<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/telangana-high-court-allows-retired-partner-to-invoke-arbitration-clause-in-reconstitution-of-partnership-deed-545514</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T18:03:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Allows Retired Partner To Invoke Arbitration Clause In Reconstitution Of Partnership Deed]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[retired partner, retirement deed, arbitration clause, partnership dispute, appointment of arbitrator, locus standi, immovable assets, Telangana High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/04/04/466766-justice-k-lakshman-telangana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/companys-name-change-cannot-defeat-execution-of-decree-against-it-karnataka-high-court-545509</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:45:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Company's Name Change Cannot Defeat Execution Of Decree Against It: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Karnataka HC, Execution Proceeding, Company Name]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/04/671709-karnataka-high-court-justice-lalitha-kanneganti.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/2026-ibc-amendment-excluding-security-interests-created-by-operation-of-law-to-apply-prospectively-nclt-mumbai-545506</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:32:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[2026 IBC Amendment Excluding Security Interests Created By Operation Of Law To Apply Prospectively: NCLT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[IBC Amendment 2026, Section 3(31) IBC, Statutory Charge, Secured Creditor, Sane Guruji Premises Co-operative Society, Amar Remedies Ltd., Rainbow Papers Case]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681875-nclt-poster-4.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/msme/msme-council-cannot-act-as-executing-court-after-rendering-arbitral-award-gujarat-high-court-545502</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:23:29+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[MSME Council Cannot Decide Post-Award Enforcement Disputes: Gujarat High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MSME Facilitation Council, arbitral award, enforcement of award, post-award interest, satisfaction of award, functus officio, MSMED Act, Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/24/682044-high-court-of-gujarat-chief-justice-sunita-agarwal-and-justice-dnray.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-expanding-foreign-portfolio-investor-participation-commodity-derivatives-545501</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:22:00+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Wider FPI Participation In Non-Agricultural Commodity Derivatives]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Foreign Portfolio Investors, FPIs, Exchange Traded Commodity Derivatives, ETCDs, Commodity Derivatives, Non-Agricultural Commodities, Physically Settled Derivatives, Non-Agricultural Index Derivatives, Commodity Markets, Price Discovery, Market Liquidity, SEBI Consultation Paper, Commodity Derivatives Advisory Committee, CDAC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/29/670579-sebi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-dismisses-nsel-plea-for-joint-trial-in-two-cbi-cases-over-2013-payment-crisis-545500</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:14:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses NSEL Plea For Joint Trial In Two CBI Cases Over 2013 Payment Crisis]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[National Spot Exchange Limited, Bombay High Court, Supreme Court, CBI Case, Payment Crisis]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683637-whatsapp-image-2026-07-01-at-214126.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitration-act-does-not-exclude-cpc-from-court-proceedings-arising-from-arbitral-awards-patna-high-court-545499</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:01:53+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CPC Applies To Court Proceedings Arising From Arbitration Unless Excluded: Patna High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Act, CPC, Section 34, Section 149 CPC, deficit court fee, arbitral award, limitation, Commercial Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652631-patna-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/supreme-court/laser-imagers-are-accessories-not-diagnostic-apparatuses-for-customs-duty-purposes-supreme-court-545498</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T17:01:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Laser Imagers Are Accessories, Not Diagnostic Apparatuses For Customs Duty Purposes: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Classification, Laser Imager, Medical Diagnostic Equipment, Diagnostic Apparatus, Medical Equipment Accessories, Customs Tariff Act 1975, CTH 9018, CTH 9022, CTH 9033, Chapter 90, Residuary Tariff Heading, Note 2(b), Note 2(c), Carestream Health India]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693460-justice-sanjay-kumar-justice-sanjeev-sachdeva-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-eases-municipal-debt-securities-framework-rupees-10000-face-value-private-placements-545495</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T16:24:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Amends Municipal Debt Rules, Allows ₹10,000 Face Value For Private Placements]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Municipal Debt Securities, Municipal Bonds, Municipal Debt Framework, Private Placement, Rs.10,000 Face Value, Pooled Finance Vehicle, Special Purpose Vehicle, Escrow Mechanism, Credit Enhancement, Financial Results, Disclosure Requirements, Urban Local Bodies, SEBI Regulations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672440-sebi-poster-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-esteve-patent-for-tramadol-celecoxib-co-crystal-545493</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T16:16:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Rejection