<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/gujarat-high-court-rejects-bus-owners-plea-over-53-lakh-tax-demand-for-lack-of-non-use-certificate-545975</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T18:13:20+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T18:12:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Rejects Bus Owner's Plea Over ₹53 Lakh Vehicle Tax Demand For Lack Of Non-Use Certificate]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, Section 3(2), deemed use, non-use certificate, Form-NT, passenger bus, sleeper bus, vehicle fitness certificate, Gujarat vehicle tax, Diu registered vehicle, motor vehicle tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/telangana-reat-upholds-order-to-refund-3658-lakh-to-homebuyers-for-plot-sold-to-third-part-545974</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T18:05:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana REAT Upholds Order To Refund ₹36.58 Lakh To Homebuyers For Same Plot Sold To Third Party]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, promoter duties, agreement of sale, third-party sale, plot allotment, refund with interest, delayed conveyance, homebuyer rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/04/525992-real-estate-appellate-tribunal-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/telangana-hc-quashes-non-agricultural-tax-demands-on-industrial-land-545973</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T17:51:09+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T17:50:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Upholds Law Levying Non-Agricultural Land Tax At Different Rates Based On Use]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Andhra Pradesh Non-Agricultural Land Assessment Act 1963, Sirpur Paper Mills, non-agricultural land assessment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652543-telangana-hc-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/law-shows-greater-sympathy-to-debt-trapped-individuals-nclat-gives-guarantors-fresh-chance-for-relief-545967</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T16:39:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Law Shows Greater Sympathy To Debt-Trapped Individuals': NCLAT Gives Guarantors Fresh Chance For Relief]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Bankruptcy, Personal Insolvency]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/07/10/378057-nclat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-allows-renault-nissan-powertrain-demerger-scheme-directs-stakeholder-meetings-545966</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T16:19:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Allows Stakeholder Meetings On Renault-Nissan's Demerger Of Powertrain Business]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, Chennai NCLT, Renault Nissan Automotive India, Renault India Powertrain, Composite Scheme of Arrangement, Demerger, Powertrain Manufacturing Business, Companies Act 2013, Sections 230-232, Scheme of Arrangement, Share Swap Ratio, Corporate Restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681149-nclt-mumbai-renault.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-temporarily-restrains-universal-spirits-from-using-marco-polo-for-liquor-545965</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T16:09:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Temporarily Restrains Universal Spirits From Using 'Marco Polo' For Liquor]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, Trademark, Empee Distilleries Limited, SNJ Distillers Private Limited, Marco Polo Trademark, Class 33 Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, NCLT Resolution Plan, OA 492 of 2026, OA 493 of 2026, A 2183 of 2026, Pernod Ricard India v Karanveer Singh Chhabra, IMFL Trademark Dispute, ARL Sundaresan, Vijay Narayan, Palakkad Kerala Factory, Discontinuous Trademark Use, Deceptive Similarity, Trademark Injunction India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/03/23/464938-justice-k-kumaresh-babu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/chhattisgarh-high-court-rejects-plea-against-rs-1975-lakh-property-tax-demand-on-loyola-school-545962</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T16:00:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T15:59:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Chhattisgarh High Court Rejects Plea Against ₹19.75 Lakh Property Tax Demand On Loyola School]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[property tax, Section 12(A) of Income Tax Act, educational institution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/25/649321-chhattisgarh-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/madras-high-court-allows-ott-rights-holder-of-pawan-kalyan-starrer-movie-to-seek-4-crore-from-producer-545961</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T15:49:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Allows OTT Rights Holder Of Pawan Kalyan-Starrer Movie To Seek ₹4 Crore Refund From Producer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Vijay Kothari, Hari Hara Veera Mallu, Pawan Kalyan, Mega Surya Productions, Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, Amazon Prime Video, Justice K Kumaresh Babu, Plaint Amendment, Specific Performance, OTT Rights Dispute, Assignment Agreement, A No 442 of 2026, CS COMM DIV 211 of 2025, Film Rights Litigation, Refund of Rs 4 Crores, Increased Damages Claim, Factual Pleadings, Telugu Film Industry, Civil Procedure Code]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/03/23/464938-justice-k-kumaresh-babu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/sebi-proposes-fast-track-settlement-for-certain-violations-cases-up-to-10-lakh-545959</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T15:33:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Fast-Track Settlement For Certain Violations, Cases Up To ₹10 Lakh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Settlement Proceedings, Settlement Regulations, Securities Market, Settlement Mechanism, SEBI Consultation, Fast-Track Settlement, Settlement Amount, Disclosure Violations, Repetitive