<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/tmc-bank-account-freeze-supreme-court-asks-ed-if-limited-funds-can-be-released-for-day-to-day-expenses-544022</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-03T11:42:53+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-03T11:38:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[TMC Bank Account Freeze: Supreme Court Asks ED If Limited Funds Can Be Released For Day-To-Day Expenses]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[All India Trinamool Congress, Bank Accounts Frozen, Enforcement Directorate, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Calcutta High Court, HDFC Bank Accounts, Interim Relief Refused, Money Laundering Investigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690629-whatsapp-image-2026-07-31-at-071333.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/recovery-of-inadmissible-pre-gst-cenvat-credit-must-proceed-under-earlier-tax-laws-gstat-thane-544017</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-03T11:21:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Recovery Of Inadmissible Pre GST CENVAT Credit Must Proceed Under Earlier Tax Laws: GSTAT Thane]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GSTAT Thane, Transitional ITC, TRAN-1, CENVAT Credit, Section 140 CGST Act, Section 74 CGST Act, Pre-GST Credit, Jurisdiction, Krishi Kalyan Cess, KKC, VAT Credit, Usha Martin, Steel Authority of India, Kunjal Synergies, Godrej & Boyce.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/03/691132-tata-unistore-limited-gstat-thane-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-notice-on-ex-rajasthan-mla-baljeet-yadavs-plea-challenging-rajasthan-hc-order-rejecting-bail-in-pmla-case-544016</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-03T11:24:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-03T11:11:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On Former Rajasthan MLA Baljeet Yadav's Plea Seeking Bail In PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Baljeet Yadav, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), Rajasthan High Court, Sports Equipment Scam, Regular Bail]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/03/691143-sc-baljeet-yadav.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/monthly-digests/livelawbiz-company-law-monthly-digest-july-2026-companies-act-2013-543997</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-03T09:52:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Company Law Monthly Digest: July 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013, Company Law, Monthly Digest, Company Law Monthly Digest, Livelawbiz Company Law Monthly Digest, Monthly Digest July 2026]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/28/659138-monthly-digest-company-law.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-monthly-digest-july-2026-543985</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-03T11:53:37+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-03T09:34:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Monthly Digest: July 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Arbitral Tribunal, Section 34, Section 11, Section 16, Section 17, Section 29A, Section 31(5), Section 33, Section 8, Interim Relief, Interim Award, Jurisdiction, Limitation, Delivery of Award, Arbitration Agreement, Mandatory Injunction, Arbitrability, Return of Title Deeds, Fraud, Criminal Proceedings, Commercial Dispute, Joint Venture Agreement, Lease Deed, Evidence, Discovery, Bank Account Freeze, De Novo Arbitration, Substitute Arbitrator, UNCITRAL, AI in Arbitration, Consensus Ad Idem, Meeting of Algorithms, Justice Vikram Nath, Bombay High Court, Kerala High Court, Chhattisgarh High Court, Calcutta High Court, Madras High Court, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, Karnataka High Court, Manipur High Court, Rajasthan High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/03/691151-arbitration-monthly-digest-july-2026.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-01-2026-543951</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-02T13:11:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 01, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/payment-gateway-charges-paid-by-makemytrip-to-banks-are-not-commission-not-liable-for-tds-itat-delhi-543944</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T20:17:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Payment Gateway Charges Paid By MakeMyTrip To Banks Are Not Commission, Not Liable For TDS: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[payment gateway charges, Section 194H, TDS, banking services, Section 40(a)(ia), MakeMyTrip, website depreciation, AMP expenditure, ITAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/10/20/499605-makemytrip-to-pay-compensation-for-cancellation-of-travel-package-due-to-visa-rejection-kerala-consumer-forum.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/skodas-technical-know-how-licence-to-indian-unit-not-consulting-engineer-service-cestat-mumbai-543942</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T19:40:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T19:38:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Skoda's Technical Know-How Licence To Indian Unit Not Consulting Engineer Service: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Skoda, CESTAT Mumbai, Service Tax, Consulting Engineer Service, Technical Know-how, Technology Licence, Intellectual Property, Trademark Licence, Reverse Charge, Section 66A, Finance Act, 1994, Foreign Service Provider, Technical Documentation, Licensing Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690990-skoda-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-bangalore-allows-acc-cenvat-credit-on-fly-ash-transport-and-pond-maintenance-services-543939</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T19:09:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T19:08:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Bangalore Allows ACC CENVAT Credit On Fly Ash Transport And Pond Maintenance Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT credit, fly ash, input service, transportation, loading and unloading, fly ash pond, ACC Ltd., CESTAT Bangalore]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654280-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/excess-quantity-enhanced-value-alone-dont-establish-misdeclaration-under-customs-act-cestat-mumbai-543937</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:52:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Excess Quantity, Enhanced Value Alone Don't Establish Misdeclaration Under Customs Act: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RKPS Impex Private