<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/trade-promotion-bodies-qualify-as-charitable-institutions-if-dominant-object-is-general-public-utility-543654</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T19:43:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T19:43:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Reiterates Trade Associations Can Qualify As Charitable Institutions Under Income Tax Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 12AA, Section 2(15), general public utility, trade association, charitable registration, Rule 17A, Gujarat High Court, trade promotion]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/16/661992-750x450648290-gujarat-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-restrains-edible-oil-firm-holds-cycle-mark-has-reputation-beyond-agarbattis-543649</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T19:05:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Restrains Edible Oil Firm, Holds 'CYCLE' Mark Has Reputation Beyond Agarbattis]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, N.Ranga Rao & Sons, Trademark, Cycle Brand Agarbathies, Cycle Trademark, Sree Annapoorna Agro Foods, Section 29(4) Trade Marks Act, Trademark Infringement, Well-known Trademark, Dissimilar Goods, Edible Oil, Secondary Meaning, Dictionary Word, Incense Sticks, Justice P. Velmurugan, Secondary Significance, Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-money-lenders-cirp-plea-says-loan-to-repay-existing-bank-debt-is-not-financial-debt-543644</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T18:50:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Money Lender's CIRP Plea, Says Loan To Repay Existing Bank Debt Is Not Financial Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Money Lender, Financial Creditor, Financial Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655532-nclt-ahmedabad-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/karnataka-high-court-quashes-temporary-injunction-against-areca-nut-dehusking-machine-maker-in-patent-suit-543640</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T18:33:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Quashes Temporary Injunction Against Areca Nut Dehusking Machine Maker In Patent Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Patent, Priya Industries, V-Tech Engineers, Indian Patent No. IN259204, Areca Nut Dehusking Machine, Patent Infringement, Ex-parte Ad-interim Order, Commercial Appeal, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru, Nurling Shaft, NIT Karnataka, Patent Claims, Judicial Reasoning, Inter-court Appeal, Justice K.S. Hemalekha]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690500-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-ks-hemalekha-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-imposes-20-lakh-penalty-three-individuals-telegram-akash-infra-stock-manipulation-543639</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T18:21:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Penalises Three ₹20 Lakh For Manipulating Akash Infra Stock Through Telegram Channels]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Akash Infra-Projects Limited, AIPL, Telegram stock tips, Telegram channels, stock market manipulation, pump and dump scheme, misleading stock recommendations, PFUTP Regulations, SEBI Act, Amit Kapoor, Adjudicating Officer, Amesh Surajlal Jaiswal, Jalaj Agarwal, Arvind Shukla, WhatsApp chats, call detail records, market manipulation, securities fraud, share price manipulation, stock recommendations, securities market, SEBI penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672440-sebi-poster-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-declines-bail-to-punjab-minister-sanjeev-arora-on-medical-grounds-in-pmla-case-543636</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T18:10:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Declines Bail To Punjab Minister Sanjeev Arora On Medical Grounds In PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Sanjeev Arora, Aam Aadmi Party, Medical Bail, Enforcement Directorate, Money Laundering Case, Punjab and Haryana High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690529-whatsapp-image-2026-07-30-at-172321.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-protects-opella-phensedyl-restraining-phenseryl-cough-syrup-maker-in-trademark-suit-543635</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T18:05:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T18:04:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Use Of PHENSERYL Mark In Opella Healthcare's Trademark Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Opella Healthcare Group, Trademark, Sanofi Group, Pureca Laboratories, PHENSEDYL, PHENSERYL, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Summary Judgment, Order XIII-A CPC, Deceptive Similarity, Pharmaceutical Trademarks, Cough Syrup, Trade Dress, Justice Jyoti Singh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690494-delhi-hc-phensedyl.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/mere-delay-in-paying-income-tax-does-not-amount-to-wilful-tax-evasion-bombay-high-court-543634</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T18:10:19+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T17:52:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Delay In Paying Income Tax Does Not Amount To Wilful Tax Evasion: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Section 276C(2), Wilful Attempt to Evade Tax, Criminal Prosecution, Mens Rea, Delayed Payment of Tax, Tax Evasion, Income Tax Prosecution, Quashing of Criminal Complaint, Summoning Order, Nil Dues Certificate, Penal Provisions, Bombay High Court, Goa Bench, Pepsi Foods, Criminal Writ Petition.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/12/08/635365-goa.