<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/arbitration-act-s-116-is-a-default-clause-cant-be-used-to-replace-an-agreed-three-member-tribunal-with-a-sole-arbitrator-allahabad-high-court-547612</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T16:45:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Act Sec. 11(6) Is Default Provision, Can't Override Agreed 3-Member Tribunal: Allahabad HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Act, Default Clause,Three-Member Tribunal ,Sole Arbitrator, Allahabad High Court,Justice Jaspreet Singh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/06/11/421586-justice-jaspreet-singh-allahabad-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/vigilantibus-non-dormientibus-jura-subveniunt-nclt-indore-rejects-belated-homebuyer-claim-after-resolution-plan-approval-547608</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T16:33:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Belated Homebuyer Claims Cannot Reopen Approved Resolution Plan: NCLT Indore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt, NCLT Indore,  Homebuyer, Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/22/681620-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/ibc-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-settle-family-dispute-nclt-indore-dismisses-421-crore-section-7-plea-547604</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-27T16:16:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T16:16:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Indore Holds IBC Cannot Be Used To Settle Family Disputes, Rejects ₹4.21 Crore Section 7 Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC ,Family Dispute,NCLT Indore, NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/customs-cant-reclassify-imported-fabric-without-lab-test-cestat-sets-aside-3912-lakh-demand-547602</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T16:06:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Cannot Reclassify Fabrics Without Laboratory Test To Determine Composition: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs, CESTAT Kolkata, Classification of Imported Goods, Polyester Warp Knitted Fabrics, Laboratory Test, Customs Duty, Burden of Proof, Misclassification, Concessional Basic Customs Duty, Notification No. 82/2017-Customs]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684077-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-traders-from-selling-counterfeit-skf-ball-bearings-trademark-infringement-547596</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T15:42:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Sale Of Counterfeit SKF Bearings, Calls Them A “Safety Hazard” For Drivers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, AB SKF, BM Bearing Sales, Justice Jyoti Singh, SKF India, Counterfeit Ball Bearings, Public Safety Hazard, Bank Account Freeze Lien, Trademark Infringement, Copyright Packaging, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, Bharat Jain, Oriental Enterprises, CS COMM 918 2026, SKF Authenticate, Demerger Industrial Bearings, John Doe Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/25/676104-skf-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/freight-charges-not-always-part-of-assessable-value-extended-limitation-cant-be-invoked-in-interpretational-dispute-cestat-hyderabad-547594</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T15:32:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Hyderabad Says Sample Purchase Orders Cannot Establish All Sales Were FOR Sales]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, Assessable Value, Freight Charges, Transportation Charges, FOR Sales, Place of Removal, Extended Period of Limitation, Show Cause Notice, Section 11AC, Penalty, Sample Purchase Orders, Ex-Factory Sales, Suppression of Facts, Interpretational Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684078-cestat-hyderabad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitration-between-partners-not-barred-merely-because-unregistered-firms-dissolution-was-not-sought-calcutta-high-court-547591</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T15:04:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 69 Partnership Act Does Not Bar Arbitration Without Dissolution Plea: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[unregistered partnership firm, partnership arbitration, arbitral award, dissolution of partnership, scope of reference, public policy, rewriting contract, Section 37 appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/mere-customs-clearance-role-cannot-make-person-beneficial-owner-of-smuggled-goods-547585</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T14:54:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Quashes ₹4.56 Crore Customs Duty Demand Against Shipping Forwarder]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs clearance, Section 114A of the Customs Act, Section 114A of the Customs Act, Section 28(8) of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/18/694629-madras-hc-justice-hemant-chandangoudar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/ph-high-court-orders-release-of-imported-areca-nuts-says-customs-cant-withhold-goods-based-on-physical-appearance-alone-547584</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T14:47:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab And Haryana High Court Orders Release Of Roasted Areca Nuts Detained Since November 2024]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[P&H High Court, Areca Nuts,  Customs , Physical Appearance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/27/696505-ppppp.