<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-quashes-rejection-of-bpl-telecoms-vces-declaration-as-notice-was-delayed-537540</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T18:22:41+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T18:22:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Quashes Rejection Of BPL Telecom's VCES Declaration As Notice Was Delayed]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[VCES Declaration, Time-Barred ,Show Cause Notice ,Roving Inquiry,CESTAT Chennai,CESTAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654281-cestat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/similarity-with-excel-alone-not-bad-faith-delhi-hc-sets-aside-award-transferring-exceltotallyin-to-microsoft-537539</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T18:17:58+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T18:13:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Similarity With 'Excel' Alone Not Bad Faith; Delhi HC Sets Aside Award Transferring 'exceltotally.in' To Microsoft]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation, exceltotally.in, Domain Name Dispute, INDRP, Bad Faith, Trademark Similarity, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Public Policy of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679294-microsoft.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/indexed-cost-of-construction-must-be-allowed-where-building-details-form-part-of-sale-deed-itat-chennai-537536</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T17:51:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Indexed Cost Of Construction Must Be Allowed Where Building Details Form Part Of Sale Deed: ITAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[registered sale deed, indexation on the cost of construction, capital gains, Section 48 of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-secured-creditor-cannot-be-forced-to-issue-noc-for-sale-of-mortgaged-assets-537534</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T17:35:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Secured Creditor Cannot Be Compelled To Issue NOC For Sale Of Secured Assets: NCLT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, National Company Law Tribunal, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 60(5) IBC, Piramal Finance Limited, Gulam Mustafa Enterprises Private Limited, Secured Creditor, No Objection Certificate, NOC, Secured Assets, Mortgaged Property, Asset Monetisation, Corporate Debtor, Commercial Discretion, Security Interest, Homebuyers, Real Estate Project, Debt Settlement, Insolvency Proceedings, Section 7 IBC, Financial Creditor, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652668-nclt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/jurisdicitional-seat-of-arbitration-not-altered-because-proceedings-conducted-elsewhere-allahabad-high-court-537530</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T17:22:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Seat Cannot Be Shifted Merely Due To Convenience Venue: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jurisdicitional Seat,  Arbitration, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/25/676019-justice-piyush-agrawal-allahabad-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/madras-high-court-affirms-de-novo-arbitration-of-25-crore-dispute-between-isha-foundation-and-bsnl-537528</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T17:07:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Affirms Fresh Arbitration In ₹2.5 Cr. Isha Foundation-BSNL Call Billing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court,  De Novo ,Arbitration, Isha Foundation , BSNL]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679206-whatsapp-image-2026-06-11-at-140307.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-financial-hardship-liquidity-crunch-or-market-conditions-not-valid-defence-to-reject-section-7-petition-537527</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T17:03:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits CIRP Against Areli Commerce, Rejects Financial Hardship Defence In S.7 Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Standard Capital Markets Ltd., Areli Commerce Pvt Ltd, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655533-nclt-ahmedabad-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/rejection-of-personal-guarantors-repayment-plan-by-coc-has-same-effect-as-tribunal-rejection-nclt-indore-537526</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T16:55:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rejection Of Personal Guarantor's Repayment Plan By CoC Has Same Effect As Tribunal Rejection: NCLT Indore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, Personal Guarantor Insolvency, Bankruptcy, CoC, Repayment Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/11/678562-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141820-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-orders-takedown-of-fake-signature-global-websites-grants-interim-injunction-in-trademark-dispute-537525</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T16:54:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Ex Parte Injunction Against Clone Websites Impersonating Signature Global]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Signature Global, Ashok Kumar, John Doe, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Website Cloning, Phishing Scam, Real Estate Fraud, Hostinger, GoDaddy, Instagram, Justice Jyoti Singh, Domain Name, Copyright Infringement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679229-signatureglobal-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/interpretational-dispute-cannot-trigger-extended-limitation-under-service-tax-law-537521</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T16:37:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Bars Extended Limitation In CERA Audit Case, Says Issue Interpretational, Not Suppression]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[non-payment of service tax, CERA Audit Objection, suppression of facts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654283-cestat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/no-retention-of-flat-booking-amount-on-voluntary-exit-from-purchase-without-forfeiture-clause-hp-rera-537520</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T16:29:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Retention