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/trustee-shareholding-doesnt-make-public-trust-a-concern-under-deemed-dividend-provision-gujarat-high-court-543625</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T17:36:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T17:34:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Act | Trustee's Shareholding Doesn't Make Public Trust A 'Concern' Under Deemed Dividend Provision: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 2(22)(e), deemed dividend, public trust, concern, shareholder, Section 148A, reassessment, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-imposes-10-lakh-penalty-madhav-copper-limited-goods-and-service-tax-disclosure-lapses-543621</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T17:15:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Fines Madhav Copper ₹10 Lakh For Failing To Disclose GST Search And Registration Cancellation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Madhav Copper, Madhav Copper Limited, LODR Regulations, SEBI LODR Regulations, Regulation 30, GST Search, GST Proceedings, GST Registration Cancellation, Disclosure Norms, Material Disclosure, Delayed Disclosure, Continuing Disclosure, Stock Exchange Disclosure, NSE, SEBI Penalty, ₹10 Lakh Penalty, Corporate Disclosure, Listed Company Compliance, Regulatory Action, GST Department, Provisional Attachment, Material Event, SEBI Adjudicating Officer, Amit Kapoor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672733-sebi-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/chemical-examiner-cannot-decide-tariff-classification-nicotine-sulphate-falls-under-chapter-29-not-tobacco-products-cestat-ahmedabad-543619</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T17:14:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Nicotine Sulphate Not Tobacco Product, Examiner Can't Decide Tariff Classification: CESTAT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, Nicotine Sulphate, Classification, Tariff Heading 2939, Tariff Heading 2403, Chemical Examiner, CRCL, Extended Limitation, Related Party, Excise Duty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/11/667069-tobacco.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/receipt-of-arbitral-award-by-spouse-on-behalf-of-other-party-living-at-same-address-is-valid-delivery-543605</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T17:17:12+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T17:00:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Service Of Arbitral Award Through Spouse At Same Address Triggers Limitation: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitral award, limitation, service of award, postal acknowledgment, deemed service, arbitration challenge, delivery of award, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/678946-sharmila-deshmukh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/three-days-to-reply-to-income-tax-scn-not-reasonable-gujarat-high-court-quashes-assessment-543603</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T16:48:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Three Days To Reply To Income Tax SCN Not Reasonable: Gujarat High Court Quashes Assessment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 144B, Section 143(3), reasonable opportunity, show cause notice, faceless assessment, natural justice, video conference hearing, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-in-accambuja-amalgamation-scheme-543595</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T16:09:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion In ACC-Ambuja Cements Merger, Dispenses With Creditor Meetings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Ambuja Cements, ACC Limited, First Motion]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690453-nclt-ahemdabad-acc-limted-and-ambuja.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/family-members-of-sole-proprietor-cant-be-vicarious-liable-under-ni-act-by-being-labelled-as-partners-calcutta-high-court-543594</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T15:59:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Sole Proprietor's Family Members Can't Be Held Vicariously Liable U/S 141 NI Act: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 141 NI Act, Vicarious Liability, Sole Proprietorship, Cheque Bounce Case]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/gita-discourses-alone-do-not-make-trust-a-religious-institution-543593</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T15:58:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Disseminating Bhagavad Gita Teachings Can't Be Treated As Religious Propagation: ITAT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 80G, Section 12AB, charitable institution, religious entity, Bhagavad Gita, gaushala, World Sankirtan Tour Trust, ITAT Chandigarh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690471-itat-with-bhagavad-gita.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/operational-creditor-cannot-rely-on-internally-inconsistent-documents-to-extend-limitation-nclat-543592</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T15:57:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Operational Creditor Cannot Use Conflicting Debt Documents To Extend Limitation: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Operational Creditor, limitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-waives-section-244-threshold-for-minority-shareholder-says-merits-of-oppression-plea-cannot-be-examined-at-waiver-stage-543581</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T15:31:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Merits Of Oppression Plea Not To Be Examined While Deciding Waiver Application: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai , Section 244,Shareholder, Oppression Plea , Waiver Stage,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/22/681620-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-acquittal-cheque-bounce-case-does-not-bar-civil-recovery-suit-on-same-cheque-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-543576</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T14:52:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case Doesn't Bar Civil Recovery Suit On Same Cheque: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 138 NI Act, Negotiable Instruments Act, Cheque Bounce, Cheque Bounce Case, Civil