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/personal-hearing-not-absolute-right-at-section-148a-stage-547580</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T14:00:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Upholds Reassessment Against Chirania Projects, Orders Personal Hearing]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 148A(3) of the Income Tax Act, Assessing Officer, unsecured loan, cash deposits]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/purchaser-cannot-claim-itc-without-ensuring-tax-is-paid-to-government-547576</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-27T13:48:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T13:47:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Says Supplier's Tax Payment Mandatory For ITC, Upholds Recovery From Buyer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 16(2) (c) of the CGST, Input Tax Credit, recovery of ITC,  Section 41 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696195-justice-pushpendra-singh-bhati-and-justice-praveer-bhatnagar-rajasthan-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/reasonable-time-to-appoint-arbitrator-cannot-be-decided-by-counting-days-after-notice-delhi-high-court-547573</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T13:36:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Reasonable Time To Appoint Arbitrator Cannot Be Decided By Counting Days After Notice: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Reasonable Time, Failure To Act, Partnership Dispute, Sole Arbitrator, Failed Mediation, DIAC, Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689857-delhi-hc-justice-om-prakash-shukla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/best-judgment-assessment-cant-be-based-on-arbitrary-turnover-estimates-when-actual-records-available-cestat-547570</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T13:24:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitrary Turnover Projections Cannot Support Best-Judgment Service Tax Assessment: CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax, Best Judgment Assessment, Section 72 Finance Act 1994, Arbitrary Estimation, Taxable Value, CENVAT Credit, Extended Period of Limitation, Reimbursable Expenses, CESTAT Delhi, Security Agency Services]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684083-cestat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/writ-courts-should-not-pre-empt-msmed-arbitration-when-objections-can-be-raised-before-tribunal-delhi-high-court-547566</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T13:07:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says Writ Courts Should Not Pre-empt MSMED Arbitration, Dismisses BSNL Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MSMED arbitration, writ jurisdiction, arbitral tribunal jurisdiction, MSME registration, limitation, MSEFC reference, DIAC arbitration, BSNL]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689087-dr-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-dismisses-pil-over-ifcis-44093-crore-nse-share-divestment-says-petitioner-approached-with-unclean-hands-547562</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T12:49:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Against IFCI's ₹440.93 Cr NSE Share Sale For Petitioner's Forum Shopping]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IFCI NSE Divestment, PIL Rules, Rule 9(i)(h), Suppression Of Facts, Forum Shopping, Unclean Hands, Public Interest Litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/27/696508-whatsapp-image-2026-08-27-at-102823.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/direct-contract-with-homebuyers-not-a-precondition-for-promoter-liability-telangana-rera-547560</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T12:38:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Direct Contract With Homebuyers Not A Precondition For Promoter Liability: Telangana RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana RERA, Promoter Liability, Privity of Contract, Homebuyer Refund, Bharati Builders, Pre-Launch Project, Joint and Several Liability, Section 18 RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654496-rera-telangana.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-high-court-bars-ex-franchisee-from-using-kidzee-similar-kidgee-mark-pending-arbitration-547558</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T12:17:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Restrains Ex-Kidzee Franchisee From Using 'KIDGEE' Or Similar Mark Pending Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, trademark dispute, franchise agreement, KIDZEE, KIDGEE, interim injunction, rights in personam, deceptive similarity]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-19804-crore-award-against-jda-says-arbitrator-rewrote-concession-agreement-547556</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T12:01:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Quashes ₹198.04 Cr. Award Against JDA, Says Arbitrator Rewrote Concession Agreement]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitral award, BOT project, concession agreement, contractual risk allocation, Internal Rate of Return, patent illegality, corrigendum award, Jaipur Development Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/rajasthan-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/madras-hc-upholds-9466-lakh-tax-on-fd-interest-of-charitable-trust-says-no-specific-donor-direction-to-treat-it-as-corpus-547550</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T11:37:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Interest On Trust's FDs Taxable Without Specific Donor Direction For Corpus: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, Self-Help Groups, fixed deposit interest, SJDT Sustainable Fund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686923-madras-high-court-with-chief-justice-sushrut-arvind-dharmadhikari-and-justice-g-arul-murugan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-registered-office-doesnt-confer-jurisdiction-over-up-tax-audit-dispute-delhi-high-court-547548</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T11:30:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi Registered Office Doesn't Confer Jurisdiction Over UP Tax Audit Dispute: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-stays-fssai-action-against-enerzal-electrolyte-labels-for-8-months-over-lack-of-improvement-notice-547543</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T11:02:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Stays FSSAI Notice Against FDC's Enerzal For 8 Months Over 'Electrolyte' Label]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[FDC Limited, Enerzal, FSSAI Notice, Section 32 FSS Act, Electrolyte Label, Food Safety Regulations, Seizure Of Stock, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/26/696440-whatsapp-image-2026-08-26-at-195302.