<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-allows-first-motion-in-landmark-cars-scheme-of-amalgamation-with-wholly-owned-subsidiary-549866</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-12T18:16:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T18:16:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Allows First Motion In Landmark Cars Scheme Of Amalgamation With Wholly Owned Subsidiary]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Landmark Cars (East) Private Limited, Landmark Cars Limited]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699793-nclt-ahmedabad-landmark-cars.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-adani-group-company-acc-limited-gets-relief-karnataka-high-court-rupees-482-crore-mining-penalty-dispute-549865</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T18:07:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Sets Aside ₹482.69 Crore Penalty Against Adani Group's ACC Over Kalaburagi Mining]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ACC Limited, Adani Group, Karnataka High Court, Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru, Justice K.S. Hemalekha, mining lease, MMDR Act, Section 8A(5), Section 21(5), Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, Supplementary Lease Deed, Department of Mines and Geology, DMG, ILMS Portal, royalty arrears, notional royalty calculation, limestone mining, deemed lease extension, mining penalty, captive consumption, Revisional Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690500-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-ks-hemalekha-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/declared-goods-used-to-conceal-undeclared-branded-goods-also-liable-for-confiscation-549863</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T16:53:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Declared Goods Used To Conceal Undeclared Imports Can Be Confiscated: CESTAT Allahabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Ashtvinayak and Company, CESTAT Allahabad, undeclared goods, branded goods, Sections 118 and 119 Customs Act, redemption fine, customs penalty, imported garments]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654306-cestat-6.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/madras-high-court-says-time-extension-doesnt-waive-liquidated-damages-if-right-is-reserved-549862</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T16:43:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Says Time Extension Doesn't Waive Liquidated Damages If Right Is Reserved]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Liquidated Damages, Extension of Time, Waiver, Contract Law, Neyveli Thermal Power Station, Arbitral Award, Delay]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/state-cant-claim-priority-over-secured-creditors-dues-by-merely-attaching-property-without-proclamation-bombay-high-court-549856</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T15:50:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[State's Government Dues Cannot Override Secured Creditor's Priority By Mere Attachment: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Indian Overseas Bank, Bombay High Court, SARFAESI Act, Section 26E, Secured Creditor, Government Dues, CERSAI]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/11/685930-justice-manish-pitale-and-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat-bombay-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-protects-rajat-sharma-personality-rights-bars-trademark-misuse-of-india-tv-549855</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T15:42:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects Rajat Sharma's Personality Rights, Bars Trademark Misuse of INDIA TV]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Rajat Sharma, Justice Jyoti Singh, Personality Rights, Injunction, Deepfake Video Lawsuit, India TV Trademarks, AI Misuse Legal Action, Aap Ki Adalat Host, Google LLC YouTube Takedown, Meta Platforms Injunction, DoT MeitY Directives, CS COMM 1147 2024, Basic Subscriber Information IP Logs, Copyright Injunction Media, Celebrity Publicity Rights, Dynamic Takedown Order, Padma Bhushan Journalist, Tamara Doc Legal Case, Interim Injunction Deepfakes, Intellectual Property Protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699797-delhi-hc-india-tv.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-directs-restoration-of-gensol-ev-leases-gst-registration-during-cirp-549854</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T15:35:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Directs Restoration Of Gensol EV Lease's GST Registration During CIRP]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, GST Registration, CIRP, Gensol EV Lease]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699794-nclt-ahmedabad-gensol-ev-lease.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cenvat-credit-available-on-depot-clearing-and-forwarding-services-549853</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T15:19:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit Available On Depot Clearing And Forwarding Services: CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras Cements, CENVAT credit, C&F services, depot, place of removal, FOR destination sale, transportation credit, unloading charges, extended limitation, CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/16/412272-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/customs-department-must-hear-account-holder-before-extending-bank-account-attachment-patna-high-court-549852</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T15:04:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Customs Department Must Hear Account Holder Before Extending Bank Account Attachment: Patna High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Act 1962, Section 110(5), Provisional Attachment, Bank Account Attachment, Debit Freeze, Pre-Decisional Hearing, Post-Decisional Hearing, Commissioner Approval, Extension of Provisional Attachment, Customs Investigation, Natural Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/images/patna-high-court.