Defaults, Securities Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bank-cannot-mark-lien-on-cooperative-society-account-for-tds-on-cash-withdrawals-karnataka-high-court-545957</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T15:17:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bank Cannot Mark Lien On Cooperative Society Account For TDS On Cash Withdrawals: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 194N of the Income Tax Act, Cooperative Society’s Account, Tax Deduction at Source, Section 271C of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/12/661211-750x450652568-karnataka-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/cestat-must-decide-all-issues-as-final-fact-finding-authority-bombay-high-court-545956</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T15:04:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Must Decide All Issues As Final Fact-Finding Authority: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT, CENVAT Credit, final fact-finding authority, failure to exercise jurisdiction, construction services, factory construction, GTA services, penalty, Central Excise Act, Bombay High Court, Prima Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/17/680441-bombay-high-court-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-firdosh-phiroze-pooniwalla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-high-court-refuses-to-restore-terminated-bpcl-lpg-transport-contract-pending-arbitration-545955</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T14:53:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T14:52:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Refuses To Restore Terminated LPG Transport Contract Pending Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LPG transportation contracts, interim relief, terminated contracts, tank trucks, BPCL, IOCL, PESO licence, arbitration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652576-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-restrains-matrimonycom-from-using-jodii-mark-for-matchmaking-app-545954</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T14:41:50+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T14:41:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Restrains Matrimony.com From Using 'Jodii' Mark For Matchmaking App]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Trademark, FreeElective Network, Matrimony.com, Jodi365, Jodii, Justice P Velmurugan, Justice K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Patel Field Marshal, Cadila Health Care, BharatMatrimony, Class 99 Trademark, Phonetic Similarity, Common to Trade, Publici Juris, Permanent Injunction, Matchmaking App]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/cita-has-discretion-to-order-fresh-tax-assessment-but-must-first-decide-reassessment-challenge-itat-mumbai-545952</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T14:31:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CIT(A) Has Discretion To Order Fresh Tax Assessment, But Must First Decide Reassessment Challenge: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Keywords: CIT(A), discretionary power, Section 251, Section 144, reassessment proceedings, jurisdictional objections, Section 148 notice, deceased assessee, de novo assessment, Income Tax Act, ITAT Mumbai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680236-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-allows-jakson-limiteds-demerger-into-jakson-powergen-orders-creditor-meetings-545951</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T14:18:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T14:18:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Allows First Motion In Jakson Limited's Demerger Into Jakson Powergen, Orders Creditor Meetings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Jakson Powergen Limited, Jakson limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687498-nclt-delhi-with-jakson-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/msme/msme-council-cannot-hear-buyers-claims-over-defective-supply-by-msme-supplier-madras-high-court-545948</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T14:08:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MSME Council Cannot Hear Buyer's Claims Over Defective Supply By MSME Supplier: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MSMED Act, MSME Facilitation Council, defective supply, buyer damages claim, unpaid invoices, arbitration agreement, EV chargers, interim security]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/03/23/464938-justice-k-kumaresh-babu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/bombay-high-court-rules-in-favour-of-ilfs-in-84880-crore-recovery-suits-545946</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T13:59:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rules In Favour Of IL&FS In ₹848.80 Crore Recovery Suits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IL&FS Financial Services, Loan Recovery, Commercial Summary Suit, Order XXXVII CPC, Conditional Leave To Defend, Deficit Stamp Duty, Recovery Decree]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/15/694104-whatsapp-image-2026-08-15-at-130954.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/service-tax-demand-cannot-go-beyond-show-cause-notice-cestat-delhi-545940</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T13:42:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Service Tax Demand Cannot Go Beyond Show-Cause Notice: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Service Tax, Construction Contract, Works Contract Service, Construction of Complex Service, Wrong Classification, Show Cause Notice, Composite Contract, Larsen & Toubro, CESTAT Delhi, Gandharva Infrastructure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684083-cestat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/sarfaesi-demand-notice-alone-insufficient-to-establish-personal-guarantee-without-guarantee-deed-nclt-chandigarh-545937</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T13:30:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Notice Alone Cannot Establish Personal Guarantee Invocation Without Deed: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, SARFAESI Act, Personal