<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/madras-high-court-upholds-barytes-export-curbs-orders-dgft-to-decide-licence-plea-in-4-weeks-555328</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T18:57:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Upholds Barytes Export Curbs, Orders DGFT To Decide Licence Plea In 4 Weeks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit, Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Foreign Trade Policy 2023, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707344-madras-hc-directorate-general-of-foreign-trade-dgft.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/bare-claim-of-poverty-not-enough-to-defend-contempt-for-non-payment-nclat-555327</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T18:53:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bare Claim Of Poverty Not Enough To Defend Contempt For Non-Payment: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Contempt Petition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/18/410089-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141818-2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/rera-registration-third-party-flat-purchasers-rights-cannot-stop-housing-society-from-replacing-defaulting-developer-bombay-high-court-555326</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T18:41:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Housing Society Not Liable for Developer's RERA Obligations As Landowner: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Housing Society Redevelopment, Defaulting Developer, RERA Registration, Third-Party Purchasers' Rights, Termination of Development Agreement, Interim Arbitration Relief, Transit Rent Arrears, Developer Replacement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/24/689100-bombay-hc-justice-arun-r-pednekar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/state-cannot-retain-money-without-corresponding-consideration-karnataka-high-court-orders-refund-in-failed-iron-ore-auction-555325</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T18:24:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Directs Refund Of ₹15.41 Lakh Deducted From Iron Ore Auction Proceeds, Awards 8% Interest]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Iron Ore Auction, Commercial Tax Department, Income Tax Department, Value Added Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690500-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-ks-hemalekha-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/income-tax-law-doesnt-prescribe-50000-salary-ceiling-for-trustees-of-charitable-trusts-itat-chennai-555324</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T18:17:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Income Tax Law Doesn't Prescribe ₹50,000 Salary Ceiling For Trustees Of Charitable Trusts: ITAT Chennai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Founder trustee, Section 13(2)(c), Section 13(3), charitable trust exemption, Sections 11 and 12, Form 10B, revised audit report, salary payment, reasonable remuneration, clerical error, remand to Assessing Officer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410183-income-tax-appellate-tribunal.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/bombay-high-court-appoints-arbitrator-suncrypto-wazirx-dispute-crypto-assets-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-555323</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T17:20:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Appoints Arbitrator In Suncrypto-WazirX Dispute Over $261,967 In Crypto Assets]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Angellic Info Tech, Zanmai Labs, WazirX, Suncrypto, Cryptocurrency, Virtual Digital Assets, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Section 11 Arbitration Act, Broker Terms, User Agreement, Conflicting Arbitration Clauses, Seat of Arbitration, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, Mumbai Seat of Arbitration, Sole Arbitrator, Singapore Restructuring Scheme]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/21/695494-justice-amit-borkar-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-rejects-stay-on-suspension-of-ip-over-brg-iron-steel-sale-says-tainted-ips-have-no-place-in-other-cirps-555321</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T17:07:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Delhi Refuses Stay On 2-Year Suspension Of Insolvency Professional Over BRG Iron & Steel Sale]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, IP, Stay, BRG Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/21/410211-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141818-1.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bank-credits-cannot-automatically-be-treated-as-business-turnover-karnataka-high-court-quashes-reassessment-order-555313</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T16:54:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Quashes Reassessment Over ₹13.39 Crore Turnover Without Supporting Computation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[income tax reassessment, Section 148A(1) of the Income Tax Act, bank credits]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/24/695883-justice-b-m-shyam-prasad-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gstat/ca-certificate-cannot-be-rejected-merely-because-it-was-issued-later-can-be-submitted-during-gst-appeal-gstat-lucknow-555308</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T16:47:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CA Certificate Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because It Was Issued After Transactions: GSTAT Lucknow]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Input Tax Credit, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A, ITC Mismatch, CA Certificate, GST Appellate Tribunal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/16/674395-gstat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/telangana-high-court-has-set-aside-an-income-tax-department-order-invoking-the-general-anti-avoidance-rule-gaar-against-ekge-retail-llp-555307</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T16:33:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Sets Aside GAAR Order Against EKGE Retail, Allows ₹49.32 Cr. Capital Loss Set-Off]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[tax-avoidance arrangement, Income Tax Act, long-term capital gains, Section 70(2) of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/16/687220-justice-p-sam-koshy-justice-narsing-rao-nandikonda-telangana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/bombay-hc-allows-tu-hai-meri-kiran-release-only-after-echelon-deposits-885-crore-plus-15-interest-as-security-for-co-producer-555306</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T16:19:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Bars 'Tu Hai Meri Kiran' Release Until Co-Producer's ₹8.85 Cr. Investment Is Secured]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tu Hai Meri Kiran, Sonakshi Sinha, Echelon Productions, AND Movie Products LLP, Co-Production Agreement, Film Release Injunction, Security Deposit, Contractual Consent]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707300-tu-hai-meri-kiran-movie-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/cash-receipt-additions-restricted-after-tribunal-flags-unverified-excel-entries-555305</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T15:50:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Chennai Deletes 75% Additions Against IG3 Infra Over Unverified Cash Entries In Seized Excel Sheet]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Seized Excel sheet, cash receipts, entity-wise segregation, bogus expenditure, protective additions, peak credit, electronic records, Section 132(4), Section 292C, Income Tax Act, 1961]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679648-itat-chennai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-finds-cancellation-of-ips-registration-excessive-absent-dishonesty-or-prejudice-acting-as-ar-of-homebuyers-555304</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T15:35:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Delhi Quashes Cancellation Of IP Deepak Goyal's Registration Over Disproportionate Penalty]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, AR, IP, IBBI, Cancellation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/12/03/367449-nclat-03.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/gujarat-high-court/gujarat-high-court-sets-aside-order-reviving-33-year-old-land-re-grant-claim-against-reliance-industries-limited-555303</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T15:09:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Order Reopening 33-Year-Old Land Re-Grant Dispute Involving Reliance SEZ]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Reliance Industries Limited, Land Re-Grant, 33-Year Delay, Special Economic Zone, SEZ, Government Land, Bombay Land Revenue Code, Revenue Department, Devan M Desai, Land Allotment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707286-justice-devan-m-desai-gujarat-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-permanently-restrains-rogue-websites-from-streaming-copyrighted-films-of-universal-warner-bros-netflix-disney-555302</loc>