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-indore-rejects-oswal-woollen-mills-insolvency-plea-against-eki-energy-over-pre-existing-dispute-549851</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T14:53:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Indore Rejects Oswal Woollen Mills Insolvency Plea Against EKI Energy]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Indore, Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd., EKI Energy Services Ltd., Insolvency Plea]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699783-nclt-indore-eki-energy-services-ltd-and-oswal-woollen-mills-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/lack-of-written-allotment-or-agreement-cannot-oust-rera-jurisdiction-chhattisgarh-high-court-549849</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T14:41:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Lack Of Written Allotment Or Agreement Itself Cannot Oust RERA Jurisdiction: Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RERA jurisdiction, oral agreement, aggrieved person, allottee, real estate transaction, written agreement, RERA complaint, REAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699776-justice-parth-prateem-sahu-justice-sachin-singh-rajput-chhattisgarh-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/assessment-order-need-not-discuss-every-claim-reopening-same-issue-is-change-of-opinion-bombay-high-court-549846</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T14:26:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Assessment Order Need Not Discuss Every Claim; Reopening Same Issue Is 'Change Of Opinion': Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Reassessment, Change of Opinion, Scrutiny Assessment, Section 148, Section 148A, Section 54F, Capital Gains Exemption, Reasons for Reopening, Assessing Officer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/msme-registration-cannot-revive-abandoned-arbitration-claims-delhi-high-court-549845</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T14:14:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MSME Registration Cannot Revive Abandoned Arbitration Claims: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MSME Act, Prospective Registration, Arbitral Jurisdiction, Section 37 Appeal, Section 18 MSMED Act, Retrospective Benefit, Abandonment of Claims, Forum Hunting]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670210-justice-tushar-rao-gedela-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/nclat-asks-lawyers-to-seek-no-objection-from-opposing-counsel-for-adjournments-549842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T13:23:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Asks Lawyers To Seek 'No Objection' From Opposing Counsel For Adjournments]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, SOP, Adjournments]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/02/18/410089-whatsapp-image-2022-01-31-at-141818-2.jpeg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-once-share-trade-annulled-stock-exchange-cannot-insist-physical-delivery-stock-exchange-bombay-549841</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T13:10:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[“Defies All Logic”: Bombay High Court Directs Stock Exchange To Refund ₹10.58 Lakh For Annulled Share Trade]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Stock Exchange Bombay, Bipin Kantilal Kapadia, Energy Products India Ltd, EPL shares, annulled share trade, physical delivery of shares, stockbroker, share trading, Clearing House, refund, ₹10.58 lakh, 9% interest, K.F. Vora, Stock Exchange Bye-Laws, fictitious transactions, securities market]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699772-justice-aarti-sathe-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/microsoft-gets-relief-from-bombay-high-court-against-interest-levy-on-tax-paid-within-statutory-timeline-549839</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T12:54:16+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Allows Microsoft's Plea Against ₹1.40 Crore VAT, CST Interest Demand]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, MVAT Act, Microsoft Corporation, Section 30(2) MVAT Act, Six-Monthly Returns, Interest on Delayed Payment, Rule 17 MVAT Rules, Rule 41 MVAT Rules, Tax Payment Timeline, Unjust Enrichment, Tax Planning, Statutory Compliance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699752-microsoft-corporation-india-pvt-ltd-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/allahabad-high-court-customs-act-cbic-circular-cannot-override-section-110a-on-provisional-release-of-seized-goods-549829</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T11:42:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CBIC Circular Cannot Override Provisional Release Of Seized Goods Under Customs Act: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Act, CBIC, Allahabad High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/15/694072-justice-shekhar-b-saraf-and-justice-abdhesh-kumar-chaudhary-with-lucknow-bench-of-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-high-court-quashes-criminal-case-against-britannia-dairy-over-unsafe-cheese-cubes-allegation-549826</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T11:19:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Britannia Dairy Over Sale Of Unsafe Cheese Cubes]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Britannia Dairy, Bombay High Court, Food Safety Act, Cheese Cubes, Food Analyst Report, Re testing, Section 482 CrPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699740-bombay-hc-britania-cheese.