<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/high-court/madras-high-court-upholds-2014-notification-granting-pan-india-powers-to-dgcei-officers-in-service-tax-cases-541729</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T16:20:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds 2014 Notification Granting Pan-India Powers To DGCEI Officers In Service Tax Cases]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Notification No. 22/2014, DGGI, Service Tax, Pan-India Jurisdiction, Central Excise Officer, Show Cause Notice, Pre-Consultation, Madras High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/15/661673-750x450652633-madras-hc-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-ayurvedic-firm-from-using-hajmola-mark-in-trademark-suit-by-dabur-541728</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T16:17:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains MDL Herbal From Using “HAJMOLA” Mark In Dispute With Dabur]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Dabur India Limited, HAJMOLA, Sameer Das Shastri, MDL Herbal, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ayurvedic Digestive Tablets, Well-known Trademark, Ex-parte ad-interim injunction, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre-litigation Mediation, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Intellectual Property, Deceptive Similarity]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687502-delhi-hc-hajmola.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/sale-deeds-alone-not-conclusive-proof-to-exempt-rural-housing-projects-from-rera-odisha-reat-541724</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T16:04:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rural Project Promoters Cannot Avoid RERA Merely By Relying On Pre-RERA Sale Deeds: Odisha REAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ORERA, Odisha REAT, Rural Housing Project, DUDA Validation, Occupancy Certificate, Completion Certificate, RERA, Real Estate]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652505-reat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/karnataka-hc-says-surrender-of-transit-pass-doesnt-bar-kvat-penalty-if-facts-indicate-tax-evasion-541719</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T15:38:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Transit Pass Surrender Not Conclusive Proof Of Goods Movement, Doesn't Bar KVAT Penalty: Karnataka HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[transit pass, KVAT penalty, goods in transit, tax evasion, transporter, Section 53(12), Section 64 KVAT, Karnataka High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/04/28/416084-download-2.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/delhi-high-court-rules-section-433-of-arbitration-act-cannot-save-void-arbitration-clause-541716</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T15:24:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rules Section 43(3) Of Arbitration Act Cannot Save Void Arbitration Clause]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 43(3), Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 28(b), contractual time-bar clause, contractual limitation clause, arbitration invocation, arbitral award, Section 34, Section 37, construction contract, MTNL, Rukma Decor, contractual rights, undue hardship, procedural limitation, commercial arbitration, Delhi HC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687483-justice-anil-kshetarpal-and-justice-amit-mahajan-with-delhi-high-court-mtnl.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-rejects-resolution-plan-paying-less-than-liquidation-value-to-operational-creditor-541715</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T15:18:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Rejects Kalka Home Developers Resolution Plan Paying Government Dues Below Liquidation Value]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Operational Creditor, Resolution Plan, Liquidation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/karnataka-hc-says-cestat-must-decide-limitation-before-remanding-excise-dispute-541714</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T15:10:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Holds CESTAT Must Decide Limitation Plea Before Remanding Excise Matter]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT remand, limitation, show cause notice, extended period, Central Excise Act, Karnataka High Court, excise demand, appellate tribunal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/13/686245-karnataka-hc-justice-s-g-pandit-and-justice-rajesh-rai-k.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-closes-case-over-delhi-airport-security-contracts-to-gmr-group-company-delhi-international-airport-541709</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T14:50:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Rejects Anti-Competitive Conduct Claims Against DIAL, Upholds IGIA Security Tender Process]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Delhi International Airport Limited, DIAL, Airports Authority of India, AAI, Ministry of Civil Aviation, MoCA, Indira Gandhi International Airport, IGIA, GMR Group, GMR Airports, RAXA Security Services, airport security contracts, competitive bidding, tender process, abuse of dominance, Competition Act 2002, Section 3 Competition Act, Section 4 Competition Act, arm's-length transaction, OMDA, Operation Management and Development Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683850-cci2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-dismisses-jaypee-greens-owners-plea-for-inclusion-of-mandatory-club-construction-in-jal-resolution-plan-541707</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T14:42:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Dismisses Jaypee Greens Homeowners' Appeals Seeking Social Club Condition In JAL Resolution Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Jaypee Greens, Jaiprakash Associates, Jaypee Greens]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652478-nclat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-protects-bata-from-counterfeiters-directs-flipkart-to-remove-infringing-listings-541705</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T14:34:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects “BATA” From Counterfeiters, Directs Flipkart To Remove Infringing Listings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Bata India Limited, Lalli Devi, Flipkart, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Counterfeit Footwear, Well-Known Mark, Batanagar, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Ex-Parte Injunction, Takedown Order, Justice Jyoti Singh, Rights Protection, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687428-delhi-hc-bata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-court-restrains-surat-builder-from-using-antara-mark-in-suit-by-max-group-antara-senior-living-awards-5-lakh-in-damages-541703</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T14:20:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Saket Court Protects “ANTARA” Trademark, Restrains Kapiraj Corporation From Using “Shivant Antara”]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[New Delhi District Court, Antara Senior Living, Kapiraj Corporation, Shivant Antara, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Real Estate, Max Group, Senior Living, Section 29 Trademarks Act, Permanent Injunction, Deceptive Similarity, Prior User, Saket Court, Damages]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687423-saket-district-court-antara.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-upholds-award-in-turner-morrisons-construction-cost-recovery-dispute-against-nirlac-541698</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T14:07:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Award In Turner Morrison's Construction Cost Recovery Dispute Against NIRLAC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 37, Construction Agreement, Contract Interpretation, Arbitral Award, Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, Construction Costs, Interest on Award, Contractual Penalty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/04/671745-anil-kshetarpal-amit-mahajan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-hc-bail-denial-to-former-congress-mla-dharam-singh-chhoker-in-mahira-group-pmla-case-541669</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T12:31:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Bail Denial To Ex-Haryana Congress MLA In Mahira Group Housing Scam]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ED, PMLA, Mahira Group, Dharam Singh Chhoker, ₹616 Crore Diversion, Homebuyers, Bail Rejected]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687337-whatsapp-image-2026-07-16-at-152818.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-closes-case-against-reliance-jio-mere-similarity-in-telecom-tariffs-pricing-not-enough-infer-collusion-541667</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T12:18:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Similar Telecom Tariffs Not Collusion; CCI Closes Case Against Reliance Jio, 4,500 Others]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Reliance Jio, Reliance Jio CCI, Competition Act 2002, Section 3 Competition Act, Section 4 Competition Act, anti-competitive agreements, cartelisation, parallel pricing, similar pricing, telecom tariffs, telecom recharge plans, oligopolistic market, abuse of dominance, prima facie case, Director General investigation, Section 26(2), GeM procurement, logistics sector, bid rigging, market allocation, Competition Commission order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/17/687402-cci-reliance-jio.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-madras-hc-order-directing-filmmaker-gautham-menon-to-repay-425-crore-in-unmade-film-dispute-541664</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T11:59:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With ₹4.25 Crore Refund Order Against Filmmaker Gautham Menon Over Unmade Film]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[R.S. Infotainment, Photon Factory, Nee Thane En Pon Vasantham, ₹4.25 Crore, Breach of Contract, Madras High Court, Repayment with Interest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687355-whatsapp-image-2026-07-16-at-215217.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclat-sets-aside-nclt-order-applying-corporate-insolvency-threshold-to-personal-insolvency-plea-541657</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T11:30:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Applying Corporate Insolvency Threshold To Personal Insolvency Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, NCLT, CIRP Threshold, Personal Guarantor Insolvency]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/jharkhand-high-court-orders-separate-registers-for-sarfaesi-applications-makes-records-accessible-under-rti-541654</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T11:11:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Jharkhand High Court Orders Separate Registers For SARFAESI Applications, Makes Records Accessible Under RTI]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SARFAESI ,Directory, Mandatory, Jharkhand High Court,Justice Ananda Sen, , Jharkhand Gramin Bank v. State of Jharkhand and Ors, Section 14 SARFAESI, Separate Registers, Pending Applications, Speedy Disposal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/08/31/432965-sarfaesi-act.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-16-2026-541635</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-17T09:28:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 16, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-july-06-july-12-2026-541625</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T22:07:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: July 06 - July 12, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest, LiveLaw]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/20/668661-750x450663198-weekly-round-up-ipr-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-dismisses-insolvency-plea-against-ganesh-benzoplast-over-disputed-corporate-guarantee-amid-fraud-allegations-541624</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T20:58:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against Ganesh Benzoplast Over Disputed Corporate Guarantee]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 7 IBC, Corporate Guarantee, Fraud & Forgery, Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., Financial Creditor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687328-whatsapp-image-2026-07-16-at-193321.