Of Esteve Pharma's Tramadol-Celecoxib Co-Crystal Patent]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Patent, Esteve Pharmaceuticals, Patents Act 1970, Section 2(1)(ja), Co-crystals of Tramadol and Coxibs, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, J Sai Deepak, Rukhmini Bobde, Patent Application 1435/DELNP/2012, Celecoxib, Tramadol Co-crystal, Inventive Step, Prior Art D5, Prior Art D7, Obviousness, Person Skilled in the Art, Section 3(d), Section 3(e), Indian Patent Office, Patent Appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/27/670210-justice-tushar-rao-gedela-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/assured-monthly-returns-and-lease-rentals-under-builder-buyer-agreement-not-operational-debt-nclt-delhi-545492</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T16:09:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT New Delhi Dismisses Vatika One On One Insolvency Plea, Holds Assured Returns Not Operational Debt]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Lease Rental, Vatika One On One Pvt. Ltd, Operational Debt]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693416-nclt-delhi-with-vatika.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/customs-cannot-deny-provisional-release-merely-due-to-pending-investigation-545491</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T16:04:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Orders Provisional Release Of Vimpro Tech Goods Pending Adjudication]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 110A of the Customs Act, provisional release of detained goods, detention certificate, CBIC Circular No.35/2017-Customs dated 16.08.2017]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693437-madras-hc-vimpro-tech.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delay-in-rectification-application-cannot-take-away-itc-benefit-545484</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T15:37:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Kerala High Court Grants Wild Planet ITC Benefit, Says Delay Cannot Defeat Statutory Right]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rectification Application, Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, Section 73 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693427-kerala-hc-wild-planet-pvt-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/supreme-court-stays-bombay-hc-ruling-holding-cdsl-liable-for-86-lakh-loss-from-brokers-misuse-of-investor-shares-545479</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T15:24:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Directing CDSL To Pay ₹86.02 Lakh To Investor]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Depository Participant, Demat Fraud, Power of Attorney, Stay Order, Indemnity, Section 16 Depositories Act, Share Pledge, Unauthorised Transfer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-zyngo-ev-to-hand-over-16-evs-to-gensol-evs-working-condition-and-damage-disputes-left-open-545475</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T15:13:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Directs Zyngo EV Mobility To Hand Over 16 Leased EVs To Gensol EV Lease]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Gensol EV Lease, Zyngo EV Mobility Pvt. Ltd.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693414-nclt-ahmedabad-with-gensol-ev-lease-and-zyngo-mobility.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/cst/high-court/cst-exemption-denied-to-mahindra-mahindra-over-vehicle-transfers-545467</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:45:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Telangana High Court Upholds ₹43.48 Crore CST Demand Against Mahindra & Mahindra For Inter-State Sales]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 3(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, Section 6A of the CST Act, Advance Planning Optimizations]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693413-telangana-hc-mahindra-mahindra.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/no-gst-payable-on-building-plan-sanction-as-there-is-no-supply-of-goods-or-services-545465</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:41:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[No Supply Of Service In Building Plan Sanction Process, GST Cannot Be Levied: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Building Plan Sanction, Supply of Goods, Bangalore Development Authority]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/25/689375-justice-r-nataraj-karnataka-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/defendant-can-question-trademark-owner-on-prior-use-even-if-written-statement-not-on-record-supreme-court-545464</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T14:48:43+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:28:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Defendant Can Question Trademark Owner On Prior Use Even If Written Statement Not On Record: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice K. Vinod Chandran, Kerala High Court, trademark, cross-examination, permanent injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693422-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/irp-cannot-be-expected-to-satisfy-all-stakeholders-amid-conflicting-interests-of-financial-creditors-nclat-545463</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:24:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT New Delhi Says IRP Cannot Keep Creditors And Homebuyers Satisfied In Real Estate Insolvency]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, IRP, Financial Creditor, Homebuyers, Catalyst Trusteeship]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652479-nclat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/representing-union-of-india-in-arbitration-does-not-give-its-representatives-right-to-challenge-award-independently-chhattisgarh-hc-545462</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:23:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Officers