<lastmod>2026-10-19T15:30:16+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T14:55:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Permanently Blocks 63 Rogue Sites From Streaming Copyrighted Films Without Permission]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Copyright, Delhi High Court, Universal City Studios, Netflix Studios, Warner Bros, Copyright Infringement, Rogue Websites, Summary Judgment, IPD Rules 2022, Rule 27 IPD Rules, Order XIII-A CPC, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, UTV Software Case, Website Blocking Injunction, Digital Piracy, Dynamic Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707288-delhi-hc-logos-of-universal-studios-warner-bros.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/livelawbiz-rera-weekly-digest-october-12-october-17-2026-555301</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T14:54:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz RERA Weekly Digest: October 12 - October 17, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA, Real Estate Regulation, Homebuyer Rights, Refund of Booking Amount, Property Attachment, Occupancy Certificates, Delayed Possession, Maintenance Charges, Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Developer Obligations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652648-weekly-digest-rera-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/karnataka-high-court-refuses-quash-proceedings-agisnt-super-royal-holidays-directors-alleged-non-cooperation-ponzi-scheme-probe-555298</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T14:40:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash Case Against Super Royal Holidays Directors For Ignoring Summons]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court, Super Royal Holidays, Companies Act 2013, Section 217(4), Registrar of Companies, Non-Cooperation With Investigation, Failure To Furnish Information, Criminal Proceedings, Cognizance, Quashing Of Proceedings, Justice H P Sandesh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/07/04/424446-justice-hp-sandesh-and-karnataka-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-bars-airgun-firm-from-using-german-brand-kiehberg-for-shooting-equipment-555297</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T14:25:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Permanently Bars Capital Airgun From Using 'KIEHBERG' Mark, Cancels Registration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Kiehberg GmbH, Capital Airgun Manufacturers, Syndicate Innovations, KIEHBERG Trademark, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Quia Timet Action, Passing Off Suit, Order XIII-A CPC, Summary Judgment, Class 13 Trademark, Prior User Rights, Shooting Equipment Trademark, Section 27 Trade Marks Act, Trademark Cancellation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://clawsite.hocalwire.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/647908-justicepurushaindrakumarkauravdelhihcllbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/livelawbiz-ibc-arbitration-digest-october-12-october-17-2026-555296</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T14:24:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Arbitration Weekly Digest: October 12 - October 17, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Arbitral Award, Supreme Court, High Courts, Commercial Disputes, Interim Relief, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Contractual Disputes]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652647-weekly-digest-arbitration-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-menarini-acne-scar-serum-name-in-mankind-acnestar-trade-mark-dispute-555292</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T13:56:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Menarini And Alaina From Using ACNE SCAR Mark In Mankind's ACNESTAR Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Delhi High Court, Mankind Consumer Products, AcneStar, Menarini India, Acne Scar Serum, Trademark Infringement, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Hexilak, Deceptive Similarity, Sub Branding, Order XXXIX CPC, Dermatological Products, Trade Marks Act, Product Recall, Cosmetics, Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707265-delhi-hc-acne-star.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-ibc-weekly-digest-october-12-october-17-2026-555286</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T12:35:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz IBC Weekly Digest: October 12 - October 17, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/04/19/415195-weekly-digest-of-ibc-cases.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/livelaw-biz-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories-from-last-week-555279</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T11:43:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLaw Biz | Top 10 Corporate & Business Law Stories From Last Week]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[top 10 business stories]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/07/698569-top-10-corporate-business-law-stories.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-october-17-2026-555269</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T10:38:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: October 17, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate Legal News, Daily Round-Up]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/19/707253-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-provisional-freezing-of-bank-accounts-cannot-be-justified-solely-through-affidavit-in-reply-bombay-high-court-555259</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-19T10:04:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST | Provisional Freezing Of Bank Accounts Cannot Be Justified Solely Through Affidavit-In-Reply: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST, Section 83 CGST Act, Provisional Attachment, Bank Account Freezing, Payment Aggregator, GST Investigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/04/698050-justice-sandesh-d-patil-justice-m-s-karnik-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-hindustan-zincs-1887-crore-additional-depreciation-claim-on-power-plant-machinery-555213</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-17T20:36:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rajasthan High Court Upholds Hindustan Zinc's ₹18.87 Crore Additional Depreciation Claim On Power Plant Machinery]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, plant and machinery, production, Section 263 of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/17/707158-rajasthan-high-court-hindustan-zinc-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/small-cash-loan-not-unenforceable-solely-due-to-lack-of-agreement-itr-disclosure-calcutta-high-court-555210</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-10-17T19:24:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Small Cash Loan Not Unenforceable Solely Due To Lack Of Agreement, ITR Disclosure: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Tuhin Gangopadhyay, Benukar Sikdar, cheque dishonour, Negotiable Instruments Act, ₹30,000 loan, ₹35,000 compensation, statutory presumption]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/10/17/707156-whatsapp-image-2026-10-17-at-191617.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
