<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-delhi-sets-aside-377-crore-penalty-against-maruti-suzuki-in-customs-classification-dispute-544669</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T19:00:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi Sets Aside ₹3.77 Crore Penalty Against Maruti Suzuki In Customs Classification Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Maruti Suzuki, Glow Plug Control Unit, GCU, CTH 8511, CTH 9032, customs classification, HSN, extended limitation, customs duty, CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/11/07/629791-maruti-suzuki.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-jaipur-approves-resolution-plan-holiday-inn-jaipur-city-centre-operator-accil-corporation-544668</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T18:46:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Jaipur Clears ₹288.37 Crore Resolution Plan For Holiday Inn Jaipur City Centre Operator ACCIL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Jaipur, National Company Law Tribunal, ACCIL Corporation Private Limited, Holiday Inn Jaipur City Centre, Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited, OSEPL, resolution plan, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 31 IBC, Section 30(6) IBC, Committee of Creditors, CoC, CIRP, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, ARCIL, Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, hospitality insolvency, hotel insolvency, insolvency resolution, successful resolution applicant, commercial wisdom of CoC, statutory compliance, ₹288.37 crore resolution plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/madras-high-court-restrains-piracy-of-lokesh-kanagaraj-starrer-dc-ahead-of-release-544666</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T18:28:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Restrains Piracy Of Lokesh Kanagaraj-Starrer 'DC' Ahead Of Release]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Copyright, Sun TV Network Limited, Justice K Kumaresh Babu, Cinematographic Film DC, Copyright Infringement, Rogue Websites, Ad Interim Injunction, Jak Communications Private Limited, Thamizhaga Cable TV Communication, Action Lane, C32 Cable Net, Thiru Nagar Satellite Vision, Unauthorised Broadcasting, Tamil Language Film, CS COMM DIV 233 of 2026, Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, M Jyothi Basu, CBFC Certificate, Murasoli Maran Towers, King and Partridge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692139-madras-hc-dc-movie.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-dissolves-newgen-payment-gateway-after-voluntary-liquidation-544660</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T18:03:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Dissolves Newgen Payment Gateway After Voluntary Liquidation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Newgen Payment Gateway Pvt. Ltd, Dissolution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692117-nclt-ahmedabad-newgen-payment-gateway.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/nclt-mumbai-issues-contempt-show-cause-notice-to-atlas-equifin-in-dispute-with-jackie-shroff-544655</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T17:47:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Issues Contempt Show Cause Notice To Atlas Equifin In Dispute With Jackie Shroff]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jackie Shroff, NCLT Mumbai, Atlas Equifin Pvt Ltd, Contempt Proceedings, Oppression & Mismanagement, Company Law, Decretal Amount]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692125-nclt-mumbai-actor-jackie-shroff.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/kolkata-court-restrains-tv19-from-using-mark-deceptively-similar-to-tv9-in-trademark-suit-544651</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T17:34:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kolkata Court Restrains TV19 From Using Marks Deceptively Similar To TV9]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajarhat Commercial Court, Associated Broadcasting Company, TV9, TV19, TV19 Network Bangla, Ishani Chakravarty Banerjee, Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre-Institution Mediation, Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction, Dhanbad Fuels, Novenco Building, Pernod Ricard India, Heinz Italia, Midas Hygiene, Blue and Red Background, Order 39 Rule 3, News Broadcasting, West Bengal Commercial Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692122-commercial-court-at-rajarhat-tv-19.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-rejects-enforcement-directorate-plea-transfer-anitha-radhakrishnan-disproportionate-assets-case-pmla-court-544649</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T17:29:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Refuses To Transfer Ex-Minister Radhakrishnan Case To PMLA Court, Calls Plea Premature]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Enforcement Directorate, ED, Anitha R. Radhakrishnan, former Tamil Nadu Minister, Tamil Nadu MLA, disproportionate assets case, DA case, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, PMLA, Section 44(1)(c) PMLA, Special PMLA Court, money laundering complaint, cognizance, scheduled offence, committal of case, Prevention of Corruption Act, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, DVAC, ECIR, prosecution sanction, Section 223 BNSS, speedy trial, transfer petition, Principal Sessions Court Thoothukudi, PMLA Special Court Madurai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692080-madras-hc-anitha-r-radhakrishnan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-implements-express-resorts-resolution-plan-for-neesa-leisure-following-nclat-approval-544648</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T17:19:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T17:19:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Makes Neesa Leisure Resolution Plan Effective, Ends IBC Moratorium]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Neesa Leisure, Resolution Plan, Express Resorts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692124-nclt-ahmedabad-neesa-leisure.