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-makes-max-trademark-injunction-permanent-against-maxlife-diagnostic-confirms-5-lakh-damages-541617</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T19:57:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Makes Permanent Injunction Against MaxLife Diagnostic's Use of 'MAX' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Max Health Care Institute, Maxlife Diagnostic and Research Center, Trademark Infringement, MAX Trademark, Permanent Injunction, Settlement, Damages, Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC, Interlocutory Injunction, Contempt of Court, Take down order, Judicial Decree, Amicable Resolution, Justice V. Kameswar Rao, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/13/686241-justice-v-kameswar-rao-justice-manmeet-pritam-singh-arora-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-dissolves-bse-institute-of-research-development-innovation-after-successful-voluntary-liquidation-541612</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T19:20:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Dissolves BSE Institute of Research Development & Innovation After Voluntary Liquidation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Voluntary Liquidation, Section 59 IBC, BSE Institute of Research Development & Innovation Pvt. Ltd., National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Declaration of Solvency, Corporate Dissolution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687282-nclt-mumbai-bse.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-nubeat-from-using-n-logo-marks-in-trademark-suit-by-new-balance-541605</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T18:54:24+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T18:53:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Astormueller From Using 'n:' And 'nu:beat' Marks In New Balance Trademark Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, New Balance Athletics, Astormueller AG, NUBEAT, n: Logo, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Initial Interest Confusion, Well-known Trademark, Prior User, Class 25, Footwear Industry, Section 27(2) Trade Marks Act, Justice Jyoti Singh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687265-delhi-hc-new-balance.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/karnataka-hc-upholds-177-lakh-refund-says-developer-failed-to-establish-rera-exemption-claim-541597</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T18:23:26+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T18:23:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Upholds ₹1.77 Lakh Refund, Says Developer Failed To Establish RERA Exemption Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA registration, unregistered project, completion certificate, homebuyer refund, promoter liability, Karnataka RERA, excess charges, occupancy certificate]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/18/662352-750x450661211-750x450652568-karnataka-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/partial-admission-of-financial-creditors-claim-in-resolution-plan-does-not-extinguish-guarantors-coextensive-liability-nclt-delhi-541581</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T17:19:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Admits CIRP Against Prodot Media, Holds Guarantee Liability Survives Borrower's Resolution Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Guarantor, Financial Creditor, Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652481-nclt-copy-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-banks-can-freeze-suspected-money-mule-accounts-without-police-requisition-revises-guidelines-ajith-pr-541576</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T17:07:50+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T17:02:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Revises Its Guidelines On Freezing Bank Accounts Suspected Of Money Mule Activity]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Money Mule Account, Bank Account Freeze, Debit Freeze, Cybercrime, Section 111 BNS, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Federal Bank, RBI Guidelines, Banking Law, Cyber Fraud, Standard Operating Procedure, Bank Account Unfreezing, Abdul Azeez v. Union of India, Sinana Farvin v. Kerala Gramin Bank]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/13/599671-justice-m-a-abdul-hakhim.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-admits-cirp-against-regal-enterprises-rejects-solvency-claim-without-evidence-541574</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:48:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Admits CIRP Against Regal Enterprises, Rejects Solvency Claim Without Evidence]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Akkme Food Craft Limited, CIRP, Regal  Enterprises]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652668-nclt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-ibbi-chairperson-cannot-act-as-disciplinary-committee-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-sashi-agarwal-541570</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T19:20:54+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:40:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBBI Chairperson Cannot Act As Disciplinary Committee Under IBC: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBBI, Insolvency Professional, Registration Cancellation, Disciplinary Committee, IBBI Chairperson, Whole-Time Members, Section 220 IBC, Section 218 IBC, Inspection, Investigation, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Committee of Creditors, CIRP, Interim Resolution Professional, Calcutta High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/31/653037-justice-shampa-sarkar-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/a-mere-reproduction-of-the-statutory-language-without-disclosing-any-tangible-material-or-reasons-cannot-justify-such-a-drastic-measure-541567</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:32:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Quashes Bank Account Attachment Under GST For Lack Of Tangible