<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gujarat-high-court-quashes-4343-crore-gst-demand-against-amul-over-cross-charging-555089</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-16T18:24:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T18:23:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Quashes ₹43.43 Crore GST Demand Against Amul]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation, Amul, internally generated services, Head Office, branch offices, cross-charging, revenue neutrality, Rule 28 CGST Rules, GST demand, fraud, suppression of facts, Section 74 CGST Act, IGST demand quashed]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/12/14/385888-amul.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/lawyers-assumption-that-judgment-was-postponed-cannot-justify-ircts-delayed-appeal-karnataka-high-court-555084</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T18:11:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Lawyer's Assumption That Judgment Was Postponed Cannot Justify IRCT's Delayed Appeal: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IRCTC, Amulya Enterprises, Condonation of Delay, Commercial Appeal, Limitation Period, Counsel's Negligence, Pronouncement of Judgment, Sufficient Cause]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/22/701669-karnataka-hc-justice-anu-sivaraman-and-justice-t-p-vivekananda.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/fema/high-court/ed-must-first-prove-contravention-before-burden-shifts-under-foreign-exchange-regulation-delhi-high-court-555078</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-16T17:58:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:57:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ED Must First Prove FERA Violation Before Shifting Burden Of Proof To Accused: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Laxman T. Advani, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, FERA, Enforcement Directorate, Section 71 FERA, Foreign Exchange Appellate Tribunal, ₹20 Lakh Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706930-whatsapp-image-2026-10-16-at-134537.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/reproducing-substantial-portions-of-award-while-deciding-challenge-not-non-application-of-mind-delhi-high-court-555075</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:46:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Reproducing Substantial Portions Of Award While Deciding Challenge Not Non-Application Of Mind: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Non-Speaking Judgment, Non-Application of Mind, Judicial Scrutiny, Contractual Interpretation, Sahara Lease, Mumbai International Airport, Airports Authority of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/directors-cannot-evade-liquidation-duties-by-claiming-one-director-managed-company-affairs-nclt-kochi-555073</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:32:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Directors Cannot Evade Liquidation Duties By Claiming One Director Managed Company Affairs: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Goodwin Packpet Pvt Ltd, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Liquidation, Directors’ Liability, Company Cash Balance, Balance Sheet, Statutory Duties of Directors, Sections 19(2) and 34(3) IBC, Corporate Debtor, Liquidator.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/22/681620-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/cash-loan-violating-income-tax-provisions-still-legally-recoverable-in-cheque-bounce-cases-bombay-high-court-555070</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:22:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cash Loan Violating Income Tax Provisions Still Enforceable Under Cheque Bounce Law: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cash Loan, Income Tax Returns, Section 269SS, Cheque Dishonour, Legally Enforceable Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706944-bombay-high-court-justice-mm-sathaye.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/shareholder-cannot-maintain-individual-appeal-after-being-given-representative-remedy-nclat-555069</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:21:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Shareholder Cannot Maintain Individual Appeal After Failing To Avail Representative Remedy: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Company Law, Shareholder]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652483-nclat-05.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-sets-aside-cenvat-credit-demand-against-ramco-cements-says-machinery-repair-and-installation-services-not-automatically-excluded-555066</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:16:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Remands Ramco Cements' CENVAT Dispute, Says Actual Nature Of Work Must Be Examined]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, Machinery Repair and Installation Services, plant expansion project]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706936-cestat-chennai-the-ramaco-cements.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/borrowers-cannot-bypass-sarfaesi-pre-deposit-requirement-through-writ-petition-challenging-npa-classification-karnataka-high-court-555061</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-16T17:57:53+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:08:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Borrowers Cannot Bypass SARFAESI Pre-Deposit Requirement By Challenging Original NPA Classification: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, SARFAESI Act, Canara Bank, NPA Classification, Pre-Deposit Requirement, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, MSME Restructuring, Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706952-whatsapp-image-2026-10-16-at-142101.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/karnataka-high-court-appoints-retired-district-judge-as-sole-arbitrator-in-air-force-college-construction-dispute-555058</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T17:04:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Appoints Arbitrator In ₹2.53 Cr. Dispute Concerning Military Engineer Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Sole Arbitrator, Military Engineer Services, Air Force Technical College, Varsha Constructions, Construction Dispute, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Contractual Claims]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706926-whatsapp-image-2026-10-16-at-133426.