<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/supreme-court/supreme-court-committee-of-creditors-cannot-withdraw-approved-resolution-plan-after-submission-to-national-company-law-tribunal-556038</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T20:29:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Committee Of Creditors Cannot Withdraw Resolution Plan After It Is Placed Before NCLT: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Committee of Creditors, CoC, Resolution Plan, Successful Resolution Applicant, SRA, NCLT, NCLAT, Section 12A IBC, Section 30(2) IBC, CIRP, Withdrawal of Resolution Plan, One-Time Settlement, OTS, Bank of India, Ebix Singapore, Supreme Court Judgment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-october-19-october-25-2026-556032</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T19:31:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: October 19 - October 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Digest, weekly digest,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/05/644693-direct-tax-weekly-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-show-cause-notice-must-specify-whether-itc-misuse-involves-fraud-or-suppression-of-facts-himachal-pradesh-high-court-556030</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-26T19:22:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T19:21:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Show-Cause Notice Must Specify Whether ITC Misuse Involves Fraud Or Suppression Of Facts: Himachal Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Notice , Foundational Facts, Fraud, Misstatement,  Suppression, ,Himachal Pradesh High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/30/703515-himachal-pradesh-hc-justice-ajay-mohan-goel-justice-yogesh-jaswa.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/arbitral-awards-not-invalid-due-to-lack-of-msme-registration-at-relevant-tim-jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-556027</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-26T21:40:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T19:13:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Awards Not Invalid Due To Lack Of MSME Registration At Relevant Time: Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Non-Registration ,Supplier ,MSME,Arbitration Award, J&K High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670439-justice-sanjay-dhar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/livelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-october-19-october-24-2026-556022</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T19:04:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: October 19 - October 24, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708298-whatsapp-image-2026-10-26-at-171453.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/personal-guarantors-insolvency-cannot-block-recovery-against-companys-property-nclt-mumbai-556021</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:59:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Personal Guarantor's Insolvency Cannot Block Recovery Against Company's Property: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Personal Guarantor, Insolvency ,Moratorium , Corporate Debtor,Assets ,SARFAESI , NCLT Mumbai,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/commercial-property-allottees-can-qualify-as-financial-creditors-under-ibc-nclt-mumbai-556020</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:49:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Property Allottees Can Be Financial Creditors Under IBC: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Commercial Property,  Financial Creditor,IBC, NCLT Mumbai,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/accounting-discrepancies-alone-cannot-establish-fraudulent-trading-under-ibc-nclt-mumbai-556019</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:39:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Accounting Discrepancies Alone Cannot Establish Fraudulent Trading Under IBC: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Accounting Discrepancies, Fraudulent Trading ,IBC,NCLT Mumbai,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/stamp-duty-refund-cannot-be-denied-merely-because-original-receipt-is-lost-bombay-high-court-556015</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:29:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Stamp Duty Refund Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Original Receipt Is Lost: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Stamp Duty Refund, Maharashtra Stamp Act, Article 265, E-Stamp Receipt, ESBTR, Property Registration, Refund of Unused Stamp Duty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/karnataka-high-court-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-myfitness-founders-over-alleged-misrepresentation-on-brand-use-556014</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:21:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against MyFitness Founders Over Alleged Misrepresentation On Brand Use]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Justice M Nagaprasanna, MyFitness Peanut Butter, Mensa Brands, Mohammadabbas Patel, Tanvi Fitness, Section 528 BNSS, Cheating FIR BNS, Section 318(4) BNS, Trademark Concealment, Class 29 Nut Butters, Paradise Nutrition, Quashing Petition Dismissed, Neeharika Infrastructure, Somjeet Mallick, Parallel Arbitration Criminal Proceedings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708317-karnataka-hc-my-fitness.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/karnataka-bank-wins-rupees-1-lakh-defamation-suit-against-btv-news-alleged-defamatory-broadcasts-bengaluru-city-civil-court-556012</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:16:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bengaluru Court Orders BTV News To Pay ₹1 Lakh Damages For Defamatory Broadcasts Against Karnataka Bank]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka Bank, BTV News, Defamation Suit, Bengaluru City Civil Court, Defamation Damages, ₹1 Lakh Compensation, Press Council of India, Journalistic Ethics, Media Accountability, Permanent Injunction, Public Apology, R.Y. Shashidhara, Boardroom Dispute, Banking Sector, Freedom of Press]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708300-karnataka-bank-limited-and-b-tv-news-channel.