Limited, Commissioner of Customs (Import), Import of Goods, Excess Quantity, Misdeclaration, Confiscation, Redemption Fine, Section 125, Section 112(a), Section 111(l), Section 111(m), Customs Valuation Rules, 2007]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684076-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-shareholder-and-creditor-meetings-fpr-irm-energy-enertech-amalgamation-scheme-543935</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:41:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Orders Shareholder, Creditor Meetings For IRM Energy-Enertech Amalgamation Scheme]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Enertech Distribution Management Pvt. Ltd., IRM Energy Ltd., Amalgamation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690968-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-11157-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/gujarat-high-court-sets-aside-order-restraining-trademark-owners-from-using-own-mark-calls-it-grave-error-543933</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:28:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Order Restraining Trademark Owners From Using Own Mark, Calls It 'Grave Error']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Trademark, Aditya Jewellers, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 28 Trade Marks Act, Prior User, Registered Proprietor, Commercial Suit, Interim Injunction, Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC, Mini Trial, Evidence Reliability, Gold Jewellery, Rajkot, Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal, Justice D.N. Ray]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690245-high-court-of-gujarat-chief-justice-sunita-agarwal-and-justice-dnray.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-debars-punit-goenka-subhash-chandra-unauthorised-pleadge-zeel-property-secure-promoter-group-loan-543932</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:08:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Bars ZEE, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra From Securities Market Over Unauthorised Property Pledge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, ZEEL, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra, Hyderabad property, unauthorised mortgage, promoter group entities, related party transaction, SEBI LODR Regulations, PFUTP Regulations, disclosure violations, audit committee approval, board approval, contingent liability, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, IHFL, securities market debarment, monetary penalty, fraud, corporate governance, Declaration and Acknowledgment, D&A]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690977-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-161112.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/lic-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-on-premiums-retained-after-policy-lapse-cestat-mumbai-543931</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T17:50:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LIC Not Liable To Pay Service Tax On Premiums Retained After Policy Lapse: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Life Insurance Corporation of India, LIC, Service Tax, Section 66E(e), Declared Service, Agreeing to Tolerate an Act, Forfeiture of Premium, Insurance Policy Lapse, Non-payment of Premium, Mis-declaration, CBIC Circular 214/1/2023, Double Taxation, Finance Act 1994, Service Tax Demand.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690965-lic-livelawbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-use-of-cobex-mark-in-glaxosmithklines-trademark-suit-over-cobadex-543930</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T17:37:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Use Of 'COBEX' Mark In GlaxoSmithKline's Trademark Suit Over 'COBADEX']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Orion Biotech, COBADEX, COBEX, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Multi-vitamin, Paediatric Antibiotic, Deceptive Similarity, Ex-parte Ad-interim Injunction, Section 151 CPC, Order XXXIX CPC, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690960-cobadex-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/coal-beneficiation-not-taxable-as-business-auxiliary-service-before-mining-service-was-introduced-june-1-2007-543925</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:35:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:34:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable As Business Auxiliary Service Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[coal beneficiation, washing of coal, Business Auxiliary Service, Mining Service, service tax, CESTAT New Delhi, Aryan Coal Benefications, Revenue appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/05/10/417009-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/effect-of-part-payments-on-dishonoured-cheques-cannot-be-decided-in-revision-against-summoning-order-delhi-high-court-543918</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:21:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Effect of Part Payments On Dishonoured Cheques Cannot Be Decided In Revision Against Summoning Order: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Delhi High Court, Part Payments, Statutory Notice, Cheque Dishonour]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690949-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-154205.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-patna-firm-from-using-nintendo-india-private-limited-name-543916</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:24:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:05:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Patna Firm From Using 'Nintendo India Private Limited' Name]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Nintendo, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Trademark, Nintendo India Private Limited, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 29(4) Trade Marks Act, Interactive Entertainment, Video Games, Real Estate, Deceptive Similarity, Coined Mark, Defensive Marks, Justice Jyoti Singh, Bloomberg Finance LP, ex-parte ad-interim injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690961-nintendo-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-sanctions-rs-2775-cr-inoxauthum-resolution-plan-for-wind-world-india-543912</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:55:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Approves ₹2,775 Crore Inox Neo-Authum Resolution Plan For Wind World India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Wind World,  Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690934-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-11157-pm-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/builder-cannot-deny-possession-to-subsequent-purchaser-holding-registered-sale-deed-telenga-rera-543910</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-03T11:49:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:42:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Builder Cannot Deny Flat Possession To Subsequent Purchaser Holding Registered Sale Deed: Telengana RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[subsequent purchaser, allottee, registered sale deed, possession, promoter, title dispute, Telangana RERA, apartment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/13/533750-rera-tamil-nadu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/stamp-duty-on-loan-assignment-to-arc-must-be-based-on-debt-assigned-not-property-value-mp-high-court-543909</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:29:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Stamp Duty On Loan Assignment To ARC Must Be Based On Debt Assigned, Not Property Value: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Stamp Duty, Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company, Madhya Pradesh High Court, SARFAESI Act, Deed of Assignment, Loan Securitisation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/15/680016-750x450652653-madhya-pradesh-hc-jabalpur.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/sarfaesi-auction-purchaser-cant-be-treated-as-unauthorised-occupant-under-state-eviction-law-mp-high-court-543907</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:12:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Auction Purchaser Can't Be Treated As Unauthorised Occupant Under State Eviction Law: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MP HC, SARFAESI, Auction Purchaser, Unauthorised Occupant]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690926-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-20222-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-closes-proceedings-against-religare-rashmi-saluja-directors-burman-open-offer-case-543902</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T14:54:26+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:53:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Closes Proceedings Against Religare, Rashmi Saluja Over Burman Group Open Offer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Religare Enterprises Ltd., Burman Group, Rashmi Saluja, Open offer, SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, SAST Regulations, Committee of Independent Directors, Interim Order-cum-Show Cause Notice, LODR Regulations, Change in control, RBI approval, IRDAI approval, Regulatory approvals, Independent directors, Sections 11 and 11B SEBI Act, Remedial directions, Preventive powers, Proceedings disposed, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/13/673763-sebi-rashmi-saluja.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/emden-formula-for-calculating-construction-contract-damages-cant-apply-to-dealership-agreements-madras-high-court-543901</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:46:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Emden Formula For Calculating Construction Contract Damages Can't Apply To Dealership Agreements: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Emden Formula, dealership agreement, arbitral award, damages, wrongful termination, commercial contract, Hyundai Motor India, patent illegality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/msme/though-mandatory-75-pre-deposit-to-challenge-msme-award-need-not-accompany-plea-rajasthan-high-court-543900</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T18:29:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:30:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Though Mandatory, 75% Pre-Deposit To Challenge MSME Award Need Not Accompany Plea: Rajasthan High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajasthan HC, Pre Deposit, MSME Act, Arbitration Act, Objection Application]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690981-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-180822.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/minority-shareholders-move-nclt-kolkata-alleging-oppression-mismanagement-over-2007-sweat-equity-allotment-in-manipal-hospitals-synergie-543899</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T13:58:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[US-Based Investors Move NCLT Kolkata Against Manipal Hospitals Synergie Over 2007 Share Dilution]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Minority Shareholders, Manipal Hospitals Synergie, NCLT Kolkata, Oppression and Mismanagement, Sweat Equity Shares, Companies Act, Corporate Governance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690915-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-122007.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-rejects-third-partys-impleadment-plea-in-ciplas-no-darar-trademark-restoration-case-543895</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:22:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T13:17:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Third Party's Impleadment Plea in Cipla's 'NO DARAR' Trademark Restoration Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Cipla Limited, NO DARAR, Trademark Renewal, Trademark Restoration, Section 151 CPC, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Necessary and Proper Party, Locus Standi, Right in Personam, Trade Marks Registry, Rectification, O-3 Notice, Justice Saurabh Banerjee, Intellectual Property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690959-cipla-no-darar-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-trial-court-cannot-reject-service-of-notice-comparing-signatures-cheque-postal-acknowledgment-section-138-ni-act-543890</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T12:45:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T12:44:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NI Act Notice Not Invalid Merely Because Postal Acknowledgment Signature Differs From Cheque: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice A. Badharudeen, Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Cheque bounce, Statutory demand notice, Service of notice, Section 27 General Clauses Act, Postal acknowledgment card, Signature mismatch, Presumption of service, Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed, Dishonour of cheque, Insufficient funds, Sections 118 and 139 Negotiable Instruments Act, Presumption under NI Act, Financial capacity of complainant, Acquittal reversed, Conviction under Section 138 NI Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
