<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/bombay-high-court-enforcement-directorate-must-return-seized-articles-after-180-days-unless-further-retention-permitted-555631</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T17:24:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Directs ED To Return Chellaram Mills Director's Seized Assets After 180-Day Limit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Enforcement Directorate, ED, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, PMLA Section 20, PMLA Section 17, 180 Day Retention Period, Seizure of Documents, Digital Devices, Locker Freezing, PMLA Adjudicating Authority, Mukesh Talreja, Chellaram Mills Pvt Ltd, Justice Bharati Dangre, Justice Ashish S Chavan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707766-bombay-hc-with-justice-bharati-dangre-and-justice-ashish-s-chavan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/rights-shares-below-market-value-not-automatically-taxable-bombay-high-court-quashes-grasim-reassessment-555629</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T16:56:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Proportionate Rights Shares Allotment Not Taxable Merely Due to Price Difference: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rights Shares, Section 56(2)(x), Income Tax Reassessment, Fair Market Value]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/gujarat-high-court-quashes-on-money-reassessment-over-lack-of-link-to-seized-register-555627</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T16:46:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Based On Broker's Register Without Live Nexus On-Money Payment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sanjaykumar Amrutlal Patel, Section 148, reassessment notice, on-money payment, seized inquiry register, live nexus, broker records, land purchase, Sections 132(4A) and 292C, Income Tax Act, 1961]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-permanently-injuncts-jabalpur-real-estate-developers-from-using-anantara-trademark-555624</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T16:30:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Permanently Injuncts Jabalpur Real Estate Developers From Using 'ANANTARA' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Minor Hotel Group, Anantara Trademark, Evergreen Dealcom, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Order XIII-A CPC, Summary Judgment, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Real Estate Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Anantara Downtown, Class 36 Trademarks, Jabalpur Real Estate, Ex Parte Permanent Injunction, Commercial Suit Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691811-delhi-hc-minor-anantara.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/bombay-high-court-declares-five-paintings-including-two-by-mf-husain-assets-mafatlal-dyes-and-chemicals-in-liquidation-555619</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T16:13:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Declares 5 Paintings, Including 2 By M.F. Husain, Mafatlal's Liquidation Assets]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Mafatlal Dyes and Chemicals Limited, Bombay High Court, Mafatlal Paintings Dispute, Sheetal Mafatlal, MF Husain, Company Liquidation, Official Liquidator, Companies Act 1956, Liquidation Estate, Ownership of Paintings, Family Settlement, Art Auction, Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707740-bombay-hc-mafatlal-dyes-chemicals-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitration-based-on-parties-consent-courts-cannot-disregard-contractually-mandated-steps-bombay-high-court-555615</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:58:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Dismisses ₹29.36 Lakh Arbitration Plea For Failure To Follow Agreed Mediation Process]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Mandatory Mediation, Section 11, Pre-Arbitration Procedure, Contractual Dispute Resolution, Maintenance Dues, Limitation Act, Appointment of Arbitrator]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-nectar-biopharma-in-fastactive-trademark-infringement-suit-555614</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:48:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Herbax Ayurveda From Selling Joint Pain Products Under 'FASTACTIVE' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Nectar Biopharma, Herbax Ayurveda, FASTACTIVE Trademark, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Order XXXIX CPC, Class 5 Trademarks, Pain Relief Gel, Benatton Pharma, Fast Active Arthro Cream, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707706-fast-active-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-successful-auction-bidder-no-vested-right-to-property-before-sale-concluded-555613</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:43:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Highest Bidder Has No Vested Right To Enforce Auction Sale Before Completion: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Asten Realtors Private Limited, Asten Aurum Woods, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Liquidation, Successful Bidder, Highest Bid, Vested Rights, E-Auction, Private Sale, Committee of Creditors, CoC, IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations, Homebuyers, Earnest Money Deposit, EMD Refund, Eva Agro Feed v. Punjab National Bank, Commercial Wisdom]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667714-750x450652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-admits-beacon-trusteeships-insolvency-plea-against-vatika-it-parks-for-rs-23375-crore-debenture-default-555612</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:35:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Initiates CIRP Against Vatika IT Parks Over ₹233.75 Cr. Default, Rejects Debenture Conversion Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Beacon Trusteeship Ltd., Vatika Group, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693416-nclt-delhi-with-vatika.