Guarantee]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/18/681009-ncltchandigarh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/delhi-high-court-orders-omaxe-to-refund-335-crore-after-developer-stopped-assured-returns-545935</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T13:13:46+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T13:13:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Omaxe To Refund ₹3.35 Crore After Developer Stopped Assured Returns]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Omaxe Ltd., assured returns, delayed possession, arbitral award, property refund, force majeure, commercial allotment, interest award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/13/686241-justice-v-kameswar-rao-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/high-court/only-sebi-can-initiate-criminal-complaint-for-front-running-under-sebi-act-bombay-high-court-545932</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T13:00:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Only SEBI Can Initiate Criminal Complaint For Front-Running Under SEBI Act: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Front-Running, Axis Mutual Fund, Axis Asset Management Company, Viresh Gangaram Joshi, SEBI Act, Section 26 SEBI Act, IPC, FIR, Economic Offences Wing, Market Abuse, Investor Protection, Market Integrity, Quashing of FIR]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690107-bombay-high-court-justice-ranjitsinha-raja-bhonsale.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-imposes-10-lakh-costs-on-reliance-industries-for-delaying-20-year-old-ntpc-suit-545931</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T12:41:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Imposes ₹10 Lakh Costs On Reliance Industries For Delaying 20-Year-Old NTPC Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Reliance Industries Limited, National Thermal Power Corporation, NTPC, Supreme Court, Gas Supply Suit, Bombay High Court, Prolonged Delay, 2005 Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/19/668614-reliance-industries.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-act-transfer-of-settlement-application-between-interim-boards-does-not-restart-18-month-limitation-allahabad-high-court-545915</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T11:31:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T10:51:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Act | 18-Month Period To Decide Settlement Application Cannot Restart On Transfer Between Interim Boards: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Settlement ,  Limitation, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/15/694072-justice-shekhar-b-saraf-and-justice-abdhesh-kumar-chaudhary-with-lucknow-bench-of-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/delhi-high-court-full-bench-commercial-courts-act-applies-suits-filed-before-2015-even-id-re-numbered-later-commercial-courts-act-2015-545899</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-15T10:51:53+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T10:05:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Courts Act Applies To Suits Filed Before 2015 Even If Re-numbered Later: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Commercial Courts Act, Section 13, Section 15, Right to Appeal, Commercial Disputes, Pre-2015 Suits, Re-numbering, Brahmos Aerospace, Samsung Leasing, Yes Bank, Modi Rubber, Order VI Rule 17 CPC, Order XLIII CPC, Commercial Division, V Kameswar Rao, Amit Mahajan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/15/694062-justice-v-kameshwar-rao-justice-chandrashekharan-sudha-justice-amit-mahajan-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-14-2026-545892</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-15T09:33:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 14, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658700-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/2010-it-act-amendment-bringing-overseas-technical-services-within-tax-net-cannot-apply-retrospectively-karnataka-high-court-545886</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T22:33:24+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T21:45:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[2010 IT Act Amendment Bringing Overseas Technical Services Into Tax Net Cannot Apply Retrospectively: Karnataka HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, tax liability, India-USA DTAA, Article 12(4) of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/694013-jindal-india-power-ltd-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/failure-to-serve-execution-notice-on-legal-representatives-does-not-invalidate-drt-auction-sale-supreme-court-545877</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T20:30:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T20:29:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Failure To Serve CPC Notice On Legal Representatives Does Not Invalidate DRT Auction Sale: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Recovery Officer, DRT Jabalpur, Auction Sale, Order XXI Rule 22 CPC, Second Schedule Income-tax Act, Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC, Punjab & Sind Bank]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/12/673395-750x450671104-750x450670308-750x450662489-justices-ps-narasimha-and-alok-aradhe-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/four-year-income-tax-refund-delay-delhi-high-court-directs-ao-to-appear-if-campus-activewear-not-paid-with-interest-545871</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T20:09:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Four-Year Income Tax Refund Delay: Delhi High Court Directs AO To Appear If Campus Activewear Not Paid With Interest]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Campus Activewear, Delhi High Court, income tax refund, tax refund delay, Assessing Officer, AO appearance, four-year refund delay, applicable interest, income tax department, Delhi High Court order, tax refund, Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/no-formal-builder-buyer-agreement-needed-to-establish-promoter-allottee-relationship-haryana-reat-545866</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:56:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Formal Builder-Buyer Agreement Needed To Establish Promoter-Allottee Relationship: Haryana REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Promoter-Allottee Relationship, Builder-Buyer Agreement, Delay Possession Charges, Omaxe City Centre, Real Estate Regulation, Haryana REAT, Unit Allotment, Consideration Retention]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/24/649210-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-new-route-accredited-investor-status-keeps-accreditation-agency-route-545864</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:43:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Manager-Led Accreditation For Investors, Adds ₹5 Crore Securities Asset Criterion]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Accredited Investors, Accredited Investor Framework, manager-led accreditation, investment managers, Accreditation Agency, self-certification, securities market assets, ₹5 crore threshold, ₹20 crore threshold, FPIs, Persons Resident Outside India, AIF, PMS, SEBI consultation paper]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672420-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/us-court-confirms-5625-mn-devas-arbitration-award-against-isros-antrix-545863</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T19:38:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:38:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[US Court Confirms $562.5 Million Devas Arbitration Award Against ISRO's Antrix]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Devas Multimedia, Antrix Corporation, $562.5 Million Award, New York Convention, FSIA Arbitration Exception, Forum Non Conveniens, ICC Arbitration, Satellite Spectrum Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693975-whatsapp-image-2026-08-14-at-165938.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/no-unaccounted-assets-or-investments-found-delhi-high-court-rejects-revenue-plea-for-higher-tax-545860</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T19:23:23+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:23:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Unaccounted Assets Or Investments Found: Delhi High Court Rejects Revenue's Plea For Higher Tax]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax, Income Tax Act, Section 115BBE, Section 69, higher tax rate, unexplained investments, unaccounted assets, undisclosed assets, unexplained income, business income, Income Tax Department, Revenue]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/national-company-law-tribunal-introduces-new-case-listing-framework-older-matters-to-get-priority-545858</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:15:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Introduces New Case Listing Framework, Older Matters To Get Priority]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, National Company Law Tribunal, case listing, Cause List, IBC, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Companies Act, resolution plans, Registry, NCLT Benches, “With Defects”, Supplementary Cause List, Revised Cause List, three-day listing deadline, Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652586-nclt-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gujarat-high-court-declares-pre-october-2023-gst-levy-on-related-persons-corporate-guarantees-unconstitutional-545857</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T19:14:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Declares Pre-October 2023 GST Levy On Related Persons' Corporate Guarantees Unconstitutional]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[corporate guarantee, GST on corporate guarantee, Rule 28(2), CGST Rules, 1% valuation, whichever is higher, retrospective GST levy, October 26 2023, Section 7, Section 15(4), Section 74, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g), Article 265, reading down, CBIC Circular, holding company, subsidiary, pledge of shares]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/section-7410-gst-act-starting-point-for-gst-demand-limitation-debatable-delhi-high-court-declines-writ-545853</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T18:33:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Section 74(10) GST Act | Starting Point For GST Demand Limitation 'Debatable': Delhi High Court Declines Writ]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST limitation, Section 74(10) CGST Act, erroneous refund, GST appeal, writ jurisdiction, limitation period, annual return, CGST Act, GST audit, Section 65 GST]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/12/620143-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-audit-file-transfer-is-administrative-cannot-be-challenged-in-writ-petition-delhi-high-court-545852</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T18:26:19+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T18:25:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Audit File Transfer Between Wings Is Administrative, Cannot Be Challenged In Writ Petition: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST audit file transfer, GST Audit Wing, GST Anti-Evasion Wing, Delhi High Court GST, GST audit Section 65, transfer of GST audit file, CGST Act 2017, GST audit proceedings, GST writ petition, GST audit timeline]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/12/620143-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gst-appellate-authorities-presumed-to-know-government-notifications-cant-ignore-them-gujarat-high-court-545850</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T18:16:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Appellate Authorities Presumed To Know Government Notifications, Can't Ignore Them: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST appeal, Notification 53/2023, Section 107 CGST Act, limitation, GST Council, January 31 2024 cut-off, delayed appeal, GST amnesty, appellate authority, Section 74, CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-kolkata-allows-cenvat-credit-on-steel-used-to-manufacture-capital-goods-545848</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T18:03:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T18:02:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata Allows CENVAT Credit On Steel Used To Manufacture Capital Goods]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit, MS Angles, MS Channels, Steel