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-insolvency-plea-against-sadbhav-engineering-holds-claims-arising-out-of-mou-not-operational-debt-544641</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T16:39:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Insolvency Plea Against Sadbhav Engineering, Holds MoU Claims Cannot Trigger IBC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Insolvency Petition, N.S. Company, Sadbhav Engineering Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692100-nclt-ahmedabad-sadhbhav-engineering.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/vantage-cannot-recover-rbi-imposed-liquidated-damages-under-separate-contract-from-spark-technologies-delhi-hc-upholds-992-lakh-award-544640</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T16:38:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds ₹9.92 Lakh Award Against Vantage, Rejects Recovery Of RBI Penalties From Supplier]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[networking products, unpaid invoices, RBI surveillance project, delayed supplies, liquidated damages, purchase order, MSME dispute, arbitral award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/high-court/refund-claim-cannot-be-rejected-if-filed-within-six-months-of-sipcot-certificate-544632</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T16:16:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Six Month Limitation For Service Tax Refund Starts From SIPCOT Certificate Date: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 104 of the Finance Act 2017, service tax refund, limitation, Notification No.41/2016 dated 22.09.2016]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690161-madras-hc-with-justice-g-jayachandran-and-justice-n-mala.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-directs-restoration-of-blue-chip-trademark-says-removal-without-notice-violates-trade-marks-act-544630</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T16:07:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Restoration Of 'BLUE CHIP' Trademark, Holds Removal Without Notice Invalid]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Amrit Singh Mehta, Mehta Cosmetics, BLUE CHIP, Trademark Restoration, Section 25(3), Rule 64(3), Trademark Renewal, Controller General of Patents, Form-O2 Notice, Form-O3 Notice, Trademark Removal, Justice Jyoti Singh, Class 03, Malhotra Book Depot, Trade Marks Act 1999, Trade Marks Rules 2002, Expiry of Trademark, Mandatory Notice, Rakesh Kumar Mittal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/06/04/394509-justice-jyoti-singh-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/unauthenticated-foreign-agency-documents-cant-be-conclusive-proof-in-customs-proceedings-cestat-chandigarh-544629</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T16:06:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Unauthenticated Foreign Authority Documents Can't Be Conclusive Proof In Customs Proceedings: CESTAT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Findoc Impex, Pakistani origin, dry dates, UAE Customs, COIN report, customs duty, country of origin, electronic evidence, CESTAT Chandigarh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654305-cestat-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/protective-covenants-in-financing-documents-do-not-make-lenders-related-parties-under-ibc-unless-they-exercise-actual-management-control-nclt-delhi-544625</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T17:33:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T15:50:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Protective Covenants In Finance Documents Do Not Make Financial Creditors 'Related Parties': NCLT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Protective Covenant, Financing Documents ,Related Parties, IBC,Management Control,NCLT Delhi,NCLT,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652583-nclt-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-merger-of-ten-subsidiaries-of-adani-power-ltd-544621</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T15:22:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Sanctions Merger Of 10 Adani Power Subsidiaries Into Parent Company]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Adani Power Ltd, Merger]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692074-nclt-ahmedabad-with-adani-power-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/pre-2015-arbitrator-appointment-void-only-if-made-without-contractual-authority-or-consent-bombay-high-court-544614</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T14:32:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Pre-2015 Arbitrator Appointment Void Only Without Contractual Authority Or Consent: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Unilateral Appointment, Executing Court, Section 12(5), Pre-2015 Arbitral Award, Void Ab Initio, Party Autonomy, Retrospective Ineligibility]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/04/665552-750x450616133-justice-jitendra-jain-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/arbitrators-can-decide-contractual-tax-disputes-not-statutory-tax-issues-allahabad-high-court-544612</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T14:26:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitrators Can Decide Contractual Tax Disputes, Not Statutory Tax Issues: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Contractual Tax Allocation , Arbitrable, Arbitrator , Statutory Tax Liability, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/12/29/643333-chief-justice-arun-bhansali-and-justice-jaspreet-singh-lucknow-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/mp-high-court-declines-to-interfere-with-boards-findings-in-liquor-fire-loss-case-544610</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T14:15:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Excise Duty On Liquor Destroyed In Accidental Fire Without Negligence: Madhya Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[M.P. Foreign Liquor Rules 1996, Rule 19(2) of the M.P. Foreign Liquor Rules, unavoidable cause, Article 226 of the Constitution