-cancelling-duplicate-pan-can-cause-hardship-to-taxpayers-delhi-high-court-553068</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T10:54:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T10:53:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Timeframe For Cancelling Duplicate PAN Can Cause Hardship To Taxpayers: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Pan card, cancelling pan card. Delhi high court delhi high court news, tax news, no timeframe for cancelling pan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/14/674006-chief-justice-dk-upadhyaya-and-justice-tejas-karia.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/related-party-status-under-section-524d-depends-on-shareholding-threshold-not-actual-exercise-of-control-nclt-553067</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T14:56:58+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T10:48:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Related Party Status Depends On Shareholding Threshold, Not Actual Control: NCLT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Shareholding Threshold,  Exercise Of Control,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652518-nclt-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-continuation-of-going-concern-sale-after-2025-liquidation-regulations-directs-sale-of-assets-individually-553064</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T14:56:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T10:28:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Bars Revival Of Going-Concern Sale After 2025 IBBI Regulation Changes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad,  Going-Concern, Sale,Liquidation Regulations,Sale Of Asset,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655531-nclt-ahmedabad-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-quashes-section-153c-income-tax-order-says-satisfaction-note-was-recorded-after-limitation-period-553058</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T10:01:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Quashes Section 153C Income Tax Order, Says Satisfaction Note Was Recorded After Limitation Period]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Section 153C, Income Tax Act, tax assessment, search assessment, limitation period, time-barred assessment, AY 2012-13, escaped income, Sections 153A and 153C, Ojjus Medicare, Income Tax Department, Consistent Builders Pvt Ltd.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/pre-cirp-electricity-dues-cannot-be-recovered-by-discontinuing-supply-during-moratorium-nclt-ahmedabad-553057</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T14:55:43+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T09:52:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Pre-CIRP Electricity Dues Cannot Be Recovered By Discontinuing Supply During Moratorium: NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CIRP, Electricity Dues , Moratorium, NCLT Ahmedabad,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-03-2026-553055</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T09:50:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 03, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up,LiveLawBiz: Business Law Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658700-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/nclt-chandigarh-refuses-to-recall-scheme-order-holds-accounting-dispute-insufficient-to-establish-fraud-553050</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T14:55:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T09:40:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh Refuses To Recall Scheme Order, Holds Accounting Dispute Insufficient To Establish Fraud]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh ,Accounting Dispute ,Fraud,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-chennai-cancels-sale-deed-of-homebuyer-who-failed-to-submit-claim-during-cirp-553038</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-05T14:54:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-05T09:24:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Cancels Sale Deed Of Homebuyer Who Failed To Submit Claim During CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai , Sale Deed, Homebuyer,CIRP,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-has-laid-down-detailed-guidelines-governing-the-denial-or-reversal-of-input-tax-credit-itc-from-purchasing-dealers-552981</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-03T19:04:56+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-03T19:04:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana High Court Lays Down Guidelines For ITC Reversal Where Supplier Fails To Deposit GST]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Retrospective Cancellation, ITC reversal, Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, Section 155 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/punjab-and-haryana-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gujarat-high-court-rejects-writ-plea-finds-gst-officer-was-authorised-to-verify-vehicle-carrying-goods-552977</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-03T18:21:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Rejects Writ Plea, Finds GST Officer Was Authorised To Verify Vehicle Carrying Goods]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Shreeji Steel, GST confiscation, Section 130 CGST Act, statutory appeal, Section 107, Rule 138B, MOV-04, MOV-06, MOV-10, natural justice, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
