<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/delhi-high-court-orders-winding-up-of-paytm-payments-bank-on-rbis-plea-appoints-official-liquidator-543271</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T21:02:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Winding Up of Paytm Payments Bank On RBI Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Paytm Payments Bank, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Banking Regulation Act, Winding Up, Official Liquidator, Banking Licence Cancellation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/690004-whatsapp-image-2026-07-28-at-204055.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-approves-amalgamation-go-digit-holding-company-with-go-digit-general-insurance-merger-543265</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:44:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Approves Proposed Merger Of Go Digit Holding Company With Go Digit General Insurance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, CCI Approval, Go Digit General Insurance Limited, Go Digit Infoworks Services Private Limited, Amalgamation, Merger Approval, Combination, Competition Act, Corporate Restructuring, Holding Company, General Insurance, Health Insurance, Insurance Sector, Competition Law, Internal Restructuring]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683849-cci1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-electricity-dues-must-be-recovered-in-liquidation-not-from-auction-purchaser-kerala-state-electricity-board-543264</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:42:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[KSEB Cannot Demand Previous Owner's Power Dues From Auction Purchaser: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB), Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Arrears, Fresh Electricity Connection, Previous Consumer's Dues, Auction Purchaser, Company in Liquidation, Company Court Auction, Official Liquidator, Liquidation Proceedings, Unsecured Creditor, Recovery of Electricity Dues, Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2005, KSEB Terms and Conditions of Supply, 2005, Regulation 19, Statutory Charge, Encumbrance-Free Sale, Winding Up Proceedings, Company Law, Insolvency, Electricity Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/30/683135-kerala-high-court-with-justice-ak-jayasankaran-nambiar-and-justice-preeta-ak.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-admits-appeal-on-taxability-of-demonetisation-era-cash-deposits-543259</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:16:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Admits Appeal On Taxability Of Demonetisation-Era Cash Deposits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Department, ITAT, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Section 69A, Section 115BBE, demonetisation cash deposits, unexplained cash deposits, income tax appeal, tax department appeal, cash deposits during demonetisation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-stays-draft-tax-assessment-order-against-american-express-admits-transfer-pricing-appeal-543257</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T20:10:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Stays Draft Assessment Order Against American Express, Admits Transfer Pricing Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[American Express, Delhi High Court, transfer pricing, income tax appeal, Bright Line Test, BLT, Transfer Pricing Officer, TPO, draft assessment order, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ITAT, transfer pricing adjustment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/registrar-cannot-delete-mark-without-issuing-expiry-notice-kerala-high-court-quashes-removal-of-trademark-543256</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:59:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Trade Marks Registry Cannot Remove Trademark Without Mandatory Notice: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Justice Shoba Annamma Eapen, Kerala High Court, S. Prasannan, Trademark, VIC Trademark, Water Level Controllers, Section 25(3) Trade Marks Act, Rule 58 Trade Marks Rules, Mandatory Notice, Trademark Renewal, Vayalar Invention Centre, Controller General of Patents, Intellectual Property, Writ of Mandamus, Registrar of Trademarks, Removal of Mark]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/03/02/370812-kerala-high-court-011.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-uttarakhand-university-from-using-maharaja-agrasen-name-in-trademark-suit-543254</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:42:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Uttarakhand University From Using 'Maharaja Agrasen' Name In Trademark Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Maharaja Agrasen Technical Educational Society, MATES, Maharaja Agrasen Himalayan Garhwal University, MAHGU, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Class 41, Education Sector, Deceptive Similarity, Justice Jyoti Singh, Maharaja Agrasen University, MAU, MAIMS, MAIT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689963-delhi-hc-maharaja-university.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/director-must-prove-he-was-not-responsible-for-companys-unpaid-vat-kerala-high-court-543251</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T19:28:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:28:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Director Must Prove He Was Not Responsible For Company's Unpaid VAT: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 39 of the KVAT Act, recovery proceedings, non-recovery, misfeasance, breach of duty]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/09/685435-the-honourable-mr-justice-devan-ramachandran-the-honourable-mr-justice-basant-balaji.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-admits-insolvency-plea-bse-listed-pradhin-limited-operational-creditor-tatad-nayan-543250</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:17:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chennai Admits Insolvency Plea Against Pradhin Limited Over ₹12.98 Crore Default]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Section 7 IBC, NCLT Chennai, Pradhin Limited, BSE-listed company, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP, Financial Creditor, Financial Debt, Default, Unsecured Loan, NeSL Record of Default, Admission of Insolvency Petition, Interim Resolution Professional, IRP, Section 14 Moratorium, Rajesh Jasti, Innoventive Industries v. ICICI Bank, Acknowledgement of Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/cenvat-credit-cannot-be-denied-solely-because-running-account-bills-are-not-invoices-cestat-delhi-543249</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:13:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied Solely Because Running Account Bills Are Not Invoices: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajasthan Housing Board, CENVAT credit, running account bills, Rule 9 Cenvat Credit Rules, Rule 4A Service Tax Rules, reverse charge, service tax, CESTAT New Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654283-cestat-04.