Suit, Money Recovery Suit, Recovery of Money, Dishonoured Cheque, Acquittal, Execution of Cheque, Proof of Execution, Signature on Cheque, Sections 118 and 139 NI Act, Statutory Presumption, Issue Estoppel, Res Judicata, Section 43 Evidence Act, Civil Proceedings, Criminal Proceedings, Kerala High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/11/16/571520-justice-mohammed-nias-cp-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/penalty-once-imposed-under-rera-act-cannot-be-waived-even-if-promoter-and-allottees-settle-dispute-543575</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T14:52:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T14:50:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Penalty Under RERA Act Can Be Set Aside Only By Appellate Authority Not Private Settlement: Goa RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Goa RERA, promoter penalty, settlement, waiver of penalty, recovery proceedings, Section 11(4)(a), State revenue, real estate regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/10/660661-rera-goa.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/finding-that-joint-venture-agreement-is-genuine-does-not-make-jurisdiction-order-an-interim-award-bombay-hc-543570</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T14:20:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Jurisdiction Order U/S 16 Arbitration Act Cannot Be Independently Challenged: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 16, Section 34, interim award, arbitral jurisdiction, arbitration agreement, Joint Venture Agreement, maintainability, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/678946-sharmila-deshmukh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-upholds-nclts-jurisdiction-to-adjudicate-easement-dispute-having-direct-nexus-with-liquidation-asset-543564</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T14:01:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Easement Right Disputes Affecting Liquidation Fall Within NCLT's Jurisdiction: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Easement, NCLT, Liquidation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652666-nclat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-flags-misuse-of-metas-copyright-strike-system-calls-it-platform-for-extortion-by-bad-actors-543557</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T13:36:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T13:36:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Flags Misuse Of Meta's Copyright Strike System, Calls It 'Platform For Extortion By Bad Actors']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, copyright, Meta Platforms, Instagram account restoration, fake copyright strikes, platform for extortion, opportunity of blackmail, John Doe suit, Ashok Kumar, inauthentic engagement, automated takedown, human intervention, IT Rules 2021, Mohammed Nawaz Shaikh, Prateek Sahni, cyber extortion, content creators, grievance redressal, repeat copyright infringement policy, and intellectual property rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689897-delhi-hc-meta-insta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-refuses-entertain-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-appeal-atlas-ramachandran-escrow-funds-axis-bank-limited-543550</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T13:11:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T12:57:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Dismisses SEBI Appeal Over Escrow Funds Linked To Atlas Ramachandran]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Axis Bank, M.M. Ramachandran, Atlas Ramachandran, Atlas Jewellery Private Limited, Atlas Jewellery India Limited Escrow Account, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Act, Tax Recovery Officer, Writ Appeal, Collateral Challenge, Independent Statutory Remedies, Enforcement Directorate, SEBI Appeal, Escrow Funds, Income Tax Recovery]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690414-kerala-hc-atlas-ramachandran.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/it-is-your-callous-attitude-that-leads-to-such-litigations-before-the-highest-court-sc-pulls-up-gda-up-govt-over-delay-in-ansal-project-approvals-543543</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-30T12:16:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T12:09:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA["Your Callous Attitude Leads To Such Litigations": Supreme Court Pulls Up GDA, UP Govt. Over Delay In Ansal Resolution Plan Implementation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, National Company Law Tribunal New Delhi, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ansal Urban Condominiums Pvt. Ltd, One City Infrastructure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690318-whatsapp-image-2026-07-29-at-224312.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-29-2026-543533</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T11:14:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-lilavati-trust-plea-for-2500-crore-damages-against-former-trustee-mumbai-police-chief-543518</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T10:24:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses Lilavati Trust's ₹2,500 Crore Plea For Damages Against Ex-Trustee, Ex-Mumbai Police Chief]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Lilavati Trust, Rajesh Mehta, Param Bir Singh, Article 32, Lilavati Hospital, Confidential Records]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690358-sc-param-bir-singh-rajesh-kishore-mehta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-no-enforceable-right-to-seek-mca-investigation-orders-ongoing-sfio-probe-preliminary-stage-mandke-foundation-543478</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T20:43:31+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T20:42:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses Disclosure Of MCA Orders In SFIO Probe Into Anil Ambani Group Companies]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Companies Act, 2013, Section 212 Companies