<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-kolkata-admits-planet-infrastructure-into-cirp-holds-arbitration-against-directors-not-a-pre-existing-dispute-547939</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T17:57:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kolkata Admits Planet Infrastructure Into CIRP, Rejects Guarantee Arbitration As Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kolkata , Planet Infrastructure , CIRP,  Arbitration , Director,Pre-Existing Dispute,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/different-financial-years-cannot-be-clubbed-in-one-section-73-show-cause-notice-bombay-high-court-547936</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T17:45:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Different Financial Years Cannot Be Clubbed In One Section 73 Show Cause Notice: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CGST Act, Section 73, Show Cause Notice, Clubbing Of Financial Years, Multiple Tax Periods, GST Demand, Limitation, Annual Returns, Tax Assessment, Doctrine Of Merger, Conflicting High Court Decisions]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697094-anil-l-pansare-justice-nivedita-p-mehta-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/proxy-litigation-not-permissible-suspended-directors-cannot-challenge-cirp-on-behalf-of-homebuyers-nclt-chandigarh-547935</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T17:39:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Suspended Directors Cannot Pursue 'Proxy Grievances' On Behalf Of Homebuyers:  NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Proxy Litigation, Suspended Director, CIRP , Homebuyer, NCLT Chandigarh,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-rejects-jyoti-limited-insolvency-plea-against-marg-limited-pre-existing-dispute-547929</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T17:19:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Rejects Jyoti Ltd's Insolvency Plea Against Marg Ltd Over Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, Chennai NCLT, Jyoti Limited, Marg Limited, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 9 IBC, Section 8 IBC, Operational Creditor, Corporate Debtor, Pre-existing Dispute, Insolvency Proceedings, Arbitral Award, Arbitration, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Mobilox Innovations, CIRP, Operational Debt, Performance Bank Guarantee, Retention Amounts, Insolvency Application]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681053-nclt-chennai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/additional-evidence-cannot-be-produced-as-a-matter-of-right-in-challenge-to-arbitral-award-karnataka-high-court-547928</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T17:10:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Allows Villa Buyer To Place RTI Records In Award Challenge Over Occupancy Certificate]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 34, Additional Evidence, Fraud, Public Policy, Occupancy Certificate, 2019 Amendment, Supervisory Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/17/662250-justice-suraj-govindaraj-karnataka-high-court-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-arbitrator-mutually-nominated-by-parties-cannot-be-treated-unilaterally-appointed-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-547923</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T16:53:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Executing Court Cannot Reject Award Where Parties Mutually Nominated Arbitrator: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Arbitration, Arbitral Award, Execution of Arbitral Award, Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator, Mutual Appointment of Arbitrator, Section 12(5) Arbitration Act, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Section 47 CPC, Hedge Finance Limited, Sangeetha A.V., Bijish Joseph, Judicial Impropriety, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/17/656587-justice-easwaran-s-and-kerala-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/mandatory-rera-pre-deposit-applies-even-to-delay-condonation-plea-cannot-be-treated-separately-from-appeal-bombay-high-court-547918</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T16:36:06+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T16:34:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delay Condonation Application Cannot Be Separated From Appeal For RERA Pre-Deposit: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Real Estate Regulation, Condonation of Delay, Pre-deposit Mandate, Promoter Obligation, Homebuyer Rights, Adjudication on Merits, Appellate Jurisdiction, Statutory Compliance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654482-justice-nj-jamadar-bombau-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-not-payable-on-penalty-imposed-on-employee-for-stock-shortage-547915</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T16:04:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Cannot Be Levied On Penalty Imposed On TASMAC Employee For Stock Shortage: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Stock Shortage, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/16/668065-750x450661674-750x450652633-madras-hc-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/income-tax-act-section-245w-appeal-must-be-filed-by-ao-not-pcit-delhi-high-court-547914</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T15:53:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Act Section 245W Appeal Must Be Filed By AO Not