Material]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 83 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, provisional attachment, Sections 74 and 122 of the CGST Act, Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, Form GST DRC-22A]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/608674-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-imposes-82-lakh-costs-on-hair-cream-manufacturer-for-breaching-nova-trademark-injunction-541565</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:26:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Imposes ₹82 Lakh Costs On Hair Cream Manufacturer For Breaching 'NOVA' Trademark Injunction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Ashok M. Bhat, NOVA Trademark, Brilliantine Hair Cream, Harichand Nagpal, Ravi Industries, Order XXXIX Rule 2A, Civil Contempt, NONI Label, Artistic Work, Copyright Infringement, Exemplary Costs, Section 35 CPC, Safe Distance Rule, Habitual Counterfeiter, Justice Arif S. Doctor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/16/668015-justice-arif-doctor-and-bombay-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/creditors-can-proceed-against-personal-guarantors-even-without-cirp-against-corporate-debtor-nclat-541564</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:21:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Does Not Require Prior CIRP Against Corporate Debtor To Initiate Guarantor Insolvency: NCLAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Financial Creditor, CIRP, CD]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652482-nclat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-hc-upholds-662-crore-arbitral-award-in-iocl-toyo-engineering-dispute-541562</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:12:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds ₹662 Crore Toyo-L&T Award, Says Contract Interpretation Cannot Be Revisited]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, international commercial arbitration, IOCL, Toyo Engineering, Larsen & Toubro, price adjustment, extension of time, Section 34]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/11/06/442833-justice-amit-bansal-and-delhi-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/telangana-hc-directs-refund-of-10-crore-security-deposit-says-contract-value-cannot-be-altered-after-execution-on-ground-of-tax-exemption-541561</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:10:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[State Cannot Recover Unintended Benefit From Contractor After Accepting Lump Sum Contract: Telangana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[tender document, Central government, excise duties, sales tax, bidders]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687228-telangana-hc-justice-moushumi-bhattacharya-justice-gadi-praveen-kumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-allows-pharma-companys-70-lakh-refund-holds-claim-not-hit-by-unjust-enrichment-541560</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T16:07:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi Allows Pharma Company's ₹70 Lakh Refund, Holds Claim Not Hit By Unjust Enrichment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CA certificate, unjust enrichment, service tax refund, Consumer Welfare Fund, CENVAT credit, Section 11B, CESTAT Delhi, refund claim]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654283-cestat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/cbdt-notifies-oman-social-protection-fund-as-eligible-pension-fund-for-tax-exemption-on-investments-in-india-541556</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T15:49:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Centre Notifies Oman's Social Protection Fund For Tax Exemption On Eligible Investments In India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Social Protection Fund, Oman pension fund, CBDT notification, Income-tax Act 2025, Schedule V, tax exemption, foreign pension fund, S.O. 3890(E)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/09/25/622732-cbdt.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-flags-indian-banks-loss-of-trust-claim-for-replacing-rp-in-nimitiya-hotels-cirp-541555</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T15:41:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Questions Indian Bank's Belated RP Removal Bid, Cites Lack Of Basis For 'Loss Of Trust']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, RP, CIRP, Indian Bank, Nimitaya Hotels]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/26/682495-nclt-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/content-creators-move-delhi-hc-alleging-misuse-of-facebook-edit-post-tool-to-trigger-false-copyright-strikes-541553</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T15:34:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Content Creators Move Delhi HC Alleging Misuse Of Facebook 'Edit Post' Tool To Trigger False Copyright Strikes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Neeraj Joshi, Meta Platforms Inc., Instagram Deactivation, Copyright Infringement, Rights Manager Tool, Extortion, John Doe, Justice Jyoti Singh, IP Logs, BSI Details, Financial Educator, Fraudulent Takedowns, Backdating Mechanism, Commercial Suit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687231-delhi-hc-meta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-minor-admitted-to-benefits-of-partnership-firm-not-liable-for-firm-loan-default-dhruv-hitesh-dattani-rbi-cibil-541543</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T15:00:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Minor Admitted To Partnership Firm's Benefits Not Liable For Firm's Loan Default: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Partnership Act, Minor Admitted to Benefits of Partnership, Section 30(5), Section 42, Partnership Dissolution, Minor Partner Liability, CIBIL Report, Credit Score, Willful Defaulter, Loan Default, Debts Recovery Tribunal, DRT, Bank of India, TransUnion CIBIL, Kerala High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/13/599671-justice-m-a-abdul-hakhim.