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/audit-objection-alone-not-enough-to-reopen-income-tax-assessment-sikkim-high-court-grants-relief-to-zydus-healthcare-555054</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:58:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Sikkim High Court Quashes Zydus Healthcare Reassessments, Says Audit Objection Isn't New Evidence]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Reassessment, Audit Objection, Section 148, Section 149(1)(b), Change of Opinion, Zydus Healthcare.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706934-sikkim-high-court-zydus-healthcare-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitration-act-interim-relief-unavailable-in-electricity-disputes-when-commission-can-grant-similar-relief-delhi-high-court-555052</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:57:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Act Interim Relief Unavailable In Electricity Disputes When Commission Can Grant Similar Relief: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Electricity Regulatory Commission, Section 86(1)(f), Section 94(2), Section 9 Arbitration Act, Bank Guarantee Encashment, Battery Energy Storage Project, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Interim Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670210-justice-tushar-rao-gedela-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/tax-order-cannot-be-challenged-again-through-revision-after-rejection-of-correction-plea-himachal-pradesh-high-court-555050</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:47:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rejection Of Correction Plea Cannot Be Challenged In VAT Revision: Himachal Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh High Court, HP VAT Act 2005, Section 48, Section 47, Revision Petition, Rectification Application, Tax Tribunal, Super Power Steels, Tax Dispute, Maintainability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706925-himachal-pradesh-high-court-justice-ajay-mohan-goel-and-romesh-verma-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-rejects-epfo-claim-against-peejay-agro-foods-uncrystallised-dues-555049</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:39:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi Rejects EPFO's ₹59.46 Lakh Claim Against Peejay Agro Foods Over Uncrystallised Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, EPFO, Provident Fund Dues, EPF Act 1952, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, Liquidation, Crystallised Liabilities, Sections 7A, 7Q and 14B EPF Act, Peejay Agro Foods Private Limited, NCLAT, Rachna Jhunjhunwala]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652667-nclt-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/apartment-owners-cannot-avoid-maintenance-charges-merely-because-no-separate-agreement-was-signed-punjab-rera-555048</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:37:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Apartment Owners Cannot Avoid Maintenance Charges Merely Because No Separate Agreement Was Signed: Punjab RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Maintenance Charges, Buyer's Agreement, Apartment Owners, Maintenance Agreement, Statutory Obligations, Interest on Outstanding Dues, Housing Society Maintenance, Recovery of Maintenance Charges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/13/533754-rera-punjab.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-sets-aside-registry-refusal-of-exponent-energy-exponent-mark-555045</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:22:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside Refusal To Register Exponent Energy's 'EXPONENT' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Exponent Energy, Registrar of Trademarks, Section 18(5) Trade Marks Act, Section 11(1) Trade Marks Act, Section 12 Honest Concurrent Use, Dr Justice AD Maria Clete, Non-Speaking Order, Trademark Registration Refusal, Class 42 Trademarks, EV Battery Technology, Remand Order, Trademark Examination Report, Specification of Services, Intellectual Property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706962-madras-hc-exponent-energy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/kerala-high-court-sets-aside-nclt-order-refusing-implead-alleged-share-transferees-company-mismanagement-petition-555044</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T16:11:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala HC Sets Aside NCLT Order Refusing To Implead Alleged Share Transferees In Company Mismanagement Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice Harisankar V Menon, NCLT Kochi, Company Mismanagement, Share Transfer Dispute, Impleadment, Proper Parties, Principles of Natural Justice, Section 421 Companies Act 2013, Article 226 Constitution of India, Tharakan Web Innovations Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/delhi-high-court-dismisses-spicejets-plea-for-more-time-to-deposit-14451-crore-in-dispute-with-kalanithi-maran-kal-airways-555040</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T15:54:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Denies SpiceJet More Time To Deposit ₹144.51 Crore Interest In Dispute With Kalanithi Maran]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SpiceJet, Kalanithi Maran, Kal Airways, Ajay Singh, Delhi High Court, Arbitral Award, ECLGS, ₹144.51 Crore]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706955-whatsapp-image-2026-10-13-at-154707.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-must-assess-prospects-of-recovering-arbitral-claim-before-ordering-liquidation-nclat-555037</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T15:52:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Must Assess Prospects Of Recovering Arbitral Claim Before Ordering Liquidation: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, NCLT, CIRP Revival, Liquidation,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652479-nclat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/merely-introducing-an-importer-to-a-freight-forwarder-does-not-establish-involvement-in-an-illegal-activity-555033</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T15:34:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Introduction To Freight Forwarder Does Not Prove Intent To Evade Customs Duty: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Importer-Exporter Code, Section 114AA of the Customs Act, Sections 