<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-weekly-digest-october-5-october-10-2026-554258</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T14:47:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: October 5 - October 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, homebuyer, allottee, delay, payment, compensation, adjudicating officer, tribunal, appeal, complaint, mental agony, promoter, liability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/11/646089-weeklydigestrerallbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/dissenting-secured-creditors-minimum-liquidation-value-cannot-be-capped-at-resolution-plan-value-nclt-mumbai-554255</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T14:39:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Dissenting Secured Creditors Entitled To Minimum Payment Based On Security Value: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai dissenting creditor payment, SBI liquidation value entitlement, dissenting financial creditor minimum payment, Section 30(2)(b) IBC, Section 53 IBC, Committee of Creditors commercial wisdom, NCLT resolution plan, DBS Bank v Ruchi Soya Industries, India Resurgence ARC v Amit Metaliks,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/karnataka-high-court-upholds-prosecution-over-alleged-non-disclosure-of-foreign-investments-554249</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T14:16:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Refuses Relief in ₹22 Lakh Foreign Investment Case and Wealth Tax Return Default]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 35B of the Wealth Tax Act 1957, Section 277 of the Income Tax Act 1961, income tax returns, Indian Penal Code]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/07/04/424446-justice-hp-sandesh-and-karnataka-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-weekly-digest-october-5-october-10-2026-554246</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T14:02:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: October 5 - October 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitral Award, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitrator, Arbitration Proceedings, Commercial Dispute, Interim Relief, Enforcement of Award, Setting Aside Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/madras-high-court-has-directed-customs-authorities-to-release-an-imported-consignment-of-agricultural-rejected-nut-pieces-residue-and-waste-declared-as-cattle-feed-554241</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T13:53:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Cannot Detain Cattle Feed As Prohibited Goods Without Sufficient Grounds: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Cattle Feed, Prohibited, human consumption, laboratory reports]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703326-madras-hc-justice-s-raveekumar-justice-anita-sumanth.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-protects-actor-bjp-mp-kangana-ranauts-personality-rights-orders-meta-to-remove-ai-deepfakes-554208</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T11:37:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects Actor-BJP MP Kangana Ranaut's Personality Rights, Orders Meta To Remove AI Deepfakes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Kangana Ranaut, Justice Vikas Mahajan, CS COMM 1100 2026, Personality Rights AI Deepfake Injunction, Mandi MP Kangana Ranaut Lawsuit, Saket Sikri Advocate, Meta Platforms Intermediary Takedown, Dynamic Injunction Mirror Accounts, Fabricated Political Quotes Social Media, Sexual Deepfake Video Takedown Order, Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/08/705126-delhi-hc-kangana-ranaut.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/livelaw-biz-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories-from-last-week-554206</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T11:31:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLaw Biz | Top 10 Corporate & Business Law Stories From Last Week]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Top 10 stories, LiveLawBiz, News]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/07/698569-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-directs-mmrda-to-deposit-646-crore-with-registry-in-reliance-bkc-project-case-554200</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T11:12:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Directs MMRDA To Deposit ₹646 Crore With Registry In Reliance's BKC Project Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Reliance Industries, MMRDA, Bandra Kurla Complex, Additional Premium, Lease Deed, Promissory Estoppel, Natural Justice, Construction Delay]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/11/705826-whatsapp-image-2026-10-11-at-162658.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-10-2026-554193</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T10:41:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/madras-high-court-quashes-550-crore-gst-demand-on-unstarted-building-blocks-554169</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-12T09:42:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside ₹5.50 Crore GST Demand Based On Projected Revenue From Unbuilt Construction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[construction company, Unstarted Buildings, tax demand]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/05/06/416805-justice-krishnan-ramasamy.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-department-cannot-wait-for-certified-copy-when-digitally-signed-court-order-is-available-bombay-high-court-554081</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T19:28:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Department Cannot Wait For Certified Copy When Digitally Signed Order Is Available: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Section 153, Special Audit, Limitation Period, Digitally Signed Court Orders]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/ed-moves-supreme-court-against-delhi-hc-order-quashing-fir-ed-case-against-newsclick-founder-over-alleged-foreign-funding-554080</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T19:11:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ED Moves Supreme Court Against Order Quashing FIR, ED Case Against NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Enforcement Directorate, Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, NewsClick, Prabir Purkayastha, foreign funding, money laundering, FIR quashed, foreign direct investment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705728-whatsapp-image-2026-10-10-at-184531.