PCIT: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/rajasthan-hc-says-labour-cess-paid-to-wrong-authority-does-not-extinguish-statutory-liability-547912</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T15:42:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Holds ₹45,000 Paid To Municipality Cannot Offset Labour Cess Liability Of Hospital]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act 1996, Article 226 of the Constitution, Labour Welfare authorities]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697092-justice-arun-monga-justice-ashutosh-kumar-rajasthan-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-limitation-official-liquidator-claim-begins-from-winding-up-order-not-date-of-default-companies-act-547906</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T16:09:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T15:30:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Official Liquidator Gets 3 Years From Winding Up Order To File Claim: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Appletree Chits India, Miny Zachariah, Official Liquidator, Companies Act 1956, Section 446, Section 458A, Limitation Act, Article 137, Winding Up, Company Claim, Limitation Period, Recovery Claim]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-stay-on-itat-order-directing-release-of-1766-crore-seized-cash-547902</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T15:18:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses Stay On ITAT Order Directing Release Of ₹17.66 Crore Seized Cash]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-rejects-5056-crore-reassessment-additions-for-want-of-new-material-547901</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T15:06:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects ₹50.56 Crore Reassessment Additions For Want Of New Material]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/absence-of-price-escalation-clause-does-not-bar-revision-where-delay-is-attributable-to-employer-jk-high-court-upholds-2119-lakh-arbitral-award-547899</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T15:53:13+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T14:58:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitrator Can Award Escalation For Employer-Caused Delay Without Contractual Clause: J&K High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Price Escalation Clause ,Price Escalation,Revision ,Delay , Employer, J&K High Court , Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697122-justice-shahzad-azeem-of-jk-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-stay-black-money-act-prosecution-over-belated-retrospectivity-challenge-547896</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T14:47:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Black Money Act Prosecution Over Belated Retrospectivity Challenge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/can-itat-direct-amortisation-of-royalty-payment-beyond-aos-findings-delhi-high-court-to-decide-547894</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T14:38:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T14:37:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Can ITAT Direct Amortisation Of Royalty Payment Beyond AO's Findings? Delhi High Court To Decide]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-to-hear-appeal-against-nclt-order-approving-subhash-chandras-rs-65-cr-repayment-plan-against-rs-22006-cr-claims-547886</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T14:08:13+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T13:55:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT New Delhi To Hear Creditors' Challenge To NCLT Approval Of Subhash Chandra's ₹6.25 Crore Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Dr Subhash Chandra, Essel Group. NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697060-subash-chandra-with-zee.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-nclat-order-holding-jet-airways-workmens-pf-gratuity-dues-fall-outside-liquidation-estate-547881</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T13:44:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With NCLAT Order Protecting Jet Airways Workmen's PF Gratuity Dues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jet Airways, Provident Fund Dues, Gratuity Dues, Pension Dues, Liquidation Estate, NCLAT, CIRP, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/23/695791-whatsapp-image-2026-08-23-at-201503.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-trafiksol-its-technologies-promoters-securities-market-one-year-misleading-ipo-disclosures-547880</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T13:31:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Bars Trafiksol ITS Technologies From Securities Market For 1 Year Over Misleading IPO Disclosures]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Trafiksol ITS Technologies, IPO, Initial Public Offer, Misleading Disclosures, Financial Statements, Prospectus, PFUTP Regulations, ICDR Regulations, Investor Protection, Securities Market, Jitendra Das, Poonam Das]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-registration-cancellation-can-cause-civil-death-to-business-hearing-cannot-be-empty-formality-patna-high-court-547873</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T13:06:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Patna High Court Says Permanent GST Registration Cancellation May Cause 'Civil Death' To Business]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Registration Cancellation, Revocation of GST Registration, Section 75(4) BGST Act, Personal Hearing, Principles of Natural Justice, Limitation, Non-Filing of GST Returns, Civil Death, GSTR-3B, GSTR-1]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696854-patna-hc-justice-rajeev-ranjan-prasad-justice-ramesh-chand-malviya.