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/nclt-mumbai-rejects-jet-airways-liquidators-refund-plea-against-boeing-over-9212-million-aircraft-advances-549825</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T10:36:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Dismisses Jet Airways Plea Seeking $92M Refund From Boeing Over Undelivered Aircraft]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jet Airways, Boeing, NCLT Mumbai, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Liquidation, Advance Payment, Section 60(5), Purchase Agreements]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/12/699736-whatsapp-image-2026-09-12-at-084536.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/high-court/substantial-question-of-law-essential-for-appeal-under-rera-act-allahabad-high-court-549819</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-12T09:39:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-12T09:39:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Substantial Question Of Law Essential For Appeal Under RERA Act: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Question Of Law , Appeal , RERA Act,Allahabad High Court,RERA]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652493-allahabad-high-court-lucknow-bench-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-september-11-2026-549795</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T23:28:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: September 11, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-act-scrutiny-of-returns-under-s-61-not-a-precondition-for-show-cause-notice-under-s-74a-allahabad-high-court-549785</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T19:32:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T19:30:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Act | Scrutiny Of Returns Under S. 61 Not A Precondition For Show Cause Notice Under S. 74A: Allahabad High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Allahabad High Court, GST, Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Section 61, Section 74A, Rule 99, scrutiny of returns, show cause notice, input tax credit, bogus sub-contractors, independent verification, GST proceedings, Nagarjuna Agro Chemicals, Suncraft Energy]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/15/694072-justice-shekhar-b-saraf-and-justice-abdhesh-kumar-chaudhary-with-lucknow-bench-of-allahabad-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/meter-testing-naturally-bundled-with-electricity-distribution-not-taxable-separately-549784</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T19:03:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Meter Testing Naturally Bundled With Electricity Distribution, Not Taxable Separately: CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[meter testing charges, electricity distribution, Section 66D(k), Section 66E(e), naturally bundled services, delayed payment surcharge, extended limitation, service tax, CESTAT Hyderabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/k-rera-says-23-allottee-consent-needed-for-changes-beyond-sale-agreement-549783</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T18:51:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[K-RERA Says 2/3 Allottee Consent Needed For Changes Beyond Sale Agreement]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka RERA, Elara Celestia, L&T Realty Developers, allottee consent, project modification, development plan, apartment owners association, demolition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/06/654497-rera-karnataka.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-chandigarh-sanctions-amalgamation-of-thegot-hospitality-pvt-ltd-with-muhavra-enterprises-pvt-ltd-549780</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T17:56:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:56:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Chandigarh Bench Sanctions Merger Of Companies Behind Got Tea and Blue Tokai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Muhavra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd, Thegot Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., Merger, NCLT Chandigarh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699665-nclt-chandigarh-got-tea-and-blue-tokai-coffee-roasters.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/draft-assessment-must-be-given-to-eligible-taxpayer-before-prejudicial-variation-itat-delhi-549778</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:43:56+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Draft Assessment Must Be Given To Eligible Taxpayer Before Prejudicial Variation In Final Assessment: ITAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 144C draft assessment, foreign company eligible assessee, final assessment order, jurisdictional error, DRP, ITAT Delhi, Section 144 assessment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/13/527764-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/subsequent-ibbi-amendment-cannot-retrospectively-alter-going-concern-sale-commenced-under-earlier-liquidation-order-nclat-549774</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T17:31:59+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:31:21+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Later Amendment Cannot Retrospectively Alter Liquidation Process Already Commenced: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, IBBI (Liquidation Process) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2025, Going Concern Sale]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/07/10/378057-nclat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-extending-information-technology-cyber-security-framework-mii-subsidiaries-549768</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:13:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Extending IT, Cyber Security Framework To MII Subsidiaries]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, MII, Market