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/commercial-tax-department-failed-to-consider-the-statutory-composition-scheme-under-the-andhra-pradesh-value-added-tax-vat-act-2005-541542</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T14:37:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Best Judgment Assessment Cannot Ignore VAT Composition Scheme Compliance By Contractor: Telangana HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 4(7)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh VAT Act, VAT returns, best judgment assessment, tax deduction certificates]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687220-justice-p-sam-koshy-justice-narsing-rao-nandikonda-telangana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madhya-pradesh-hc-sets-aside-order-deleting-contractor-from-jindal-steel-counterfeit-tmt-bars-suit-cites-lack-of-notice-to-proposed-suppliers-541540</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T14:26:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MP High Court Sets Aside Deletion Of J.P. Structures From Jindal Steel's Trademark Infringement Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jindal Steel and Power Limited, JP Structures Private Limited, Counterfeit TMT Rebars, Trademark Infringement, Jindal Panther, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Bona Fide Purchaser, Commercial Court Bhopal, Justice Vivek Rusia, Government Medical College Budhni, TMT Bar Counterfeiting, Section 29 Trade Marks Act, Remand Order, MP Building Development Corporation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687214-madhya-pradesh-hc-jindal.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/karnataka-hc-prescribes-six-month-deadline-for-initiating-penalty-proceedings-541538</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T17:25:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T14:08:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Holds S. 271DA Penalty Begins Only With S. 274 Notice, Reads In Six Month Limit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 271DA, Section 275, Section 269ST, penalty proceedings, Joint Commissioner, limitation, Karnataka High Court, Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686988-karnataka-hc-justice-sg-pandit-and-justice-kv.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-issues-notice-in-jiostar-appeal-against-rejection-of-insolvency-plea-against-absolute-legends-541523</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T13:10:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Issues Notice In Jiostar's Appeal Against Rejection Of Insolvency Plea Against Absolute Legends]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Jiostar, Absolute Legends Sports]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687202-nclat-with-jiostar-and-absolute-legends-cricket-league.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-against-tvs-bar-and-restaurant-in-trademark-suit-by-tvs-group-541517</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T12:36:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T12:35:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Restrains Karnataka Bar From Using 'TVS' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, TVS Holdings Limited, TVS Motor Company Limited, TVS Bar and Restaurant, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Copyright Infringement, TVS Trademark, Visual Similarity, Phonetic Similarity, Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, Interim Injunction, Two Wheelers, Motor Oil, Commercial Division]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687185-madras-hc-tvs.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-says-tribunal-cannot-revisit-merits-after-passing-award-541513</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T12:19:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Says Tribunal Cannot Revisit Merits After Passing Award]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, award, clerical Error, ceases, tribunal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/02/653368-justice-harish-vaidyanathan-shankar-delhi-hc-ll-biz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/we-will-try-to-give-fair-and-equal-allocation-ag-tells-supreme-court-in-ethanol-allocation-dispute-541508</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T12:02:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA["We Will Try To Give Fair And Equal Allocation": Centre Tells Supreme Court In Ethanol Allocation Row]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, BPCL, Ethanol Allocation, Karnataka High Court, Status Quo, Oil Marketing Companies, VINP Distilleries]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/687075-whatsapp-image-2026-07-15-at-221907.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-hgpi-chairman-in-post-matric-scholarship-scam-pmla-case-541499</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-16T12:51:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T11:31:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To HGPI Chairman In Post-Matric Scholarship Scam PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[PMLA, ED, Post-Matric Scholarship Scam, Anticipatory Bail, Himachal Pradesh High Court, Rajnish Bansal, Money Laundering]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/687083-whatsapp-image-2026-07-15-at-224827.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-upholds-30-lakh-deposit-forfeiture-over-suppressed-ties-with-ex-management-of-corporate-debtor-541488</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T10:41:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Upholds ₹30 Lakh Deposit Forfeiture Over Suppressed Ties With Ex-Management Of Corporate Debtor]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 60(5) IBC, Resolution Applicant, Committee of Creditors (CoC), Earnest Money Deposit (EMD), Fraudulent Practice under RFRP]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-rejects-resolution-professionals-two-fraudulent-transaction-pleas-in-rcil-insolvency-541479</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T10:23:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Rejects Resolution Professional's Two Fraudulent Transaction Pleas In RCIL Insolvency]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 66 IBC, Fraudulent Trading, Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd. (RCIL), Netizen Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (NEPL), Transaction Audit, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687122-whatsapp-image-2026-07-15-at-183146.