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/limitation-act-applies-to-rera-compensation-claims-delay-in-handing-over-possession-does-not-create-fresh-cause-of-action-tamil-nadu-reat-555609</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:23:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delayed Possession Does Not Restart Three-Year Limitation For RERA Compensation Claims: TN REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA compensation, Limitation Act, Delayed possession, Three-year limitation, Contractual breach, Continuing cause of action, COVID-19 limitation extension, Villa owners association]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652503-reat-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/allegations-of-proxy-claims-family-ties-not-enough-to-exclude-creditors-from-coc-nclt-delhi-555608</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T15:18:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Allegations Of Proxy Claims, Family Ties Not Enough To Exclude Creditors From CoC: NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Financial Creditor, Benami, Proxy Claims]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-directs-bikanervala-to-remove-anandam-gift-pack-from-website-in-contempt-plea-by-anandam-sweets-555602</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T14:51:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs Bikanervala To Remove 'ANANDAM' Products From Website Within 24 Hours]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Anandam Sweets, Bikanervala Foods, Bikano Anandam, Trademark Contempt, Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Contempt Of Courts Act, Diwali Gift Pack, Website Take Down, Court Undertaking Breach, Commercial Suit Delhi, Trademark Infringement, Physical Appearance Order, Sweet Brand Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707694-bikanervala-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/pe-of-foreign-enterprise-cannot-be-presumed-from-indian-associates-activities-555597</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T14:39:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Foreign Company's PE Cannot Be Presumed From Indian Affiliate's Activities: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cornerstone OnDemand International Limited, Cornerstone OnDemand Services India Private Limited, PE determination, dependent agent permanent establishment, fixed-place PE, service PE, Article 5, Article 7, India-UK DTAA, arm’s-length remuneration, Morgan Stanley, functions performed, assets employed, risks assumed, ad hoc profit attribution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680236-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-high-court-allows-doctors-appeal-in-21-year-old-property-dispute-finds-prima-facie-intention-to-cheat-555596</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T14:22:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Allows Five Doctors' Appeal In 21-Year Property Dispute, Finds Prima Facie Fraud]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Commercial Arbitration, Interim Protection, Property Development Dispute, ₹60 Lakh Investment, Memorandum of Understanding, Specific Performance, Third-Party Rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707687-justice-a-s-gadkari-and-justice-kamal-khata-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-cannot-be-reassessed-after-insolvency-plan-approval-even-if-new-information-emerges-bombay-high-court-555589</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T14:10:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Cannot Be Reassessed After Insolvency Plan Approval Even If New Information Emerges: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Reassessment, Section 148, Section 148A, Insolvency Resolution Plan, Tax Evasion, NCLT, Extinguishment of Tax Dues]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-smartphone-accessories-business-in-rezoni-ip-dispute-555588</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T13:49:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Ex Parte Injunction Protecting REZONI Marks And Copyrighted Marketing Material]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Ritvik Bansal, REZONI, Trademark, Arshu Technologies, Copyright Infringement, Phone Accessories, Justice AJ Bhambhani, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Marketing Creatives, E-Commerce Injunction, Passing Off, Commercial Suit Delhi, Yamini Manohar Case, Ad Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707683-delhi-hc-rezoni.