Infrastructure Institutions, IT Security, Cyber Security, Cyber Security Framework, MII Subsidiaries, IT Infrastructure, Data Security, System Audit, Incident Reporting, BCP-DR, Technology Governance, SEBI Consultation Paper]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672733-sebi-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/tripura-hc-cost-on-parallel-rera-municipal-proceedings-549767</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:12:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tripura High Court Imposes ₹40,000 Costs On Four Homebuyers Over Parallel T-RERA, Municipal Body Proceedings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tripura High Court, Tripura HC RERA, parallel RERA proceedings, municipal proceedings RERA, High Court imposes costs, RERA dispute Tripura, unauthorised construction RERA, RERA municipal remedy, Tripura High Court ruling, RERA proceedings India, real estate litigation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/21/412701-tripura-high-court-1.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-restrain-xiaomi-from-using-find-device-feature-in-patent-dispute-549765</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T17:02:31+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Refuses To Restrain Xiaomi From Using 'Find Device' Feature In Patent Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Patent, Delhi High Court, Conqueror Innovations, Xiaomi Technology India, Patent Infringement Appeal, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Justice V Kameswar Rao, Indian Patent 244963, Communication Device Finder System, Find Device Xiaomi, Element E2 Patent, Element E3 Patent, Auto Answer Mode Patent, FRAND License Notice, Wander Ltd v Antox, Novo Nordisk v Dr Reddys, Patent Expiry Injunction, Inordinate Delay Patent Suit, Form 27 Working of Patent, Independent Claim Mapping, FAO OS COMM 147 2025]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699648-delhi-hc-mi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-mumbai-approves-1611-crore-resolution-plan-for-gstaad-hotels-dismisses-objections-549761</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T16:52:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai Approves ₹1,611-Crore Resolution Plan For Gstaad Hotels, Dismisses Objections]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Mumbai, Shree Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd, Gstaad Hotels Pvt. Ltd, Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-held-courts-must-exercise-restraint-before-interfering-arbitration-proceedings-549752</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T16:15:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T16:14:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Restraint On Arbitrator, Stresses Limited Judicial Intervention In Arbitration]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Calcutta High Court, Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Section 9 Arbitration Act, Section 33 Arbitration Act, Section 14 Arbitration Act, Section 15 Arbitration Act, Kompetenz-Kompetenz, Judicial Intervention, Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitrator, Interim Relief, Arbitral Proceedings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/30/677091-calcutta-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/punjab-haryana-hc-strikes-down-section-147a-income-tax-act-finds-faceless-reassessment-framework-remains-unchanged-549749</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T16:00:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana HC Strikes Down Section 147A Income Tax Act, Finds Faceless Reassessment Framework Remains Unchanged]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Reassessment Notice, faceless assessment scheme, Section 151A of the Income Tax Act, Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, Section 148A of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/19/694940-justice-deepak-sibal-justice-rupinderjit-chahal-punjab-and-haryana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclat-upholds-rs-437-crore-liability-on-suspended-directors-of-linkson-international-for-round-tripping-of-funds-549744</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T15:47:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Upholds ₹4.37 Crore Liability On Linkson International Suspended Directors Over Round-Tripping]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Linkson International, Fraudulent transactions, Suspended Directors, NCLAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/12/03/367449-nclat-03.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst-vat-cst/gujarat-high-court-quashes-gst-demand-against-environmental-entity-holds-effluent-treatment-exempt-549742</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T15:39:39+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Quashes GST Demand Against Environmental Entity, Holds Effluent Treatment Exempt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Naroda Enviro Projects GST exemption, Notification 12/2017, Section 12AA, preservation of environment, charitable activity, GST Section 74, Heading 9994, wilful suppression, Gujarat HC GST ruling]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/23/688907-gujarat-hc-with-justice-a-s-supehia-and-justice-vaibhavi-d-nanavati.