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-penalty-order-passed-beyond-seven-days-of-show-cause-notice-is-invalid-jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-543248</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T19:03:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T19:03:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Penalty Order Passed Beyond 7 Days Of Show Cause Notice Is Invalid: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 129(3) GST, GST Penalty, J&K GST Act, Jammu & Kashmir High Court, Detention of Goods, Seizure of Goods, GST Proceedings, Penalty Order, Mandatory Timeline, Seven-Day Limitation, Show Cause Notice, GST Enforcement, Fiscal Statute, Statutory Interpretation, Detention and Seizure, Goods in Transit, State Tax Department, Writ Petition, Procedural Compliance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/07/24/378808-jammu-and-kashmir-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-ahmedabad-elevator-parts-maker-from-using-volvo-mark-in-trademark-infringement-suit-543246</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T18:52:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Ahmedabad Firm From Using VOLVO Trademark For Elevator Parts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Aktiebolaget Volvo, Shree Vishwakarma Engineering Works, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Well-known Trademark, Class 07, Elevator Components, Coined Word, Deceptive Similarity, Dilution, Justice Jyoti Singh, Swedish Automotive Group, Ex-parte Injunction, Intellectual Property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689947-delhi-hc-volvo.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera-adjudicating-officer-cannot-award-interest-while-enforcing-refund-order-madhya-pradesh-high-court-543244</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T18:44:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[RERA Adjudicating Officer Cannot Award Interest While Enforcing Refund Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh High Court, MP High Court, Justice Milind Ramesh Phadke, M/s Jetal Construction Private Limited, Real Estate Regulatory Authority, RERA, Adjudicating Officer, Section 71 RERA, homebuyer refund, refund of booking amount, interest on refund, compensation under RERA, RERA jurisdiction, Regulatory Authority powers, Adjudicating Officer powers, Recovery Certificate, recovery proceedings, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, Section 40 RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689953-justice-milind-ramesh-phadke-madhya-pradesh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-dismisses-parle-appeal-in-20-20-trademark-dispute-rules-prior-applicant-cannot-be-ousted-by-subsequent-user-543242</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T18:16:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Dismisses Parle's Appeal Against Rival Biscuit Maker's '20-20' Trademark Registration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Parle Products, 20-20 Trademark, Section 18 Trade Marks Act, First to File, Proposed to Use, Neon Laboratories, Mohan Goldwater, Prior User, Registration Priority, Approbate and Reprobate, Class 30, Biscuits, Registrar of Trade Marks, Division Bench, Justice V. Kameswar Rao, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689958-20-20-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-calcutta-hc-order-on-iibis-221-crore-preference-share-redemption-543233</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T17:55:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Calcutta HC Order On IIBI's ₹221 Crore Preference Share Redemption]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Industrial Investment Bank of India (IIBI), Preference Shares, Companies Act 1956, Section 106, Shareholder Rights, Calcutta High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689936-sc-iibi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/telangana-high-court/telangana-high-court-refuses-quash-first-information-report-srei-equipments-finance-limited-forgery-allegations-require-investigation-543225</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T17:18:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against SREI, Says Forgery Allegations Require Investigation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telangana High Court, SREI Equipment Finance Ltd, FIR quashing, Section 528 BNSS, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Forgery, Fabrication of documents, Falsification of accounts, Cheating, Criminal conspiracy, Deed of Personal Guarantee, Deed of Hypothecation, One Time Settlement, OTS, Janapriya Engineers Syndicate Pvt Ltd, SARFAESI Act, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, NCLT, Doctrine of indoor management]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689949-justice-j-sreenivas-rao.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-income-tax-prosecution-after-finding-assessee-was-entitled-to-refund-says-continuing-criminal-case-would-be-abuse-of-process-543221</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T17:03:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution For Late ITR Filing As Taxpayer Entitled To Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Justice Madhav J. Jamdar, Income Tax Act 1961, Section 276CC, Section 148, Income Tax Return, Failure to Furnish Return, Criminal Prosecution, Quashing of Criminal Complaint, Tax Refund, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), Reassessment Proceedings, Wilful Default, Abuse of Process of Law, Guru Nanak Enterprises, Income Tax Officer, Assessment Year 2014-15, Economic Offences, Direct Tax, Criminal Writ Petition, BNSS, Section 528 BNSS, Refund after Assessment, Tax Litigation, Criminal Tax Prosecution.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689911-bombay-high-court-justice-madhav-jamdar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/karnataka-rera-penalises-developer-7-lakh-says-non-disclosure-of-pending-lawsuit-before-sale-deed-caused-mental-agony-to-homebuyers-543219</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:56:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA Directs Thills To Pay ₹7 Lakh For Concealing Land Litigation From Homebuyers]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA, K-RERA, pending litigation disclosure, suppression of material fact, promoter liability, homebuyer compensation, mental agony, opportunity cost, Tivoli Hills Phase 3, Thills, Jaganmata Property Developers Private Limited, Puravankara Limited, Ashish Choudhary, Neha Mallik, residential plot dispute, Devanahalli, sale deed, homebuyer rights, RERA compensation, real estate litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654497-rera-karnataka.