112(a) of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702299-cestat-chennai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/or-otherwise-is-a-phrase-of-extension-not-limitation-supreme-court-555028</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T14:43:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Or Otherwise' Clause In Contract Bars Arbitral Interest Awards Beyond Delayed Payments: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Contractual Prohibition On Interest, Pre-Reference Interest, Pendente Lite Interest, Post-Award Interest, Arbitration Agreement, Contractual Interpretation, Ejusdem Generis, Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706907-justice-aravind-kumar-and-justice-vipul-m-pancholi-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/no-sufficient-link-with-searched-group-calcutta-high-court-quashes-income-tax-case-transfer-555026</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T14:28:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Single Business Transaction Cannot Justify Income Tax Case Transfer: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Business Transaction, Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, Fixed Deposit Receipts, Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706902-income-tax-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/postal-delivery-to-a-locality-does-not-prove-delivery-to-a-company-delhi-hc-555023</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T14:08:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says Incomplete Address Cannot Prove Award Service, Rejects GAIL's Limitation Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GAIL Gas, Saraswati Concast, arbitral award, proof of service, incomplete address, limitation, Article 227, arbitration objections]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706888-justice-ajay-digpaul-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/government-companies-cannot-be-excluded-from-ibc-nclt-admits-insolvency-plea-against-karnataka-food-and-civil-supplies-corporation-ltd-555018</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T13:52:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru Says Govt. Companies Subject To IBC, Admits CIRP Against Karnataka Food Corporation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Government Company,  IBC, NCLT, Insolvency Plea , Karnataka Food And Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/22/681620-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/delhi-high-court-restrains-fssai-from-acting-against-emami-over-healthy-tasty-brand-name-555001</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T12:51:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains FSSAI From Acting Against Emami Over 'Healthy & Tasty' Brand Name]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Emami Agrotech, Healthy and Tasty, Registered Trademark, Food Safety, Show Cause Notice, Justice Amit Mahajan, Union of India, Misleading Label, Interim Stay, Writ Petition, Brand Name Protection, Food Standards, Commercial Litigation, Regulatory Action]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706911-delhi-hc-emami-oil.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/bombay-high-court-imposes-5-lakh-costs-on-man-for-police-complaint-against-court-officers-in-data-theft-case-554996</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T12:48:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs On Man For Police Complaint Against Court Officers In Data Theft Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Avanse Financial Services, Arun Kumar Arjunan, Data Theft, Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, Court Receiver, Forensic Audit, Confidential Information, Sealed Cover, Exemplary Costs, Justice Arif S Doctor, Trade Secrets, Abuse of Process, Copyright Injunction, Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/16/668015-justice-arif-doctor-and-bombay-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/madras-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-mythri-movie-makers-against-piracy-of-vijay-deverakonda-starrer-ranaballi-554981</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T12:16:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Grants Injunction Against Piracy Of Vijay Deverakonda's Ranaballi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Mythri Movie Makers, Ranabaali Movie Piracy Suit, Justice PB Balaji, CS COMM DIV 288 2026, Ex Parte Anti Piracy Injunction, John Doe Ashok Kumar Order, Ranabaali Copyright Protection, Yalamanchili Ravi Shankar Producer, Navod Prasannan K Advocate, Internet Service Provider, ISP, X Corp, YouTube, Meta, Telegram, Injunction, Telugu Movie, Piracy, Blocking Order, Cinematograph Film, Copyright]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706881-ranabaali-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-grants-bail-to-sahara-group-functionary-in-76-crore-money-laundering-case-554978</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T11:58:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Grants Bail To Sahara Group Functionary In ₹76 Crore Money Laundering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Anil Vailaparampil Abraham, Enforcement Directorate, PMLA, Sahara Group, Ponzi Scheme, ₹76.29 Crore, Regular Bail]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706828-whatsapp-image-2026-10-16-at-091845.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/central-sales-tax-form-h-must-be-filed-by-time-of-assessment-to-claim-tax-benefit-andhra-pradesh-high-court-554974</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T11:39:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Central Sales Tax | Form H Must Be Filed By Time Of Assessment To Claim Tax Benefit: Andhra Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[assessing authority, Rule 12(7) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules 1957, Section 13(1) CST Act 1956]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706861-justice-battu-devanand-justice-maheswara-rao-kuncheam-justice-avadhanam-hari-haranadha-sarma-andhra-pradesh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/actor-kriti-sanon-moves-delhi-high-court-to-protect-her-personality-rights-554967</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T11:17:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Actor Kriti Sanon Moves Delhi High Court To Protect Her Personality Rights]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Kriti Sanon, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Pravin Anand Advocate, Personality Rights Lawsuit India, Image and Voice Rights Protection, Janhvi Kapoor Personality Rights, Meenakshi Chaudhary Injunction Suit, Rakesh Bedi Court Case, Publicity Rights Overlap, Obscene Content URL Takedown, Commercial Exploitation Proof, Amicus Curiae Gautam Bhatia]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706874-delhi-hc-kriti-sanon.