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/payments-made-during-investigation-cannot-be-automatically-treated-as-voluntary-payments-under-the-gst-law-549735</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T15:20:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Holds GST Payments Made During Investigation Were Not Voluntary, Orders Refund]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 73 of the CGST Act, Section 74 of the CGST Act, Rule 142(2) of the CGST Rules]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/03/15/528279-justice-c-m-poonacha-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/even-peripheral-question-on-customs-duty-rate-can-take-cestat-appeal-to-supreme-court-bombay-high-court-549734</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T15:14:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Even Peripheral Question On Customs Duty Rate Can Take CESTAT Appeal To Supreme Court: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Act 1962, Section 130, Section 130E, CESTAT Appeal, High Court Jurisdiction, Supreme Court Jurisdiction, Rate of Customs Duty, Customs Duty Exemption, Valuation of Goods, Salvage Operations, Imported Stores, MSC Chitra, J M Baxi & Co., Peripheral Questions, Fiscal Jurisdiction, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/29/696819-justice-b-p-colabawalla-justice-farhan-p-dubash-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-hc-assessment-based-on-section-263-order-cannot-survive-once-that-order-is-quashed-by-itat-549730</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T14:37:21+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T14:37:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Says Income Tax Assessment Cannot Stand On Quashed Revision Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 1961, Section 263, Section 143(3), Revisional Order, Assessment Order, ITAT, Quashing of Section 263 Order, Pending Revenue Appeal, Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer, Substantial Question of Law, Bombay Dyeing]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699592-the-bombay-dyeing-and-manufacturing-co-ltd-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-consortium-lenders-internal-dispute-restructuring-cannot-defeat-insolvency-proceedings-549718</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T13:39:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T13:38:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Corporate Debtor Cannot Use Dispute Between Lenders To Delay Insolvency Proceedings: NCLT Kochi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi, Indian Bank, AKS Cold Storage, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 7 IBC, loan restructuring, consortium lenders, date of default, financial debt, CIRP, limitation, NPA, OTS, Interim Resolution Professional, Mahalingam Suresh Kumar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652581-nclt-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/sony-indias-4-vat-claim-on-digital-cameras-not-affected-by-amended-entry-549716</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T13:24:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana High Court Disposes Sony India Plea Against 2006 VAT Entry Substitution]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Punjab VAT Act, Digital Still Image Cameras, IT Products, concessional tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699579-punjab-hc-sony-india.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/trademark-suits-cannot-be-tried-by-courts-below-district-court-regardless-of-pecuniary-value-549714</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T13:03:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T13:02:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Trademark Suits Cannot Be Tried By Courts Below District Court: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Trademark, Kerala High Court, Justice Mohammed Nias CP, Cutis International Cosmetics, Cutis Institute of Medicine, Trademark Infringement Suit, Section 134 Trade Marks Act, Section 9 CPC, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, District Court Trial Mandate, Munsiff Court Jurisdiction, CRP 284 of 2025, Kozhikode District Court, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Kerala Civil Courts Act, Prohibitory Injunction Damages, Trade Mark Jurisdiction India, Special Statutory Provision, Civil Revision Petition, Intellectual Property Litigation, Jurisdiction Overriding CPC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2020/03/02/652163-370813-kerala-high-court-013.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/tata-motors-finance-took-law-in-its-hands-by-acting-on-ex-parte-arbitral-award-to-auction-truck-patna-high-court-549712</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T12:48:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T12:47:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tata Motors Finance 'Took Law In Its Hands' By Acting On Ex Parte Arbitral Award To Auction Truck: Patna HIgh Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[vehicle repossession, arbitral award, award enforcement, Tata Motors Finance, commercial vehicle, illegal auction, NBFC, compensation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699575-patna-high-court-justice-girijish-kumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-president-can-transfer-any-case-across-territorial-jurisdictions-nclat-549708</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-11T12:27:17+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T12:26:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT President Can Transfer Cases Across Territorial Jurisdictions: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, NCLT President, Territorial Jurisdiction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652478-nclat-03.