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/supreme-court/itc-can-be-denied-to-purchaser-if-supplier-fails-to-pay-tax-supreme-court-upholds-s162c-of-cgst-act-543218</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:52:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITC Can Be Denied To Buyer If Supplier Fails To Pay Tax: Supreme Court Upholds S.16(2)(c) Of CGST Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Input Tax Credit, ITC, Section 16(2)(c), CGST Act, Supreme Court, Gujarat High Court, GST litigation, GST compliance, supplier tax payment, purchaser ITC, bona fide purchaser, constitutional validity, GST law, indirect tax, tax litigation, Section 41 CGST Act, GSTR-2B, GSTR-3B, GST credit, Justice Sanjay Kumar, Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, Bhandari Scrap Traders, Union of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689922-itc-conditional-on-supplier-paying-gst-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-for-rubamins-zinc-and-copper-business-demerger-543210</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:29:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion For Rubamin's Zinc And Copper Business Demerger]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Rubamin IGNISS Private Limited, Rubamin Private Limited, Demerger]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689927-nclt-ahemdabad-rubamin-private-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/forensic-audit-report-not-a-conclusive-proof-for-establishing-fraudulent-trading-without-rps-independent-opinion-nclt-ahmedabad-543208</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:21:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Forensic Audit Report Alone Cannot Prove Fraudulent Trading Under IBC Section 66: NCLT Ahmedabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Fraudulent Trading, Forensic Audit Report]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655534-nclt-ahmedabad-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-chennai-time-barred-debt-does-not-deprive-creditor-right-seek-investigation-company-affairs-543206</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:12:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Time-Barred Claim Does Not Disqualify Creditor From Seeking Probe Into Company's Affairs: NCLT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 213 Companies Act, Investigation into company affairs, Limitation, Time-barred debt, Creditor status, NCLT Chennai, ETA Engineering, Electro Trade, Fraud investigation, Section 447 Companies Act, MSME dues, Statutory non-compliance, Registrar of Companies, Financial statements, Annual General Meeting, Insolvency proceedings, Exclusive Capital Ltd. v. Kanta Agarwala, Corporate fraud]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/19/681132-nclt-poster.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/pmla/high-court/bombay-high-court-quashes-pmla-case-against-db-realty-md-vinod-goenka-company-in-chhagan-bhujbal-case-543205</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T16:14:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T16:02:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes PMLA Case Against DB Realty, MD In Case Linked To Ex-Minister Chhagan Bhujbal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Chhagan Bhujbal, PMLA, Vinod Goenka, DB Realty, Proceeds of Crime, Vijay Madanlal Choudhary]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689934-bombay-high-court-db-reality1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/revenue-cannot-deny-tax-concession-without-withdrawing-government-notification-543198</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T15:45:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Upholds Mayuri Film's Tax Benefit, Says Unrescinded Notification Can't Be Overridden]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[G.O.Ms. No. 252 dated May 19 1995, Section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act 1957, electronic goods, Entry 10 of the First Schedule to the APGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689913-telangana-hc-mayuri-film-distributors.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-kolkata-quashes-706-crore-excise-demand-says-psu-appellant-cannot-be-alleged-to-have-acted-mala-fide-543197</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T15:45:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata Quashes ₹7.06 Crore Excise Demand, Says PSU Appellant Cannot Be Alleged To Have Acted Mala Fide]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Neelachal Ispat Nigam, clandestine removal, eye estimation, stock shortage, central excise demand, PSU, extended limitation, CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654305-cestat-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/merely-reproducing-parties-pleadings-does-not-make-a-reasoned-arbitral-award-remand-means-fresh-application-of-mind-madras-high-court-543193</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T15:33:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside Land Compensation Award, Says Arbitrator Must Give Reasons After Remand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitral Award, Reasoned Award, Speaking Award, Duty to Give Reasons, Independent Application of Mind, Remand, Fresh Consideration, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Land Acquisition, National Highways Act, Section 3G, Market Value, Comparable Sale Deed, Sale Deed No. 1181 of 2005, Compensation Enhancement, Patent Illegality, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Section 37 Arbitration Act, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, Land Acquisition Compensation, Solatium, Interest, Koyambedu Land Acquisition, Chennai Land Acquisition, Reasoned Decision, Arbitral Tribunal, Comparable Sales Method, Madras High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-orders-meta-to-share-user-details-ip-logs-in-suit-over-fake-copyright-strikes-543189</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T15:04:33+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T15:03:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Meta To Share User Details, IP Logs In Suit Over Fake Copyright Strikes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Mohammed Nawaz Shaikh, Meta Platforms Inc, Instagram, Copyright, Copyright Reporting Architecture, Fake Copyright Strikes, John Doe, Extortion, Digital Content Creator, Account Suspension, Basic Subscriber Information, IP Logs, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre-litigation Mediation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689897-delhi-hc-meta-insta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-department-must-specify-grounds-for-misreporting-before-levying-penalty-543188</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T15:02:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Quashes ₹13.48 Cr Misreporting Penalty On Ennore Tank Terminals For Vague