of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689953-justice-milind-ramesh-phadke-madhya-pradesh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/once-the-search-authorisation-is-withdrawn-the-department-has-no-legal-basis-to-retain-the-seized-material-544609</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T14:14:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Department Cannot Retain Seized Records After Withdrawing Search Authorisation: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jewellery dealer, inspection, search authorisation, Section 67 of the CGST Act, seizure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692011-madras-hc-justice-g-r-swaminathan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/kerala-rera-awards-5-lakh-after-developers-used-buyers-apartment-as-site-office-before-handover-544608</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T14:09:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala RERA Awards ₹5 Lakh To Homebuyer After Apartment Lost 'Brand New' Status Due To Prior Use]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala RERA, apartment misuse, site office, homebuyer compensation, mental agony, handover certificate, unauthorized occupation, Marine One]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/09/14/561108-rera-kerala.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/supreme-court/cruise-does-not-cease-to-be-carriage-of-passengers-under-income-tax-act-because-of-onboard-hospitality-supreme-court-544604</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T13:51:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Cruise Does Not Cease To Be 'Carriage Of Passengers' Under Income Tax Act Because Of Onboard Hospitality: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 44B, Income Tax Act, presumptive taxation, foreign shipping company, cruise operator, carriage of passengers, cruise services, international taxation, withholding tax, Section 195, cruise fare, ancillary hospitality, onboard entertainment, restrictive interpretation, Bombay High Court, Supreme Court, Star Cruises, non-resident taxation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/692054-sc-star-cruises-india-p-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-delhi-refuses-to-recall-4-year-old-resolution-plan-says-inherent-power-cant-revive-time-barred-appeal-544595</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T13:10:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Refuses To Recall 4-Year-Old Resolution Plan, Says Inherent Power Can't Revive Time-Barred Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT, Resolution Plan,  Time-Barred Appea, CoC, Commercial Wisdom]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-settles-proceedings-india-power-corporation-managing-director-raghav-raj-kanoria-544588</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T12:38:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[India Power MD Raghav Raj Kanoria Settles SEBI Proceedings Over Financial Statement Misstatements]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, India Power Corporation Limited, IPCL, Raghav Raj Kanoria, settlement order, SEBI settlement, adjudication proceedings, Show Cause Notice, Expected Credit Loss, ECL, financial statement misstatement, receivables, Power Trust, unsecured loans, LODR Regulations, SEBI Settlement Regulations, Section 15JB, corporate governance, disclosure norms, listed company, settlement amount, ₹24.70 lakh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672420-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-approved-proposed-merger-interglobe-hotels-private-limited-with-six-hotel-companies-544582</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T12:10:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T12:09:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Proposed Merger Of Six Hotel Companies Into InterGlobe Hotels]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CCI, Competition Commission of India, InterGlobe Hotels, InterGlobe Hotels Private Limited, IGH, Accor, Accor Group, InterGlobe Enterprises, Bhatia Family, AAPC India Hotel Management, AAPC Singapore, Caddie Hotels, Triguna Hospitality Ventures, Srilanand Mansions, Techpark Hotels, Accent Hotels, merger approval, share acquisition, combination approval, hotel sector, Accor-branded hotels, corporate restructuring, merger transaction, competition law, CCI approval, India hotel industry]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683850-cci2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-orders-takedown-of-disparaging-content-in-actor-tabu-personality-rights-suit-544581</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T12:08:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T12:05:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of Allegedly Disparaging Content In Actor Tabu's Personality Rights Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tabu, Delhi High Court, Actress, Actor, Personality Rights, Justice Jyoti Singh, Commercial Disparagement, defamation, Flipkart, Meta, YouTube, Instagram, Disparagement, AI-generated, publicity rights, Reddit, amendment of plaint, Facebook, plaintiff, infringement, India TV, brand, movie, GoDaddy, Spidey Post, DNR, BSI, Poster, GIF, Google, Tenor, Pornographic Content, Search Terms, Suitable Boy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/04/691460-delhi-hc-tabu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/star-health-data-breach-supreme-court-directs-cybersecurity-researcher-to-appear-before-trial-court-furnish-bail-bonds-544579</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T12:59:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T11:51:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Star Health Data Breach: Supreme Court Directs Cybersecurity Expert To Appear Before Trial Court, Furnish Bail Bonds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Star Health Data Breach, Insurer, Cybersecurity, Madras High Court, Supreme Court, Himanshu Pathak, Ministry Electronics and Information Technology]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689131-starhealth-supreme-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/natural-justice-cant-be-sheet-anchor-to-bypass-gst-appeal-remedy-bombay-high-court-544569</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T11:10:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Natural Justice Can't Be 'Sheet Anchor' To Bypass GST Appeal Remedy: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, GST, CGST Act, Section 107, statutory appeal, writ petition, Article 226, alternative remedy, principles of natural justice, GST adjudication, appellate remedy, pre-deposit, Input Tax Credit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/06/691987-bombay-hc-with-justice-suman-shyam-and-justice-advait-m-sethna.