of Flat Booking Amount On Buyer's Voluntary Exit From Purchase Without Forfeiture Clause: HP RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Homebuyer refund, booking amount, voluntary withdrawal, forfeiture of deposit, agreement for sale, WhatsApp evidence, promoter accountability, HP RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529365-rera-himachal-pradesh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-continuation-of-proceedings-unwarranted-after-settlement-in-cheque-bounce-case-537519</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T16:26:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Compromise In Commercial Disputes Warrants Closure Of 138 NI Act Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Subhas Mehla, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Section 147 NI Act, Cheque Bounce Case, Cheque Dishonour, Compounding of Offence, Compromise, Settlement Agreement, Section 528 BNSS, Inherent Powers, Mukesh Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Commercial Dispute, Criminal Proceedings, Compensation, Full and Final Settlement, Execution Proceedings, Conviction, Sentence Modification, Period Already Undergone, Quashing Proceedings, Release Warrant, Cheque Dishonour Complaint]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679205-punjab-and-haryana-hc-justice-subhas-mehla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-in-amalgamation-of-arcelor-mittal-nippon-steel-group-entities-537518</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T15:45:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion In Amalgamation Of Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel Group Entities]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India,, Subsidaries, Amalgamation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679228-whatsapp-image-2026-06-11-at-31427-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-chandigarh-initiates-cirp-against-primezone-developers-holds-admission-of-project-delay-due-to-auction-does-not-exonerate-default-537517</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T15:28:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh Admits Primezone Developers To CIRP, Treats Plot Allottee Payments As Financial Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, Primezone Developers Pvt. Ltd., CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652582-nclt-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/liability-of-erstwhile-partnership-cannot-be-fastened-without-proof-of-successor-liability-537515</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T15:13:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T15:10:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Quashes Service Tax Demand On Proprietorship, Rejects Liability For Erstwhile Firm]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[proprietorship concern, erstwhile partnership firm, distinct legal entity, VAT, industrial construction service]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654280-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/madras-high-court-restores-idhayam-trademark-suits-rules-affixing-mark-in-india-for-export-is-a-triable-cause-of-action-537512</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T15:07:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Revives Trademark Dispute Over “Idhayam” Mark, Orders Joint Trial In Connected Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Justice P. Velmurugan, Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, V.V.V and Sons, Idhayam, Meenakshi Overseas LLC, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Export as Infringement, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Division Bench, Sesame Oil, US Trademark Registry, Job Worker, Non-Joinder, Suppression of Facts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/11/679212-idhayam-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/result-of-assessment-proceedings-has-bearing-on-criminal-prosecution-under-gst-allahabad-high-court-537507</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T16:34:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T14:46:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Result Of Assessment Proceedings Has Bearing On Criminal Prosecution Under GST: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court, GST Act, Bail, GST Fraud, Input Tax Credit (ITC), Assessment Proceedings, Criminal Prosecution, Shakib Qureshi, Tax Evasion, GST Investigation, Section 73 GST Act, Section 74 GST Act, Justice Vikram D Chauhan, Fake Firms, Economic Offences, Tax Litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/27/658762-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/party-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-after-submitting-to-civil-court-jurisdiction-delhi-hc-upholds-291-lakh-decree-for-dollar-security-537505</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T14:45:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Defendant Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause After Participating In Trial Without Objection: Delhi HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Recovery decree, unpaid invoices, security services agreement, arbitration clause, participation in civil suit, outstanding dues, contractual privity, invoice recovery]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/10/11/438661-justice-neena-bansal-krishna-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/punjab-haryana-hc-quashes-canara-banks-fraud-classification-for-failure-to-furnish-full-forensic-audit-report-537499</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T14:17:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes Canara Bank's Fraud Classification For Failure To Furnish Full Forensic Audit Report]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana HC, Canara Bank, Fraud, Forensic Audit Report]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/03/15/463561-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-recording-of-evidence-video-conference-punjab-article-21.