Notice]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, M/s Ennore Tank Terminals Private Limited, Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689883-ennore-tank-terminals-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/high-court/computer-graphics-ltd-cannot-avail-cenvat-credit-on-duty-adjusted-through-depb-scrips-543186</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T14:49:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit Not Available On DEPB Scrip-Based Duty Payment Before 31 August 2004: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[DEPB Scrips, Customs Duty, Foreign Trade Policy, Central Excise Rules 2002]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689869-computer-graphics-ltd-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-seeks-centre-metas-reply-on-pil-alleging-misuse-of-instagram-copyright-strike-mechanism-543184</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T14:30:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Seeks Centre, Meta's Reply On PIL Alleging Misuse Of Instagram Copyright Strike Mechanism]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Nitin Joshi, Delhi High Court, Meta Platforms, copyright, Instagram copyright strikes, cyber extortion, fraudulent copyright complaints, content creator PIL, digital livelihood, automated enforcement, creator economy, IT Rules 2021, Justice V Kameswar Rao, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, account suspension scam, copyright blackmail, public interest litigation, SIT investigation, significant social media intermediary, arbitrary account disabling, and cybercrime racket]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689897-delhi-hc-meta-insta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-holds-consortium-lenders-noc-cannot-extinguish-co-lenders-equal-ranking-charge-orders-rs-514-crore-restoration-543183</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T14:26:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Holds Consortium Lender Cannot Defeat Co-Creditor's Charge, Rejects SBI's Mortgage Release]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, NOC, Pari Passu Charge]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/11/655532-nclt-ahmedabad-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/nclt-mumbai-dues-owed-by-separate-corporate-debtors-cannot-be-clubbed-to-meet-1-crore-threshold-under-section-7-ibc-543176</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T14:10:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Separate Corporate Debtors' Defaults Cannot Be Combined To Meet ₹1 Crore IBC Threshold: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai, Corporate Debtor, IBC,NCLT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652554-nclt-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/multiple-statutory-remedies-cannot-be-clubbed-in-a-single-writ-petition-parties-must-approach-their-respective-forums-madras-high-court-543171</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T13:44:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Homebuyer Can't Club Distinct Disputes In One Writ, Must Approach Competent Forums: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[writ jurisdiction, homebuyer dispute, RERA, Consumer Protection Act, SARFAESI Act, statutory remedy, specialised forum, maintainability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686923-madras-high-court-with-chief-justice-sushrut-arvind-dharmadhikari-and-justice-g-arul-murugan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-asks-nclat-to-expedite-appeal-against-ccis-rejection-of-antitrust-complaint-against-aveva-543168</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T13:19:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Asks NCLAT To Expedite Appeal Against CCI's Rejection Of Antitrust Complaint Against AVEVA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India (CCI), National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Competition Act, 2002, Section 53B(5), AVEVA Group Ltd., CT Infotech India Pvt Ltd, Supreme Court, Velusamy Karuppannan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689789-whatsapp-image-2026-07-28-at-074152.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-upholds-arbitral-award-relies-on-registered-lease-deed-over-oral-claim-543165</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T13:00:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Relies On Registered Lease Deed Over Oral Claim Of Joint Venture]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Section 34, Section 17, Partial Arbitral Award, Lease Deed, Registered Lease, Lessor-Lessee Relationship, Hospital Lease, Possession, Oral Collaboration, Joint Venture, Indian Evidence Act, Admissions, Clause 10.4, Delhi High Court.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689857-delhi-hc-justice-om-prakash-shukla.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-reserves-orders-in-punjab-minister-sanjeev-aroras-bail-plea-on-medical-grounds-in-pmla-case-543163</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T12:26:37+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T12:24:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Reserves Orders In Punjab Minister Sanjeev Arora's Bail Plea On Medical grounds In PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sanjeev Arora, PMLA Act, Supreme Court, AIIMS Medical Report, Bail Plea, Punjab & Haryana High Court, AAP Minister]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/689006-whatsapp-image-2026-07-23-at-220357.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/cgst-act-has-no-provision-to-exempt-mandatory-pre-deposit-for-appeal-delhi-high-court-543154</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T11:53:00+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T11:52:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CGST Act Has No Provision To Exempt Mandatory Pre-Deposit For Appeal: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, CGST Act, GST appeal, GST appeal pre-deposit, mandatory pre-deposit, GST registration cancellation, GST registration, Section 107 CGST Act, Input Tax Credit, ITC, statutory appeal, GST litigation, natural justice, GST show cause notice, GST appellate authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-asks-vat-officer-to-decide-voltas-179-crore-refund-claim-within-two-weeks-543152</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T11:34:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T11:32:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Asks VAT Officer To Decide Voltas' ₹1.79 Crore Refund Claim Within Two Weeks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Voltas Limited, Voltas VAT refund, VAT refund, Delhi VAT, Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, VAT Officer, tax refund, indirect tax, commercial tax, writ petition, tax litigation, Delhi tax dispute, FY 2017-18]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-bail-to-former-reliance-power-cfo-ashok-pal-in-6820-crore-pmla-case-543147</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T11:14:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses Bail To Former Reliance Power CFO Ashok Pal In ₹68.20 Crore PMLA Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ashok Kumar Pal, Solar Energy Corporation of India, Reliance Power, Directorate of Enforcement, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), Forged Bank Guarantees, Battery Energy Storage System]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683805-whatsapp-image-2026-07-02-at-160927.