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-15-2026-541468</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T09:32:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 15, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658698-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-6.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/calcutta-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-rejecting-20570-crore-claims-against-kmrcl-541467</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-16T09:31:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting ₹205.70 Crore Claims Against KMRCL]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitral Award, Kolkata Metro Rail Corporation (KMRC), East-West Metro, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Calcutta High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687126-whatsapp-image-2026-07-16-at-082904.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-refers-social-house-social-trademark-row-to-mediation-541457</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T21:22:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refers SOCIAL HOUSE-SOCIAL Trademark Row To Mediation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, SOCIAL HOUSE, Vardhaman Choksi, Impresario Entertainment, SOCIAL Trademark, Trademark Rectification, Trademark Squatter, Section 47 Trade Marks Act, Prior User, Non-use, Mediation, J. Sai Deepak, Justice V. Kameswar Rao, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Hospitality Industry]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/13/667347-social-and-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-upholds-confiscation-of-27-kg-undeclared-gold-says-experienced-traveller-knew-customs-rules-541453</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T21:09:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Confiscation of 2.7 kg Undeclared Gold, Says Experienced Traveller Knew Customs Rules]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court gold confiscation, 2.7 kg gold confiscation, undeclared gold India, customs declaration rules India, gold brought from Dubai, Customs Act 1962, Section 108 Customs Act, Delhi airport customs, Justice Anil Kshetarpal, Justice Shail Jain, experienced international traveller customs, gold smuggling case Delhi High Court, customs duty on gold, IGI Airport customs,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-member-anil-agrawal-resigns-after-approximately-three-year-tenure-541440</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-15T19:47:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T19:46:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Member Anil Agrawal Resigns After Nearly Three-Year Tenure]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Anil Agrawal, CCI Member, CCI resignation, Competition Act, antitrust regulator, competition law, consumer welfare, Government of India, fair competition, digital markets, startup ecosystem, public policy, corporate law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/687018-anil-agarwal-cci.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/party-cannot-reopen-maintainability-of-fresh-arbitration-after-challenging-earlier-award-mp-high-court-541437</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T19:35:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Party Cannot Reopen Maintainability Of Fresh Arbitration After Challenging Earlier Award: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Res Judicata, Estoppel, Works Contract, Concession Agreement, Arbitrator Appointment, Judicial Finality, Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/02/14/458967-madhya-pradesh-high-court-jabalpur-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/supreme-court/supreme-court-directs-fanmade11-9stacks-to-pursue-gst-appeal-instead-of-writ-petitions-541433</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T19:21:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Directs FanMade11, 9Stacks To Pursue GST Appeal Instead Of Writ Petitions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, 9Stacks, Online Gaming, Fantasy Sports, Poker, Show Cause Notice, Assessment Order, Statutory Appeal, Gameskraft, Supreme Court.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/01/24/455378-supreme-court-stay-on-karnataka-high-court-judgement-digital-games-on-gameskrafts-platforms-are-not-taxable.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-allows-loreal-to-amend-garnier-bright-complete-suit-to-add-trademark-infringement-plea-541423</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T18:57:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Allows L'Oreal To Amend 'Garnier Bright Complete' Suit To Add Trademark Infringement Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, L'Oreal SA, Garnier Bright Complete, Garuda Bright Complete, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Order VI Rule 17 CPC, Amendment of Plaint, Multiplicity of Proceedings, Justice Jyoti Singh, Subsequent Events, Trade Dress, Cosmetic Products, Commercial Suit, Real Controversy Test]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686994-delhi-hc-booster-serum.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-fresh-cause-of-action-cannot-be-introduced-through-amendment-of-pleadings-541417</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T18:46:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Fresh Cause of Action Cannot Be Introduced Through Amendment To Company Petition: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Rule 155 NCLT Rules, amendment of pleadings, fresh cause of action, Companies Act 2013, oppression and mismanagement, Sections 241 and 242, Order VI Rule 17 CPC, NCLT Rules 2016, company petition, company law, corporate litigation, Vinay Goel, Ravichandran Ramasamy, Media Solutions (I) Private Limited, Biju Scaria, Mangalam]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/26/682495-nclt-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/separate-din-intimation-valid-under-cbdt-circular-541415</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T18:25:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Order Not Invalid If DIN Is Communicated Later Through Separate Intimation: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Document Identification Number, DIN, CBDT Circular No. 19/2019, ITBA, Section 263, Section 144C, Karnataka High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686988-karnataka-hc-justice-sg-pandit-and-justice-kv.