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/unsigned-copy-of-arbitral-award-sent-by-opposing-party-cannot-trigger-limitation-to-challenge-it-kerala-high-court-556010</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T18:10:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Unsigned Copy Of Arbitral Award Sent By Opposing Party Cannot Trigger Limitation To Challenge It: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Limitation Period, Section 34(3), Section 31(5), Signed Arbitral Award, Delivery of Award, Unsigned Award Copy, Challenge to Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/11/16/571520-justice-mohammed-nias-cp-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/delayed-stock-entries-from-genuine-transactions-cannot-alone-justify-confiscation-gstat-lucknow-556008</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T17:59:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delayed Stock Entries From Genuine Transactions Cannot Alone Justify Confiscation: GSTAT Lucknow]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 130, Section 74, CGST Act, 2017, UPGST Act, 2017, delayed accounting entries, genuine transactions, statutory GST returns, physical stock verification, redemption fine, non-accountal of stock, confiscation of goods]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708191-gstat-lucknow.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gst-refund-cannot-be-denied-due-to-delay-in-uploading-appellate-order-summary-555994</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T17:13:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Says Delayed Appellate Order Upload Can't Bar GST Refund, Allows ₹5.41 Lakh Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 54, Section 56, Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, Form GST APL-04, Form GST RFD-01, delayed uploading of appellate order, refund claim, limitation period, interest on refund, procedural delay, tax refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rejection-of-building-plans-not-force-majeure-builder-must-pay-interest-for-possession-delay-bombay-high-court-555990</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T16:58:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rejection of Building Plans Not Force Majeure For Delayed Possession Interest: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Force Majeure, Delayed Possession, Building Plan Rejection, Summary Judgment, Promoter Liability, Interest on Delayed Possession, Commercial Property, RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/03/671422-750x450654895-justice-sandeep-marne-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/decree-holder-status-under-hrera-order-does-not-convert-into-financial-debt-after-possession-nclt-delhi-555987</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T16:45:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Homebuyers Cannot Pursue Compensation Claims After Conveyance Deed Under Resolution Plan: NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Financial Creditor, HRERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/26/682495-nclt-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-stays-termination-of-malad-gymkhana-restaurant-agreement-bars-third-party-rights-in-new-premises-555985</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T16:23:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Stays Malad Gymkhana's Restaurant Termination Notice, Bars Third-Party Rights]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Achieve Hospitality, Malad Gymkhana, Justice Amit Borkar, Lease Termination, Arbitration, Restaurant Agreement, Interim Relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708254-whatsapp-image-2026-10-26-at-134347.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/kerala-high-court-stays-investigation-against-pinarayi-vijayan-veena-vijayan-muhammed-riyas-four-weeks-cmrl-exalogic-case-555983</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-26T16:25:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T16:22:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CMRL-Exalogic Case: Kerala High Court Stays Investigation Against Pinarayi Vijayan, Kin For Four Weeks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CMRL-Exalogic Case, Pinarayi Vijayan, Veena Vijayan, Mohammed Riyas, Kerala High Court, FIR, Enforcement Directorate, Prevention of Corruption Act, Kerala High Court Division Bench, K Natarajan, Johnson John, K M Shajahan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708268-kerala-hc-with-pinarayi-vijayan-riyas-and-veena-vijayan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/proof-of-actual-loss-not-mandatory-for-awarding-liquidated-damages-where-loss-is-difficult-to-calculate-bombay-high-court-555981</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T16:11:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Liquidated Damages Need No Proof Of Actual Loss If It Is Difficult To Quantify: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Liquidated Damages, Genuine Pre-Estimate of Loss, Proof of Actual Loss, Housing Redevelopment Delay, Section 74 Indian Contract Act, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Arbitral Award, Patent Illegality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699772-justice-aarti-sathe-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-goldmedal-ply-and-boards-from-using-goldmedal-electricals-trademark-555977</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T15:52:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Plywood Sellers From Using Goldmedal Mark To Exploit Brand Goodwill]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Goldmedal Electricals, Jimmy Thoppilan, Plyman Industries, Goldmedal Ply and Boards, Trademark Infringement Injunction, Copyright Infringement, Passing Off Injunction, Justice Tejas Karia, Dissimilar Goods Trademark Protection, Section 29(4) Trade Marks Act, Class 19 Plywood, Ex Parte Interim Relief, Gothic Font Trademark, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708258-delhi-hc-goldmedal.