<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-rejects-nbfc-claim-madhuvan-tieup-pvt-ltd-not-engaged-in-financial-services-hdfc-banks-rs-8078-cr-cirp-admitted-530260</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T16:52:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT New Delhi Admits CIRP Against Madhuvan Tieup, Rejects Corporate Debtor's NBFC Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, NBFC, HDFC Bank, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-delhi-allows-refund-of-service-tax-paid-on-cancelled-real-estate-bookings-says-limitation-under-section-11b-not-applicable-530253</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T16:38:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT New Delhi Allows Refund Of Service Tax On Cancelled Project, Rejects Limitation Bar]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax Refund, Cancelled Booking, Real Estate, Section 11B, Limitation, Unjust Enrichment, CESTAT, Construction Service]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-in-triumph-offshoreswan-defence-merger-shareholder-meeting-directed-for-may-25-530251</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T16:31:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion in Triumph Offshore–Swan Defence Merger]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Merger, Amalgamation, First Motion Application]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655534-nclt-ahmedabad-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/a-refund-application-filed-prior-to-final-adjudication-of-an-exemption-dispute-is-premature-and-not-maintainable-530238</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T15:51:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T15:50:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi Denies Nikon ₹7.32 Crore Refund, Holds Claim Pre-Exemption Decision Is Not Maintainable]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[section 17(5) of the Customs Act, section 28 of the Customs Act, section 27A of the Customs Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667546-nikon.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/cbfc-certificate-only-prima-facie-evidence-of-who-produced-the-film-in-copyright-dispute-madras-high-court-530237</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T15:51:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T15:50:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CBFC Certificate Only Prima Facie Evidence Of Who Produced the Film In Copyright Dispute: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, R. Kishore Kumar, Durairajan, R.R. Cine Productions, Film copyright, Cinematograph Act 1952, Section 2(uu) Copyright Act, Section 17 Copyright Act, Mani movie, Money movie, Dhadha film, Bound script, Partnership deed, CBFC certificate, Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667567-whatsapp-image-2026-04-14-at-154002.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/calcutta-high-court-earning-profits-by-claimant-does-not-bar-damages-loss-of-expected-profits-compensable-in-arbitration-530236</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T15:33:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Profits Earned Do Not Negate Damages Claim In Arbitration: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Earning Profits, Claimant, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Breach of Contract, Damages]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/20/662837-750x450652652-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/essential-amenities-a-statutory-must-before-transferring-possession-himachal-pradesh-rera-530233</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T15:28:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Promoter Cannot Escape Post-Possession Obligations: Himachal Pradesh RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, essential amenities, completion certificate, possession without infrastructure, promoter obligations, association of allottees, deficiency in service, Himachal Pradesh RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652637-rera-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/separate-gst-orders-needed-for-company-and-director-to-file-appeals-530228</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:51:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Separate GST Liability Orders Must Be Issued To Enable Appeals By Company And MD: Telangana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 74 of the Central Good and Services Tax Act 2017, Section 20 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, Section 122(1)(a) of the CGST Act, Rule 16A of the Central Goods and Services Tax (amendment) Rules 2025]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667526-chief-justice-aparesh-kumar-singh-and-justice-g-m-mohiuddin.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-april-06-april-12-2026-530225</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:43:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: April 06 - April 12, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Digest, Indirect Weekly Digest, Indirect Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652650-weekly-digest-indirect-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/karnataka-high-court-reserves-judgment-in-challenge-to-cci-proceedings-on-dgs-power-to-array-third-parties-as-opposite-parties-in-amazon-flipkart-probe-530224</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:39:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Reserves Orders On Pleas Challenging CCI Probe Into Amazon, Flipkart-Linked Sellers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Competition Commission of India, Director General, Third Parties, Amazon Flipkart CCI, Opposite Parties]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667523-photo-2026-04-14-11-09-38.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/telangana-high-court/telangana-high-court-upholds-attachment-of-railway-treasury-account-530223</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:13:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Railways' SCR Treasury Account Not Immune To Attachment Without Proof Of Exempt Funds: Telangana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana High Court, attachment of bank account, government account attachment, railways treasury account, execution proceedings, arbitral award enforcement, Order XXI Rule 46 CPC, Order XXI Rule 46A CPC, garnishee proceedings, Section 60 CPC exemption, provident fund exemption, burden of proof exemption, Section 47 CPC, enforcement of arbitral award, no blanket immunity government funds, garnishee notice not mandatory, attachment of treasury funds, Civil Procedure Code]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667534-telengana-high-court-indian-railway.