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-21-2026-555574</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T11:41:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 21, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707253-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/orissa-high-court-examines-challenge-to-retrospective-validity-of-income-tax-act-section-147a-issues-notice-555566</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-22T12:00:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T11:22:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Orissa High Court Issues Notice On Challenge To Section 147A Of Income Tax Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, Finance Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707696-income-tax-act-orissa-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-expunges-adverse-remarks-against-advocate-over-email-seeking-upload-of-nclt-order-555565</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T11:14:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Advocate Over Email Seeking Upload of NCLT Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, NCLT, Email]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652666-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-clears-maybach-asia-holdings-acquisition-sahrudaaya-health-care-private-limited-555564</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T11:03:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Clears Maybach Asia Holdings' Acquisition Of Sahrudaya Health Care]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, Sahrudaya Health Care, Maybach Asia Holdings II Pte. Ltd., KKR & Co. Inc., Acquisition, Merger Control, Combination Approval, Healthcare Sector, Hospital Network, Competition Law, Corporate Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683849-cci1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/cornell-universitys-1723-crore-educational-course-receipts-not-taxable-as-fees-for-included-services-555563</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-22T11:26:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T10:58:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cornell University's Fees For Executive Courses Offered To Indians Not Taxable Under India-US Treaty: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Article 12(5)(c), professional education, executive education, educational course receipts, Equalisation Levy, Fees for Technical Services, Fees for Included Services, India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, technical knowledge, treaty exclusion, Section 10(50) of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/22/707677-itat-cornell-university-logo.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/mere-location-of-customs-headquarters-in-delhi-does-not-confer-territorial-jurisdiction-delhi-high-court-555549</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T09:33:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Location Of Customs Headquarters In Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Swastik Overseas, Territorial Jurisdiction, Customs Seizure, Stainless Steel Coils, ICD Dadri, Commissioner of Customs Noida, Customs Tariff Heading 73269060, BIS Certification, IS 6911, Chartered Engineer Certificate, CBIC Policy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703573-justices-avneesh-jhingan-and-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-says-customs-brokers-licence-need-not-be-revoked-for-every-cblr-violation-555548</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-22T09:25:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says Customs Broker's Licence Need Not Be Revoked For Every CBLR Violation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Freight Logistics, Customs Broker Licence, Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018, CBLR, CESTAT, Licence Revocation, Customs Department, Proportionality of Punishment, Non-Woven Fabric Export, Prohibited Goods Export, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, DRI, Customs Broker, KYC Verification, Rule 13(12) CBLR, Rule 14 CBLR, ₹50,000 Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703573-justices-avneesh-jhingan-and-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/govt-has-own-panel-of-lawyers-yet-takes-sweet-time-to-move-files-delhi-high-court-refuses-to-condon-delay-in-customs-appeal-555533</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T19:45:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Dept Takes “Sweet Time” To Move Files Despite Panel Of Lawyers: Delhi HC Refuses To Condone Delay]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Customs Department, condonation of delay, 154-day delay, Customs appeal, CESTAT, limitation period, administrative negligence, government litigation, panel of lawyers, Supreme Court,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703573-justices-avneesh-jhingan-and-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/gst-portal-glitch-led-to-multiple-demand-summaries-delhi-high-court-directs-correction-within-15-days-555532</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-21T19:35:24+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T19:34:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Portal Glitch Led To Multiple Demand Summaries; Delhi High Court Directs Correction Within 15 Days]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST, GST Department, GST Portal, Form GST DRC-07, Technical Glitch, Erroneous Demand Summary, GST Demand, Input Tax Credit (ITC), Section 155 CGST Act, Section 107 CGST Act, Statutory Pre-Deposit, GST Assessment Order, GST Appeal, Blue Star International, Seized Documents, Burden of Proof, GST Adjudication, Justices Anil Kshetarpal, Bharat Parashar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703302-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-bharat-parashar-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/ao-is-quasi-judicial-authority-must-act-dispassionately-delhi-high-court-sets-aside-income-tax-assessment-order-555530</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T19:30:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[AO Is Quasi-Judicial Authority, Must Act Dispassionately: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Income Tax Assessment Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax Assessment, Income Tax Act, Assessing Officer, Natural Justice, Assessment Order Quashed, Faceless Assessment, National Faceless Assessment