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-eds-plea-against-shapoorji-pallonji-in-11150-crore-pmla-case-544559</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T10:15:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Bombay HC Order Quashing ED Case Against Shapoorji Pallonji]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Shapoorji Pallonji, Enforcement Directorate, PMLA, Nilesh Thakur, Prevention of Corruption Act, Rs 111.50 Crore]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/02/691078-whatsapp-image-2026-08-02-at-192316.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-asks-income-tax-department-to-explain-13-year-delay-in-releasing-seized-jewellery-544556</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T10:04:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Asks Income Tax Department To Explain 13-Year Delay In Releasing Seized Jewellery]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Income Tax Department, seized jewellery, income tax refund, Assessing Officer, comprehensive affidavit, delay in releasing jewellery, delayed tax refund,assessee, seized assets, income tax news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/plea-in-delhi-high-court-challenges-gst-demand-notices-based-on-uncorrected-return-544555</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T10:04:19+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T09:54:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Plea In Delhi High Court Challenges GST Demand Notices Based On Uncorrected Return]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST demand notices, revised GST return, uncorrected GST return, GST audit proceedings, clerical error in GST return, GST return revision, Delhi GST Department, Commissioner CT GST Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-allows-exporter-to-approach-gst-authorities-for-interest-on-refund-544554</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T10:04:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T09:42:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Allows Exporter To Approach GST Authorities For Interest On Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court GST refund interest, Section 56 CGST Act, GST refund interest, delayed GST refund, export refund, interest on GST refund, refund under Section 54(5), GST refund application, Delhi High Court news, tax news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-to-examine-caars-power-to-void-customs-advance-rulings-544553</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T10:04:49+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T09:33:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Examine CAAR's Power To Void Customs Advance Rulings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, CAAR, Section 28K Customs Act, advance ruling, void ab initio, customs advance ruling, misrepresentation of material facts, Customs Act 1962, customs classification, Delhi High Court customs case, customs litigation, mobile phone components, advance ruling appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-05-2026-544541</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T08:23:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 05, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658699-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-04-2026-544540</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-06T00:23:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 04, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-mumbai-sets-aside-service-tax-on-packaged-software-sale-rules-it-is-goods-not-service-544520</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T20:39:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Sets Aside Service Tax on Packaged Software Sale, Rules It Is Goods, Not Service]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai, Packaged Software, Canned Software, Information Technology Software, Sale of Goods, Goods vs Service, Notification No. 11/2016-ST, Article 366(12), Section 65B(44), Finance Act 1994, Tata Consultancy Services, Software Taxation, Service Tax Demand, Interest, Penalty, Late Fee, Horizon Technologies, CGST, Central Excise, Mumbai Bench]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684076-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-chandigarh-quashes-239-crore-service-tax-demand-against-sbi-card-over-vague-scn-544515</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T20:22:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside ₹2.39 Crore Service Tax Demand Against SBI Card]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[show cause notice, service tax, taxable service, unbilled revenue, ST-3 returns, income tax returns, SBI Card, CESTAT Chandigarh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/12/20/577559-sbi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/supreme-court/xeroxs-kitting-of-imported-photocopier-modules-is-not-manufacture-supreme-court-upholds-cestat-ruling-544514</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T09:44:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T20:05:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Xerox's 'Kitting' Of Imported Photocopier Modules Is Not 'Manufacture': Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT Ruling]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, Manufacture, Kitting, CKD, SKD, Photocopiers, Xerox India, Section 2(f), Central Excise Act, Note 6 Section XVI, Excise Duty, Imported Modules, Assembly, Customs Duty, CVD, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691938-sc-photocopier-modules.