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/cinema-operators-must-pass-on-gst-rate-reduction-to-consumers-despite-state-regulated-ticket-pricing-gstat-delhi-537498</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T14:17:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[High Court Fare Approval Cannot Defeat GST Anti-Profiteering Mandate For Cinema Operators: GSTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GSTAT Delhi, GSTAT, GST, Anti-Profiteering, Cinema Ticket Pricing, Cinema Tickets, Movie Theatres, ASR Cinema LLP, Section 171 CGST Act, GST Rate Reduction, GST Benefit to Consumers, Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), Consumer Welfare Fund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/16/674395-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/high-court/kerala-high-court-refuses-to-stay-learnfluence-education-ipo-sebi-approval-can-be-challenged-before-sat-537496</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T17:27:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T13:06:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Declines To Stay Lakshya IPO, Cites Alternate Remedy Before SAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Lakshya CA Campus, Learnfluence Education Limited, IPO, Initial Public Offering, Adheesh Damodaran, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, Share Transfer Dispute, Fraud Allegations, Promoter Dispute, Corporate Governance, Writ Petition, Alternative Remedy, Section 15T SEBI Act, IPO Approval, Police Investigation, District Crime Branch Kochi, Interim Stay, Learnfluence IPO, Lakshya IPO, Capital Markets, Securities Law, Company Law, Shareholding Dispute, Public Issue, Stock Market Regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/20/668828-kerala-high-court-lakshya-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/minority-opinion-awarding-lesser-amounts-does-not-invalidate-majority-arbitral-award-madras-high-court-537495</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T12:50:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T12:48:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Minority Opinion Awarding Lesser Amounts Does Not Invalidate Majority Arbitral Award: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration and Conciliation Act, infrastructure arbitration, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, SPML Infra Limited, reduction in scope of work, additional excavation claims, majority arbitral award, Section 37 appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/15/661674-750x450652633-madras-hc-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-judge-pk-mishra-recuses-from-hearing-jacqueline-fernandezs-plea-against-charge-framing-in-200-crore-sukesh-chandrasekhar-pmla-case-537493</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T12:33:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SC's Justice PK Mishra Recuses From Hearing Jacqueline Fernandez's Plea In ₹200 Crore PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jacqueline Fernandez, Sukesh Chandrasekhar, PMLA, Money Laundering, ECIR, ₹5.71 Crore Gifts, Patiala House Charges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679137-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-215654.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/bombay-high-court-refers-1858-crore-construction-dues-dispute-against-piramal-sunteck-realty-to-mediation-537482</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T11:16:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Refers ₹18.58 Crore Construction Dues Dispute Against Piramal Sunteck Realty To Mediation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Signia Waterfront Project, Oram Realty, Piramal Sunteck Realty, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre-Institution Mediation, ₹18.58 Crore Construction Dues]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/08/679171-justice-milind-jadhav-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-june-01-june-07-2026-537479</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T10:47:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: June 01 - June 07, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Digest, Indirect Tax,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652650-weekly-digest-indirect-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-june-01-june-07-2026-537468</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T09:36:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: June 01 - June 07, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Digest, Direct Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652649-weekly-digest-direct-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/bombay-high-court-imposes-2-lakh-costs-on-lt-entities-over-suit-challenging-removal-as-slum-developer-537467</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T09:34:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Imposes ₹2 Lakh Costs On L&T Entities Over Suit Challenging Removal As Mumbai Slum Developer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Slum Redevelopment Fraud, Bombay High Court, Adani Group Entity, L&T Realty, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, ₹2 Lakh Costs]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/18/668349-justice-gauri-godse.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-june-10-2026-537465</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-11T09:08:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: June 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658695-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-11.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/economic-decision-not-a-criminal-offence-delhi-hc-quashes-fir-ed-case-against-newsclick-over-foreign-funding-537450</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T21:20:14+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T21:19:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Economic Decision, Not A Criminal Offence': Delhi HC Quashes FIR, ED Case Against NewsClick, Founder Over Foreign Funding]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court quashes NewsClick FIR and ED case, Prabir Purkayastha, FDI allegations, share valuation dispute, economic decision not criminal offence, ECIR quashed, PMLA case, foreign investment in digital media, FEMA compliance, Delhi High Court judgment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679130-newsclick.