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/sarfaesi-action-against-personal-guarantors-can-continue-without-no-pending-ibc-case-telangana-hc-541412</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-15T18:58:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T18:12:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Action Against Personal Guarantors Can Continue Without No Pending IBC Case: Telangana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana HC, SARFAESI, Guarantor]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/687003-telangana-hc-justice-moushumi-bhattacharya-justice-gadi-praveen-kumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-cancels-zora-trademark-registration-holds-it-deceptively-similar-to-zara-541409</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-15T17:49:50+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T17:49:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Cancels 'ZORA' Trademark, Holds It Deceptively Similar To Well-Known ZARA Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Industria De Diseno Textil, ZARA Trademark, ZORA Mark, Section 11(2), Well-Known Trademark, Trademark Dilution, Anti-dissection Rule, Phonetic Similarity, Class 24, Registrar of Trade Marks, Fashion Retail, Aggarwal Bag House, Justice Jyoti Singh, Brand Reputation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/24/658028-zara-and-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/kvat-revision-orders-must-be-passed-within-five-years-of-order-sought-to-be-revised-karnataka-high-court-541398</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-15T18:00:31+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T17:30:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[KVAT Revision Orders Must Be Passed Within Five Years Of Order Sought To Be Revised: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 64 KVAT Act, suo motu revision, limitation, Karnataka High Court, revisional powers, reasonable period, sales tax, KVAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686988-karnataka-hc-justice-sg-pandit-and-justice-kv.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/liquidators-sale-of-shell-entity-of-corporate-debtor-cannot-be-questioned-if-approved-after-creditor-consultation-nclat-541395</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T17:22:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Liquidator's Sale Of Corporate Debtor's Shell Entity Valid After Creditor Consultation: NCLAT New Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Shell Entity of Corporate Debtor, Liquidation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652483-nclat-05.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-temporarily-restrains-kongu-elite-matrimony-in-trademark-suit-by-matrimony-dot-com-541389</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T17:04:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Holds 'KONGU ELITE MATRIMONY' Infringes 'ELITE MATRIMONY' Mark, Grants Injunction]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Matrimony.com Limited, ELITE MATRIMONY, Kongu Elite Matrimony, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Online Matchmaking, Intellectual Property, Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, Ad-Interim Injunction, Domain Name, Social Media Handle, Unfair Competition, Dilution of Goodwill]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686933-madras-hc-matrimony.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-misuse-of-writ-petitions-to-unfreeze-money-mule-accounts-must-be-curbed-sinana-farvin-kerala-gramin-bank-541386</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T16:57:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Warns Against Misuse Of Writ Petitions By “Money Mule” Account Holders]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice M.A. Abdul Hakhim, money mule accounts, cyber fraud, financial cyber fraud, frozen bank account, bank account freezing, unfreezing bank account, writ petition, Article 226, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Section 111 BNS, FIR, cybercrime, cryptocurrency, USDT, Binance, Kerala Gramin Bank, National Cybercrime Reporting Portal, cyber law, banking law, digital fraud, financial fraud, money laundering, mule accounts]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/05/13/599671-justice-m-a-abdul-hakhim.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/by-executing-the-amendment-agreement-the-lessee-did-not-gain-any-new-property-or-extra-rights-541381</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T16:44:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Holds Lease Area Reduction Cannot Attract Fresh Stamp Duty, Orders ₹1.15 Cr Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Fresh Lease, Tata Communications Data Centers Pvt. Ltd., Indian Stamp Act, amendment agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686923-madras-high-court-with-chief-justice-sushrut-arvind-dharmadhikari-and-justice-g-arul-murugan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-adjudicating-authority-not-obliged-to-call-for-further-documents-if-material-on-record-found-insufficient-delhi-high-court-rejects-sodexos-plea-541379</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-15T16:35:48+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-15T16:35:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Adjudicating Authority Not Bound To Seek Additional Documents Before Passing Order: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court GST judgment, GST adjudicating authority, GST authority additional documents, GST natural justice, Section 74 CGST Act, Section 107 CGST appeal, Delhi HC Sodexo GST case, GST writ petition, GST demand challenge, GST appellate remedy, adjudicating authority GST, composite supply GST, Article 226 GST, GST audit proceedings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