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-frames-guidelines-to-distinguish-mental-acts-from-patentable-inventions-544506</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T19:29:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Frames Guidelines To Distinguish 'Mental Acts' From Patentable Inventions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Patent, T-Mobile International, Patents Act 1970, Section 3(m), Mental Act, Patent Examination Guidelines, Amicus Curiae, Adarsh Ramanujan, Intellectual Property, Patentability, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, Method of Performing Mental Act, Technical Implementation, Computer-Implemented Inventions, Section 3(k)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/06/659895-patent.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-whether-cheque-dishonour-complaint-maintainable-when-secretary-name-precedes-society-cause-title-ni-act-544504</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T19:09:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Refuses To Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Over Defect In Cause Title]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice C.S Dias, Negotiable Instruments Act, NI Act, Section 138 NI Act, Cheque Dishonour, Cheque Bounce, Cause Title, Authorised Representative, Co-operative Society, Secretary of Society, Maintainability of Complaint, Quashing of Complaint, Bhupesh Rathod v. Dayashankar Prasad Chaurasia, Hyper-Technical Objection, Payee, Authorised Secretary]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/09/666715-justice-cs-dias-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/gujarat-high-court-rejects-plea-against-tribunal-order-granting-vat-exemption-for-seeds-used-for-sowing-544494</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T18:38:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Rejects Plea Against Tribunal Order Granting VAT Exemption For Seeds Used For Sowing]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[VAT exemption, seeds used for sowing, certified seeds, research and development, Gujarat VAT Act, Western Agri Seeds, purchase tax, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-mumbai-quashes-pcit-revision-against-mumbai-trader-as-larger-issue-was-already-under-appeal-544483</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T18:24:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T18:24:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai Quashes PCIT Revision Against Mumbai Trader As 'Larger Issue' Was Already Under Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 263, Revisional Jurisdiction, Explanation 1(c), Pending Appeal, CIT(A), Bogus Purchases, Section 69C, Section 41(1), Plausible View, Assessing Officer, PCIT, Income Tax Act, ITAT Mumbai, Revision Proceedings, Unexplained Expenditure, Jurisdictional Bar, Appellate Proceedings, Profit Element, Assessment Order.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679645-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-pulls-up-masala-maker-for-only-paying-lip-service-to-trademark-injunction-544476</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T18:07:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Pulls Up Masala Maker For Only Paying 'Lip Service' To Trademark Injunction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Trademark, Sky Enterprise Private Limited, Abaad Masala & Co, Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, Safe Distance Rule, Deceptive Similarity, Trademark Infringement, White Chinese Pepper Masala, White Spicy Pepper Masala, Family Commercial Rivalry, Section 151 CPC, Surreptitious Registration, Contempt of Court, Star Zing, Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/684876-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/calling-ecir-an-administrative-document-cannot-shield-it-from-writ-courts-scrutiny-karnataka-high-court-544469</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T17:46:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T17:46:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Describing ECIR An Administrative Document Cannot Shield It From Judicial Review: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, ECIR, PMLA, Judicial Review, Gameskraft Technologies, Article 226, Enforcement Directorate]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/09/666704-justice-m-nagaprasanna.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/supreme-court/supreme-court-of-india-mere-denial-liability-does-not-rebut-presumptions-negotiable-instruments-act-sections-138-119-139-544465</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-06T09:43:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T17:20:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Denial Can't Rebut Cheque Bounce Presumption, Accused Must Produce Probable Evidence: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, NI Act, Section 138 NI Act, Sections 118 and 139 NI Act, Cheque Bounce, Dishonour of Cheque, Statutory Presumption, Legally Enforceable Debt, Burden of Proof, Mere Denial of Liability, Rebuttal of Presumption, Revisional Jurisdiction, Karnataka High Court, Justice B.V. Nagarathna, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/07/21/550880-justice-bv-nagarathna-and-justice-ujjal-bhuyan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-ahmedabad-real-estate-project-from-using-anantara-mark-in-trademark-suit-by-minor-hotels-544464</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T17:17:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Ahmedabad Project From Using 'ANANTARA' Mark In Minor Hotels Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Minor Hotel Group, MHG IP Holding, Anantara, Trademark, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Hospitality Services, Real Estate Projects, Deceptive Similarity, Allied Services, Commercial Nexus, Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act, Ex-parte Ad-interim Injunction, Justice Jyoti Singh, anantara.life]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691811-delhi-hc-minor-anantara.