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-asks-centre-to-consider-60-day-tax-exemption-for-indian-seafarers-stranded-in-india-during-covid-19-pandemic-547539</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T10:44:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Directs Union To Consider 60-Day Tax Relief For Seafarers Stranded In India During COVID-19]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Indian Seafarers, CBDT Circular, Tax Exemption, COVID-19, Compassionate Tax Policy, Supreme Court, 182 Day Rule, Merchant Navy Officers and Ladies Association]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/26/696422-whatsapp-image-2026-08-26-at-181456.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-dismisses-future-group-directors-challenge-to-sfio-probe-holds-bombay-hc-appropriate-forum-547537</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T10:31:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Dismisses Anil Biyani's Challenge To SFIO Probe, Says Mumbai Has Principal Nexus]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Future Group, Anil Biyani, SFIO Investigation, Future Retail, Future Consumer Retail, Companies Act Section 212, Territorial Jurisdiction, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/26/696434-whatsapp-image-2026-08-26-at-192335.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-26-2026-547533</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-27T10:07:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 26, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658699-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-ajmer-spa-from-using-anantara-mark-in-trademark-suit-by-minor-hotels-group-547494</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:51:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Ajmer Spa From Using "ANANTARA" For Similarity With MHG IP Holding's Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Minor Hotel Group, MHG IP Holding, Anantara Spa, Justice Jyoti Singh, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, CS COMM 914 2026, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, Luxury Hospitality Brand, Well Known Trademark, INDRP Domain Dispute, Written Statement 30 Days, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Dilution by Tarnishment, Ajmer Massage Website, MakeMyTrip Minor Hotels]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691811-delhi-hc-minor-anantara.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-scalp-sayy-from-selling-hair-care-products-deceptively-similar-to-sayy-547493</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:38:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Sale Of 'SCALP SAYY' Hair Care Products For Similar To 'SAYY']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, Sayy Partnership Firm, Bhuva Ankitkumar Jaysukhbhai, Scalp Sayy, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Class 03 Trademark, Scalp Revival Hair Serum, Coined Trademark, Deceptive Trade Dress, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, Amazon Nykaa Takedown, Prior User Trademark, CS(COMM) 912/2026, Haircare Cosmetics Litigation, Delhi High Court IPD Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/06/04/394509-justice-jyoti-singh-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/msme-registration-does-not-automatically-override-existing-arbitration-agreement-bombay-high-court-547492</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:28:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MSME Registration Does Not Automatically Override Existing Arbitration Agreement: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MSME registration, arbitration agreement, MSME Facilitation Council, appointment of arbitrator, contractual arbitration, MSMED Act, Section 11 jurisdiction, Qwik Supply Chain]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-cancels-stonex-world-trademark-flags-registry-lapse-in-verifying-conflicting-marks-547491</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:23:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Cancels 'STONEX WORLD' Mark Finding Likelihood Of Confusion With 'STONEX India Pvt Ltd']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Stonex India, Mohit Kumawat, Justice Jyoti Singh, Stonex World Trademark, Class 19 Trademark, Trademark Cancellation, Section 57 Rectification, Deceptive Similarity, Section 11 Trade Marks Act, South India Beverages, Pernod Ricard v Karanveer, Marble Trademark Dispute, Procedural Manipulation, Trade Marks Registry, Dominant Mark Test, Anti Dissection Rule, Ex Parte Judgment, CO COMM IPD TM 284 2025, Indian Trademark Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/06/04/394509-justice-jyoti-singh-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-refusal-to-register-ayu-lifescience-trademark-remands-matter-to-registry-547490</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:13:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Trademark Registry Order Refusing “AYU LIFESCIENCE” Registration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, Ayu Lifescience Industries, Trademark Registry, Section 11 Trade Marks Act, Section 91 Appeal, Anti Dissection Rule, Deceptive Similarity, Class 05 Trademark, Ayu Lifescience Device, Ayu18 Trademark, Ayu Shakti Word Mark, Patent and Trademark Office, Abhinandan Khanduri Advocate, Gaurav Barathi SPC, Pernod Ricard India, Trademark Remand Order, Objected Trademark Status, Opposed Trademark, Dominant Mark Test]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/28/649831-justice-jyoti-singh-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/natural-rubber-latex-toy-balloons-classifiable-as-toys-under-cth-9503-not-as-rubber-articles-cestat-delhi-547489</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T17:02:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Natural