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-reassessment-against-royal-chains-mere-suspicion-about-investor-cannot-establish-income-escapement-547863</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T12:39:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Against Royal Chains, Says 'Reason To Suspect' Not Enough]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Section 147, Section 148, Reassessment, Reason To Believe, Reason To Suspect, Share Capital, Share Premium, FDI, Accommodation Entry, Live Nexus, Tangible Material, PF Contribution, ESIC Contribution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-closes-complaint-against-mercedes-benz-alleged-forced-financing-insurance-tie-in-547861</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T12:27:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Closes Complaint Against Mercedes-Benz Over Alleged Forced Financing, Insurance Tie-In]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, Mercedes-Benz, Tie-In Arrangement, Vehicle Sale, Financing, Insurance, Vertical Arrangement, Market Dominance, Competition Act, Section 3(4), Section 4, Section 26(2), Captive Financer, Authorised Dealer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696800-cci-mercedes-benz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-new-entities-misusing-hcl-trademarks-in-suit-against-fake-job-racket-547856</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T12:07:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Alleged Fraudsters In Recruitment Scam From Using HCL Marks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, HCL Corporation, Justice Jyoti Singh, Document Inspection Timelines, Original Side Rules 2018, Job Impersonation Syndicate, Fraudulent Recruitment Racket, Trademark Infringement, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, HCL Healthcare, CS(COMM) 127/2026, Order I Rule 10 CPC, Order VI Rule 17 CPC, Banking KYC Disclosure, John Doe Lawsuit India, Telecom Number Block, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, State Bank of India KYC, Corporate Impersonation Fraud, Commercial Trial Timelines]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/12/655716-hcl-and-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-august-24-august-30-2026-547853</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:59:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: August 24 - August 30, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644693-direct-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-august-24-august-30-2026-547852</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:59:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: August 24 - August 30, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords/>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644694-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-delhi-hc-order-holding-godaddy-domain-registration-fees-not-taxable-in-india-under-india-us-dtaa-547848</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T11:58:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:54:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Delhi HC Ruling On GoDaddy Domain Fees Under India-US DTAA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GoDaddy.com LLC, India-USA DTAA, Domain Name Registration Fees, Income Tax, Section 197, Nil TDS Certificate, Withholding Tax, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/696940-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-115544.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-dismisses-reddy-pharmaceuticals-review-petition-upholds-injunction-in-favour-of-dr-reddys-laboratories-over-reddy-mark-547847</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-31T12:10:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:50:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Reddy Pharmaceuticals' Review Plea In 'REDDY' Trademark Dispute With DRL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Dr Reddys Laboratories, Reddy Pharmaceuticals, Justice Om Prakash Shukla, Justice C Hari Shankar, Trademark Passing Off, Review Petition Dismissed, DW1 Witness Admission, Section 57 Trade Marks Act, IPAB Rectification Order, Brihan Karan Sugar, Mosaic of Evidence, Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, Tainted Trademark Adoption, Class 5 Trademark, Ameerpet Packaging Address, Chander M Lall, Swathi Sukumar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674865-dr-reddys-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-rera-cases-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547846</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:41:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, REAT, Promoter Liability, Delayed Possession, Conciliation Proceedings, Allottee Rights, Housing Association, Consumer Law Principles, Project Amenities, RERA Complaints]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/05/07/538436-rera-cases-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-august-24-august-30-2026-547844</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:35:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 30, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/10/692889-ipr-weekly-digest.