Representing Union Of India Cannot Independently Challenge Award: Chhattisgarh High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Locus Standi, Union of India, Railway Officers, Arbitral Award, Section 34, Maintainability, Representation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652569-chhattisgarh-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/supreme-court-upholds-interim-relief-to-unsuccessful-arbitration-party-in-rare-compelling-case-545461</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:13:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Upholds Interim Relief To Unsuccessful Arbitration Party In 'Rare, Compelling' Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 9 Arbitration Act, interim measures, award debtor, bank guarantee, ₹3.5 crore deposit, Section 34 challenge, unjust enrichment, post-award interim relief]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652538-supreme-court-of-india-sc-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/125-lakh-bank-deposit-wrongly-reported-as-125-crore-patna-high-court-quashes-income-tax-reassessment-imposes-25k-cost-on-bank-545460</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T14:05:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Patna High Court Quashes Reassessment Based On Bank's Wrong Reporting Of ₹12.50 Lakh FD As ₹12.50 Cr]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Reassessment, Section 148A, Section 148, Section 149, Wrong Bank Information, Reopening of Assessment, Limitation, ₹50 Lakh Threshold, Union Bank of India, Patna High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/05/06/416745-patna-high-court-10.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/why-are-scammers-getting-rights-manager-access-while-genuine-creators-are-denied-delhi-high-court-asks-meta-in-copyright-strike-case-545459</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T13:54:01+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Why Can Scammers Access Meta's Copyright Strike Tool While Creators Are Denied? Delhi High Court Asks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Meta Platforms, copyright, Instagram copyright strikes, cyber extortion, fraudulent copyright complaints, content creator PIL, digital livelihood, automated enforcement, creator economy, IT Rules 2021, account suspension scam, copyright blackmail, public interest litigation, SIT investigation, significant social media intermediary, arbitrary account disabling, cybercrime racket, Meta, copyright strike, rights manager tool]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689897-delhi-hc-meta-insta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-questions-logic-sebi-two-month-debarment-zee-entertainment-enterprises-limited-reserves-order-545445</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T13:56:16+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T13:05:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Questions Rationale Behind SEBI's 2-Month Market Ban On Zee Entertainment, Reserves Order On Interim Relief]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, ZEEL, Zee Entertainment Enterprises, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra, SEBI, Market Access Ban, Debarment, Hyderabad Property, Indiabulls Housing Finance, ₹726 Crore Loans, Related Party Transaction, PFUTP Regulations, LODR Regulations, Securities Law, ₹3,000 Crore Fundraise, Warrants, Interim Relief, SEBI Order, SAT Interim Order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693176-securities-appellate-tribunal-with-punit-goenka-and-logo-of-zee-enterprises-entertainment-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/itat-delhi-cuts-share-of-bbc-global-news-india-ad-revenue-attributed-to-indian-pe-from-15-to-12-545439</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T12:52:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi Cuts Share Of BBC Global News' India Ad Revenue Attributed To Indian PE From 15% To 12%]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[BBC Global News, ITAT Delhi, Permanent Establishment, DAPE, profit attribution, advertisement revenue, Mutual Agreement Procedure, MAP, transfer pricing, arm's length remuneration, international taxation, tax credit, Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693356-bbc-global-news-limited-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/russia-appoints-former-cji-dy-chandrachud-as-arbitrator-in-investment-treaty-dispute-with-ukrainian-bank-545435</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T12:35:55+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T12:30:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Russia Appoints Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud As Arbitrator In Investment Treaty Dispute With Ukrainian Bank]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[D.Y. Chandrachud, Oschadbank, Russia, Ukraine, investment arbitration, bilateral investment treaty, UNCITRAL arbitration, investor-state dispute]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693371-d-y-chandrachud-russia-and-ukraine-flags-an-arbitration-backdrop-oschadbanks-logo.