Rubber Latex Toy Balloons Classifiable As 'Toys', Not As 'Rubber Articles': CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs, Toy Balloons, Natural Rubber Latex, Customs Classification, CTH 9503, CTH 4016, HSN Explanatory Notes, Customs Duty, BIS Standards, CESTAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684083-cestat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-quashes-tax-demand-against-ex-kingfisher-airlines-employee-over-undeposited-tds-547488</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T16:52:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Ex-Kingfisher Airlines Employee Over Undeposited TDS]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/calcutta-high-court-upholds-deletion-of-752-crore-tax-disallowances-in-syama-prasad-mookherjee-port-case-547486</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T16:30:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta HC Upholds ₹752 Cr. Relief For Syama Prasad Port, Says Actuarial Contributions Not Limited]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gratuity Fund, employees’ PF/ESI contributions, Kolkata Port Trust, Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/the-customs-authorities-could-not-directly-invoke-section-75a2-of-the-customs-act-1962-for-recovery-without-first-reassessing-the-exporters-self-assessment-under-section-17-of-the-act-547485</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T16:15:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Says Customs Cannot Recover Excess Drawback Without Reassessment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 75A(2) of the Customs Act 1962, Sections 17 and 18 of the Customs Act, Section 142 of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/rajasthan-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/karnataka-reat-awards-compensation-for-delayed-possession-amenities-reiterates-consumer-law-principles-can-apply-to-rera-proceedings-547483</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T16:08:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka REAT Directs BCV To Pay For Delayed Possession, Says Consumer Law Principles Apply To RERA Claims]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, homebuyers, promoter obligations, delayed possession, clubhouse amenities, consumer law principles, compensation, delay interest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/05/564493-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-questions-income-tax-depts-withholding-of-7171-lakh-refund-against-125-lakh-demand-547481</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T15:50:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Questions Income Tax Dept's Withholding Of ₹71.71 Lakh Refund Against ₹1.25 Lakh Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-on-plea-against-bombay-hc-ruling-trademark-evidence-filing-deadline-is-directory-not-mandatory-547480</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T15:21:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On Plea Against Bombay HC Ruling Trademark Evidence Deadline Is Directory]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules, Evidence Affidavit, Black Diamond Motors, Trademark Rectification, Registrar of Trade Marks, Bombay High Court, Supreme Court Notice, Trade Marks Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-upholds-365-crore-advance-tax-credit-against-capital-gains-liability-547477</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T15:08:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds ₹3.65 Crore Advance Tax Credit Against Capital Gains Liability]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-statutory-right-debenture-holders-section-7-ibc-cannot-curtailed-trust-deed-547474</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T14:16:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Debenture Holders Retain Right To Initiate Insolvency Despite Trustee Appointment: NCLT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 7 IBC, NCLT, NCLT Bengaluru, Debenture Holders, Debenture Trustee, Financial Creditor, CIRP, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Gulam Mustafa Enterprises, India Housing Fund, Debenture Trust Deed, Financial Debt, Default]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667714-750x450652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/bombay-high-court-dismisses-contempt-plea-against-kotak-mahindra-bank-over-seven-day-possession-notice-for-secured-asset-547472</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T14:09:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Plea Against Kotak Mahindra Bank Over 7-Day Possession Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act, Physical Possession, Contempt Proceedings, Seven-Day Notice, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Secured Asset, Wilful Disobedience]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696251-whatsapp-image-2026-08-25-at-193451.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/supreme-court/supreme-court-sets-aside-gst-demand-against-tata-steel-says-mere-use-of-suppression-cannot-justify-extended-limitation-547469</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T13:56:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Sets Aside GST Notice Against Tata Steel, Says 'Suppression' Must Have Factual Basis]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tata Steel, Supreme Court, GST, CGST Act, Section 74 CGST Act, Section 73 CGST Act, Extended Limitation, Suppression of Facts, Show Cause Notice, Input Tax Credit, ITC Mismatch, GST Demand, Fraud, Wilful Misstatement, GST Audit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693331-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/supreme-court/mumbai-port-trust-liable-for-customs-duty-on-pilfered-goods-once-approved-as-custodian-supreme-court-547467</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T13:52:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Holds Port Trust Liable For Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods After Custodian Approval]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Act, Section 45, Section 45(3), Mumbai Port Trust, Pilfered Goods, Customs Duty, Custodian, Major Port Trusts Act, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/22/621979-464746-462976-justice-bv-nagarathna.