Act, Section 217 Companies Act, Serious Fraud Investigation Office, SFIO, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, MCA, Delhi High Court, investigation, corporate fraud investigation, disclosure of investigation orders, Mandke Foundation, Reliance Home Finance Limited, Reliance Communications Limited, preliminary stage of investigation, natural justice, ongoing investigation, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689087-dr-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-high-court-says-freezing-bank-accounts-cannot-be-routine-interim-relief-under-arbitration-act-543476</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T20:29:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Says Freezing Bank Accounts Cannot Be Routine Interim Relief Under Arbitration Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 9, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Interim Measures, Construction Equipment Finance, Loan-cum-Hypothecation Agreement, Tata Capital Limited, Bank Account Attachment, Freezing of Bank Accounts, Security for Claim, Hypothecated Assets, Asset Disclosure, Prima Facie Case, Interim Relief, Monetary Claims, Arbitral Proceedings, Receiver, Bombay High Court.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690199-bombay-high-court-tata-capital.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/gujarat-high-court-quashes-reassessment-notice-issued-beyond-covid-era-tola-deadline-543471</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T20:23:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T19:57:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond COVID-Era TOLA Deadline]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[surviving time, Section 148, Section 148A, TOLA, Rajeev Bansal, Ashish Agarwal, reassessment, Gujarat High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688908-supehia-vaibhavi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/ca-cpt-icwa-foundation-coaching-eligible-for-service-tax-exemption-543469</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T19:43:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T19:42:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CA-CPT, ICWA Foundation Coaching Eligible For Service Tax Exemption: CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Notification No. 33/2011-ST, CA-CPT, ICWA Foundation, coaching institute, service tax exemption, educational qualification, Master Minds]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/09/06/559850-cestat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-one-workman-cannot-represent-others-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-proceedings-without-authorisation-543468</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T19:28:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[One Workman Cannot Represent Others In IBC Proceedings Without Authorisation: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, NCLT Kochi, workmen, employees, liquidation, liquidation costs, unpaid wages, statutory dues, provident fund, gratuity, pension fund, Section 60(5) IBC, maintainability, authorisation, power of attorney, signatory applicant, Liquidator, sale of corporate debtor, going concern, Vysali Pharmaceuticals Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/15/667714-750x450652584-nclt-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/manipur-high-court-sets-aside-arbitral-award-on-parties-consent-in-thoubal-multipurpose-project-dispute-543467</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T19:23:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Manipur High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award On Parties' Consent In Thoubal Multipurpose Project Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, De Novo Arbitration, Consent Order, Arbitral Award, Substitute Arbitrator, Thoubal Multipurpose Project, Section 31(5), Manipur High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/11/06/442766-manipur-high-court-imphal.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/letters-patent-appeal-not-maintainable-against-single-judge-order-in-trademark-act-appeals-gujarat-high-court-543464</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T19:11:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Letters Patent Appeal Not Maintainable Against Single Judge's Order Under Trade Marks Act: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Raj Abhushan Bhandar, Letters Patent Appeal, Clause 15, Section 91 Trade Marks Act, Section 100A CPC, Trappings of a Court, Quasi-judicial, Section 109 TM Act 1958, Glorious Investment, Promoshirt SM SA, Intellectual Property, Appellate Jurisdiction, Statutory Appeal, Intra-court Appeal, Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice D.N. Ray]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/07/24/652171-378806-gujarat-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/subsequent-shareholding-changes-cannot-retrospectively-cleanse-related-party-status-nclt-chandigarh-543459</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T18:56:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Subsequent Shareholding Changes Cannot Retrospectively Cleanse Related-Party Status: NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh, Shareholders, Related Party]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-stays-sfio-proceedings-against-vivo-india-543454</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T18:45:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays SFIO Proceedings Against Vivo India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Vivo India, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Pre-Cognizance Hearing, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), Companies Act, 2013, Punjab & Haryana High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/04/653922-vivo-and-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-rejects-eyetex-divya-owners-plea-against-divyam-trademark-543450</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T18:32:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rejects