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-delhi-hc-order-denying-ctuils-87-crore-bank-guarantee-claim-against-idbi-bank-554966</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T11:14:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Direct IDBI Bank To Honour ₹8.7 Crore Bank Guarantee To CTUIL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Central Transmission Utility of India, IDBI Bank, Lanco Vidarbha Thermal Power, Bank Guarantee, ₹8.7 Crore, NCLT, NCLAT, Writ Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/16/706849-whatsapp-image-2026-10-16-at-102916.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-15-2026-554954</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-16T11:29:49+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T10:51:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 15, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658695-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-11.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/high-court/rera-brochure-clause-allowing-20-deduction-on-refund-without-interest-is-unfair-allahabad-high-court-554933</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-16T09:29:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[RERA| Brochure Clause Allowing 20% Deduction On Refund Without Interest Is Unfair: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA,Brochure,  Allahabad High Court,Justice Saurabh Lavania]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652625-allahabad-high-court-lucknow-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/delhi-high-court-grants-bail-to-former-rcom-executive-in-alleged-14977-crore-money-laundering-case-554923</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T21:04:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Former RCOM Executive In Alleged ₹149.77 Crore Money Laundering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punit Narendra Garg, Reliance Communications, Anil Ambani Group, ₹40,185 Crore Loan Dues, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Enforcement Directorate, Loan Fund Diversion, Proceeds of Crime, Luxury Yacht, Rouse Avenue Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706599-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-112416.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/yes-banks-8415-crore-at-1-bond-write-down-after-reconstruction-scheme-took-effect-was-illegal-supreme-court-554922</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T21:00:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Yes Bank's ₹8,415 Crore AT-1 Bond Write-Down After Reconstruction Scheme Took Effect Was Illegal: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Yes Bank, AT-1 Bonds, ₹8,415 Crore Write-Down, Reserve Bank of India, Reconstruction Scheme, Administrator’s Powers, Bombay High Court, Bondholders’ Rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706770-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-194707.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-appeal-delay-time-spent-pursuing-writ-petition-wont-be-automatically-excluded-from-limitation-delhi-high-court-554916</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T19:43:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Time Spent In Writ Petition Not Automatically Excluded From GST Appeal Limitation: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST appeal limitation, Section 14 Limitation Act, 1963, GST adjudication order, limitation period, writ petition, Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Appellate Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703302-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-bharat-parashar-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-approves-pothys-retail-43-crore-resolution-plan-arihant-retail-private-limited-554914</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T19:38:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Approves Pothys Retail's ₹43.02 Crore Resolution Plan For Arihant Retail]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai, Arihant Retail Private Limited, Pothys Retail Private Limited, Resolution Plan, ₹43.02 Crore Resolution Plan, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Committee of Creditors, CIRP, Commercial Wisdom, Section 30 IBC, Section 31 IBC, Resolution Plan Approval]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667714-750x450652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-calls-assessees-absence-from-cross-examination-despite-10-day-notice-indolent-and-negligent-554913</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T19:37:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Calls Taxpayer's Absence From Cross-Examination Despite 10-Day Notice “Indolent And Negligent”]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax Assessment, Cross-Examination, Assessee, Income Tax Act, Assessing Officer, Natural Justice, Pradeep Kumar Sehgal, Yogesh Jain, Income Tax Dispute, Witness Cross-Examination, Assessment Order Set Aside, Delhi High Court Judgment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/madras-high-court-closes-aamir-khan-productions-copyright-suit-over-batwara-1947-after-withdrawal-554912</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T19:25:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Closes Aamir Khan Productions' Copyright Suit Over “Batwara 1947” After Withdrawal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Madras High Court, Aamir Khan Productions, Justice PB Balaji, Batwara 1947 Movie Suit, CS COMM DIV 239 2026, John Doe Anti Piracy Suit Withdrawn, Copyright Infringement Film Lawsuit, PK Law Firm Advocate, Internet Service Provider ISP Blocking, OA 835 836 of 2026 Dismissed, Cinematograph Film Batwara 1947, Bollywood Anti Piracy Litigation, Commercial Suit Withdrawal Madras HC, October 13 2026 Order, Film Copyright Protection India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706753-batwara-1947.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/ibc-profitability-of-corporate-debtor-irrelevant-to-insolvency-proceedings-once-default-is-established-supreme-court-554911</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T19:24:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Profitable Companies Can Face Insolvency Proceedings If They Default On Loans: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, CIRP, Section 7, Financial Default, Information Utility, Omkara Asset Reconstruction, Hotel Insolvency]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706741-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-183354.