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-bengaluru-dismisses-netambit-insolvency-plea-against-flipkart-pre-existing-dispute-537441</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T19:20:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru Dismisses Netambit's Insolvency Plea Against Flipkart, Finds Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd, Netambit Value First Services Pvt Ltd, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 9 IBC, CIRP, Operational Debt, Operational Creditor, Corporate Debtor, Pre-Existing Dispute, Section 8 Demand Notice, Affiliate Marketing Programme, Insolvency Petition, Mobilox Innovations v Kirusa Software, Invoice Dispute, Email Correspondence, Affiliate Onboarding, Governance Concerns, Operational Creditor Claim, Rejection of CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678775-nclt-bengaluru-flipkart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-former-reliance-power-cfo-ashok-kumar-pal-in-6820-crore-pmla-case-537440</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T19:16:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Former Reliance Power CFO Ashok Kumar Pal In ₹68.20 Crore PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SECI Tender, Forged Bank Guarantees, Reliance Power, Ashok Kumar Pal, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Money Laundering, Battery Energy Storage System]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678902-whatsapp-image-2026-06-09-at-195536.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/plea-in-delhi-high-court-alleges-nclat-e-filing-glitches-hampering-appeal-against-ccis-rapido-order-537439</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-11T07:46:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T19:07:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Plea In Delhi High Court Alleges NCLAT E-Filing Glitches Hampering Appeal Against CCI's Rapido Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Delhi High Court, Vedansh Pandey, Rapido, Competition Commission of India, E-Filing Portal, Registry Defects]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/05/678214-750x450664917-750x450657345-750x450652672-delhi-high-court-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bare-possibility-of-confusion-enough-in-pharma-marks-bombay-high-court-restrains-use-of-aciprox-537436</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T18:33:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Bare Possibility Of Confusion' Enough In Pharma Marks: Bombay High Court Restrains Use Of 'ACIPROX']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Alkem Laboratories, Numen Pharma, ALCIPRO, ACIPROX, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ciprofloxacin, Aceclofenac, Phonetic Similarity, Anti-dissection Rule, Section 13 Trade Marks Act, Medicinal Preparations, Schedule H Drugs, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679103-alkem-numen-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-quashes-continued-suspension-of-nhava-sheva-cfs-notes-no-inquiry-was-initiated-537434</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T18:22:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Quashes Continued Suspension Of Nhava Sheva CFS, Notes No Inquiry Was Initiated]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Container Freight Station, CFS, Customs Cargo Service Provider, CCSP, HCCAR 2009, Regulation 11(2), Regulation 12, Suspension of CFS Operations, Customs Custodian, DRI Investigation, Chinese Firecrackers, Restricted Goods Import, Smuggling Allegation, Natural Justice, Show Cause Notice, Inquiry Proceedings, Customs Area Security, Revenue Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679064-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-155923.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/drt/drat-kolkata-upholds-rejection-of-bank-borrower-settlement-that-kept-auction-purchaser-in-the-dark-537430</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T18:10:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DRAT Kolkata Upholds Rejection of Bank-Borrower Settlement That Kept Auction Purchaser In the Dark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/17/409951-drat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/sarfaesi-auction-timelines-are-mandatory-not-directory-unjustified-deviation-vitiates-sale-supreme-court-537420</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T17:52:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Auction Timelines Are Mandatory, Not Directory; Unjustified Deviation Vitiates Sale: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, SARFAESI Act, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rule 9, Auction Sale, Secured Asset, Auction Purchaser, Sale Consideration, Mandatory Compliance, Payment Timeline, Delay in Deposit, Written Extension, Mortgage Redemption, Guarantor, Bank Recovery Proceedings, Indian Bank, DRT, DRAT, Auction Sale Validity, Sale Certificate, Recovery of Secured Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/09/26/562789-justices-dipankar-datta-ag-masih-and-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/karnataka-high-court-rejects-trademark-suit-after-finding-reliefs-were-undervalued-to-avoid-commercial-court-537419</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T17:34:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Rejects Trademark Suit After Finding Reliefs Were Undervalued To Avoid Commercial Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, MRN GOLD, MR GOLD, Rice, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Specified Value, Forum Shopping, Justice Ravi V Hosmani, Raichur, Bengaluru Civil Court, Deliberate Undervaluation, Plaint Rejection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679088-justice-ravi-v-hosmani-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/persons-unconnected-to-a-real-estate-project-cannot-seek-relief-under-rera-telangana-reat-537418</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T17:24:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana REAT Upholds “Aparna Sunstone” Registration, Limits RERA To Allottees Or “Aggrieved Persons”]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana REAT, Aparna Sunstone, Aparna Infra Housing Pvt. Ltd., aggrieved person, locus standi, title dispute, project registration, civil court jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/04/525992-real-estate-appellate-tribunal-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-chandigarh-dispenses-with-shareholder-and-creditor-meetings-in-amberpramber-enterprises-amalgamation-scheme-537416</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T17:04:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh Allows AmberPR–Amber Enterprises Merger First Motion, Dispenses With Meetings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh,AmberPR Technoplast India Pvt. Ltd.,Amber Enterprises India Ltd, Amalgamation Scheme, Company Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679003-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-125624-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/dispute-regarding-the-applicability-of-bocw-act-non-arbitrable-chhattisgarh-high-court-537411</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T17:12:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T16:47:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[BOCW Cess Dispute Not Arbitrable, Must Be Decided Under Statutory Mechanism: Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[BOCW Act, Non-Arbitrable , Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/chhattisgarh-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/karnataka-high-court-remands-trademark-suit-sets-aside-return-of-plaint-for-non-examination-of-specified-value-537410</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T16:47:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Remands Trademark Suit, Sets Aside Return Of Plaint For Non-Examination Of Specified Value]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Kanpur Flowercycling, Sarathi International, Tulasi Trademark, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Section 12, Article 227, Specified Value, Intangible Rights, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Forum Shopping, Section 8 CC Act, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Trademark Infringement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679076-justice-tara-vitasta-ganju-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/credit-on-common-inputs-cannot-lapse-when-other-final-products-remain-dutiable-537406</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T16:27:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT New Delhi Holds CENVAT Credit Does Not Lapse If Other Dutiable Final Products Continue]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[exemption from excise duty, Rule 6(6)(v) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, exempted products, Rule 11(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/02/653444-cestat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/tehsildars-possession-letter-cannot-be-treated-as-sarfaesi-measure-for-computing-limitation-drt-chandigarh-537403</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T16:49:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T16:22:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tehsildar's Possession Letter Cannot Be Treated As SARFAESI 'Measure' For Computing Limitation: DRT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRT Chandigarh. SARFAESI Act, Limitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410181-debt-recovery-tribunal-drt.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-chennai-ocean-freight-mark-up-earned-by-freight-forwarder-not-liable-to-service-tax-537401</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:56:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mark-Up On Ocean Freight Cannot Be Taxed Merely Because It Exceeds Actual Freight Paid: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ocean Freight, Freight Forwarder, Freight Mark-Up, Steamer Agent Service, Service Tax Demand, Freight Charges, Taxable Value, Valuation, Finance Act 1994, CESTAT Chennai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678997-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-133654.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/service-tax-not-payable-on-one-time-water-infrastructure-charges-collected-by-sipcot-from-industrial-allottees-cestat-chennai-537400</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T16:05:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:55:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SIPCOT Water Infrastructure Charges Exempt From Service Tax Under Section 104: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax exemption, SIPCOT, water supply infrastructure charges, water capital cost, one-time upfront amount, Section 104 Finance Act, industrial development corporation, long-term lease of industrial plots, support services, service tax demand, CESTAT Chennai, industrial allottee, water infrastructure cost, taxability of upfront charges, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679066-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-134457.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/taxpayer-entitled-to-seek-gst-registration-revival-by-filing-pending-returns-paying-dues-537394</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:35:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Registration Can Be Restored On Filing Pending Returns, Clearing Dues Under Rule 22(4): Gauhati HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[non-filing of returns, restoration of registration, furnishing pending returns, Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules 2017, cancellation of GST registration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678984-justice-kardak-ete.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-consolidated-remuneration-disclosures-amc-employees-537391</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T15:34:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:32:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Consolidated Pay Disclosures For Mutual Fund AMCs, Flags Privacy Concerns]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Asset Management Companies, AMC, Executive Remuneration, Remuneration Disclosure Framework, Consolidated Remuneration Disclosure, Fund Manager Remuneration, Mutual Funds, Association of Mutual Funds in India, AMFI, Investor Protection, Transparency, Employee Privacy, Unitholders, Consultation Paper, Public Comments, Disclosure Norms, AMC Employees, Scheme-Level Disclosure, Mutual Fund Regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/low-income-of-share-applicants-alone-cannot-justify-addition-under-section-68-itat-delhi-537384</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:18:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 68 Addition