EYETEX DIVYA Owner's Plea Against DIVYAM Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Aravind Laboratories, Trademark, Manoj Agrawal, EYETEX DIVYA, DIVYAM, Trademark Rectification, Section 17 Trade Marks Act, Generic Words, Kumkum, Pooja Goods, Deceptive Similarity, Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, Class 3, Intellectual Property, Device Mark]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/16/684876-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan-and-bombay-highcourt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/delhi-rera-orders-refund-after-housing-society-took-bookings-without-land-needed-to-register-project-543438</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T18:14:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi RERA Orders Refund After Housing Society Took Bookings Without Land Needed To Register Project]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi RERA, Diamond Multistate CGHS Ltd., Cooperative Housing Society, Promoter, Section 2(zk), Section 12, Section 18, Refund with Interest, Homebuyer, Apartment Booking, Delhi Housing Scheme II, L Zone Dwarka, Project Registration, Non-Disclosure, Material Information, Misleading Information, Failure to Commence Project, Project Delay, Transparency, Accountability, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Devesh Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Anwar (HUF), Consumer Protection, Real Estate Regulation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652639-rera.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/why-should-delay-interest-not-be-recovered-from-your-salary-delhi-high-court-to-ao-over-4-year-delay-in-tax-refund-543436</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T18:03:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Why Should Delay Interest Not Be Recovered From Your Salary? : Delhi High Court To AO Over 4-Year Delay In Tax Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Justice Dinesh Mehta, Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, Clix Capital Services, Clix Finance India, Assessing Officer, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Act, Section 254, Section 250, Section 143(1), tax refund delay, delayed tax refund, interest recovery, salary recovery, tax litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/high-court/revenues-appeal-against-cestats-service-taxability-ruling-lies-before-supreme-court-delhi-high-court-543429</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T17:46:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Revenue's Appeal Against CESTAT's Service Taxability Ruling Lies Before Supreme Court: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT appeal, Section 35L Central Excise Act, service taxability, appeal against CESTAT order, Supreme Court appeal, Justice Anil Kshetarpal, Justice Shail Jain, Commissioner of Central Tax v Samiah International Builder Pvt Ltd, SpiceJet judgment, NKG Infrastructure]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-flags-delays-in-direct-tax-vivad-se-vishwas-refunds-543425</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T17:33:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Something Seriously Amiss': Delhi High Court Flags Delays In Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Refunds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court tax news, CBDT, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Income Tax Department, Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas refund, tax refund delay, Form No. 4, Income Tax Business Application, ITBA, Assessing Officer, tax arrears settlement, Section 94, Section 244A, income tax refund, Yashita Finance Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-insolvency-plea-against-manpasand-beverages-finds-claim-timebarred-and-linked-to-gst-circular-trading-543418</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T17:13:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Insolvency Plea Against Manpasand Beverages Over Time-Barred ₹34.40 Cr Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Insolvency, Do Well Moulds, Manpasand Beverages Ltd.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690149-nclt-ahemdabad-manpasand-beverage.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/dgov-guidelines-cannot-override-valuation-rules-543417</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T17:12:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chandigarh Quashes ₹99.59 Lakh Demand, Says DGOV Guidelines Cannot Override Valuation Rules]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DGOV guidelines, Customs Valuation Rules, transaction value, aluminium scrap, LME prices, undervaluation, Customs Act, Fire Stone Metal Pvt. Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654283-cestat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/what-happens-when-the-meeting-of-minds-is-replaced-by-the-meeting-of-algorithms-justice-vikram-nath-on-ai-driven-commercial-contracting-543414</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T17:22:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T16:46:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA['Meeting Of Minds' To 'Meeting Of Algorithms': Justice Vikram Nath Flags AI Challenges At UNCITRAL Event]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[UNCITRAL, Anna Joubin-Bret, Singapore Convention on Mediation, Mediation, India, Ratification, International Commercial Mediation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Cross-Border Disputes, Supreme Court, Justice Vikram Nath, UNCITRAL, Artificial Intelligence, AI, Contract Law, Consensus Ad Idem, Meeting of Minds, Commercial Contracts, International Commercial Law, Digital Commerce, Smart Contracts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690177-uncitral.