<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-weekly-digest-july-13-july-18-541962</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-20T10:48:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: July 13 - July 18, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Section 11, Section 16, Section 34, Section 37, Section 43(3), Commercial Courts Act, MSMED Act, RERA, Arbitral Award, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitral Tribunal, Appointment of Arbitrator, Jurisdiction, Territorial Jurisdiction, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Article 227, Judicial Interference, Contract Interpretation, Functus Officio, Counterclaim, Limitation, Performance Bank Guarantee, Commercial Dispute, Arbitration Clause, Section 21 Notice, Natural Justice, NCLT Scheme of Arrangement, Transfer of Liability, Public Policy, Patent Illegality, Section 18 Arbitration Act, Waiver, Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator, COVID-19, National Highways Act, Section 3G]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-18-2026-541960</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-20T10:43:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 18, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658700-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/livelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-july-13-july-18-2026-541955</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-20T10:18:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: July 13 - July 18, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/18/668467-750x450652651-weekly-digest-ibc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/madras-high-court-directs-gst-authorities-to-adjust-tax-paid-under-wrong-head-instead-of-seeking-fresh-payment-541950</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-20T10:04:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Directs GST Authorities To Adjust Tax Paid Under Wrong Head Instead Of Seeking Fresh Payment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SYA Homes, rectification order, GSTR-3B, GST Liability, Section 19 of the IGST Act, Rule 89(1A) of the CGST Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/608674-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/finance-ministrys-high-value-arbitration-policy-conflicts-with-indias-declared-policy-justice-ujjal-bhuyan-541944</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-20T09:48:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-20T09:47:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Finance Ministry's High-Value Arbitration Policy Conflicts With India's Declared Policy Justice Ujjal Bhuyan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Arbitration in India, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd., Finance Ministry Office Memorandum June 3 2024, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Curative Jurisdiction, Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd., Appellate Arbitral Tribunal, India International Arbitration Centre, Government Procurement, Mediation, Delhi PWD, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Arbitration Week, Ease of Doing Business, International Arbitration Hub]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/04/06/594635-ujjal-bhuyan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/salaries-paid-by-foreign-banks-head-office-to-expatriates-working-for-indian-branch-not-head-office-expenses-itat-mumbai-541895</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T22:00:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Salaries Paid By Foreign Bank's Head Office To Expatriates Working For Indian Branch Not Head Office Expenses: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax, Section 44C, Section 37(1), India–UK DTAA, Article 7, Expatriate Salary, Head Office Expenditure, Permanent Establishment, Standard Chartered Bank, Foreign Bank, ITAT Mumbai.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679645-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-mumbai-allows-yrf-studios-cenvat-credit-on-studio-repair-and-renovation-works-541885</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T20:53:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai  Allows YRF Studios' CENVAT Credit On Studio Repair and Renovation Works]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[YRF Studios, CENVAT credit, studio renovation, repair and maintenance, works contract service, Rule 2(l), input service, CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654281-cestat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/outstanding-business-advances-cannot-be-treated-as-taxable-income-541872</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-18T17:32:24+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T17:32:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Upholds Deletion Of Tax Addition On Advances Received By Businessman Procuring Land]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[outstanding, forfeiture, section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act, capital asset, capital asset]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/18/687736-justice-sg-pandit-and-justice-rajesh-rai-k.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-chennai-sez-refund-cannot-be-denied-because-services-were-not-consumed-within-sez-used-for-authorised-operations-541864</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T16:22:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Service Tax Refund For SEZ Can't Be Denied If Services Were Used For Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEZ refund, authorised operations, Notification No. 17/2011-ST, service tax exemption, wholly consumed, Section 26 SEZ Act, CESTAT Chennai, input services]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/telangana-hc-says-delay-in-registration-or-possession-of-villa-does-not-bar-section-54f-exemption-541863</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T16:07:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Upholds Capital Gains Tax Exemption Despite Delay In Villa Registration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, residential property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/01/671082-justice-p-sam-koshy-and-justice-narsing-rao-nandikonda.