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-quashes-income-tax-penalty-order-passed-during-pendency-of-itat-appeal-554907</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:52:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Quashes Income Tax Penalty Order Passed During Pendency Of ITAT Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Penalty Order, income tax, Delhi HIgh Court, Delhi HIgh Court news, Tax judgment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-allows-first-motion-pocl-enterpises-limited-and-planetfirst-green-amalgamation-554905</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:45:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Allows First Motion For POCL Enterprises-Planetfirst Green Amalgamation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai, POCL Enterprises Limited, Planetfirst Green Private Limited, First Motion Application, Scheme of Amalgamation, Sections 230–232 Companies Act, 2013, Shareholders' Meeting, Unsecured Creditors, Corporate Restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/26/682495-nclt-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/breach-of-family-settlement-over-trade-name-falls-under-commercial-division-not-ipr-division-calcutta-high-court-554902</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:43:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Breach of Family Settlement Over Trade Name Falls Under Commercial Division, Not IPR Division: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Ramji Lal Agarwal, Sourav Agarwal, Justice Aniruddha Roy, GA COM 1 2026 CS COM 178 2026, Sindharam Sanwarmal Trade Name, Cotton Street Kolkata Dry Fruits Dispute, Family Settlement Locational Covenant, Commercial Division vs IPR Division Jurisdiction, Section 134 Trade Marks Act Maintainability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/647305-justice-aniruddha-roy-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-permanently-bars-hisar-coaching-outfit-from-using-career-power-mark-and-metis-eduvantures-name-554899</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:34:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Permanently Bars Hisar Coaching Operators From Using 'CAREER POWER' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Metis Eduventures Private Limited, Career Power Coaching Centre, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, CS COMM 916 2022, Order 8 Rule 10 CPC Decree, CAREER POWER Trademark Passing Off, SCG Contracts 120 Day Written Statement Limit, Metis Eduvantures Hisar Lawsuit, Ex Parte Permanent Injunction Commercial Suit, copyright]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/06/598730-justice-purushaindra-kumar-kaurav.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-rejects-new-delhi-municipal-council-plea-dismiss-indian-hotels-company-38-crore-covid-era-license-fee-suit-554896</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:27:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects NDMC Plea To Dismiss Taj Mahal Hotel Operator's ₹38.35 Crore COVID-19 Licence Fee Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Indian Hotels Company Limited, NDMC, Taj Mahal Hotel, COVID-19 Pandemic, Force Majeure, Licence Fee, Section 385 NDMC Act, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Limitation, Public Premises Act, Specific Relief Act, Leave and Licence Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666865-justice-subramonium-prasad-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/water-supply-agreement-is-sale-of-water-not-taxable-service-cestat-delhi-554890</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T18:10:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Water Supply Agreement Is Sale Of Water, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bharat Aluminium Company Limited, Hasdeo Barrage, Water Resources, Natural Resources, Section 66D(a)(iv), Finance Act 1994, Revenue Neutrality, Limitation, CENVAT Credit, Service Tax Demand]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/amount-collected-from-dhabas-under-yatri-plaza-yojna-not-taxable-as-service-tax-cestat-allahabad-554883</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T17:37:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Amounts Collected From Dhabas Under 'Yatri Plaza Yojna' Not Taxable To Service Tax: CESTAT Allahabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, dhaba owners, ₹25 collection, declared service, Section 66E(e), Finance Act 1994, quid pro quo, passenger safety, service tax demand, Business Auxiliary Service]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702304-cestat-allahabad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/calcutta-high-court-has-quashed-gst-penalty-orders-totalling-over-2523-lakh-imposed-in-connection-with-two-detained-trucks-554877</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T17:28:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Quashes ₹25.23 Lakh GST Penalty, Orders Release Of Two Detained Trucks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Detained Trucks, Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, penalty orders, Section 129(1) of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706715-justice-aryak-dutt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-approves-grt-jewellers-acquisition-majority-stake-tribhovandas-bhimji-zaveri-554862</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T16:43:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves GRT Jewellers' Acquisition Of Majority Stake In Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, GRT Jewellers, Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri, TBZ, Merger Control, Acquisition Of Majority Stake, Competition Law, Gems And Jewellery Industry]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706688-cci-grt-jewellers-tribhovandas-bhimji-zaveri-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-upholds-cirp-admission-against-shri-paramsukh-edible-foods-relies-on-tds-deductions-and-gst-input-tax-credit-554859</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T16:39:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Delhi Upholds CIRP Against Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods Based On GST Credit And TDS