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/timing-of-cheque-handover-not-material-contradiction-once-defendants-signature-and-delivery-are-established-delhi-high-court-547465</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T13:51:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cheque Handover Date Discrepancy Does Not Defeat Liability When Signatures Are Admitted: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cheque Liability, Friendly Loan, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 118 & 139 NI Act, Recovery Suit, Section 34 CPC, Dishonoured Cheque]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/10/11/438661-justice-neena-bansal-krishna-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/the-kerala-high-court-has-set-aside-the-governments-decision-rejecting-the-regional-sports-centre-kochis-claim-for-exemption-from-building-tax-and-directed-the-state-government-to-reconsider-the-matter-afresh-547457</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T13:10:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Regional Sports Centre's Building Tax Exemption Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 3(1)(b) of the Kerala Building Tax Act, religious, charitable or educational purposes]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-ahmedabad-quashes-54-lakh-recovery-from-panasonic-holds-six-year-old-demand-time-barred-547455</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T12:53:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Ahmedabad Holds ₹54 Lakh Recovery Against Panasonic Time-Barred, Faults Department's Inaction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[₹54 lakh credit, suo motu credit, Notification No. 39/2001-CE, limitation, Section 11A, annual differential refund, Kutch exemption, refund claim, procedural lapse, departmental inaction, time-barred show cause notice, Central Excise Act, Gujarat High Court, Parle Products]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-directs-bdr-pharmaceuticals-to-seek-prior-court-approval-before-launch-of-cancer-drug-dabrafenib-in-patent-dispute-with-novartis-547452</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T12:32:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs BDR To Seek Prior Approval Before 'Dabrafenib' Launch In Novartis Patent Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Patent, Novartis AG, BDR Pharmaceuticals, Justice AJ Bhambhani, Dabrafenib Patent, Patent Infringement, Quia Timet Action, Section 107A Patents Act, Bolar Exemption, Commercial Manufacturing License, Amit Sibal, J Sai Deepak, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Rejection of Plaint, BDR Lifesciences, FDCA Gujarat RTI, CS COMM 293 2026, Joint Registrar Delhi High Court, Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation India, Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient API]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/03/659501-delhi-hc-novartis.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-new-delhi-holds-ddas-statutory-status-does-not-exempt-commercial-land-leasing-activities-from-service-tax-547443</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T12:14:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DDA's Statutory Status Does Not Exempt Its Commercial Leasing From Service Tax: CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DDA Service Tax, statutory authority, sovereign functions, renting of immovable property, Nazul land, lease premium, ground rent, commercial activity, sports complex, membership charges, subscription charges, lease/salami, RIICO, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, vacant land, July 1 2010, Finance Act 1994]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/jammu-kashmir/jammu-and-kashmir-high-court-violation-section-269ss-ni-act-presumptions-547440</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T11:45:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 269SS Income Tax Act Breach Does Not Bar Section 138 NI Act Case: J&K High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Income Tax Act, Section 138 NI Act, Section 269SS Income Tax Act, Statutory Presumptions NI Act, Cheque Dishonour]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/02/11/370090-cheque.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/jammu-kashmir-high-court-ruling-arbitrator-ineligibility-nomination-547438</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T11:20:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[J&K And Ladakh High Court Holds SIDCO MD Ineligible To Act As Arbitrator In Contract Dispute With UT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitrator Ineligibility, Ineligible Arbitrator Nomination, Section 12(5) Arbitration Act, Seventh Schedule Arbitration Act, J&K SIDCO, TRF Ltd v Energo Engineering Projects Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/09/16/435259-justice-sanjeev-kumar-jammu-and-kashmir-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/annuity-payments-for-road-construction-liable-to-gst-under-works-contract-services-547434</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T10:44:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Deferred Annuity Payments To Road Companies Under NHAI Contracts Taxable Under GST: Rajasthan High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Road Construction Annuity Payments, GST exemption, National Highways Authority of India, CBIC Circular No. 150/06/2021-GST]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696195-justice-pushpendra-singh-bhati-and-justice-praveer-bhatnagar-rajasthan-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-gives-nod-cyient-limited-acquisition-tao-digital-solutions-competition-act-2002-public-limited-547433</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T10:43:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Cyient's 