Centre, NFAC, Video Conferencing Hearing, Opportunity of Hearing, Taxpayer Reply, Section 144, Section 144B, Section 142(1), Income Tax Dispute, Fresh Assessment, Quasi-Judicial Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/bombay-high-court-rejects-enforcement-directorate-proceeds-of-crime-avinash-bhosale-sets-aside-property-attachment-555529</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T19:26:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Sets Aside Attachment Of ₹25 Crore Properties Linked To Businessman Avinash Bhosale]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Avinash Bhosale, Directorate of Enforcement, ED, PMLA, Proceeds of Crime, DHFL, YES Bank, Debenture Investment, Fund Disbursal, Property Attachment, SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal, Money Laundering]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/23/701970-bombay-hc-nitin-gadkari.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/unsuccessful-applicant-cannot-demand-re-voting-on-resolution-plan-merely-because-its-plan-was-rejected-nclt-delhi-555523</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T17:52:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Unsuccessful Applicant Cannot Demand Re-Voting On Resolution Plan Merely Because Its Plan Was Rejected: NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, RA, CoC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-separate-capital-reduction-application-not-necessary-share-cancellation-oppression-case-555521</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T17:39:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Says It Can Order Share Cancellation Without Separate Capital Reduction Plea In Oppression Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai, Notion Press Media, C. Janarthanan, Companies Act 2013, Section 242, Section 241, Section 66, oppression and mismanagement, reduction of share capital, cancellation of shares, share buyback, shareholder settlement, Cosmo Steels judgment, Supreme Court, corporate law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652583-nclt-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-liquidation-of-rainbow-papers-after-failed-implementation-of-resolution-plan-555520</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T17:28:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Orders Liquidation of Rainbow Papers After Failed Implementation Of Resolution Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Liquidation, Rainbow Papers Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707576-nclt-ahmedabad-rainbow-papers-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-dissolution-of-captivate-foods-after-finding-no-traceable-assets-555517</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T17:20:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Dissolves Captivate Foods After Finding No Traceable Assets Despite Pending Tax Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Captivate Foods Private Limited, Dissolution, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655534-nclt-ahmedabad-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-hc-sets-aside-260-crore-nrdc-award-says-failure-to-transfer-technology-cannot-automatically-justify-monetary-compensation-555514</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T17:08:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside ₹2.60 Cr. Damages Award Against Som Shiva Impex For Lack Of Loss Assessment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Contractual Damages, Proof of Actual Loss, Technology Commercialisation, Technology Transfer, Royalty Agreement, Mitigation of Loss, Patent Illegality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666865-justice-subramonium-prasad-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-dissolution-of-siddhi-vinayak-logistic-after-completion-of-liquidation-555511</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T16:55:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Orders Dissolution Of Siddhi Vinayak Logistic After Completion Of Liquidation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Siddhi Vinayak Logistic Ltd, NCLT Ahmedabad, Dissolution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655535-nclt-ahmedabad-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-rishikesh-hotel-from-using-anandam-in-the-himalayas-mark-in-trademark-dispute-with-ananda-555509</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T16:43:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Rishikesh Hotel From Using Mark Similar To Ananda Resort's Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, IHHR Hospitality, Ananda In The Himalayas, Anandam In The Himalayas, Ishanee Villas Tech, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Order XXXIX CPC, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Luxury Resort Trademark, Narendra Nagar Rishikesh, Class 42 Trademarks, Hotel Trademark Dispute, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707554-ananda-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/telangana-rera-orders-action-against-sivom-projects-and-its-md-for-selling-40-plots-without-rera-registration-555507</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T16:26:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana RERA Initiates Penalty Proceedings Against Sivom Projects, MD For 44 Unregistered Plot Sales]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana RERA, Sivom Projects, Unregistered Plot Sales, Mandatory Project Registration, Promoter Liability, General Power of Attorney, Penalty Proceedings, Sivom Sahasra II]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654496-rera-telangana.