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/excess-imports-under-igcr-rules-cannot-be-alleged-without-showing-customs-officers-cleared-goods-irregularly-cestat-delhi-530222</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:06:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Department Cannot Allege Excess Imports Without Explaining IGCR Clearance Irregularly: CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IGCR Rules, concessional duty, excess imports, customs exemption, Section 28(4), penalty under Section 114A, Notification 50/2017-Cus, CESTAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652515-cestat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-sets-aside-penalty-on-watch-retailer-says-no-evidence-it-knew-importer-misdeclared-rsp-at-time-of-import-530221</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T14:05:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT New Delhi Sets Aside Penalty On Time Avenue, Finds No Link To Importer's RSP Misdeclaration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs, CESTAT, Imported Watches, Retail Sale Price (RSP), Misdeclaration, Section 112(b) Customs Act, Penalty Set Aside, Confiscation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/madras-high-court-dismisses-appeal-against-execution-order-after-arbitral-award-attains-finality-530212</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T13:02:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T13:01:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution Order After Arbitral Award Attains Finality]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 13(1A) Commercial Courts Act, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Section 37 Arbitration Act, Order XLIII CPC, execution proceedings, arbitral award enforcement, Section 5 Arbitration Act, share transfer dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/15/661674-750x450652633-madras-hc-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-held-high-court-orders-are-enforceable-beyond-state-limits-530207</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T12:36:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T12:36:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Authorities Where Immovable Properties Are Located Duty-Bound To Enforce Other High Court Orders: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Article 226(2), territorial jurisdiction, cause of action, enforceability of High Court orders, inter-state applicability, writ of mandamus, Sub-Registrar, Registration Act 1908, SARFAESI Act, insolvency, Official Assignee, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bombay High Court, null and void sale deeds, compliance of judicial orders]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/02/28/524958-justice-sachin-shankar-magadum-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/telangana-high-court/telangana-high-court-sets-aside-pre-judgment-attachment-against-swiggy-says-no-proof-of-intent-to-defeat-decree-530197</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T12:13:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T12:09:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Sets Aside Order Directing Swiggy To Furnish ₹58.6 Lakh Security In Recovery Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana High Court ,Pre-Judgment ,Attachment , Swiggy, Decree]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667496-swiggy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/no-waiting-for-apex-court-confirmation-to-enforce-consent-awards-supreme-court-530193</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T11:43:24+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T11:42:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Terms Delhi HC View "Paradoxical," Says Rockland Promoters Can't Defer Consent Award Liability Till Final Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[consent award, arbitration, indemnity, enforcement, share purchase agreement, liability, SIAC, commercial dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652538-supreme-court-of-india-sc-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-upheld-the-reclassification-of-imported-goods-under-customs-law-based-on-laboratory-test-reports-530191</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T11:19:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Ahmedabad Upholds Fabric Reclassification Based On CRCL Test, Remands Valuation, SEZ Exemption]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CTH 54075290, Notification No.137/2000-Cus. dated 19.10.2000, Textile committee]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/telangana-rera-orders-probe-against-sohini-builders-over-inclusion-of-private-plots-in-project-530188</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T11:05:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana RERA Orders Suo Moto Probe Against Sohini Builders Over Inclusion Of Private Plots In Registered Project]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana RERA, Suo Motu, Proceedings Registered Project,RERA,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/02/03/520150-ts-rera-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-april-06-april-12-2026-530176</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T10:31:34+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T10:30:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: April 06 - April 12, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Direct Tax Weekly Round-UP, Week;y Digest, April, 2026]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644693-direct-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-suspended-director-under-ibc-cannot-maintain-appeal-in-corporate-debtors-name-after-cirp-admission-530173</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T11:44:31+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T10:25:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Appeal Filed By Suspended Director In Corporate Debtor's Name Not Maintainable After IRP Appointment: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Suspended Director, IBC, Corporate Debtor, Supreme Court,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667509-whatsapp-image-2026-04-14-at-105418.