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/mahindra-holidays-need-not-treat-entire-158-cr-membership-fees-as-income-in-year-of-receipt-554078</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T18:44:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Rules In Favour Of Mahindra Holidays On ₹158 Crore Membership Fees, Software Licence Tax Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[membership fees, Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, Section 194J of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705724-madras-hc-mahindra-holidays-and-resorts-india-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/freshly-manufactured-goods-cannot-replace-re-imported-goods-for-customs-duty-exemption-554077</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T18:27:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Freshly Manufactured Goods Cannot Replace Re-Imported Goods For Customs Duty Exemption: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Crescent Foundry Company, Notification No. 158/95-Cus., Customs Duty, Re-Imported Goods, Freshly Manufactured Goods, Shipping Bill, Customs Act, Section 112(a), Confiscation, Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702298-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-toyota-financials-2320-crore-claim-against-blu-smart-over-150-undelivered-vehicles-554072</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:56:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Toyota Financial's ₹23.20 Crore Claim Against Blu-Smart Over 150 Undelivered Vehicles]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Blu-Smart Fleet Private Limited., NCLT Ahmedabad,Toyota Financial Services India Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680206-blu-smart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-extends-injunction-on-thunder-15000-beer-to-delhi-importer-supar-sip-traders-in-inbrew-trademark-suit-554071</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:45:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Extends 'THUNDER 15000' Beer Trademark Injunction To Importer Supar SIP Traders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Inbrew Beverages Private Limited, Kinjore Brewery, Justice Tejas Karia, CS COMM 491 2026, THUNDER 15000 Beer Trademark, Supar SIP Traders LLP, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment, Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Amendment, Injunction Extension Beer Trademark, Mittal Electronics v Sujata Home Appliances, Delhi Excise Department License, Downstream Beer Distributor Injunction, Ad Interim Injunction Extension, Trademark Infringement Beer Brand, Commercial IP Suit Delhi, Section 151 CPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/18/694689-delhi-hc-thunderbolt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-penalty-can-be-waived-even-in-cases-of-misreporting-after-2026-amendment-bombay-high-court-554069</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:41:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty Can Be Waived Even In Cases Of Misreporting After 2026 Amendment: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty, Section 270AA, Finance Act 2026, Misreporting Of Income]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/ahmedabad-entities-agree-before-bombay-high-court-to-stop-using-7-drug-names-in-sun-pharma-suit-554068</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:31:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Ahmedabad Entities Agree Before Bombay High Court To Stop Using 7 Drug Names In Sun Pharma Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Bombay High Court, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Nectar Life Care, Kashmik Formulations, Justice Madhav J Jamdar, Commercial IP Suit 28038 2025, HISTAC Trademark Infringement, OMESEC Trademark Suit, Consent Terms Decree Bombay HC, L HISTACT M Injunction, OMENEC Passing Off Suit, Class 5 Pharmaceutical Trademark India, SNIZACT Trademark Withdrawal, EZACT PREDMET LUMIA NEZACT Marks, Pharmaceutical Brand Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705703-bombay-hc-nectar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-admits-sharanam-infraproject-to-cirp-over-1035-crore-debt-rejects-restructuring-plea-554067</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:23:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Admits Sharanam Infraproject To CIRP Over ₹10.35 Crore Debt, Rejects Restructuring Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sharanam Infraproject and Trading Limited, CIRP, NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705676-nclt-ahmedabad-sharanam-infraproject-and-trading-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-religious-significance-of-annapurna-does-not-bar-trademark-protection-554066</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:17:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Religious Significance Of 'Annapurna' Does Not Bar Trademark Protection: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Madras High Court, GEF Foods India, Annapurna Swadisht, Justice AD Maria Clete, ANNAPOORNA Trademark Suit, CS Comm Div 223 2026, Phonetic Identity Trademark Infringement, Section 29 2 Trade Marks Act, Allied and Cognate Food Goods, Order 39 Rule 4 CPC Vacate Application, Sree Annapoorna Foods Coimbatore, Class 30 Trademark Registration India, Goddess Annapurna Trademark Protection, Sathish Parasaran Senior Advocate, Arun C Mohan Advocate, NSE Listed Company Trademark Dispute, Commercial Origin Likelihood Confusion, Section 34 Prior User Defense, Trademark Opposition Proceedings Acquiescence, August 5 2026 Injunction Absolute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/01/703816-madras-hc-justice-a-d-maria-clete.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/conditional-arbitration-clause-requiring-fresh-consent-cannot-be-converted-into-unconditional-one-karnataka-high-court-554062</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-11T23:43:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T16:01:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Clause Requiring Fresh Mutual Consent Is Not Binding: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Agreement, Mutual Consent, Conditional Arbitration Clause, Appointment of Arbitrator, Section 7, Section 11(6), Contractual Interpretation, Party Autonomy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/21/668985-justice-h-t-narendra-prasad-karnataka-high-court-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/directors-cannot-be-held-liable-for-company-debt-merely-by-their-designation-delhi-high-court-554059</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:51:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Directors Cannot Be Held Liable For Company Debt Merely By Their Designation: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Corporate Debt, Personal Liability of Directors, Arbitration Agreement, Severability of Arbitral Awards, Venture Capital Assistance, Notice of Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/29/703302-justices-anil-kshetarpal-and-bharat-parashar-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-closed-morgan-securities-contempt-plea-against-bpl-limited-alleged-violation-asset-restraint-order-554054</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-10T15:01:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Closes Morgan Securities' Contempt Plea Against BPL Over Alleged Property Encumbrance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Morgan Securities and Credits, BPL Limited, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Asset Encumbrance, Asset Attachment, Share Capital Dilution, Restraint Order, Creation of Third-Party Interest, Justice Jayant Banerji, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/10/705686-bpl-with-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