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-reserves-verdict-in-concast-steel-power-cmds-bail-plea-in-6210-crore-pmla-case-545431</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T12:06:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Reserves Verdict On Concast Steel MD's Bail Plea In ₹6,210 Crore Money Laundering Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Sanjay Surekha, Enforcement Directorate, PMLA, Concast Steel and Power, Money Laundering, ₹6,210.72 Crore, Bail Rejected]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/09/672764-750x450654590-pmla-and-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-grants-khushi-kapoor-relief-against-unauthorised-merchandise-obscene-content-545428</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T12:09:20+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T11:56:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Khushi Kapoor Relief Against Unauthorised Merchandise, Obscene Content]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Khushi Kapoor, Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh, personality rights, personality infringement, fan pages, copyright infringement, AI generated deep fake photographs, pornographic content, X Corporation, Meta, Facebook accounts, Instagram, Jahnvi Kapoor, commercial exploitation, free speech, blanket dynamic injunction, proprietary right in persona, social media influencer, morphed photographs, safe harbours, John Doe]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693349-delhi-hc-khushi-kapoor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/order-authorising-arrest-under-gst-law-must-be-communicated-before-arrest-supreme-court-545416</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T12:16:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T11:00:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Order Authorising Arrest Under GST Law Must Be Communicated Before Arrest: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Future Group, Sunil Biyani, Supreme Court, Bombay High Court, GST Fraud, Interim Protection from Arrest, Anticipatory Bail]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686908-future-group-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-mocha-kaffee-from-using-mocha-mark-says-word-kaffee-just-a-misspelling-of-cafe-545407</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T10:33:39+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T10:31:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Mumbai Café Operator From Using 'MOCHA KAFFEE' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Social, Trademark, Impresario Entertainment, Mocha Kaffee, Justice Jyoti Singh, Trademark Infringement, MOCHA Cafe, MOCHA COFFEES AND CONVERSATIONS, Passing Off, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, Class 43 Trademark, Churchgate Mumbai, Kharghar, Seawoods, Trade Marks Act 1999, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, Restaurant Services, Think Coffee Think Mocha]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693330-delhi-hc-mocha.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-11-2026-545393</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-12T08:45:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 11, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658701-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-evidentiary-value-of-kachcha-parchis-electronic-data-must-be-examined-by-appellate-authority-delhi-high-court-545365</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T20:18:32+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T20:18:14+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Evidentiary Value Of Kachcha Parchis, Electronic Data Must Be Examined By GST Appellate Authority: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court; evidentiary value; kachcha parchis; electronic data; GST; GST appellate authority; CGST Act; Section 63 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam; Section 107 CGST Act; electronic evidence; GST investigation; GST adjudication; alternative remedy; writ jurisdiction; Arora Communication]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-rejects-challenge-to-cgst-proceedings-as-sgst-notices-came-later-545360</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T19:58:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Challenge To CGST Proceedings As SGST Notices Came Later]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, CGST proceedings, SGST proceedings, Central GST, State GST, Goods and Services Tax, GST litigation, GST proceedings, GST dispute, Shub Conductors LLP, Anil Kshetarpal, Shail Jain, Section 6(2)(b), CGST Act, statutory appeal, Section 74, GST notice, tax proceedings, writ petition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/two-customs-show-cause-notices-from-same-dri-investigation-retain-separate-legal-identity-delhi-high-court-545357</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T19:45:44+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T19:43:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Two Customs Show Cause Notices From Same DRI Investigation Retain Separate Legal Identity: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Dehi High Court  tax news, Customs Act, customs show cause notice, DRI investigation, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, two show cause notices, separate legal identity, independent adjudication, customs adjudication, common adjudicating authority, misdeclaration, undervaluation, Section 28 Customs]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/07/692418-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-allotment-fresh-shares-during-injunction-can-amount-wilful-disobedience-contempt-of-court-545356</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T19:32:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Upholds Restoration Of Shareholding After 964 Shares Allotted During Restraint Order]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Moral Properties Private Limited, Veena Solanki, Share Allotment, Fresh Equity Shares, Wilful Disobedience, Injunction Order, Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, Shareholding Pattern, Third-Party Rights, Corporate Law, Company Law, Equity Shares, Share Capital, Form PAS-3, Registrar of Companies, CPC, Interim Injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/11/29/506787-justice-manoj-kumar-ohri-delhi-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/patent/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-order-rejecting-patent-for-carbon-dioxide-capture-device-545352</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T19:12:03+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Rejecting Patent For Carbon Dioxide Capture Device]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Patent, Enviro Ambient Corporation, Assistant