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/breach-of-interim-orders-cannot-trigger-fresh-contempt-after-final-order-in-insolvency-case-nclt-kochi-530164</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T10:05:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Breach Of Interim Orders Cannot Trigger Fresh Contempt After Final Order In Insolvency Case: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Interim Order, Final Order;  Execution ,, Remedy,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-april-13-2026-530160</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T09:37:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: April 13, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658698-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-6.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/nclt-mumbai-admits-sbis-personal-insolvency-plea-against-videocon-promoter-venugopal-dhoot-over-6157-crore-default-530159</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-14T10:07:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-14T09:33:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Admits Insolvency Plea Against Videocon Guarantor Venugopal Dhoot Over ₹6,157 Crore Default]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Venugopal Nandlal Dhoot, Videocon Telecom, State Bank of India, Personal Guarantor, NCLT Mumbai, Insolvency]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/14/667483-whatsapp-image-2026-04-14-at-094924.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-dismisses-adm-agros-256-crore-insolvency-plea-against-bari-foods-pvt-ltd-over-pre-existing-dispute-530156</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T21:50:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Indore Dismisses ₹2.56 Crore Insolvency Plea Against Bari Foods Pvt. Ltd. Over Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, IBC, Pre Existing Disputes]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652585-nclt-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/himachal-pradesh-state-co-operative-bank-ltd-reserve-bank-of-india-penalty-non-compliance-kyc-directions-530155</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T21:35:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T21:34:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[RBI Imposes ₹7.5 Lakh Penalty On Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. for KYC Non-compliance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Reserve Bank of India, Penalty, Non-compliance, KYC, Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Risk Categorisation of Accounts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652523-reserve-bank-of-india-rbi-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/investigation-statements-lose-evidentiary-value-if-statutory-admissibility-procedure-not-followed-530154</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T21:30:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Excise Act | Statements Recorded During Probe Not Admissible Without Following Mandatory Procedure: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules 2002, section 9D of the Central Excise Act, Pan Masala, section 14 of the Central Excise Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court-time-barred-claim-share-ownership-articles-of-association-530153</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T21:19:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Sets Aside $114,041 Decree, Says Time-Barred Claims Cannot Be Revived By Assignment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Time-Barred Claim, Share Ownership, Articles of Association, Article 58 Limitation Act, 1963, Supply of Goods]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/12/12/385848-karnataka-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/mca-company-incorporation-rules-amendment-companies-incorporation-amendment-rules-2026-530152</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T21:02:20+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T21:01:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MCA Draft Rules for Company Incorporation Propose Merging Multiple Forms Into Two To Ease Compliance Burden]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2026, MCA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/11/667174-mca.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/no-new-claims-maintainable-after-cirp-settled-in-white-water-hospitality-case-nclt-chandigarh-530144</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T19:59:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No New Claims Maintainable After CIRP Settled In White Water Hospitality Case: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, Post-Settlement, CIRP ,Adjudication,Creditor,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/12/03/367452-nclt-03.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-chennai-upholds-service-tax-on-05-deductions-from-sub-contractors-bills-by-cccl-as-business-support-services-530141</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T19:34:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T19:33:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Upholds Tax On 0.5% Deductions From Sub-Contractors' Bills By CCCL As Business Support Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Social Responsibility, administrative charges, rebate/discount, Section 77 of the Finance Act 1994]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667377-consolidated-construction-consortirum.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-allahabad-clears-first-motion-in-salasarhill-view-amalgamation-scheme-530140</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T19:21:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad Clears First Motion In Salasar–Hill View Merger]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad, Merger, First Motion, Company Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652581-nclt-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-daimler-india-against-third-party-buses-for-infringing-bharatbenz-trademark-530139</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T19:04:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Injuncts Bus Service And Manufacturing Entities From Using BharatBenz Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Daimler India, BharatBenz, Benz trademark, Getmohit Cab, Shri Bheru Nath Motor Body, Trademark infringement, Well-known mark, Justice Jyoti Singh, Ex-parte injunction, Bus body building, Leyland