Plates, Capital Goods, Welding Electrodes, Oxygen, Chartered Engineer Certificate, Extended Period of Limitation, Suppression, ER-1 Returns, Central Excise, CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684083-cestat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/calcutta-high-court-directs-an-arbitral-tribunal-to-record-chief-examination-of-all-witnesses-before-cross-examination-545847</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T17:51:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Directs An Arbitral Tribunal To Record Chief Examination Of All Witnesses Before Cross-Examination]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[rbitration procedure, evidence-in-chief, witness affidavits, additional documents, civil revision, Article 227, procedural fairness, arbitral tribunal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/08/07/485008-justice-shampa-dutt-paul-calcutta-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/substantial-compliance-cannot-be-defeated-by-technical-lapses-545842</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T18:49:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T17:37:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta HC Rejects ₹27.74 Cr CENVAT Demand, Says Revenue Cannot Choose Assessee's Compliance Method]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, Notification No. 12/2012-CE, Rule 6(3A) of the Credit Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-says-5-crore-emd-cannot-be-forfeited-over-applicants-eligibility-dispute-in-morarjee-cirp-545840</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T17:28:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Says ₹5 Crore EMD Cannot Be Forfeited Over Applicant's Eligibility Dispute In Morarjee CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai, Forfeiture , EMD, Legal Challenge ,Disqualification ,Bank Guarantee ,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/26/682495-nclt-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-issues-bailable-warrant-against-personal-guarantor-for-failing-to-appear-despite-directions-545828</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T16:41:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Issues Bailable Warrant Against Personal Guarantor For Failing To Appear Despite Repeated Directions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai , Bailable Warrant , Personal Guarantor , Insolvency Proceedings,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-delhi-directs-stakeholder-meetings-for-avinya-batteries-ppap-automotive-amalgamation-545823</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T16:27:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Directs Stakeholder Meetings For Avinya Batteries-PPAP Automotive Amalgamation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Avinya Batteries Limited, PPAP Automotive Limited, Merger, First Motion]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693924-nclt-delhi-with-avinya-batteries-limited-ppap-automotive-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-demand-order-served-only-on-portal-delhi-high-court-allows-appeal-to-be-filed-without-limitation-objection-545820</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T16:19:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Demand Order Served Only On Portal: Delhi High Court Allows Appeal To Be Filed Without Limitation Objection]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST demand order, GST Common Portal, GST order uploaded on portal, GST appeal limitation, GST appeal without limitation objection, Delhi High Court GST ruling, GST show cause notice, GST statutory appeal, GST demand order service, GST portal service, GST limitation relief, Section 73 CGST Act,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-grants-limitation-relief-to-importer-after-supreme-courts-itc-ruling-changed-refund-rules-545818</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T16:05:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Limitation Relief To Importer After Supreme Court's ITC Ruling Changed Customs Refund Rules]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court customs refund limitation, Senior India Pvt Ltd customs case, ITC Limited refund ruling, customs refund Section 27, Section 14 Limitation Act customs appeal, Section 128 Customs Act limitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/vijay-mallya-claims-15000-crore-recovered-against-6203-crore-dues-bombay-high-court-asks-sbi-ed-to-respond-545816</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T15:54:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Vijay Mallya Claims ₹15,000 Crore Recovered Against ₹6,203 Crore Dues: Bombay High Court Asks SBI, ED To Respond]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vijay Mallya, Bombay High Court, State Bank of India, SBI, Enforcement Directorate, ED, PMLA, PMLA Court, confiscated assets, debt recovery, bank dues, Rs.15000 crore, Rs.6203 crore, ECIR, Vijay Vittal Mallya, Vijay Mallya banks recovery, Vijay Mallya assets, Vijay Mallya SBI, Vijay Mallya ED case]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693932-bombay-hc-vijay-mallya.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/high-court/kerala-high-court-expunges-adverse-remark-national-company-law-tribunal-against-union-bank-of-india-sets-aside-1-lakh-cost-545811</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T15:39:37+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T15:39:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Expunges NCLT's Adverse Remarks Against Union Bank, Sets Aside ₹1 Lakh Cost]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Union Bank of India, NCLT Kochi, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 12A IBC, withdrawal of insolvency proceedings, Committee of Creditors, CoC, NCLT Rules, ₹1 lakh cost, rectification of errors, Air Travel Enterprises India Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/t-series-tells-delhi-high-court-it-will-rename-kartik-aaryan-film-to-tu-meri-zindagi-hai-in-aashiqui-trademark-dispute-545807</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T21:49:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T15:25:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[T-Series