Unsustainable Where Identity and Creditworthiness Are Proven: ITAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income , Share Applicant, ITAT Delhi,ITAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-lift-injunction-against-ks-agros-rice-packaging-over-similarity-to-zarda-king-537383</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:17:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Lift Injunction Against KS Agro's Rice Packaging Over Similarity To Zarda King]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GRM Foodkraft, Zarda King, Zarda Special, Basmati Rice, Trade Dress Infringement, Passing Off, Justice Jyoti Singh, KS Agro Impex, Double Chabi, Deceptive Similarity, Golden Sella Rice, Initial Interest Confusion, FMCG IP Litigation, Packaging Imitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679022-zarda-king-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-mumbai-customs-cannot-classify-imported-dolomite-blocks-as-marble-by-relying-on-test-reports-of-other-importers-537382</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T15:14:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Cannot Reclassify Dolomite as Marble Based on Other Importers' Test Reports: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Classification, Rough Dolomite Blocks, Rough Marble Blocks, Customs Tariff Act, CTH 2518 1000, CTH 2515 1210, DRI Investigation, Chemical Test Report, Laboratory Report, Misclassification, Differential Duty Demand, Confiscation, Customs Penalty, Burden of Proof, Classification Dispute, Import of Stones, Dolomite Imports, Marble Imports, Customs Duty Exemption, Evidence in Classification Cases]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652517-cestat-01-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/drt-mumbai-dismisses-borrowers-review-plea-seeking-to-reopen-issues-already-decided-537381</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T16:50:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:57:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DRT Mumbai Dismisses Borrower's Review Plea Seeking To Reopen Issues Already Decided.]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DRT Mumbai, Mercury Apparel Ltd, Union Bank of India, Review Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410181-debt-recovery-tribunal-drt.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/high-court-cannot-order-recall-of-order-appointing-arbitrator-remedy-under-inherent-powers-allahabad-high-court-537378</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:39:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 11 Arbitration Orders Not Reviewable, Article 215 Powers Limited: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[High Court,Arbitrator, Remedy , Inherent Powers ,Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/27/658762-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-high-court-orders-no-coercive-action-against-anil-ambani-pending-challenge-to-black-money-act-537377</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T14:40:23+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:35:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders No Coercive Action Against Anil Ambani Pending Challenge To Black Money Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Anil Ambani, Black Money Act, Constitutional Challenge, Interim Protection, Prosecution Stay, Penalty Proceedings, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/679010-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-141325.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/composite-gst-show-cause-notice-covering-more-than-one-assessment-year-is-legally-unsustainable-and-cannot-form-the-basis-of-adjudication-537373</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T14:04:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Quashes GST Notice Issued For Multiple Assessment Years Through Single Proceeding]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[consolidated notice for multiple assessment years, assessment years, composite notices]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/01/23/455152-407498-justice-ziyad-rahman-and-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-holds-four-odisha-truck-associations-liable-price-fixing-restricting-market-access-537371</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T13:58:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Finds Four Odisha Truck Associations Guilty Of Cartelisation, Orders Cease-And-Desist]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Indian Steel Association, Odisha Truck Owners' Associations, Cartelisation, Freight Rate Fixation, Price Fixing, Mineral Transportation, Anti-Competitive Conduct, Independent Transporters, Market Access Restriction, Transportation Services, State Transport Authority, STA, Odisha Mining Sector, Section 3(1) Competition Act, Section 3(3)(a) Competition Act, Section 3(3)(b) Competition Act, Section 48 Competition Act, Cease and Desist Order, Office Bearers Liability, Competition Law, Freight Charges, Truck Associations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/17/656504-cci-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/patent-illegality-ground-unavailable-to-challenge-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitrations-bombay-hc-537363</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T12:52:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Patent Illegality Ground Unavailable To Challenge Awards In International Commercial Arbitrations: Bombay HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[International Commercial Arbitration, ONGC, Sapura Fabrication, Patent Illegality, Mumbai High South Field, Additional Works, Offshore Contract, Section 34 Challenge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/03/671422-750x450654895-justice-sandeep-marne-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-restrains-use-of-ai-cloned-voice-of-ayurvedic-guru-acharya-manish-in-personality-rights-suit-537361</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T12:31:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Relief To Acharya Manish Against AI-Generated Fake Endorsements]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Acharya Manish, Manish Grover, Personality Rights, Publicity Rights, AI Voice Cloning, Deepfakes, John Doe, Meta Platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Ayurveda, Jeena