buses, Consumer safety, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Passing off]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667397-bharatbenz-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-nism-certification-social-impact-assessors-530137</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T18:49:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Mandates NISM Certification For Social Impact Assessors]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI circular, Social Impact Assessors, NISM certification, NISM Series XXIII, ICDR Regulations, SEBI Act 1992, certification requirement, securities market regulation, eCPE programme]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/10/666984-750x450652549-sebi-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-relief-to-kamdhenu-limited-in-trademark-dispute-with-ashiana-ispat-limited-530136</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T18:44:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T18:43:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Ashiana From Using 'AL KAMDHENU GOLD' In TMT Bars]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Ashiana Ispat, Kamdhenu Limited, AL KAMDHENU GOLD, Trademark infringement, Passing off, Justice Tejas Karia, Section 62 Contract Act, Novation of contract, 2002 Agreement, License vs Assignment, Steel industry trademarks, TMT bars, Section 48 Trade Marks Act, Interim injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667396-kamdhenu-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/labelling-clause-as-arbitration-doesnt-create-arbitration-agreement-without-arbitration-mechanism-punjab-haryana-hc-530132</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T18:30:27+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T18:29:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Labelling Clause As 'Arbitration' Doesn't Create Arbitration Agreement Without Mechanism For It: Punjab & Haryana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration agreement, Section 7(4)(c), Section 11 appointment, MoU dispute, Committee, intention to arbitrate, arbitration clause validity, dispute resolution mechanism]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/12/13/509628-punjab-haryana-high-court-justice-jasgurpreet-singh-puri.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-allahabad-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-based-solely-on-itr-data-in-ganpati-transport-case-530127</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T18:12:59+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T18:08:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Allahabad Sets Aside Service Tax Demand Based Solely On ITR Data In Ganpati Transport Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GTA Service, clause (p) of Section 66D (Negative List), Service Tax Liability, Service Tax Paid by Consignor/Consignee]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654280-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/karnataka-rera-slaps-up-to-5-penalty-of-project-cost-on-mantri-developers-for-non-compliance-with-refund-order-530125</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T17:55:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA Slaps Up To 5% Penalty Of Project Cost On Mantri Developers For Non-Compliance With Refund Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA,  Mantri ,Project Cost,Penalty,  Non-Compliance,Director,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/28/530937-rera-karnataka.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/kerala-high-court-protects-lazza-trademark-grants-injunction-against-hazza-mark-530124</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T17:42:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Upholds Injunction Against 'HAZZA', Finds Prima Facie Infringement Of 'LAZZA' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, trademark infringement, passing off, LAZZA vs HAZZA, deceptive similarity, overall impression test, phonetic similarity, trade dress, interim injunction, appellate interference, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, likelihood of confusion, Lazza ice cream]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667375-kerala-high-court-lazza-ice-cream.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/calcutta-high-court-personal-appearance-not-mandatory-under-gst-for-release-of-seized-goods-530122</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T17:33:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta HC Questions GST Officer's Demand For Personal Appearance When Law Allows Representation Through Counsel]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Calcutta HC, GST, GST seized goods release, personal appearance GST, Calcutta High Court GST ruling, GST confiscation release procedure, GST detention goods law, no personal appearance GST, GST section 129 release, GST litigation India, indirect tax judgment GST, taxpayer relief GST seizure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667386-justice-kausik-chanda.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-chandigarh-creditor-initiating-insolvency-must-bear-cirp-costs-even-if-proceedings-are-set-aside-530117</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T16:51:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T16:50:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Financial Creditor Who Initiated CIRP Must Bear Costs When Proceedings Are Set Aside: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh,Creditor , Insolvency ,CIRP ,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652583-nclt-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-indore-homebuyers-claim-filed-15-years-after-resolution-plan-approval-not-maintainable-530116</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T16:29:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Indore Rejects Homebuyer's Claim Filed 1.5 Years After Resolution Plan Approval In JSM Devcons CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, Flat Possession, Belated Claim, IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652586-nclt-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/haryana-rera-dismisses-plea-against-ansal-says-allottee-who-stays-entitled-only-to-delay-interest-530112</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T16:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Haryana RERA Dismisses Plea Against Ansal Housing, Says Allottee Who Stays Entitled Only To Delay Interest]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Haryana RERA, Allottee , Compensation,Possession ,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529364-rera-haryana.