Records]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods, CIRP, NCLAT, TDS, ITC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652478-nclat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/sale-of-tender-documents-not-a-service-no-service-tax-payable-on-tender-fees-cestat-delhi-554856</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T16:27:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tender Documents Sale Not A Service, No Service Tax Payable On Fees: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi, Service Tax, Tender Documents, Rajasthan State Road Development Corporation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684083-cestat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/share-buyout-cannot-be-ordered-without-finding-of-oppression-and-mismanagement-nclat-554854</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T16:19:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Cannot Order Share Buyout Without Finding Oppression, Mismanagement: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Company Law, Oppression]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-permanently-bars-domzz-pizza-domind-pizza-outlets-in-dominos-trademark-suit-554846</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T16:03:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Bars 3 Pizza Outlets From Using 'Domind's', 'Domzz' And Other Names Mimicking Domino's]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Domino's Pizza, Jubilant FoodWorks, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, CS COMM 461 2024, Domind's Pizza Injunction, Domzz Pizza Trademark Suit, Order 13A CPC Summary Judgment, Zomato Swiggy Search Prompt Manipulation, Cloud Kitchen Trademark Infringement, Food Brand Deceptive Similarity Test, Dominick Pizza Precedent, Ex Parte Summary Judgment Delhi HC, October 8 2026 Judgment, Commercial Division Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706668-delhi-hc-dominos.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/companies-act-does-not-bar-oral-agreements-between-companies-rajasthan-high-court-554845</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T15:46:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 21 Of Companies Act Does Not Bar Oral Agreements Between Companies: Rajasthan High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court, Gnex Impex, Shyam And Shyam Oils, Oral Agreements, Companies Act 2013, Indian Contract Act, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Justice Rekha Borana]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706660-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-133701.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/bombay-high-court-directs-ed-to-issue-noc-for-redevelopment-of-society-building-despite-pmla-attachment-of-one-flat-554842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T15:37:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Directs ED To Issue NOC For Society Redevelopment Despite PMLA Attachment Of One Flat]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Antaral Co-operative Housing Society, Enforcement Directorate, PMLA Attachment, Flat No. 4, Society Redevelopment, No-Objection Certificate, Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706653-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-132838.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/nclt-mumbai-approves-first-motion-merger-of-hsbc-investdirect-companies-allows-capital-reduction-554838</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T15:27:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Clears First Motion For HSBC InvestDirect Merger With 1% Share Capital Reduction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai, HSBC InvestDirect, HSBC InvestDirect Sales & Marketing, Composite Scheme of Arrangement, First Motion Application, Amalgamation, Capital Reduction, Companies Act 2013, Shareholder and Creditor Meetings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/14/706459-nclt-mumbai-hsbc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-high-court-directs-income-tax-department-to-act-on-vodafone-ideas-pending-tax-cases-continues-stay-on-699-crore-recovery-554835</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T15:21:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Vodafone Idea Tax Dispute: Bombay HC Directs Income Tax Dept To Pass Orders In 13 Matters In 6 Weeks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vodafone Idea, Bombay High Court, Income Tax Refund, ₹699.54 Crore Recovery, Income Tax Department, Section 245(2), Section 153, Appellate Orders, Statutory Limitation, Tax Refund Dispute, Income Tax Act 1961]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706637-bombay-high-court-vi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/freshly-manufactured-goods-cannot-replace-re-imported-goods-for-customs-duty-exemption-554831</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T14:51:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Service Tax Orders Against A.P. Constructions, Orders Fresh Adjudication]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[A.P. Constructions India Pvt. Ltd., Service Tax Demand, Landowners' Share, Residential Construction, Works Contract Service, GTA Services, Manpower Supply, Security Services, Legal Services, Reverse Charge Mechanism, Limitation, Remand]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654283-cestat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/payment-made-to-stop-former-employee-from-competing-with-company-is-tax-deductible-even-if-paid-in-instalments-bombay-high-court-grants-relief-to-tata-chemicals-554827</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T14:27:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Upholds Tata Chemicals' Tax Deduction For Non-Compete Fee Paid To Former Employee]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Tata Chemicals Ltd., Income Tax Act 1961, Section 37(1), Non-Compete Fee, Revenue Expenditure, Capital Expenditure, Income Tax Deduction, Payment in Instalments, Business Expenditure, ITAT,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706634-bombay-high-court-tata-chemicals.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-bombay-hc-order-quashing-yes-banks-8415-crore-at-1-debenture-bond-write-off-554823</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T14:11:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T14:09:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[BREAKING | Yes Bank AT-1 Bond Write-Off: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Bombay High Court Order Quashing It]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Yes Bank, AT-1 Bonds, Axis Trustee Services, Bombay High Court, Reserve Bank of India, ₹8,415 Crore, Bondholders, Banking Regulation Act, Reconstruction Scheme, Bond Write Off]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706572-whatsapp-image-2026-10-14-at-230931.