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-bengaluru-style-dosa-brand-benne-in-trademark-dispute-with-benne-delhi-555503</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T15:33:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Benne Delhi From Using 'BENNE' Trademark In South Indian Cuisine Business]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Shimow Hospitality, Benne Dosa, Benne Delhi, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Class 43 Trademark, South Indian Cuisine, Bandra Benne Dosa, Swiggy Food Delivery, Order XXXIX CPC, Commercial Suit Delhi, Prior User Rights, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707551-delhi-hc-benne.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-notices-hidden-in-different-portal-section-bombay-high-court-quashes-62-lakh-tax-demand-over-denial-of-hearing-555501</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T15:22:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Sets Aside ₹62.42 Lakh GST Demand Over Notices Uploaded In Wrong Portal Section]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Portal, Show Cause Notice, Tax Demand, Natural Justice, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/04/698050-justice-sandesh-d-patil-justice-m-s-karnik-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-orders-takedown-of-fake-kotak-trading-schemes-across-social-media-in-trademark-infringement-case-555497</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-21T18:13:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T15:07:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of Fake Kotak Trading Accounts From Social Media]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Kotak Securities, John Doe Injunction, Justice Vikas Mahajan, Online Investment Fraud, Meta Platforms, Telegram Injunction, WhatsApp Trading Scam, Basic Subscriber Information, KYC Details Disclosure, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, MeitY Blocking Orders, Trademark Impersonation, Financial Fraud Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707552-delhi-hc-kotak.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/design/delhi-high-court-rejects-godrej-contempt-plea-against-geeken-seating-in-design-infringement-case-555495</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-21T14:59:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T14:55:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Godrej's ₹1 Crore Contempt Claim Against Geeken Over Registered Designs]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Godrej and Boyce, Geeken Seating, Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, Contempt Of Courts Act, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Furniture Design Infringement, Wilful Disobedience, Civil Contempt, Registered Design Breach, Civil Prison Detention, Punitive Damages, Design Act 2000, Commercial Suit Delhi, Design Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707553-godrej-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-reserves-order-jane-street-challenge-sebi-non-disclosure-relevant-documents-555493</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T14:35:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Reserves Order On Jane Street's Plea Over SEBI's Non-Disclosure Of Relevant Documents]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jane Street, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Natural Justice, Right to Fair Hearing, Counterparty Trade Data, Disclosure of Documents, Market Manipulation, BANKNIFTY, NIFTY 50, Interim Order, JSI Investments Private Limited, Jane Street Singapore Pte Limited, ₹4,843.57 Crore Gains]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707549-jane-street-securities-appellate-tribunal-sat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-takes-down-fake-experion-emerelle-reserve-website-using-real-estate-developers-marks-555492</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T14:22:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of Fake Website Misusing Experion's 'Emerelle Reserve' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Experion Developers, Experion Emerelle Reserve, Justice Tejas Karia, Domain Take Down, Fake Real Estate Website, Basic Subscriber Information, Order XXXIX CPC, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Gurugram Real Estate, RERA Registration, Endurance International Group, Digital Trademark Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707527-experion-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/government-cannot-cite-lok-sabha-elections-for-delayed-arbitration-appeals-delhi-high-court-555488</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T14:09:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Govt. Must Prove How Election Duties Prevented Timely Filing Of Arbitration Appeals: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Lok Sabha Elections 2024, Arbitration Appeals, Condonation of Delay, Non-Est Filing, Arbitral Award, Limitation Period, Government Departments, Watershed Management]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707525-justice-nitin-wasudeo-sambre-and-justice-amit-sharma-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-restrains-ampra-biobact-from-using-pk-bor-mark-in-indian-agro-chem-pk-mor-infringement-suit-555485</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T13:51:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Restrains Ampra Biobact From Using 'PK-BOR' Fertilizer Mark Similar To 'PK MOR']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Indian Agro Chem, Ampra Biobact, PK MOR Trademark, PK-BOR Trademark, Justice Madhav J Jamdar, Fertilizer Trademark Dispute, Deceptive Similarity, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Clause XIV Letters Patent, Class 