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/supreme-court/supreme-court-flags-ibc-unfair-impact-msme-urges-law-commission-revisit-repayment-framework-tata-steel-limited-bhushan-steel-limited-541862</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T15:48:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Small Operational Creditors Are 'Significantly Disenfranchised': Supreme Court Urges Review Of IBC Framework]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Tata Steel, Bhushan Steel, operational creditors, MSMEs, clean slate doctrine, resolution plan, civil suit, arbitration proceedings, Law Commission, Committee of Creditors, Resolution Professional, Section 31 IBC, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP, Justice Manoj Misra, Justice Manmohan, insolvency law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/04/653924-justice-manoj-misra-and-justice-manmohan-and-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/madras-high-court-upholds-sales-tax-demand-against-ford-india-over-breach-of-exemption-conditions-541857</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-18T15:04:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T15:03:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds Sales Tax Demand Against Ford India Over Breach of Exemption Conditions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Central Sales Tax Act, Section 5(3) of the CST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/18/687699-tvl-ford-india-private-limited-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/hawkins-cookers-liable-to-pay-balance-85-vat-on-original-sale-price-541851</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T14:30:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gauhati High Court Rejects Hawkins Cookers' Plea To Compute VAT On Reduced Sale Price]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Assam Value Added Tax Act 2003, VAT demand, Differential VAT Liability, Sale Price]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/18/687691-hawkins-cookers-gauhati-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/tamil-nadu-reat-refuses-to-strike-off-sobha-vp-from-rera-complaint-at-threshold-stage-541849</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-18T14:12:04+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T14:11:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu REAT Upholds Refusal To Remove Sobha VP From RERA Complaint At Preliminary Stage]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, Sobha Limited, Sobha Westhill Owners Association, company officer, authorised signatory, impleadment, strike off application, Tamil Nadu REAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652503-reat-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/dismissal-of-drt-recovery-case-for-default-does-not-bar-insolvency-proceedings-against-personal-guarantor-nclat-541848</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T14:03:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Dismissal Of DRT Recovery Case For Default Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantor: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Recovery Proceedings, Personal Guarantor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652483-nclat-05.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-recalls-its-own-order-five-minutes-after-pronouncement-failure-to-disclose-material-facts-541847</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T13:47:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi Recalls Oral Order Minutes After Pronouncement Over Undisclosed Facts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi Bench, Air Travel Enterprises India Ltd., CIRP, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Resolution Professional, RP, Committee of Creditors, CoC, Union Bank of India, One-Time Settlement, OTS, withdrawal of CIRP, oral order, recall of oral order, unsigned order, Rule 11 NCLT Rules, Fakir Mamad Suleman Sameja, Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd., NCLAT, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/gratuity-payable-to-retiring-employee-not-salary-cannot-form-part-of-cirp-costs-nclat-541844</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T13:13:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gratuity Payable To Retiring Employee Cannot Be Equated With Salary, Not Part Of CIRP Costs: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Gratuity Dues, CIRP Costs]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652666-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/chhattisgarh-high-court-restores-abb-in-arbitration-appeals-after-hitachi-challenges-substitution-order-541842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T12:57:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Chhattisgarh High Court Restores ABB In Arbitration Appeals After Hitachi Challenges Substitution Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration appeals, review petition, substitution of parties, Scheme of Arrangement, NCLT, transfer of liability, natural justice, corporate restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652569-chhattisgarh-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/himachal-pradesh-high-court-refuses-interim-relief-in-sml-patent-infringement-suit-over-territorial-jurisdiction-541840</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T12:32:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh High Court Refuses Interim Relief In SML Patent Infringement Suit Over Territorial Jurisdiction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh High Court, SML Limited, Happy Agro Chemicals, Patent No. 282092, SELZIC, TECHNO Z, Patent Infringement, Territorial Jurisdiction, Trap Purchase, Fertilizer Control Order 1985, Mitul Industries, ULink Agri Tech, Commercial Scale, Justice Sandeep Sharma, Agricultural Composition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/18/687655-himachal-pradesh-hc-justice-sandeep-sharma.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-simplifies-mutual-fund-transmission-process-legal-heirs-nominees-541836</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T12:13:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Simplifies Mutual Fund Transmission Process For Legal Heirs, Nominees]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, AMFI, Association of Mutual Funds in India, mutual funds, mutual fund transmission, transmission of mutual fund units, legal heirs, nominees, deceased unit holder, mutual fund claims, address mismatch, name mismatch, signature mismatch, Registrars and Transfer Agents, RTAs, Asset Management Companies, AMCs, investor protection, SEBI circular, mutual fund regulations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/pending-compromise-scheme-no-bar-to-cirp-proceedings-once-debt-and-default-are-established-nclat-541834</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T12:09:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Pending Compromise Scheme No Bar To Insolvency Proceedings: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Compromise, CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652479-nclat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/calcutta-hc-says-gst-order-issued-within-limitation-doesnt-become-time-barred-merely-because-it-was-uploaded-a-day-later-541824</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T11:37:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Order Uploaded A Day After Limitation Expired]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 73 GST, limitation, issuance of order, service of order, DRC-07, GST portal, Section 169, Calcutta High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/18/687637-calcutta-hc-justice-raja-basu-chowdhury.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/mere-denial-cant-rebut-ni-act-presumption-accused-must-explain-how-cheque-reached-payee-supreme-court-541822</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-18T11:23:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Denial Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt In Cheque Dishonour Cases: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Section 139 NI Act, Section 269SS Income Tax Act, Cheque Dishonour, Legally Enforceable Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655258-supreme-court-sc-llbiz2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