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-sets-aside-cirp-against-monte-carlo-ltd-following-settlement-with-operational-creditor-544463</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T17:22:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T17:17:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT New Delhi Sets Aside Monte Carlo Insolvency Order After Settlement & Prior Dispute Admission]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Montecarlo Ltd, Insolvency Plea,CIRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691841-nclat-montecarlo-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/covid-limitation-extension-cant-revive-time-barred-tax-demands-544460</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T17:09:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[COVID Limitation Extension Can't Revive Time-Barred Service Tax Demands: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[limitation, COVID extension, TOLA, Form 26AS, ST-3 returns, service tax, extended period, pre-show cause consultation, CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654280-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/polite-expression-like-advice-seeking-cheque-payment-constitutes-a-valid-demand-under-section-138-ni-act-gauhati-hc-544455</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T17:07:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T16:41:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Word 'Demand' Not Mandatory In Cheque Dishonour Notice, 'Advice' Can Suffice: Gauhati High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gauhati HC, NI Act, Dishonour of Cheque]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652628-gauhati-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/bombay-hc-quashes-canara-banks-fraud-classification-against-borrower-holds-redaction-of-forensic-audit-report-permitted-only-in-rare-cases-544454</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T17:07:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T16:41:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Banks Must Share Forensic Audit Reports Before Declaring Accounts Fraudulent: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay HC, Redaction, Forensic Audit Report]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691799-bombay-hc-with-justice-colabawalla-and-justice-somashekar-sundareshan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/homebuyer-at-fault-for-not-taking-possession-cannot-claim-further-compensation-tamil-nadu-tribunal-544450</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T16:21:49+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T16:12:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Homebuyer Cannot Seek Mental Agony Rent Claims After Declining Possession: Tamil Nadu REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Real Estate Regulation Act, Homebuyer Compensation, Delay in Possession, Registration Avoidance, Force Majeure, Construction Agreement, RERA Appeal, Snag Rectification]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/04/525992-real-estate-appellate-tribunal-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-framework-issuance-depository-receipts-against-reit-publicly-listed-invit-units-544445</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T15:49:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Depository Receipts Framework For REIT And InvIT Units To Attract Foreign Capital]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Consultation Paper, Depository Receipts, DRs, Real Estate Investment Trusts, REITs, Infrastructure Investment Trusts, InvITs, Publicly Listed InvITs, Depository Receipts Scheme 2014, Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules 2019, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956, Hybrid Securities Advisory Committee, HYSAC, Foreign Investment, REIT Regulations, InvIT Regulations, Equity Depository Receipt Framework]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672440-sebi-poster-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/madras-high-court-sets-aside-tax-revision-order-against-grace-infrastructure-544441</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T15:27:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Says Tax Authorities Must Consider Demerger Impact, Remands Grace Infrastructure Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 232 of the Companies Act 2013, demerger, Section 170A of the Income Tax Act, Section 263 of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691766-madras-hc-grace-infrastructure-private-limited-justice-c-saravanan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/benami-proceedings-independent-income-tax-assessment-findings-evidentiary-value-rajasthan-high-court-544440</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T15:27:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Findings Have Evidentiary Value In Benami Proceedings: Rajasthan High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajasthan HC, evidentiary value of income tax proceedings in benami matters, benami proceedings, Rajasthan High Court benami, income tax assessment findings, evidentiary value tax, Benami Transactions Act, independent benami proceedings, benami property case, income tax evidence, Rajasthan HC ruling, benami law India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691791-justice-arun-monga-and-justice-sandeep-shah-rajasthan-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/gameskraft-case-karnataka-high-court-holds-challenge-to-ecir-and-consequential-pmla-freezing-orders-maintainable-544430</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T15:30:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T15:09:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gameskraft Case | Search And Seizure Under PMLA Is Not An Independent Civil Exercise, Consequence Of ECIR: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gameskraft Technologies, PMLA, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Bank Account Freeze, Online Gaming, Proceeds of Crime, Karnataka High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/04/691654-whatsapp-image-2026-08-04-at-210409.