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/income-tax-delhi-high-court-to-examine-if-section-153-limitation-governs-final-assessment-orders-under-section-144c-543132</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T10:46:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court To Examine If Limitation For Income Tax Assessments Applies To Final Orders Passed Under DRP Procedure]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 153, Section 144C, Income Tax Act, Dispute Resolution Panel, DRP, final assessment order, limitation period, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ITAT, income tax assessment, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/mandatory-75-customs-appeal-pre-deposit-cannot-be-waived-or-reduced-delhi-high-court-543128</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T11:54:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T10:23:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mandatory 7.5% Customs Appeal Pre-Deposit Cannot Be Waived Or Reduced: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Act, Section 129E, CESTAT, Customs Appeals, Mandatory Pre-Deposit, 7.5% Pre-Deposit, Customs Litigation, Indirect Tax, Tax Litigation, Customs Law, Customs Duty, Customs Authorities, Appeal Before CESTAT, Waiver of Pre-Deposit, Reduction of Pre-Deposit, CESTAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/supreme-court/taxpayer-cannot-claim-pharma-samples-removed-for-testing-were-not-marketable-without-maintaining-records-supreme-court-543125</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T14:52:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T10:08:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Upholds Excise Duty On Pharmaceutical Samples Removed For Testing Over Record-Keeping Lapse]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Central Excise, Excise Duty, Pharmaceutical Samples, Quality Control Testing, In-house Testing, Laboratory Testing, Marketability, Home Consumption, Removal of Samples, Test Samples, Non-maintenance of Records, Statutory Records, CBEC Supplementary Instructions, Rule 11, Daily Stock Account, Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 35G, ITC Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689910-supreme-court-upholds-excise-duty-on-pharmaceutical-samples.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/uncitral-next-60-years-will-be-about-inclusive-tech-responsive-commercial-law-ag-r-venkatramani-543122</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-28T10:27:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T09:31:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[UNCITRAL's Next 60 Years Will Be About Inclusive, Tech-Responsive Commercial Law: AG R. Venkatramani]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[UNCITRAL, Arbitration, Mediation, Rule of Law, International Trade Law, Commercial Law, Cross-Border Disputes, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Attorney General R. Venkatramani, International Commerce, Global Trade, Technology and Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689806-attorney-general-r-venkatramani.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ipr-weekly-digest-july-20-july-26-2026-543120</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T09:12:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IPR Weekly Digest: July 20 - July 26, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz, IPR, Weekly Digest, LiveLaw]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/23/663198-weekly-round-up-ipr-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-27-2026-543115</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-28T08:01:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 27, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-july-20-july-26-2026-543100</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T21:07:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: July 20 - July 26, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Digest, Indirect Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652650-weekly-digest-indirect-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/court-can-revive-arbitration-even-after-arbitrators-mandate-ends-jk-high-court-543095</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T20:37:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitration Can Be Revived Even After Arbitrator's Mandate Ends: Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration, extension of time, arbitral mandate, Section 29-A, delayed award, revival of arbitration, Jammu and Kashmir High Court, sole arbitrator]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/28/670439-justice-sanjay-dhar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/ibc-moratorium-applies-only-to-corporate-debtor-not-directors-or-promoters-supreme-court-543092</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T20:15:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IBC Moratorium Applies Only To Corporate Debtor, Not Directors Or Promoters: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Section 14 IBC, Corporate Debtor, Moratorium, Consumer Complaint, Homebuyers]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689731-whatsapp-image-2026-07-27-at-185255.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/gauhati-high-court-quashes-income-tax-reassessment-after-ao-cites-paucity-of-time-for-not-verifying-transactions-543090</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T20:10:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gauhati High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment After AO Cites 'Paucity of Time' For Not Verifying Transactions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Reassessment; Section 147; Section 148; Section 151; Reason to Believe; Insight Portal; Bogus LTCG; Long-Term Capital Gain; Penny Stock; Mechanical Approval; Application of Mind; Fishing Inquiry; Roving Inquiry; Reopening of Assessment; Jurisdiction.