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/bombay-high-court-rejects-taxpayers-apprehension-of-recovery-based-on-communication-of-audit-findings-549702</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T12:12:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rejects Taxpayer's Apprehension Of Recovery Based On Communication Of Audit Findings]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Audit, Section 65 CGST Act, Form GST ADT-02, Rule 101(5) CGST Rules, Audit Findings, GST Recovery, Show Cause Notice, Adjudication, Sections 73 and 74 CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699573-svs-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/delhi-high-court-says-failed-conciliation-talks-cannot-be-used-to-decide-arbitration-claims-549700</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T12:00:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Says Failed Conciliation Talks Cannot Be Used To Decide Arbitration Claims]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Conciliation Confidentiality, Arbitral Award, Failed Settlement Talks, Proof of Loss, Local Commissioner, Patent Illegality, Construction Dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/11/673217-delhi-hc-avneesh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-delhi-allows-651-crore-cenvat-credit-to-bharat-aluminium-on-coal-suppliers-invoices-549698</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T11:43:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Delhi Allows ₹6.51 Crore CENVAT Credit To Bharat Aluminium On Coal Supplier's Invoices]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit, Supplementary Invoices, Rule 9(1)(b) CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, Differential Excise Duty, Short Payment of Duty, Fraud, Suppression of Facts, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Input Credit]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/11/699558-cestat-delhi-bharat-aluminium-company-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-launches-demat-20-pilot-tokenised-corporate-bonds-press-release-549695</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T11:32:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Launches 'Demat 2.0' Pilot For Tokenised Corporate Bonds]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Demat 2.0, Tokenised Corporate Bonds, Corporate Bonds, Distributed Ledger Technology, DLT, RBI, e₹, Central Bank Digital Currency, CBDC, Unified Market Interface, Atomic Settlement, Market Infrastructure Institutions, Smart Contracts, REC Limited, L&T, IIFL]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-september-10-2026-549671</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T10:04:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: September 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-settles-adjudication-proceedings-against-b-ravi-karan-adani-pmc-projects-proceedings-549661</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-11T09:39:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Adani Ports CEO Karan Adani Pays ₹13.65 Lakh To Settle SEBI Proceedings Over PMC Transactions]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Adani Ports, APSEZ, Karan Adani, B Ravi, PMC Projects, SEBI Settlement, Settlement Proceedings, LODR Regulations, SCRA, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, Adjudication Proceedings, SEBI Adjudicating Officer, Jai Sebastian, Inter-Corporate Security Deposits]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672420-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/2016-amendment-to-cenvat-credit-rule-clarificatory-applies-retrospectively-cestat-allahabad-549618</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-10T19:59:59+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-10T19:58:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[2016 Amendment To CENVAT Credit Reversal Formula Clarificatory, Applies Retrospectively: CESTAT Allahabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[BHEL CENVAT credit reversal, common CENVAT credit, Rule 6(3A), trading as exempt service, clarificatory amendment, service tax demand, extended limitation, CESTAT Allahabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/10/26/500378-cestat-bhel.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/cci-closes-dvc-complaint-against-west-bengal-power-distributor-wbsedcl-over-anti-competitive-tariffs-549607</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-10T18:48:38+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Closes DVC Complaint Against West Bengal Power Distributor WBSEDCL Over Anti-Competitive Tariffs]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India, CCI, Damodar Valley Corporation, DVC, West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, WBSEDCL, predatory pricing, discriminatory pricing, leveraging of dominant position, electricity distribution market, Competition Act, 2002, West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission, Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, competitive tariffs, maximum ceiling, Electricity Act, 2003, Tariff Regulations, abuse of dominant position]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/09/10/699444-cci-dvc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/tax-paid-twice-on-same-income-is-unjust-enrichment-by-government-delhi-high-court-549604</loc>
<lastmod>2026-09-10T18:34:15+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-10T18:33:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Tax Paid Twice On Same Income Is 'Unjust Enrichment' By Government: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, double taxation, same income taxed twice, unjust enrichment, income tax, revised return, Section 119(2)(b), Income Tax Act, tax relief, Form 26AS, Section 154, Section 264]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652540-income-tax-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/deposit-made-without-prejudice-cannot-by-itself-amount-to-admission-of-debt-in-cirp-proceedings-nclat-549602</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-09-10T18:21:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Deposit Made 'Without Prejudice' Cannot By Itself Amount To Admission Of Debt In CIRP Proceedings: NCLAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Insolvency Petition, Closure,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652479-nclat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