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-dismisses-conart-engineers-insolvency-petition-against-senores-pharmaceuticals-on-pre-existing-disputes-544429</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T14:57:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Conart Engineers' Insolvency Plea Against Senores Over Pre Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Conart Engineers Limited, Senores Pharmaceuticals Limited, Pre-exisiting Disputes]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691775-nclt-ahmedabad-conart-engineers-and-senores-pharamaceutical.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-magistrate-does-not-become-functus-officio-after-handing-over-possession-secured-asset-creditor-sarfaesi-act-544427</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T14:53:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CJM Can Entertain Fresh SARFAESI Plea For Possession If Borrower Re-Enters Secured Asset: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act, Section 14 SARFAESI Act, Kerala High Court, Justice P.V. Balakrishnan, ICICI Bank, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, ACJM, Functus Officio, Secured Creditor, Secured Asset, Restoration of Possession, Possession of Secured Asset, Borrower, Illegal Re-entry, Advocate Commissioner, Police Assistance, Enforcement of Security Interest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/16/680229-kerala-high-court-justice-p-v-balakrishnan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/jk-high-court-orders-refund-of-29-lakh-security-deposits-despite-claim-not-being-raised-in-arbitration-544421</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T14:29:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[J&K And Ladakh HC Holds Past Arbitration No Bar In Refund Claim, Directs SKUAST-J To Release Deposit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Earnest Money Deposit, Performance Security, Arbitration, Order II Rule 2 CPC, Writ of Mandamus, Refund of Security, Delayed Payments, Contractual Obligations.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/04/15/391911-high-court-of-jammu-and-kashmir-03.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/passenger-carrying-undeclared-gold-has-no-entitlement-to-seek-its-re-export-delhi-high-court-544418</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T14:16:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Passenger Carrying Undeclared Gold Has No Entitlement to Seek Its Re-Export: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, High Court news, Customs Act, Section 125 Customs Act, Section 80 Customs Act, Section 77 Customs Act, undeclared gold, passenger baggage, re-export of confiscated goods, customs declaration, gold seizure, customs confiscation, redemption fine, prohibited good, tax news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/school-entitled-to-fresh-consideration-of-property-tax-exemption-544416</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T14:12:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delay In Filing Certificate Not Ground To Deny Property Tax Exemption To School: Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, Municipal Council, Municipality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691746-justice-parth-prateem-sahu-chhattisgarh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/sugar-export-ban-was-well-thought-out-not-a-knee-jerk-reaction-bombay-high-court-dismisses-exporters-plea-against-teh-decsion-544412</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T13:41:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Sugar Export Ban Was Well Thought Out, Not A Knee-Jerk Reaction: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sugar Export Ban, DGFT, Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, FTDR Act, Foreign Trade Policy 2023, FTP 2023, Export Restriction, Sugar Exports, Export Contracts, Advance Payments, Advance Remittances, Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit, ICLC, Transitional Arrangement, Para 1.05(b), Export Notification, Judicial Review, Economic Policy, Customs, Indirect Tax, Foreign Trade, Export Policy, Vested Right to Export, Public Interest, Trade Regulation, India Exports]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691749-bombay-hc-ban-on-the-export-of-sugar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-protects-alakh-pandey-personality-rights-orders-takedown-of-infringing-content-544404</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T13:05:45+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T13:03:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects Physics Wallah Founder Alakh Pandey's Personality Rights]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Alakh Pandey, Physics Wallah, Delhi High Court, personality rights, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J Sai Deepak, personality rights suit, John Doe order, celebrity personality rights, AI generated images, deepfake content, monetisation of personality, defamatory content online, ex parte injunction, social media takedown, YouTube subscribers, Instagram followers, education sector India, Google BSI details, satire, parody law, interim injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/04/691489-delhi-hc-alakh-pandey.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/bankers-books-evidence-bill-lok-sabha-electronic-bank-records-recognition-544402</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T12:56:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bankers' Books Evidence Bill Introduced In Parliament To Recognise Digital Bank Records As Evidence]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bankers Books Evidence Bill 2026, electronic bank records, Lok Sabha bill 2026, digital banking records, bank evidence law India, electronic records recognition, banking law amendment, Parliament banking bill, Bankers Books Evidence Act, financial legislation India, can electronic bank record be used as evidence, bankers book evidence act replaced]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691740-lok-sabha-bankers-book-evidence-bill.