Sikho Lifecare, Justice Saurabh Banerjee, Integrated Healthcare]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678959-manish-grover-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/mere-criminal-overtones-or-claimed-public-overtones-do-not-make-dispute-non-arbitrable-bombay-high-court-537358</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T11:55:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere 'Criminal Overtones' Or Claimed 'Public Overtones' Do Not Make Dispute Non-Arbitrable: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 8, Share Subscription-cum-Shareholders Agreement, Film Production Company, Fraud Allegations, Arbitrability, Forgery, Shareholder Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/610214-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-awards-against-guarantors-despite-ibc-moratorium-on-debt-537355</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T11:37:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Awards Against Guarantors Despite IBC Moratorium On Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Abhyudaya Co operative Bank, IBC Moratorium, Guarantor Liability, Arbitration Award Set Aside, Cross Examination Rights, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Nirmangold Group]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/678946-sharmila-deshmukh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-holds-difc-penal-notice-and-certificate-satisfy-cpc-requirement-for-foreign-decree-execution-537347</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T09:42:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Holds DIFC Penal Notice And Certificate Satisfy CPC Requirement For Foreign Decree Execution]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Fimbank P.L.C., DIFC Court Judgment, Foreign Decree Execution, Section 44A CPC, Bhatia Traders Co. LLC, Bombay High Court, Dubai Decree]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/09/26/494761-justice-abhay-ahuja-and-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-june-09-2026-537343</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-10T09:19:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: June 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658696-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-7.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/more/kerala-high-court-complainant-who-admitted-father-advanced-loan-cannot-claim-ni-act-presumptions-without-his-evidence-537332</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T21:12:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T21:11:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Evidence Of Person Without Direct Knowledge Insufficient In Cheque Bounce Case: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Cheque Dishonour, Cheque Bounce Case, Sections 118 and 139 NI Act, Statutory Presumptions, Presumption of Consideration, Acquittal, Direct Knowledge of Transaction, Proof of Loan Transaction, Burden of Proof, Execution of Cheque, Passing of Consideration, Complainant, Father Advanced Loan, Competent Witness, Evidence, Witness Examination, Documentary Evidence, Dishonoured Cheque, Cheque Bounce Prosecution, Underlying Transaction, NI Act Presumptions, Failure to Prove Transaction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-sanlam-emerging-markets-acquisition-shriram-life-insurance-537325</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T19:57:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Proposed Acquisition Of 2.8% Stake In Shriram Life Insurance By Sanlam Emerging Markets]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, Combination Approval, Merger Control, Sanlam Emerging Markets (Mauritius) Ltd, SEMM, Shriram Life Insurance Company Limited, SLIC, Sanlam Group, Shriram Group, Share Acquisition, Preferential Issue, Equity Capital, Stake Acquisition, Life Insurance Sector, Insurance Industry, IRDAI, South Africa, Mauritius Entity, Foreign Investment, Corporate Transactions, Mergers and Acquisitions, Competition Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670609-cci.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/calcutta-high-court-tenant-cannot-claim-rights-under-lease-created-after-sarfaesi-proceedings-commenced-537324</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-10T08:40:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T19:33:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Holds No Title Passed Under Tenancy Created After SARFAESI Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 13(2) SARFAESI Act, Section 13(13) SARFAESI Act, Section 17 SARFAESI Act, Section 34 SARFAESI Act, Tenancy Agreement, Lease After SARFAESI Notice, Secured Creditor, Auction Purchaser, E-Auction Sale, Sale Certificate, Registered Sale Deed, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Civil Court Jurisdiction, Bar of Civil Suit, Interim Injunction, Status Quo Order, Possession, Non-Performing Asset, NPA, Boon Realtors Pvt Ltd, Julien Educational Trust, Secured Asset, Recovery Proceedings, Injunction Application, Property Dispute, Tenancy Rights, SARFAESI Auction, Jurisdictional Bar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/10/678929-whatsapp-image-2026-06-10-at-082529.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-delhi-quashes-antriksh-group-assessments-over-mechanical-search-assessment-approval-537321</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:41:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Quashes Antriksh Group Assessments Over Mechanical Search Assessment Approval]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Common Approval ,Application Of Mind ,Search Assessment,ITAT Delhi,ITAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652551-itat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-hc-denies-anticipatory-bail-to-eee-md-in-931-crore-bescom-payment-diversion-case-537320</loc>
<lastmod>2026-06-09T18:25:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-06-09T18:24:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To EEE MD In ₹9.31 Crore BESCOM Payment Diversion Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Anticipatory Bail, Economic Fraud, Escrow Account, BESCOM, Forged Purchase Order, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/09/678868-750x450652670-delhi-high-court-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