1 Trademarks, Agrochemical Litigation, Over The Counter Inputs, Prior User Rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/13/706223-bombay-high-court-justice-madhav-jamdar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/simultaneous-withdrawal-of-all-three-arbitrators-cannot-be-treated-as-termination-of-arbitration-delhi-high-court-555479</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-21T13:05:40+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T13:04:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Simultaneous Withdrawal Of All Three Arbitrators Cannot Be Treated As Termination Of Arbitration: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitrator Recusal, Substitution Of Arbitrators, Termination Of Arbitral Proceedings, Arbitration Fees, NHAI, IRB Westcoast Tollway, Presiding Arbitrator, Highway Concession Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/02/28/588997-justice-sachin-datta-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/supreme-court/supreme-court-stays-investigation-pinarayi-bijayan-for-a-week-sets-aside-kerala-high-court-division-bench-order-cmrl-exalogic-555471</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T12:57:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CMRL-Exalogic Case: Supreme Court Stays Investigation Against Kerala Ex-CM Pinarayi Vijayan, Kin, For A Week]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Pinarayi Vijayan, CMRL-Exalogic Case, Kerala High Court, FIR, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Section 66(2) PMLA, BNSS Section 175(4), Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited, Exalogic Solutions, Enforcement Directorate, Investigation Stayed, Leave to Appeal, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice V Mohana]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707508-supreme-court-pinarayi-vijayan-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/allahabad-high-court-seeks-centre-reserve-bank-of-india-response-release-bank-deposit-comatose-patients-to-dependents-555446</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-21T10:45:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court Calls For Law Or RBI Guidelines To Allow Comatose Patients' Dependents Access To Bank Funds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court, Comatose Patients, Bank Deposits, Dependents, Reserve Bank of India, Union of India, Uttar Pradesh Government, Chief Secretary, Shobha Gopalakrishnan v. State of Kerala, Uma Mittal Case, Bank Account Funds, Succession Certificate, Banking Guidelines, Medical Expenses]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/21/707511-allahabad-hc-with-justice-ajit-kumar-and-justice-garima-prashad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-20-2026-555430</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T22:04:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 20, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707253-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-october-12-october-18-2026-555425</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T20:20:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: October 12 - October 18, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644694-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/gujarat-high-court-cheque-bounce-compensation-recoverable-under-criminal-procedure-cannot-be-added-to-civil-recovery-suit-555416</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T19:18:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cheque Bounce Compensation Cannot Be Recovered Through Separate Civil Suit: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, cheque dishonour, compensation, civil recovery suit, amendment of plaint, different cause of action, BNSS 2023, CrPC 1973, Article 227 Constitution of India, legal expenses]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/27/623068-justice-maulik-jitendra-shelat-gujarat-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-october-12-october-18-2026-555415</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T19:10:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: October 12 - October 18, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644693-direct-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/itc-cannot-be-denied-solely-on-allegation-that-supplier-is-bogus-without-examining-buyers-evidence-gstat-agra-555412</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T18:06:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely On Allegation That Supplier Is Bogus Without Examining Buyer's Evidence: GSTAT Agra]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Input Tax Credit, Bogus Supplier, GST Registration Restoration, Section 16(2)(b) CGST Act, GSTAT Agra, Genuine Purchases, Tax Demand, E-Way Bills, Section 74 CGST Act.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/11/25/632796-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-explains-whether-shareholders-could-represent-company-legal-proceedings-no-authorisation-555410</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-20T17:28:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Shareholding Alone Does Not Authorise Shareholders To Represent Company in Court: NCLT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, Shree Basaveshwara Sugars Limited, Companies Act 2013, Sections 241-242, Oppression and Mismanagement, Shareholder Rights, Board Authorisation, Corporate Representation, Arbitral Award, ₹52.71 Crore Liability, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Section 37 Appeal, Derivative Proceedings, Inherent Powers of NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652668-nclt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