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/gstat-delhi-has-directed-a-real-estate-company-to-pass-on-3120-lakh-to-66-homebuyers-of-its-atri-green-valley-project-554822</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T14:05:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GSTAT Delhi Directs Builder To Pay ₹31.20 Lakh To 66 Homebuyers For Failure To Pass On ITC Benefit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[homebuyers, Atri Green Valley project, Section 171(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, Section 171(3A) of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/16/674391-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-authorities-cannot-seize-cash-under-the-cgst-act-merely-on-the-suspicion-that-it-represents-proceeds-from-unaccounted-sales-554818</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T13:53:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Orders Release Of ₹47.45 Lakh Cash Seized Over Alleged Unaccounted Sales]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, residential premises, Section 2(52) of the CGST Act, unaccounted sales]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/14/699971-justice-arun-monga-justice-ashutosh-kumar-rajasthan-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/calcutta-high-court-rejects-tax-departments-objection-to-birla-corporations-cross-objections-554814</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T13:41:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Allows Birla Corporation's Cross-Objections In Income Tax Appeal Under CPC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Code of Civil Procedure, Birla Corporation Limited, Income Tax Department]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706602-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-112448-am.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/have-to-draw-some-line-delhi-high-court-to-examine-scope-of-personality-publicity-rights-amid-rising-suits-554787</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T12:43:33+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T12:40:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[“Have To Draw Some Line”: Delhi High Court To Examine Scope Of Personality, Publicity Rights Amid Rising Suits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Rakesh Bedi, personality rights, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Intellectual Property Division, IPD Delhi High Court, celebrity personality rights India, right to publicity case, actor moves court, personality rights litigation India, Janhvi Kapoor suit, Meenakshi Chaudhary suit, Khushi Kapoor suit, AI generated content lawsuit, image misuse online, deepfake celebrity case, unauthorised merchandise lawsuit, John Doe suit Delhi High Court, celebrity image protection, Bollywood actor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/23/701939-actor-rakesh-bedi-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/delhi-high-court-holds-it-can-execute-commercial-decrees-below-2-crores-where-original-suit-exceeded-pecuniary-jurisdiction-554779</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T12:28:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says It Can Execute Decrees Below Pecuniary Threshold If Original Suit Exceeded It]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Ozone Spa, Co-Incept Hospitality, Justice Subramonium Prasad, Commercial Decree, Execution Petition, ₹2.53 Crore Suit, ₹1.19 Crore Decree]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706624-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-120423.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/kerala-high-court-dismisses-ex-cm-pinarayi-vijayans-plea-to-appeal-against-fir-direction-in-cmrl-exalogic-case-554751</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T19:43:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T11:30:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Dismisses Ex-CM Pinarayi Vijayan's Plea To Appeal Against FIR Direction In CMRL-Exalogic Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Pinarayi Vijayan, Veena Vijayan, Mohammed Riyas, Kerala High Court, CMRL-Exalogic Case, Enforcement Directorate, Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited, ₹1.72 Crore Payments, Prevention of Corruption Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/09/705391-kerala-hc-pinarayi-vijayan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/rajesh-exports-allegedly-misrepresented-998-of-consolidated-revenue-sebi-in-interim-order-continuing-curbs-554748</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T11:13:31+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T11:13:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajesh Exports Allegedly Misrepresented 99.8% Of Consolidated Revenue: SEBI In Interim Order Continuing Curbs]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-to-ex-raheja-developers-director-nayan-n-raheja-in-2425-crore-pmla-case-554745</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T12:57:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T10:44:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Raheja Developers' Ex-Director In ₹2,425 Crore Money Laundering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Nayan Raheja, Anticipatory Bail, Enforcement Directorate, PMLA, Raheja Developers, Money Laundering, Homebuyers’ Funds, Saket Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706593-whatsapp-image-2026-10-15-at-104928.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-stays-cirp-admission-against-polycab-india-limited-554741</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-15T11:01:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T10:35:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against Polycab India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT,  Polycab India Limited, Asier Metals Pvt. Ltd., IBC, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/15/706594-nclat-delhi-with-asier-metals-private-limited-and-polycab-india-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-14-2026-554732</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T10:07:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 14, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658693-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-10.