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-in-amalgamation-of-four-renewable-energy-companies-into-ratabhe-renewable-energy-543405</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T16:03:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion Application For Amalgamation Of Five Renewable Energy Companies]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Amalgamation, Renewable Energy Companies]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655531-nclt-ahmedabad-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-quashes-time-barred-assessments-says-limitation-runs-from-transfer-order-543401</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T15:37:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Limitation Begins On Jurisdiction Transfer When Same AO Handles Searched And Other Person: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 153C, Section 153B, Section 127, limitation, searched person, other person, ITAT Delhi, Sudhir Agrawal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679647-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-dismisses-machino-polymers-plea-for-revision-of-admitted-claim-against-sintex-bapl-543400</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T15:36:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Rejects Machino Polymers' Plea To Revise Claim In Sintex-BAPL Ltd Insolvency Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Machino Polymers Limited, Sintex-BAPL Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655367-nclt-ahmedabad-sintex.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-legal-heir-deceased-payee-cannot-maintain-negotiable-instruments-act-complaint-unless-holder-in-due-course-543396</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T15:19:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Legal Heir Can't File Cheque Bounce Case Without Being Payee Or Holder In Due Course: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 138 NI Act, Negotiable Instruments Act, cheque bounce, dishonoured cheque, legal heir, deceased payee, holder in due course, payee, Section 142 NI Act, maintainability of complaint, Bombay High Court, Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale, cheque dishonour, criminal complaint, succession certificate, probate, legal representative, Vishnupant v. Kailas, Naresh Potteries v. Aarti Industries, JMFC Devrukh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690107-bombay-high-court-justice-ranjitsinha-raja-bhonsale.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/depb-licences-are-goods-but-not-eligible-for-itc-under-tnvat-act-543391</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T15:01:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[DEPB Licences Not Eligible For ITC Under TNVAT Act Even If Classified As Goods: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Goods, Section 19(1) of the TNVAT Act, Input Tax Credit, Section 2(23) of the TNVAT Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690161-madras-hc-with-justice-g-jayachandran-and-justice-n-mala.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/banking-nbfc/kerala-high-court-banking-ombudsman-cannot-review-recall-complaint-after-disposal-becomes-functus-officio-central-bank-of-india-543390</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:58:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[RBI Banking Ombudsman Cannot Review Or Recall Order After Disposing Complaint: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Banking Ombudsman, RBI Integrated Ombudsman Scheme 2021, Reserve Bank of India, Central Bank of India, functus officio, review jurisdiction, recall of order, fresh order, quasi-judicial authority, natural justice, personal hearing, reasoned order, deficiency in service, loan disbursal, moratorium, Clause 16(2)(a), Kerala High Court, Justice M.A. Abdul Hakhim, judicial review, banking dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/13/599671-justice-m-a-abdul-hakhim.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-sets-aside-vat-penalty-says-bona-fide-classification-dispute-cannot-establish-tax-evasion-543388</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:52:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bona Fide Classification Dispute Cannot Establish Tax Evasion Intent For Penalty: Punjab & Haryana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 51(7)(c) of the PVAT Act, Classification Dispute,  Section 63(1) of the PVAT Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690151-acting-chief-justice-ashwani-kumar-mishra-and-justice-rohit-kapoor-punjab-and-haryana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-ahmedabad-failure-to-disclose-information-not-required-under-central-excise-law-cannot-be-treated-as-suppression-to-invoke-extended-limitation-543386</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:41:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked For Non Disclosure Of Facts Not Required By Law: CESTAT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, Cenvat Credit, Input Services, Setting Up of Factory, Extended Period of Limitation, Suppression of Facts, Wilful Misstatement, Intent to Evade Duty, Section 11A(4), Central Excise Act, 1944, Rule 2(l), Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, Rule 15(2), Cenvat Credit Rules, Statutory Returns, Penalty, Limitation, Indirect Tax Litigation, Polychem Industries, Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684082-cestat-ahmedabad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-fraudsters-impersonating-aditya-birla-sun-life-amc-directs-whatsapp-to-remove-fake-groups-in-36-hours-543385</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:39:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Unknown Entities From Impersonating Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC, Officials]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC, ABSLAMC, John Doe, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Digital Fraud, Investment Scams, WhatsApp Groups, Diya Mehra, ABSLNHW, ABSLPRIV, MeitY, DoT, Justice Jyoti Singh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/09/685484-delhi-hc-aditya.