Tells Delhi HC It Will Rename Kartik Aaryan Film To 'Tu Meri Zindagi Hai' In Aashiqui Trademark Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vishesh Films Private Limited, trademark, Super Cassettes Industries Limited, T-Series, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, Amit Sibal, Pravin Anand, Aashiqui trademark dispute, Tu Meri Zindagi Hai, Tu Hi Aashiqui, trademark infringement, passing off, Section 124 Trademarks Act, Section 57 rectification, joint proprietorship, consent order, Kartik Aaryan, Sai Pallavi, Anurag Basu]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693936-delhi-hc-kartik-aaryan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/defective-or-withdrawn-liquidation-application-cannot-end-rps-entitlement-to-fees-nclt-ahmedabad-545803</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T15:05:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T15:04:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Defective Or Withdrawn Liquidation Application Cannot End RP's Entitlement To Fees: NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Liquidation, RP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/gujarat-hc-quashes-301-crore-assessment-order-passed-in-defiance-of-court-directions-545801</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T14:46:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IT Dept. Cannot Cite Website Functionality To Avoid Withdrawing Order Passed In Defiance Of Court: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ahmedabad South Indian Association Charitable Trust, assessment order, interim order, Section 148, Section 148A, Section 152(2), Section 10(23C)(vi), reassessment, 85% utilisation, charitable exemption, Section 264, Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-to-examine-if-audit-objection-can-trigger-reassessment-for-period-prior-to-april-2021-545798</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T14:17:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Examine If Audit Objection Can Trigger Reassessment For Period Prior To April 2021]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court income tax, audit objection as information, income tax reassessment, Section 148 Income Tax Act, Section 148A reassessment, audit objection reassessment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/can-itat-annul-assessment-on-issue-taxpayer-did-not-challenge-in-cross-appeal-delhi-high-court-issues-notice-545797</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T14:06:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Can ITAT Annul Assessment On Issue Taxpayer Did Not Challenge In Cross-Appeal Delhi High Court Issues Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, cross-appeal, assessment orders, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Section 153C, Income Tax Act, Assessing Officer, tax appeals]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/karnataka-high-court-dismisses-income-tax-appealsas-additions-were-based-on-uncorroborated-search-material-545795</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T13:52:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeals, As Additions Were Based On Uncorroborated Search Material]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[unaccounted fees, loose sheets, diary entries, seized materials, corroborative evidence, Section 132 of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693881-karnataka-hc-ananda-social-education-trust.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/msme/msme-suppliers-interest-claim-cannot-be-denied-merely-because-principal-dues-are-paid-gauhati-high-court-545791</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T13:30:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MSME Supplier's Interest Claim Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Principal Dues Are Paid: Gauhati High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gauhati High Court, MSMED Act, MSME, Delayed Payment, Statutory Interest, Principal Amount, Section 15 MSMED Act, Section 16 MSMED Act, Section 17 MSMED Act, Section 18 MSMED Act, Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, MSEFC, Compound Interest, Three Times Bank Rate, RBI Bank Rate, Admitted Contractual Dues, Outstanding Bills, Contractual Payment, Delayed Contractual Dues, Supplier, Buyer Liability, Micro Enterprise, Small Enterprise, Rain Water Harvesting Systems, Public Works Department, PWD Assam, State of Assam, SRK Metals and Plastics, Garg Poly Industries, Charu Technology]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652628-gauhati-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-delhi-approves-western-up-tollway-scheme-slashing-equity-capital-from-11487-crore-to-148-crore-545788</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T13:05:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T13:05:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Approves Western UP Tollway Scheme, Slashing Equity Capital From ₹114.87 Crore To ₹1.48 Crore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Western UP Tollway Pvt. Ltd, Scheme of Arrangement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/karnataka-high-court-upholds-vat-on-swiping-machines-rented-to-merchants-by-axis-bank-edct-545783</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T12:52:14+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T12:50:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Upholds VAT On Swiping Machine Rentals By Axis Bank To Merchants]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[EDCT Machine Rental Charges, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003, Finance Act 1994]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693890-card-swiping-machine-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-stop-tv-channel-from-airing-sgpcs-live-gurbani-broadcast-545779</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T12:34:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T12:34:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Stop TV Channel From Airing SGPC's Live Gurbani Broadcast]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE, SGPC, Gurbani, Golden Temple, Sikh, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Chander lall, patwalia, GALACTIC TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS PVT LTD, Amritsar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693869-delhi-hc-sgpc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-allows-zee-entertainment-complete-preferential-warrant-subject-to-fully-penalty-deposit-fund-raise-545773</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T12:07:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T12:00:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Partly Lifts SEBI Market Ban On ZEEL, Punit Goenka To Allow Fundraise From Promoter Group Entity]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Zee Entertainment Enterprises, ZEEL, Punit Goenka, SEBI, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, Market Access Restrictions, Securities Market Ban, Hyderabad Property, Promoter-Linked Entities, Unauthorised Pledging, Related Party Transaction, LODR Regulations, PFUTP Regulations, Essel Group, Fundraise, Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693855-sat-with-punit-goenka-and-logo-of-zee-enterprises-entertainment-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-reliance-plea-against-redaction-of-affidavit-portions-in-ntpc-gas-dispute-545767</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-14T18:46:46+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-14T10:59:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses Reliance's Plea Against Redaction Of Affidavit Portions In NTPC Gas Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NTPC, Reliance Industries, Natural Gas Supply, Letter of Intent, Concluded Contract, Gas Sale And Purchase Agreement, Specific Performance, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/14/693833-whatsapp-image-2026-08-14-at-055620.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-13-2026-545729</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T22:47:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 13, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-declines-to-rule-on-gst-penalty-for-non-taxable-persons-pending-proceedings-in-supreme-court-545728</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T22:38:29+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T22:36:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Declines To Rule On GST Penalty For Non-Taxable Persons Amid Proceedings Before Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST, GST penalty, non-taxable person, CGST Act, Section 122(1), Supreme Court, Mukesh Kumar Garg, GST penalty proceedings, taxable person, GST appellate remedy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-dismisses-tax-dept-appeals-against-suzuki-motorcycle-over-amp-adjustment-using-bright-line-test-545727</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T22:30:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T22:30:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Dismisses Tax Dept. Appeals Against Suzuki Motorcycle Over AMP Adjustment Using Bright Line Test]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Suzuki Motorcycle India, Income Tax Department, AMP adjustment, Advertising Marketing and Promotion, Bright Line Test, transfer pricing, ITAT, Sony Ericsson, Maruti Suzuki, income tax, international transaction, Supreme Court, SLP, tax litigation, transfer pricing adjustment.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/supreme-court/excise-department-cannot-invoke-extended-limitation-for-omission-when-facts-were-already-known-supreme-court-545726</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T22:19:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Excise Department Cannot Invoke Extended Limitation For Omission When Facts Were Already Known: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Audi Automobiles, Supreme Court, Central Excise, excise duty, Section 11A, extended limitation, suppression of facts, time-barred demand, job work, motor vehicle chassis, valuation, Rule 8, show-cause notice, CESTAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-itat-ex-parte-order-against-aai-over-non-service-of-hearing-notice-545721</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T21:25:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside ITAT's Ex-Parte Order Against AAI Over Non-Service Of Hearing Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, ITAT, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Airports Authority of India, AAI, ex-parte order, Rule 20, Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules 1963, notice of hearing, service of notice, procedural irregularity, natural justice, income tax appeal, Section 260A, fresh hearing]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-stays-reassessment-proceedings-over-non-supply-of-material-to-taxpayer-545719</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T21:16:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Stays Reassessment Proceedings Over Non-Supply Of Material To Taxpayer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[elhi High Court, Income Tax Act, Section 148, Section 148A, Reassessment Proceedings, Income Tax Department, Assessing Officer, Insurance Commission, IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance, Tax Litigation, Direct Tax, Taxpayer Rights, Natural Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/delhi-high-court-rejects-plea-against-gst-registration-cancellation-over-failure-to-reply-to-show-cause-notices-545717</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T21:09:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Against GST Registration Cancellation Over Failure To Reply To Show Cause Notices]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Writ, Show Cause Notice, GST notice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/12/620143-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/saas-support-does-not-amount-to-transfer-of-technology-under-india-us-dtaa-itat-delhi-545707</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T20:03:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SaaS Support Does Not Amount To Transfer Of Technology Under India-US DTAA: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Branch Metrics, SaaS, make available, India-USA DTAA, Article 12(4), Fees for Included Services, technical services, standard