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-agro-orbit-from-selling-counterfeit-agrochemicals-under-upl-trademarks-555975</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T15:40:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Agro Orbit Hub From Selling Unauthorised Products Bearing UPL Trademarks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, UPL Limited, Agro Orbit Hub, Agrochemical Counterfeiting, Insecticides Act 1968, Principal Certificate, Rule 10E Insecticides Rules, Justice Tejas Karia, B2B E-Commerce Intermediary, Trademark Infringement Injunction, Passing Off Injunction, John Doe Injunction, J Sai Deepak, Stop Sale Notice Lucknow, Basic Subscriber Information]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708241-delhi-hc-upl.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/service-tax-refund-cannot-be-denied-on-presumption-that-tax-was-collected-from-customers-cestat-bangalore-555969</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T15:28:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gross Contract Value Alone Cannot Prove Service Tax Collection From Customers: CESTAT Bangalore]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Bangalore, Service Tax Refund, Unjust Enrichment, Service Tax Exemption, Section 11B, Electricity Distribution Services, Skilltech Engineers]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702296-cestat-bangalore.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/delayed-retraction-of-statements-cannot-overturn-service-tax-demand-555965</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T14:56:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delayed Retraction Can't Undermine Service Tax Demand Backed By Signed Digital Records: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 14, Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 83, Finance Act, 1994, service tax demand, unaccounted cash receipts, pen-drive records, signed printouts, delayed retraction, corroborative evidence, residential flats, AGC Reality Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/24/702303-cestat-new-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/adding-new-guarantors-does-not-automatically-discharge-existing-personal-guarantor-nclt-delhi-555960</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T14:25:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Adding New Guarantors Does Not Automatically Discharge Existing Personal Guarantor: NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Personal Guarantor, Restructuring Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/itc-demand-cannot-be-based-solely-on-retrospective-cancellation-of-suppliers-gst-registration-gstat-thane-555959</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T14:21:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supplier's Retrospective GST Cancellation Not Enough To Deny ITC Without Verification: GSTAT Thane]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GSTAT Thane, Input Tax Credit, ITC Denial, Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration, Section 16 CGST Act, Section 107 CGST Act, Section 155 CGST Act, Natural Justice, Non-Prosecution, GST Appeal, Fresh Adjudication]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708190-gstat-thane.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/criminal-investigation-cannot-be-used-to-exert-pressure-in-commercial-disputes-madhya-pradesh-high-court-555956</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T14:08:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Criminal Investigation Cannot Be Used To Exert Pressure In Commercial Disputes: M.P. High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Commercial Dispute, Arbitration Award, Economic Offences Wing, Sand Mining Projects, Criminal Breach of Trust, Fraud Allegations, Quashing of Criminal Complaint, Contractual Obligations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708230-madhya-pradesh-hc-justice-himanshu-joshi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-october-19-october-25-2026-555954</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T14:05:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: October 19 - October 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/10/692889-ipr-weekly-digest.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-rera-weekly-digest-october-19-october-24-2026-555952</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T13:59:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Weekly Digest: October 19- October 24, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, RERA, Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Developer Obligations, Housing Society Redevelopment, Landowner Liability, Agreement for Sale, Section 13 of RERA Act, Delayed Possession, Three-Year Limitation Period, Limitation Act 1963, Article 27, Compensation Claims, Refund to Homebuyer, Partnership Firm Reconstitution, Promoter Liability, Mandatory RERA Registration, Unregistered Real Estate Projects, Sale of Residential Plots, Penalty Proceedings, Homebuyer Rights, Bombay High Court, Karnataka REAT, Tamil Nadu REAT, Punjab RERA, Telangana RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652648-weekly-digest-rera-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/provisional-itc-reversal-and-pending-probe-do-not-prove-tax-liability-555951</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T13:55:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Refund Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Provisional ITC Reversal: GSTAT Lucknow]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[reversed ITC, stock shortage, GST return, Section 54 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708191-gstat-lucknow.