100% Acquisition Of Tao Digital Solutions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Cyient Limited, Tao Digital Solutions, Tao Digital India, Merger Control, Combination, Acquisition, Digital Transformation, Technology Services, Share Acquisition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683851-cci3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-says-ao-must-objectively-consider-taxpayers-reply-upholds-deletion-of-55-cr-addition-547428</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T10:21:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says AO Must Objectively Consider Taxpayer's Reply, Upholds Deletion Of ₹55 Cr. Addition]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-25-2026-547423</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-26T09:52:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-refers-territorial-jurisdiction-question-in-huls-disparagement-suit-against-kwick-living-to-larger-bench-547373</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T18:19:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refers Territorial Jurisdiction Question In HUL's Disparagement Suit Against Kwick Living To Larger Bench]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Disparagement, Delhi High Court, Trademark, Hindustan Unilever Limited, Kwick Living, Justice AJ Bhambhani, Vim Surf Excel Disparagement, Trademark Infringement, Territorial Jurisdiction, Larger Bench Reference, Sanjay Dalia, Banyan Tree Holding, Court Shopping, Libel Tourism, Escorts v Tejpal Singh, Section 20 CPC, Section 134 Trade Marks Act, Nilesh Girkar, Kohinoor Seed Fields, War on Whats Hidden, Amit Sibal, Chander M Lall]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/19/694871-delhi-hc-beco-vim-surfexel.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-liverheal-makers-from-using-trade-dress-similar-to-himalaya-liv52-547363</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T17:42:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Healing Pharma From Using Trade Dress Similar To Himalaya Products]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Himalaya Global Holdings, Healing Pharma, Justice AJ Bhambhani, Himalaya Trade Dress, Liverheal 52, Liv 52, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, J Sai Deepak, Delhi High Court Mediation Centre, Time Bound Mediation, Ad Interim Injunction, Amicable Settlement, Class 05 Trademark, Deceptive Similarity, Healing Pharma India, CS COMM 892 2026, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696121-delhi-hc-liver-heal.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-approves-veranda-learning-amalgamation-dermerger-scheme-companies-act-2013-547355</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T17:26:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Approves Veranda Learning's Amalgamation-Demerger Scheme]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Veranda Learning Solutions, Veranda XL Learning Solutions, J.K. Shah Commerce Education, NCLT Chennai, Composite Scheme of Arrangement, Amalgamation, Demerger, Commerce Education Business, Companies Act 2013, Listed Company, SEBI, Stock Exchanges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/sebi-moves-supreme-court-against-kerala-hcs-writ-appeal-dismissal-over-escrow-funds-linked-to-atlas-ramachandran-547353</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T17:18:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Moves Supreme Court Against Kerala HC Ruling Dismissing Its Appeal Over Ramachandran Escrow Funds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Kerala High Court, Atlas Ramachandran, Atlas Jewellery, Escrow Account, Axis Bank, Income Tax Recovery, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696103-whatsapp-image-2026-08-24-at-225007.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/tds-credit-cant-be-denied-merely-because-deductor-failed-to-deposit-tax-with-govt-bombay-high-court-547352</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T17:17:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Taxpayer Cannot Be Denied TDS Credit For Deductor's Failure To Deposit Tax: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), TDS Credit, Section 199 Income Tax Act, Section 205 Income Tax Act, Deductor Default, TDS Not Deposited, Form 16, Form 16A, Form 26AS, TDS Mismatch, Income Tax Demand, TDS Refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/17/680441-bombay-high-court-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-firdosh-phiroze-pooniwalla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-allahabad-directs-roc-to-restore-name-of-acdi-voca-social-development-organisation-547348</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T17:04:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad Directs Restoration Of ACDI VOCA's Name Wrongly Struck Off Under FTE Scheme]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad, ACDI VOCA Social Development Organisation, RoC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696115-nclt-allahabad-acdi-voca-social-development-organisation.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-sale-of-counterfeits-bearing-sun-pharma-photostable-bello-marks-547343</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-25T16:53:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Sale Of Counterfeits With Sun Pharma's 'Photostable,' 'Bello' Marks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Sun Pharma Laboratories, Wear and Glow, Justice AJ Bhambhani, Bello Photostable, Photostable Gold, Trademark Infringement, Counterfeit Skincare, Order XI CPC, Intermediary Liability, Website Takedown Order, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, John Doe Lawsuit India, E-Commerce Trademark Infringement, Seller Disclosure Affidavit, CS COMM 845 2026, Skincare Piracy India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/25/696116-delhi-hc-bello.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
