<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/lvelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-august-24-august-29-2026-547832</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:43:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: August 24 - August 29, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/31/697014-whatsapp-image-2026-08-31-at-102316.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-pre-deposit-must-be-refunded-to-extent-taxpayer-succeeds-in-appeal-bombay-high-court-547831</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:38:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Orders ₹3.14 Cr Pre-Deposit To IBM, Says Pending Appeal Can't Affect Dropped Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Pre-Deposit, Refund, Partial Success In Appeal, GST Appeal, Section 107 MGST Act, GST Appellate Tribunal, Tax Demand, Article 265, Statutory Refund]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696817-ibm-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cestat-revenue-cannot-treat-services-as-non-export-only-to-deny-cenvat-refund-without-demanding-service-tax-allows-flipkarts-appeals-547829</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-31T10:24:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Says Revenue Can't Take Contrary Stands On Same Services, Allows Flipkart CENVAT Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Flipkart Internet, CESTAT Mumbai, Export of Services, CENVAT Credit Refund, Rule 5 CENVAT Credit Rules, Business Auxiliary Services, Export of Services Rules 2005, Section 73 Finance Act 1994, Service Tax, Revenue Cannot Take Contrary Stands, CBEC Circular]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/25/663759-cestat-flipkart.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