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652628-gauhati-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/parties-cannot-invoke-arbitration-beyond-agreed-contractual-limits-bombay-high-court-543085</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T19:27:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Parties Cannot Invoke Arbitration Beyond Agreed Contractual Limits: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration agreement, redevelopment dispute, cooperative housing society, parking spaces, Section 11, contractual interpretation, arbitration clause, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689100-bombay-hc-justice-arun-r-pednekar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-july-20-july-26-2026-543082</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T19:17:05+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T19:16:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: July 20 - July 26, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tax Weekly Digest Tax Digest, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652649-weekly-digest-direct-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/karnataka-apartment-bill-gives-flat-owners-ownership-rights-over-project-land-543080</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T18:52:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka Apartment Bill Gives Flat Owners Ownership Rights Over Project Land]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2025; Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972; Karnataka Ownership Flats Act, 1972; Apartment Ownership; Common Areas and Facilities; Project Land; Undivided Interest; Apartment Owners' Associations; Floor Area Ratio (FAR); Floor Space Index (FSI); Development Rights; Parking Rights; Real Estate Law; Karnataka Property Law; Housing Legislation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689709-karnataka-apartment-ownership-and-management-bill-2025.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/centres-order-to-change-similar-company-name-cant-be-invalid-because-it-was-triggered-by-complaint-delhi-high-court-543079</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T19:50:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T18:39:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Centre's Order To Change Similar Company Name Can't Be Invalid Because It Was Triggered By Complaint: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, DNA Forensics Test Solutions, DNA Forensics Laboratory, Section 16(1)(a), Section 16(1)(b), Companies Act 2013, Change of Name, Regional Director, Suo Motu Power, Jurisdictional Challenge, Deceptive Similarity, DNA Testing Industry, Justice Anish Dayal, Rectification of Name, M/S T.T. Ltd v. Union of India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689712-delhi-high-court-justice-anish-dayal.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-additional-written-statement-order-viii-rule-9-civil-procedure-code-not-maintainable-commercial-suits-543077</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T18:22:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Says Parties Can't Seek Leave To File Additional Written Statements In Commercial Suits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Justice Abdul Quddhose, Commercial Courts Act, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Order VIII Rule 9 CPC, Code of Civil Procedure, Additional Written Statement, Commercial Suit, Commercial Court, Section 151 CPC, Inherent Powers, Written Statement, 120-Day Limit, Speedy Disposal, Civil Procedure, Inspection of Documents, Production of Documents, Forgery Plea, Sri Gokulam Hospital Pvt Ltd, Canadian Crystalline Water India Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/06/08/376061-justice-abdul-quddhose.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/ex-gratia-payment-under-pfizer-vrs-is-capital-receipt-not-taxable-as-income-from-other-sources-itat-pune-543076</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T18:10:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Ex-Gratia Payment Under Pfizer VRS Is Capital Receipt, Not Taxable as Income From Other Sources: ITAT Pune]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 56(2)(xi); Section 17(3); Section 89; Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS); Ex Gratia Compensation; Severance Pay; Capital Receipt; Income from Other Sources; Voluntary Retirement; Termination of Employment; Enhancement by CIT(A); Taxability of Employment Compensation; Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd.; Assessment Year 2019-20; ITAT Pune; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal; Loss of Employment; Salary Income; Direct Tax; Tax Litigation.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652643-income-tax.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/vedanta-oil-block-contract-extension-delhi-high-court-asks-centre-to-clarify-if-rejection-was-a-policy-decision-543071</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T17:55:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Vedanta Oil Block Contract Extension: Delhi High Court Asks Centre To Clarify If Rejection Was A Policy Decision]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vedanta Ltd., Delhi High Court, Production Sharing Contract (PSC), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas (MoPNG), ONGC, Extension Policy, CB/OS-2 Block]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689529-whatsapp-image-2026-07-25-at-192707.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-upholds-injunction-against-dynafresh-in-trademark-dispute-with-anchors-dyna-543070</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T17:42:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Injunction Against 'DYNAFRESH' In Trademark Dispute With Anchor's 'DYNA']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Anchor Consumer Products, Jagdish Dahyalal Patel, DYNA, DYNAFRESH, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Deceptive Similarity, Material Suppression, Registrar of Trademarks, Bona Fide Adoption, Ex-parte Injunction, Division Bench, User Claim, Commercial Appeal, Justice V. Kameswar Rao, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689700-delhi-hc-dyna.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/ms-vestige-marketing-cannot-claim-lower-vat-by-reclassifying-food-supplements-as-ayurvedic-medicines-543065</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T17:27:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds 14.5% VAT On Vestige's Food Supplements, Rejects Ayurvedic Medicine Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Food Supplements, Central Sales Tax, Puducherry Value Added Tax Act, inter-State purchases]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689681-vestige-marketing-private-limited-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-allahabad-sanctions-india-glycols-demerger-of-biopharma-spirits-biofuel-businesses-543062</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T17:20:38+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T17:20:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad Sanctions India Glycols' Demerger Of Biopharma, Spirits & Biofuel Businesses]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad, India Glycols Limited, Ennature Bio Pharma Limited, IGL Spirits Limited, Demerger]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689615-nclt-allahabad-india-glycols-ennature-bio-pharma.