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-restrain-digesto-plus-maker-in-trademark-dispute-over-haslab-digesto-547842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:25:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Trademark Appeal Over “DIGESTO PLUS”, Says Mark Common To Trade]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Hahnemann Scientific Laboratory, Meera Rastogi, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Justice V Kameswar Rao, Haslab Digesto, Digesto Plus, Trademark Passing Off, Classic Trinity, Goodwill Misrepresentation Damage, Class 5 Trademark, Wander v Antox, Borse Brothers, Condonation of Delay, Homeopathic Medicine Trademark, Publici Juris, Disclaimer Trade Marks, Pernod Ricard v Karanveer, Drug Controller]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/13/686241-justice-v-kameswar-rao-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-stays-allahabad-hc-order-quashing-940-crore-nhai-contract-termination-against-tata-projects-547841</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:25:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays Allahabad HC Order Quashing ₹940 Crore NHAI Contract Termination Against Tata Projects]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tata Projects Ltd., NHAI, NH-709A, EPC Agreement, Contract Termination, Hindrance-Free Land, Article 226, Garhmukteshwar, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/697027-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-111633.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/calcutta-high-court-refuses-interim-injunction-against-publisher-in-copyright-dispute-over-bengali-english-grammar-textbooks-547839</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Rejects Injunction Against New Central Book Agency After Years Of Inaction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Calcutta High Court, Pares Chandra Das, New Central Book Agency, Justice Krishna Rao, Copyright Infringement, Applied English Grammar, Section 19 Copyright Act, Co-Publishing Agreement, Novation of Contract, Section 62 Contract Act, Abhijit Das, Amitava Das, Sima Das, Katha-o-Kahini, City Civil Court Calcutta, Termination of License, Non-Joinder of Parties, Malhotra International, GA 1 of 2023, IP COM 11 of 2024]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-in-canara-banks-plea-against-nclat-order-setting-aside-insolvency-admission-of-equinox-india-developments-547838</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T11:00:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice In Canara Bank's Plea Against NCLAT Order Setting Aside Insolvency Admission Of Equinox India Developments]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Canara Bank, Equinox India Developments, Corporate Guarantee, Section 5(8) IBC, Section 7 IBC, Section 10A IBC, Financial Debt, NCLAT, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/30/696934-whatsapp-image-2026-08-30-at-112714.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547836</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:57:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitrator Appointment, International Commercial Arbitration, MSMED Arbitration, Arbitral Seat, Interim Relief, Foreign Award Enforcement, Arbitrator Ineligibility, Partnership Disputes, Arbitral Award Challenge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/madras-high-court-rejects-film-archive-copyright-claim-over-aval-appadithan-production-stills-547835</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:54:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Rejects Film Archive's Copyright Claim Over 'Aval Appadithan' Production Stills]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Madras High Court, Cinema Resource Centre, Ganga Rudraiah, Justice P Velmurugan, Aval Appadithan, C Rudraiah, Copyright Infringement, Physical Possession vs Copyright, Adverse Possession IP, Section 17 Copyright Act, Moore Market Chennai, Scrap Dealer Film Photos, Film Archive Litigation, Original Side Appeal, CS 674 2017, OSA CAD 17 2022, Intangible Property Law, Indian Film Copyright, Sruti Harihara Subramaniam, Lalgudi G Jayaraman, Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/lvelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547832</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:43:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697014-whatsapp-image-2026-08-31-at-102316.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-pre-deposit-must-be-refunded-to-extent-taxpayer-succeeds-in-appeal-bombay-high-court-547831</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:38:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders ₹3.14 Cr Pre-Deposit To IBM, Says Pending Appeal Can't Affect Dropped Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Pre-Deposit, Refund, Partial Success In Appeal, GST Appeal, Section 107 MGST Act, GST Appellate Tribunal, Tax Demand, Article 265, Statutory Refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696817-ibm-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-revenue-cannot-treat-services-as-non-export-only-to-deny-cenvat-refund-without-demanding-service-tax-allows-flipkarts-appeals-547829</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:24:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Says Revenue Can't Take Contrary Stands On Same Services, Allows Flipkart CENVAT Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Flipkart Internet, CESTAT Mumbai, Export of Services, CENVAT Credit Refund, Rule 5 CENVAT Credit Rules, Business Auxiliary Services, Export of Services Rules 2005, Section 73 Finance Act 1994, Service Tax, Revenue Cannot Take Contrary Stands, CBEC Circular]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/25/663759-cestat-flipkart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