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/gstat-orders-refund-of-profiteered-amount-with-interest-in-real-estate-project-530110</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T16:00:00+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T15:59:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GSTAT Delhi Orders Ahmedabad East Infra LLP To Refund ₹1.20 Crore To Homebuyers In Anti-Profiteering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[gstat, gstat anti profiteering, anti profiteering case, GST refund, real estate GST, profiteering refund order, GSTAT ruling India, input tax credit benefit, 18 percent interest GST, builder profiteering case, GST compliance real estate]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/11/646071-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/bombay-high-court-upholds-refusal-of-interim-injunction-to-laser-shaving-in-setmax-trademark-dispute-530109</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T15:52:43+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T15:52:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Upholds Refusal Of Interim Injunction Io Laser Shaving In SETMAX Blades Trademark Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Laser Shaving, RKM International, SETMAX, Trademark infringement, Division Bench, Justice Bharati Dangre, Justice Manjusha Deshpande, Single Judge, Prosecution history estoppel, Suppression of material facts, Clean hands doctrine, Razor blades, Galactic Conquistadors]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667348-setmax-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-allows-arbitration-plea-filed-by-retired-partner-as-it-was-not-as-partner-of-unregistered-firm-530108</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T15:39:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka HC Allows Arbitration Plea Filed By Retired Partner As It Was Not Filed As Partner Of Unregistered Firm]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Section 8 Arbitration Act, Section 37 Arbitration Appeal, Non-Registration of Firm Section 69 Partnership Act, Partnership Dispute Arbitration, Arbitration Clause Partnership Deed, Commercial Court Refusal Arbitration, Arbitrability Fraud, Commercial Courts Act Arbitration, Dishonoured Cheques Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/10/15/626120-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-c-m-poonacha-karnatakahc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/delhi-high-court-interest-on-funds-earmarked-to-purchase-machinery-not-taxable-as-other-sources-530104</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T15:20:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T15:19:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Interest On Funds Linked To Business Setup Not Taxable As 'Other Income': Delhi HC In VNG Automotive Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[delhi hc, interest income tax, Delhi HC interest ruling, Pre-operative interest tax, Capital vs other income, Interest before business tax, Project setup funds interest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667341-justice-v-kameswar-rao-vinod-kumar-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/provision-for-termination-of-arbitrators-mandate-cannot-be-used-to-challenge-appointment-telangana-high-court-530097</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T15:04:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T15:03:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Provision For Termination Of Arbitrator's Mandate Cannot Be Used To Challenge His Appointment: Telangana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, section 14, arbitrator mandate, unilateral appointment, section 11, arbitral proceedings, bias challenge, contractual clause]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/04/04/466766-justice-k-lakshman-telangana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/right-to-shelter-part-of-right-to-life-homebuyers-cannot-be-prejudiced-by-internal-project-transfer-nclt-indore-530093</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T14:43:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Right To Shelter Part of Right To Life, Homebuyers Cannot Be Prejudiced by Internal Project Transfer: NCLT Indore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, Homebuyer, IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652582-nclt-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/actor-vijay-appeals-single-bench-ruling-of-madras-high-court-upholding-15-crore-tax-penalty-530091</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T14:18:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Actor Vijay Appeals Single-Bench Ruling Of Madras High Court Upholding ₹1.5 Crore Income Tax Penalty]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Income Tax, Actor Vijay, Income Tax Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667365-whatsapp-image-2026-04-13-at-140229.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/social-in-hospitality-services-not-generic-delhi-high-court-orders-removal-of-social-house-trademark-530085</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T13:21:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T13:16:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Cancels 'SOCIAL HOUSE' Mark For Non-Use; 'SOCIAL' Not Generic In Hospitality]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Impressario Entertainment, Vardhaman Choksi, Social House trademark, Justice Tejas Karia, Trademark rectification, Section 47 Trade Marks Act, Suggestive mark, Imagination test, Trademark squatting, Hospitality industry, Class 43 services, Non-use of mark, Escobar Mumbai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667347-social-and-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/bombay-high-court-rejects-bholaa-makers-plea-that-suit-concerning-kaithi-hindi-remake-is-triable-only-in-chennai-530081</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T12:59:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rejects Bholaa Maker's Plea That Suit Concerning 'Kaithi' Remake Is Triable Only In Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Kaithi remake, Bholaa film, Dream Warrior Pictures, Reliance Entertainment Studios, Trademark remaking rights, Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh, Jurisdiction dispute, Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Principal Agreement, Ancillary Agreement, Copyright infringement, Ajay Devgn Film Productions, Letters Patent, Contract law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667324-kaithi-bholaa-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/customs-duty-exemption-cannot-be-denied-for-absence-of-origin-marking-on-scrap-goods-cestat-chennai-530076</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T12:35:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[AIFTA Duty Exemption For Scrap Cannot Be Denied To Jindal Aluminum For No Country of Origin Markings: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Aluminium Scrap Tread, Aluminium Extrusion Scrap 6063 Tread, Notification No. 046/2011-Cus, FTA benefits, Country of Origin]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667292-jindal-aluminium.