software, off-the-shelf software, technology transfer, Section 90(2), ITAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679647-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-sebi-settlement-dues-not-bar-stock-exchanges-imposing-separate-fine-sebi-lodr-regulations-545705</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T19:50:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T19:49:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Settlement Does Not Bar Stock Exchange From Imposing Separate Fine For Same Violation: SAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, Hindustan Foods Limited, SEBI, BSE, LODR Regulations, Regulation 17(1)(b), Regulation 98, SOP Fine, Stock Exchange Fine, SEBI Settlement, Double Jeopardy, Res Judicata, Independent Directors, Board Composition, Listing Compliance, Securities Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652545-sat-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/high-court/homebuyers-right-to-interest-under-rera-for-delayed-possession-is-independent-indefeasible-bombay-high-court-545704</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T19:36:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Homebuyers' Right To Interest Under RERA For Delayed Possession Is Independent, Indefeasible: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[delayed possession, allottee interest, Kiyana Estate LLP, homebuyer rights, acceptance of possession, Contract Act, RERA override, Maharashtra REAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654482-justice-nj-jamadar-bombau-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-upholds-injunction-against-alder-biochem-says-mark-deceptively-similar-to-zydus-biochem-545701</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T19:21:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T19:20:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against Alder Biochem Over 'BIOCHEM' Mark In Zydus' Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Alder Biochem Private Limited, Zydus Healthcare Limited, Anish Dayal, Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, FAO OS COMM 268 2024, CS COMM 516 2023, Biochem Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Device Mark Protection, United Biotech v Orchid, Cadila Healthcare, Pernod Ricard India, Composite Mark, Dominant Feature Rule, Anti Dissection Principle, Class 05 Trademark, Pharmaceutical Trademark, J Sai Deepak]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/13/693751-biochem-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-ex-parte-order-based-on-show-cause-notice-uploaded-only-on-gst-portal-545699</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T19:09:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Based On Show Cause Notice Uploaded Only On GST Portal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST, CGST Act 2017, ex-parte order, show cause notice, GST portal, Common Portal, Section 73 CGST Act, Luxmi Traders, Punjab and Haryana High Court, tax proceedings, adjudicating authority, fresh adjudication, Delhi High Court, Tax news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/12/620143-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/qatar-holding-moves-karnataka-hc-to-enforce-sgd-72-million-siac-award-against-byju-raveendran-545697</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T22:40:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T18:59:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Qatar Holding Moves Karnataka High Court To Enforce SGD 7.2 Million SIAC Award Against Byju Raveendran]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Qatar Holding LLC, Byju Raveendran, SIAC Award, Foreign Award Enforcement, Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd, Aakash Shares, Asset Attachment, Karnataka High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/06/15/544724-byjus.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-allows-delhi-airport-to-approach-adjudicating-authority-for-itc-claim-in-light-of-safari-retreats-545694</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-13T18:42:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T18:42:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Allows Delhi Airport To Approach Adjudicating Authority For ITC Claim In Light Of Safari Retreats]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Delhi International Airport, Delhi Airport, Adjudicating Authority input tax credit, ITC, GST, Central Goods and Services Tax Act, Section 17(5), Section 17(5)(c), Section 17(5)(d), Safari Retreats]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/19/600606-delhi-airport.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-temporarily-restrains-dabur-from-using-neem-as-leading-feature-on-toothpaste-label-on-jyoti-labs-plea-545693</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T18:29:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Temporarily Restrains Dabur From Using 'NEEM' As Leading Feature On Toothpaste Label]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Trademark, Jyothy Labs Ltd, Dabur India Ltd, Justice Arif S Doctor, Neem Active Toothpaste, Neem Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Essential Feature, Prosecution History Estoppel, Dabur Herb'l Neem, Calcutta Chemical Company, Babool, Meswak, Section 17 Trade Marks Act, Class 03, Acquired Distinctiveness, Inherent Distinctiveness, Interim Application 1880 of 2021]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/13/693743-dabur-neem-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/delhi-high-court-conditional-votes-cannot-treated-unconditional-approval-revival-scheme-winding-up-an-buildwell-private-limited-545692</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-13T18:16:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Conditional Votes Cannot Be Treated As Unconditional Approval Of Companies Act Revival Scheme: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Companies Act 1956, Section 391, Section 392, Section 393, Revival Scheme, Scheme of Arrangement, Compromise and Arrangement, Conditional Votes, Commercial Wisdom, Statutory Majority, Allottees, A.N. Buildwell, Spire Edge, Spire Woods, Company Law, Winding Up, Real Estate]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