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/public-infrastructure-nature-of-project-no-bar-to-interim-relief-under-arbitration-act-bombay-high-court-544397</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T12:33:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Public Infrastructure Nature Of Project No Bar To Interim Relief Under Arbitration Act: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Public Infrastructure Projects, Section 9 Interim Relief, Specific Relief Act, Determinable Contracts, Dispute Escalation Clause, Exclusive Jurisdiction, Solar Energy EPC Contract]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/05/19/684298-justice-amit-borkar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-allows-centre-to-withdraw-slp-against-vedanta-in-rajasthan-oil-block-dispute-544388</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T11:34:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Allows Centre To Withdraw SLP Against Vedanta In Rajasthan Oil Block Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Union of India, Vedanta Limited, Production Sharing Contract (PSC), Final Partial Award]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/04/653923-vedanta-and-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delay-condonation-under-ni-act-cannot-be-used-to-cure-fatal-defects-supreme-court-544383</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T11:17:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delay Condonation Under NI Act Cannot Be Used To Cure Fatal Defects: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act, Supreme Court, Section 138 NI Act, Section 141 NI Act, Company Liability, Section 319 CrPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691711-whatsapp-image-2026-08-05-at-101157.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/playing-iprs-owned-music-in-hotel-rooms-without-licence-is-copyright-infringement-calcutta-high-court-544378</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T10:56:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Playing IPRS-Owned Music In Hotel Rooms Without Licence Is Copyright Infringement: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Indian Performing Right Society, IPRS, Copyright, Hotel Appolo, Copyright Infringement, Section 2(ff) Copyright Act, Communication to the Public, Musical Works, Literary Works, Hotel Rooms, Cable TV Subscription, Royalty Payment, Commercial Exploitation, Section 51 Copyright Act, Section 52(1)(k) Copyright Act, Ad-interim Injunction, Justice Debangsu Basak, Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/05/691712-iprs-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/s-76-cgst-appellate-authority-can-decide-reasonable-period-for-issuing-show-cause-notice-delhi-high-court-544362</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-05T09:43:27+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T09:42:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[S. 76 CGST Act | Appellate Authority Can Decide Reasonable Period For Issuing Show Cause Notice: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 76 CGST, CGST Act, GST Appellate Authority, GST Appellate Authority powers, reasonable period, reasonable period for show cause notice, show cause notice under Section 76, GST show cause notice, GST limitation, GST appeal, Section 107 CGST Act, input tax credit, ITC, tax demand, GST litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/high-court/would-send-wrong-signals-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-in-30-crore-investment-fraud-case-544355</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-05T09:25:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Would Send Wrong Signals': Delhi High Court Denies Bail In ₹30 Crore Investment Fraud Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, Investment Scam, SEBI, Bail Rejected, Economic Offences, Cheating Case]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/04/691647-whatsapp-image-2026-08-04-at-212758.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-allows-cenvat-credit-on-inputs-procured-from-exempt-units-even-before-2014-amendment-544342</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-04T20:41:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chandigarh Allows CENVAT Credit On Inputs From Exempt Units, Grants Relief To Reckitt Benckiser]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT credit, Rule 12, Notification No. 01/2010-CE, duty-paid inputs, extended limitation, CENVAT Credit Rules, Reckitt Benckiser, CESTAT Chandigarh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654305-cestat-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/commercial-court-act/commercial-courts-orders-can-be-challenged-under-article-227-but-not-under-article-226-orissa-high-court-544339</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-04T20:24:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Commercial Court Orders Not Amenable To Writ Of Certiorari: Orissa High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Commercial Court, Article 227 , Article 226, Orissa High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/08/06/614084-justice-harish-tandon-and-justice-murahari-sri-raman.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-july-27-august-02-2026-544327</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-04T19:39:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: July 27 - August 02, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Digest, Indirect Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652650-weekly-digest-indirect-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-chennai-department-cannot-reclassify-poultry-cage-weld-mesh-as-iron-steel-structures-without-justifying-alternative-tariff-entry-544320</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-04T19:10:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Reclassification Of Poultry Cage Components As Iron and Steel Structures]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, CESTAT Chennai, tariff classification, classification dispute, poultry battery cages, weld mesh, parts of poultry keeping machinery, CTH 84369100, CTH 73089090, iron and steel structures, Central Excise Tariff, classification of goods, end-use specific goods, burden of proof, excise duty, extended limitation, Departmental reclassification, poultry equipment, GST & Central Excise, indirect taxes.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684084-cestat-chennai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