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/appellate-hearing-cannot-cure-failure-to-issue-gst-rfd-08-notice-555949</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T13:44:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Refund Rejection Without Mandatory Notice Cannot Be Cured At Appellate Stage: GSTAT Thane]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rule 92(3) of the CGST Rules 2017, Circular No. 142/12/2020-GST, Notification No. 30/2020-Central Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708190-gstat-thane.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/livelaw-biz-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories-from-last-week-555941</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T12:58:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLaw Biz | Top 10 Corporate & Business Law Stories From Last Week]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[top 10 stories from last week]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/07/698569-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/bombay-high-court-grants-leave-to-usv-chairperson-leena-gandhi-tewari-to-sue-alleged-fake-facebook-accounts-using-her-identity-555932</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T12:30:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Allows USV Chairperson Leena Gandhi Tewari To Sue Over Fake Facebook Accounts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Leena Gandhi Tewari, USV Private Limited, Meta Platforms Inc, Facebook Impersonation, Personality Rights Suit, Clause XII Letters Patent, Justice Rajesh S Patil, John Doe Injunction, Ashok Kumar Injunction, Social Media Financial Scam, Govandi Police Station, Letters Patent 1865, Digital Identity Theft]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708232-bombay-hc-usv.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/supreme-court/supreme-court-to-hear-eys-plea-against-delhi-high-court-ruling-on-taxability-of-salary-reimbursements-for-deputed-employees-555929</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T12:21:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On EY US Plea Against Tax On Salary Reimbursements For Employees Seconded To India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Ernst & Young, EY US, Income Tax, Employee Secondment, Fees for Technical Services, India-USA DTAA, Salary Reimbursement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708224-sc-ey.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/supreme-court/supreme-court-issues-notice-on-ufhl-builders-bail-plea-in-12630-crore-money-laundering-case-555910</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T12:02:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice on Builder's Bail Plea In ₹126.30 Crore Money Laundering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court, Anil Mithas, Directorate of Enforcement, Money Laundering, PMLA, Aranya Project, Homebuyers, Diversion of Funds, Bail Rejected]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/02/703986-whatsapp-image-2026-10-02-at-115555.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitral-tribunal-cannot-reject-one-partys-in-house-witnesses-while-accepting-opponents-bombay-high-court-555907</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T11:44:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Reject One Party's In-House Witnesses While Accepting Opponent's: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, In-House Witnesses, Unequal Treatment Of Evidence, Patent Illegality, Conveyor Belt Defects, Breach Of Warranty, Manufacturing Defects, Setting Aside Arbitral Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689100-bombay-hc-justice-arun-r-pednekar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-weekly-digest-october-19-october-24-2026-555905</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T11:27:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Weekly Digest: October 19- October 24, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Section 9, Section 11, Section 34, Section 37, Arbitral Award, Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Doctrine of Merger, Limitation Period, Appointment of Arbitrator, Pre-Arbitration Mediation, Interim Relief, Local Commissioner, Preservation of Evidence, Damages for Breach of Contract, Assessment of Actual Loss, Condonation of Delay, Stamp Duty on Arbitral Awards, Contractual Obligations, Commercial Arbitration, Court Receiver, Protection of Assets, Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 2016, Developer Obligations, Redevelopment Agreement, Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, Madras High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/allahabad-high-court-rules-arbitral-tribunal-cannot-award-compound-interest-without-stipulation-555888</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T10:06:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Tribunal Can't Award Compound Interest In Absence Of Stipulation In Contract: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court, Arbitral Tribunal, Compound Interest, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Arbitration Award, Contractual Stipulation, Interest Act 1978, Central Bank of India v. Ravindra]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/26/708183-chief-justice-arun-bhansali-justice-jaspreet-singh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-24-2026-555875</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-26T09:21:13+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-26T09:20:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 24, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707253-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