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/andhra-pradesh-high-court-directs-gst-authorities-to-drop-proceedings-over-expired-e-way-bill-finds-no-tax-evasion-543060</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T17:02:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Detention Over Expired E-Way Bill After Vehicle Breakdown]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 129 of the GST Act, detention order, Form GST MOV-06]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689680-justice-t-c-d-sekhar-t-c-d-sekhar-andhra-pradesh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-imposes-30-lakh-penalty-orders-disgorgement-life-insurance-corporation-front-running-case-543057</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:56:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Imposes ₹30 Lakh Penalty On Madhav Stock Vision And Others For Front Running LIC Trades]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, SEBI order, Madhav Stock Vision Pvt Ltd, MSVPL, LIC, Life Insurance Corporation of India, front running, front-running case, securities market, PFUTP Regulations, SEBI Act, non-public information, insider trading, disgorgement, market manipulation, proprietary trading, Amarjeet Singh, Whole Time Member SEBI, securities law, stock broker, capital markets]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-rejects-elite-designs-143-cr-insolvency-plea-against-colorbar-over-pre-existing-dispute-543056</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:43:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Rejects Elite Design's ₹1.43 Cr Insolvency Plea Against Colorbar Over Pre-Existing Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Colorbar Cosmetics Private Limited, Elite Design Private Limited, Insolvency Plea]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689616-nclt-delhi-colorbar-cosmetics.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/ex-director-of-company-in-liquidation-liable-for-unpaid-gst-if-recovery-from-company-fails-543051</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:25:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds ₹2.66 Cr GST Recovery Against Former Director Of CBIGS Advertising]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 88(3) of the GST Act, Bank Attachment, Rule 145 of the GST Rules, Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689652-cbigs-apparels-and-jewels-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-grants-hbo-injunction-against-30-rogue-websites-prescribes-process-for-blocking-mirror-sites-543049</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T16:24:02+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:23:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants HBO Temporary Injunction Against 30 Rogue Websites In Copyright Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Home Box Office, HBO, Streamzy.to, Copyright Infringement, Rogue Websites, Dynamic Injunction, Digital Piracy, Internet Service Providers, DNR, MeitY, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Technical Verification, Mirror Websites, Movie Streaming]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689672-delhi-hc-hbo.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-rejects-jindals-insolvency-plea-against-kunal-structure-notes-debt-claim-inflated-by-disputed-lc-charges-543043</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:10:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Dismisses Jindal's Insolvency Plea Against Kunal Structure For Failing IBC Threshold]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Jindal India, CIRP, Kunal Structure (India) Private Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689617-nclt-ahmedabad-jindal-india-and-kunal-structure.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat-grants-relief-to-chanel-india-by-quashing-reassessment-and-deleting-308-crore-tp-adjustment-543041</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T16:09:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:08:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment Against Chanel India, Deletes ₹3.08 Crore Transfer Pricing Adjustment]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Chanel India, transfer pricing, subsidy income, operating income, reassessment, change of opinion, TNMM, ITAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689645-itat-chanel.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-mumbai-book-entry-cannot-decide-true-nature-of-transaction-reimbursement-of-actual-expenses-not-liable-for-tds-543040</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T16:08:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Book Entry Can't Decide Transaction Nature, Reimbursement Of Expenses Not Liable For TDS: ITAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[TDS, Tax Deduction at Source, Section 194J, Section 40(a)(ia), Section 37(1), Reimbursement of Expenses, Professional Fees, Common Expenditure, Income Element, Nomenclature in Books of Account, Books of Account, Nature of Transaction, Legal Expenses, Container Shipping Line Association (CSLA), Mercantile System of Accounting, Disallowance of Expenditure, ITAT Mumbai, Maersk India Private Limited.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679645-itat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-permits-electrotherm-to-reissue-109-cr-redeemable-preference-shares-to-consenting-shareholders-543028</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T15:41:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows Electrotherm To Reissue Preference Shares Due To Lack Of Redemption Profits]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Electrotherm India, Non-Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/27/689618-nclt-ahmedabad-electrotherm-india.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/scanned-signed-arbitral-award-sent-by-email-is-valid-delivery-triggers-section-34-limitation-delhi-high-court-543022</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T15:23:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Email Delivery Of Scanned Signed Arbitral Award Starts Limitation For Challenge: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award , Limitation, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652671-delhi-high-court-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/impleadment-plea-cant-be-rejected-because-locus-standi-was-challenged-before-it-nclt-bengaluru-543017</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T15:14:00+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T15:02:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Impleadment Plea Can't Be Rejected Because Locus Standi Was Challenged Before It: NCLT Bengaluru]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Bengaluru, Locus Standi Objection,  