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-to-pass-order-protecting-crocs-designs-trademarks-and-patent-over-jibbitz-charms-530070</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T12:20:56+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T12:20:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Pass Order Protecting Crocs' Designs, Trademarks and Patent Over Jibbitz Charms]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Crocs Inc., Summersalt Lifestyle Private Limited, Delhi High Court, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, Jibbitz patent, Croslite trademark, Echo Clog, Echo Slide, Toddler Classic, 3D shape trademark, design infringement, patent violation, functional footwear design, decorative shoe charms]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667317-crocs-jibbitz-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/harera-allows-registration-of-riviera-at-aipl-lake-city-project-in-gurugram-despite-land-dispute-530066</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T12:03:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T12:03:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Haryana RERA Allows Registration Of Riviera At AIPL Lake City Project In Gurugram Despite Land Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Haryana RERA,  Registration ,Riviera ,AIPL Lake City, Saleable Area , Disputed Land , Land Dispute,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/20/529364-rera-haryana.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-new-delhi-sets-aside-518-lakh-duty-on-concor-finds-no-proof-of-pilferage-or-seal-tampering-530064</loc>
<lastmod>2026-04-13T11:43:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T11:42:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT New Delhi Sets Aside ₹51.8 Lakh Customs Duty On CONCOR, Finds No Proof of Pilferage Or Seal Tampering]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 45 of the Customs Act, Regulation 6 of Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulations 2009]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667294-concor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/delay-in-itr-filing-utilities-gujarat-high-court-seeks-affidavit-from-center-530060</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T11:18:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Seeks Affidavit From Centre Over Failure To Make ITR Utilities Available By April 1]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[gujarat hc, delay in issuing itr filing utilities, Gujarat High Court income tax utilities, ITR filing delay India, CBDT Section 119 powers, e filing utilities April 1 rule, tax return deadline extension case, Chartered Accountants Association Surat case, ITR forms availability India, Gujarat HC affidavit direction to income tax department, income tax portal issues India, tax compliance litigation India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/09/660449-justice-as-supehia-and-justice-pranav-trivedi-gujarat-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-chennai-allows-84-lakh-cenvat-credit-claim-by-komatsu-india-for-factory-expansion-530057</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T10:51:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Allows ₹84 Lakh CENVAT Credit Claim By Komatsu India For Factory Expansion]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944, input service, Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654305-cestat-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/only-input-credit-used-for-both-taxable-and-exempt-activities-must-be-reversed-cestat-chennai-530052</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T10:20:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Only Input Credit Used For Both Taxable and Exempt Activities Must Be Reversed: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944, Rule 15(2) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667285-whatsapp-image-2026-04-13-at-101047.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-april-5-april-11-2026-530046</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T10:07:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: April 5 - April 11, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest, LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/23/663198-weekly-round-up-ipr-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera/validity-of-homebuyers-co-operative-society-to-act-as-residents-association-to-be-decided-under-kcs-act-karnataka-rera-530045</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T10:04:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Validity Of Homebuyers' Co-Operative Society To Act As Residents' Association To Be Decided Under KCS Act: Karnataka RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA , Homebuyer, RERA,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654497-rera-karnataka.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/freight-and-insurance-charges-collected-by-an-assessee-are-includable-in-the-assessable-value-for-levy-of-excise-duty-where-the-sale-is-effected-at-the-buyers-premises-and-not-at-the-factory-gate-530034</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-04-13T09:36:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Freight, Insurance Includable In Assessable Value For Excise Duty If Delivery at Buyer's Premises: CESTAT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Freight & Insurance Charges, Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, Section 11AC(1)(e) of the Central Excise Act 1944]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652516-cestat-02-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