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/allahabad-high-court-severs-rs-157-crore-arbitral-award-against-up-state-highway-authority-543383</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:20:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court Partly Sets Aside ₹157.57 Cr Arbitral Award Against U.P. State Highways Authority]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court,Arbitral Award ,UP State Highway Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/12/29/643333-chief-justice-arun-bhansali-and-justice-jaspreet-singh-lucknow-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-aurore-life-sciences-from-manufacturing-selling-ruxolitinib-in-patent-suit-543382</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T14:24:06+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T14:19:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Aurore Life Sciences From Manufacturing, Selling Ruxolitinib In Patent Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Incyte Holdings, Novartis, Aurore Life Sciences, Ruxolitinib, JAKAVI, Myelofibrosis, Indian Patent 269841, IN’841, Patent Infringement, ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Janus kinases, JAK1, JAK2, Bone Marrow Cancer, Justice Jyoti Singh, Patent]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/06/659895-patent.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/interim-arbitration-orders-stage-cannot-become-a-shortcut-for-evidence-calcutta-high-court-543375</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T13:31:34+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T13:30:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Compel Production Of Evidence Through Interim Relief Mechanism: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 17, Interim Measures, Discovery of Documents, Production of Evidence, Arbitral Tribunal, Joint Venture Agreement, Section 37 Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/12/673543-calcutta-hc-justice-gaurang-kanth.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-hyderabad-quashes-service-tax-demand-on-ultratech-over-railway-wagon-freight-concession-543363</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T12:35:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Hyderabad Quashes Service Tax Demand On UltraTech Over Railway Wagon Freight Concession]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 67 Finance Act, UltraTech Cement, Indian Railways, Liberalized Wagon Investment Scheme, LWIS, Freight Concession, Service Tax, Supply of Tangible Goods for Use Service]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690104-supply-of-tangible-goods-cestat-hyderabad.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/cestat-chennai-toyotas-imported-transmission-gears-cannot-be-taxed-as-motor-vehicle-parts-merely-because-they-are-used-in-cars-543354</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T11:56:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai Quashes ₹14.88 Crore Customs Duty Demand Against Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Chennai, Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts, Customs Classification, Customs Duty, Import Classification, Gears and Gearing, Motor Vehicle Parts, Differential Gear, Automobile Industry, HSN Classification, Customs Tariff, Customs Act, 1962, Differential Duty, DRI, Penalty, Redemption Fine, Interest, Automotive Imports, Tariff Classification, Customs Appeals.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690084-toyota-kirloskar-auto-parts-pvt-ltd-cestat-chennai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/sc-issues-notice-on-former-congress-mla-rajendra-bhartis-plea-against-delhi-hcs-refusal-to-stay-conviction-in-gram-vikas-bank-fraud-case-543350</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T11:35:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ex-Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti's Plea To Stay Conviction In Bank Fraud Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajendra Bharti, Delhi High Court, Zila Sahkari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank, Fixed Deposit Fraud, Criminal Conspiracy and Forgery, Suspension of Conviction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690042-whatsapp-image-2026-07-28-at-234643.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-to-direct-takedown-of-infringing-content-in-yuvraj-singh-personality-rights-suit-543347</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T11:15:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T11:14:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Order Takedown Of Content Infringing Yuvraj Singh's Personality Rights]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, cricketer, Yuvraj Singh, personality rights]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690077-delhi-hc-yuvraj-singh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-appellate-authority-can-conduct-further-inquiry-permit-cross-examination-delhi-high-court-543338</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T10:13:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[S.107 CGST Act | GST Appellate Authority Can Conduct Further Inquiry, Permit Cross-Examination: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST, CGST Act, GST Appellate Authority, GST appeal, Cross-examination, Further inquiry, GST adjudication, GST demand, Input Tax Credit (ITC), Fake invoices, Article 226, Writ petition, Tax litigation, Indirect tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-declines-writ-petition-over-gst-notice-service-dispute-cites-statutory-appeal-543332</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T09:58:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T09:57:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Declines Writ Against Ex Parte GST Order, Cites Statutory Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, GST, CGST Act, Section 169 CGST Act, Section 107 CGST Act, GST notice service, service of notices, writ petition, statutory appellate remedy, appellate authority, alternative remedy, ex parte GST order, GST adjudication, input tax credit, ITC, natural justice, show cause notice, personal hearing notice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/04/671745-anil-kshetarpal-amit-mahajan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-rejects-revenues-plea-against-spicejet-over-foreign-currency-convertible-bond-tax-dispute-543327</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T09:44:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Revenue's Plea Against SpiceJet Over Foreign Currency Convertible Bond Tax Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court SpiceJet case, Justice Dinesh Mehta, Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, SpiceJet FCCB tax dispute, Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds tax, FCCB redemption premium, revenue expenditure, capital expenditure, Income Tax Department appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/09/26/436577-spicejet.