Adjudication,NCLT,IBC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/22/681620-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/foreign-arbitral-award-cant-be-refused-enforcement-on-ground-that-tribunal-ignored-a-contract-or-shifted-burden-of-proof-allahabad-high-court-543014</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T16:14:35+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T14:49:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Foreign Award Enforcement Can't Be Refused For Ignoring Contract Or Proof Burden Shift: Allahabad HC]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Foreign Arbitral Award, Arbitral Award ,Burden Of Proof, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/08/28/617704-justice-piyush-agrawal-allahabadhc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/charitable-trust-registration-cant-be-denied-over-expenditure-concerns-alone-itat-delhi-543012</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T14:33:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Charitable Trust Registration Can't Be Denied Over Expenditure Concerns Alone: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 12AB, charitable trust registration, Commissioner (Exemptions), expenditure, charitable objects, genuineness of activities, Visan Foundation, ITAT Delhi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/13/527764-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/kvat-return-revision-cannot-be-rejected-solely-for-want-of-audit-543007</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T14:16:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Absence Of Audit Not A Ground To Reject KVAT Return Revision: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 42 of the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, Section 47 of the KVAT Act, assessment order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/10/25/568036-justice-harisankar-v-menon-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-rera-cases-weekly-digest-july-20-july-25-2026-542998</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T13:35:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Cases Weekly Digest: July 20 - July 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, REAT, Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Homebuyer, Allottee, Promoter, Delay in Possession, Delay Interest, Refund, Flat Booking Cancellation, Common Areas, Maintenance Charges, Occupancy Certificate, Buyers Association, Joint Development Agreement, JDA, Commercial Courts, Registration Extension, Possession Date, Registered Agreement for Sale, Assignment of Management, Preferred Flat, Draw of Lots, Housing Project, Statutory Interest, Refund Liability, Stalled Projects, Section 8 RERA, Recovery Certificate, Project Registration, Commercial Dispute, Real Estate Development, Apartment Allotment, Housing Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652648-weekly-digest-rera-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/allahabad-high-court-upholds-setting-aside-of-arbitral-award-for-lack-of-findings-on-contentious-issues-542992</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T15:18:59+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T13:05:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court Upholds Setting Aside Of Arbitral Award For Lack Of Findings On Contentious Issues]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitral Award, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/05/01/537204-allahabad-high-court-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/hsns-cess-act-arrest-illegal-where-authorisation-to-arrest-was-issued-a-day-later-allahabad-high-court-542983</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T12:21:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[HSNS Cess Act | Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest After Finding Authorisation Was Issued A Day Later]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[HSNS Cess Act, Arrest , Authorisation To Arrest , Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/12/16/641286-allahabad-high-court-1280720.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-orders-takedown-of-kala-hiran-teaser-related-clips-in-salman-khans-personality-rights-suit-542979</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-27T12:58:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T11:56:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of 'Kala Hiran' Teaser, Related Clips In Salman Khan's Personality Rights Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Salman Khan, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, personality rights, Kala Hiran, Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy, blackbuck poaching case, Lawrence Bishnoi, interim injunction, teaser takedown, reputation damage, sub judice, 36-hour deadline, incorrigible defendants, YouTube, right of publicit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/06/684542-salman-khan-delhi-hc-kala-hiran-movie.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-gst-penalty-orders-after-same-officer-approved-investigation-and-adjudicated-case-542974</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T11:28:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Quashes GST Penalty Orders After Same Officer Approved Investigation and Adjudicated Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CGST Act ,Rajasthan High Court ,CGST Penalty,  Same Officer , Prosecution , Apprehension of Bias]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/07/608450-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur-bench.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-arbitration-cases-weekly-digest-july-20-july-25-2026-542968</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T10:24:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Cases Weekly Digest: July 20 - July 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Arbitral Award, Section 11, Section 21, Section 34, Section 36(3), Section 37, Section 9, Interim Relief, Arbitrability, Appointment of Arbitrator, Substitute Arbitrator, Patent Illegality, Bank Guarantee, Commercial Courts Act, Settlement Agreement, Expert Determination, Expert Board, Execution of Award, Liquidation, NCLT Approval, Section 33(5) IBC, Joint Development Agreement, Specific Performance, GST Refund, Admissibility of Evidence, Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, Land Acquisition, Compensation, Shareholders' Agreement, Reserved Matters, Confidential Information, Arbitration Clause, Contract Substitution, Court-Recorded Compromise, Enforcement of Settlement, RERA, Infrastructure Disputes, Commercial Arbitration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/livelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-july-20-july-25-2026-542964</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-27T09:38:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: July 20 - July 25, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/18/668467-750x450652651-weekly-digest-ibc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