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/bombay-high-court-refuses-phantom-studios-injunction-against-kangana-ranaut-starrer-queen-full-power-554721</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-15T09:12:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Refuses To Restrain Kangana Ranaut's 'Queen Full Power' Over Copyright Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Phantom Studios India, Jiostar India, Queen Film Trademark Suit, Justice Sandeep V Marne, Kangana Ranaut Queen Full Power, Vikas Bahl Director Lawsuit, Passing Off Film Title Injunction, Secondary Meaning Film Title Law, Spiritual Sequel Film Copyright, Trigger Happy Entertainment, Digital 18 Media]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/11/685942-bombay-hc-queen-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-directs-spicejet-to-maintain-5880-lakh-in-bank-accounts-in-dispute-with-travel-agent-554690</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-14T20:17:26+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T20:16:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Directs SpiceJet To Maintain ₹58.80 Lakh In Bank Accounts In Dispute With Travel Agent]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SpiceJet Limited, Travel2Agent.com, Arbitral Award Enforcement, Bank Account Attachment, Outstanding Arbitral Dues, Partial Payment, Disclosure of Assets, Execution Proceedings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/spicejet.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/ibc-appeal-limitation-period-begins-from-pronouncement-of-order-not-collection-of-certified-copy-supreme-court-554685</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T19:55:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC | Limitation For Appeals Against NCLAT Orders Runs From Pronouncement, Not Certified Copy Receipt: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, IBC, Limitation, Certified Copy, NCLAT, Appeal, Central Tax, Samyu Glass, Delay]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/14/706521-whatsapp-image-2026-10-14-at-192739.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/pan-misuse-delhi-high-court-quashes-391-crore-tax-demand-against-security-guard-554681</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T19:33:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[PAN Misuse | Delhi High Court Quashes ₹3.91 Crore Income Tax Demand Against Security Guard]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Lalit v Union of India, Income Tax Assessment, PAN Misuse]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-quash-812-crore-income-tax-reassessment-notice-against-pernod-ricard-554678</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T19:20:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash ₹8.12 Crore Income Tax Reassessment Notice Against Pernod Ricard]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Pernord Ricard, Blender's Pride, Income Tax Reassement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703124-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-aditi-choudhary-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/can-companies-in-liquidation-skip-gst-pre-deposit-to-file-appeals-delhi-high-court-to-examine-554676</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T19:13:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Can Companies In Liquidation Seek Exemption From GST Pre-Deposit To File Appeals? Delhi High Court To Examine]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Moser Baer India, GST, CGST Act, IBC, Liquidation, Section 107(6), Section 53, Pre-Deposit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/14/706512-whatsapp-image-2026-10-14-at-184644.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/ckd-electric-two-wheelers-without-battery-charger-not-eligible-for-customs-duty-exemption-cestat-554675</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T19:08:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CKD Electric Two-Wheelers Without Battery, Charger Not Eligible For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rissala Electric Motors, Rule 2(a), General Rules for Interpretation, Notification No. 50/2017-Cus., Electric Two-Wheelers, Concessional Customs Duty, Differential Duty, Confiscation, Customs Act, Section 111(m), Section 112]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702303-cestat-new-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/calcutta-high-court-refuses-itc-exemption-from-pre-litigation-mediation-in-counterfeit-cigarette-case-554673</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T18:53:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Refuses ITC Exemption From Pre-Litigation Mediation In Counterfeit Cigarette Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, ITC Limited, SMM Tobacco Private Limited, Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty, Justice Partha Pratim Roy, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre Litigation Mediation Exemption, Urgent Interim Relief Test, Cigarette Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Tobacco Lawsuit, Police FIR Criminal Remedies Civil Suit, Novenco Building Precedent, Continuing Cause of Action Section 12A, Return of Plaint]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/23/675879-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/airline-cancellation-charges-are-compensation-for-breach-of-contract-not-taxable-service-cestat-delhi-554672</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T18:51:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Airline Cancellation Charges Are Compensation For Breach Of Contract, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Lufthansa German Airlines, Section 66E(e), Finance Act 1994, Cancellation Charges, No-Show Fees, Liquidated Damages, Breach of Contract, Service Tax Demand, Abatement, Passenger Air Transport Services]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/14/706481-cestat-lufthansa-german-airlines.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/karnataka-rera-tribunal-upholds-order-directing-homebuyer-to-pay-245-lakh-for-bengaluru-flat-554670</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-14T18:43:59+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-14T18:43:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka REAT Upholds Order Directing Homebuyer To Pay ₹2.45 Lakh For Bengaluru Flat]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Missing Apartment Amenities, Homebuyer Compensation, ALN Buildtech, Outstanding Sale Consideration, Apartment Owners' Association, Adjudicating Officer, Possession Delay, Balcony Safety Deviations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652505-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