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-28-2026-543326</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T09:43:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 28, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-1674-crore-tax-disallowance-enhancement-against-sahara-india-over-lack-of-notice-543321</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T09:32:31+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-29T09:30:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside ₹16.74 Crore Tax Disallowance Enhancement Against Sahara India Over Lack of Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd, Income Tax Act, Section 251(2), CIT(A), Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), tax disallowance, enhancement notice, statutory notice, ITAT, Article 14, income tax appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-orders-winding-up-of-paytm-payments-bank-on-rbis-plea-appoints-official-liquidator-543271</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-29T09:32:45+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T21:02:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Winding Up of Paytm Payments Bank On RBI Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Paytm Payments Bank, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Banking Regulation Act, Winding Up, Official Liquidator, Banking Licence Cancellation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/690004-whatsapp-image-2026-07-28-at-204055.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-approves-amalgamation-go-digit-holding-company-with-go-digit-general-insurance-merger-543265</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:44:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Proposed Merger Of Go Digit Holding Company With Go Digit General Insurance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, CCI Approval, Go Digit General Insurance Limited, Go Digit Infoworks Services Private Limited, Amalgamation, Merger Approval, Combination, Competition Act, Corporate Restructuring, Holding Company, General Insurance, Health Insurance, Insurance Sector, Competition Law, Internal Restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683849-cci1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-electricity-dues-must-be-recovered-in-liquidation-not-from-auction-purchaser-kerala-state-electricity-board-543264</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:42:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[KSEB Cannot Demand Previous Owner's Power Dues From Auction Purchaser: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB), Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Arrears, Fresh Electricity Connection, Previous Consumer's Dues, Auction Purchaser, Company in Liquidation, Company Court Auction, Official Liquidator, Liquidation Proceedings, Unsecured Creditor, Recovery of Electricity Dues, Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2005, KSEB Terms and Conditions of Supply, 2005, Regulation 19, Statutory Charge, Encumbrance-Free Sale, Winding Up Proceedings, Company Law, Insolvency, Electricity Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/30/683135-kerala-high-court-with-justice-ak-jayasankaran-nambiar-and-justice-preeta-ak.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-admits-appeal-on-taxability-of-demonetisation-era-cash-deposits-543259</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:16:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Admits Appeal On Taxability Of Demonetisation-Era Cash Deposits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Department, ITAT, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Section 69A, Section 115BBE, demonetisation cash deposits, unexplained cash deposits, income tax appeal, tax department appeal, cash deposits during demonetisation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-stays-draft-tax-assessment-order-against-american-express-admits-transfer-pricing-appeal-543257</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:10:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Stays Draft Assessment Order Against American Express, Admits Transfer Pricing Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[American Express, Delhi High Court, transfer pricing, income tax appeal, Bright Line Test, BLT, Transfer Pricing Officer, TPO, draft assessment order, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ITAT, transfer pricing adjustment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/registrar-cannot-delete-mark-without-issuing-expiry-notice-kerala-high-court-quashes-removal-of-trademark-543256</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T22:16:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:59:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Trade Marks Registry Cannot Remove Trademark Without Mandatory Notice: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen, Kerala High Court, S. Prasannan, Trademark, VIC Trademark, Water Level Controllers, Section 25(3) Trade Marks Act, Rule 58 Trade Marks Rules, Mandatory Notice, Trademark Renewal, Vayalar Invention Centre, Controller General of Patents, Intellectual Property, Writ of Mandamus, Registrar of Trademarks, Removal of Mark]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689982-kerala-hc-justice-shoba-annamma-eapen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