Controller of Patents, Patent Application No IN201917020705, Carbon Dioxide Capture Device, Green Technology Patent, Justice Jyoti Singh, Pravin Anand, Section 2(1)(j), Section 2(1)(ja), Inventive Step, Prior Art D1, Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan, Agriboard International LLC, F Hoffmann-La Roche v Cipla, Unreasoned Patent Rejection, Amine Free Water, Subsonic Droplet Speed, Patent Remand India, Section 15 Patents Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2021/06/04/394509-justice-jyoti-singh-and-delhi-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-directs-release-of-jk-cement-gst-refund-despite-revenue-appeal-545347</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T19:02:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Release Of JK Cement GST Refund Despite Revenue Appeal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[GST Refund, Refund claim, Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, Appellate Tribunal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693195-punjab-hc-jk-cement-works.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-rogue-websites-from-using-well-known-gati-mark-for-packers-movers-services-545345</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T18:58:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Rogue Websites From Using Well-Known GATI Mark For Packers, Movers Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Allcargo Logistics Limited, Gati, Gati Trademark, Justice Jyoti Singh, Trademark Infringement, Rogue Websites, John Doe Injunction, GoDaddy, Sav.com, Domain Suspension, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Yamini Manohar v TKD Keerthi, Chandra Kishore Chaurasia, Packers and Movers Scam, Well Known Trademark, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, CS COMM 806 2026, Amalgamation, Express Distribution Services]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693171-gati-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/single-judge-could-not-have-relaxed-injunction-upheld-by-division-bench-in-dabur-emami-case-delhi-high-court-545338</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T18:37:40+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T18:36:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Single Judge Could Not Have Relaxed Injunction Upheld By Division Bench In Dabur-Emami Case: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Emami Limited, Dabur India Limited, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, Justice V Kameswar Rao, Cool King Thanda Tel, Order XLIII Rule 1 r, Order XXXIX Rule 4, Section 151 CPC, Commercial Courts Act 2015, Doctrine of Merger, Judicial Hierarchy, Trademark Infringement, Deceptive Similarity, Trade Dress Dispute, Exhaust Existing Stock, Inventory Recall, CS COMM 532 2023, FAO OS COMM 177 2026, Abhimanyu Bhandari]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/21/675503-dabur-emami-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-rejects-insolvency-plea-over-claims-based-on-unilateral-invoice-payment-terms-545336</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T18:14:48+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi Rejects Insolvency Plea Over Claims Based On Unilateral Invoice Payment Terms]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad, Kay Pee Khaini Pvt. Ltd., Kannodia Technoplast Ltd, Insolvency Plea]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bombay-high-court-directs-amazon-to-hand-over-expired-goods-to-fda-within-3-days-for-disposal-545330</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T18:03:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Directs Amazon Retail To Hand Over Expired Goods To FDA For Disposal]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Amazon Retail India, Bombay High Court, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Expired Goods, Sealed Warehouse, Disposal, Bhiwandi, Food Safety]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693209-amazon-retail-india-with-bombay-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/competition-law/cci/competition-commission-of-india-closes-case-maharashtra-public-works-department-techfab-brand-specific-procurement-specifications-545326</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:53:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CCI Closes Case Against Maharashtra PWD Over 2022-23 Rate Schedule Specifications Favouring Techfab]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rashi Anand Suri, CCI, Competition Commission of India, Maharashtra Public Works Department, Maharashtra PWD, Techfab India Infrastructure LLP, Competition Act 2002, Section 3, Section 4, Section 26(2), Anti-Competitive Practices, Brand-Specific Specifications, Schedule of Rates, Government Procurement, Bid Rigging, Abuse of Dominance, Market Access, Procurement Specifications, Competition Law]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/02/683851-cci3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/supreme-court/taxpayer-cannot-revise-income-tax-return-under-garb-of-revision-after-deadline-supreme-court-545321</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-12T11:30:08+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:41:05+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Taxpayer Cannot Revise Income-Tax Return Under Garb Of Revision After Deadline: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Income Tax Act, Section 264, Revision, Revised Income Tax Return, Section 43CA, Tolerance Limit, Self-Assessment, Section 143(1), Section 156, Tax Demand, Income Tax Revision, Supreme Court, Bombay High Court, Om Siddhakala Associates]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/12/693331-hmj-pardiwala-and-vinod-chandran-sc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-scott-edil-from-using-nexporin-zetum-in-glaxosmithkline-trademark-dispute-545318</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:28:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Scott Edil From Selling 'Nexporin', 'Zetum' Over Similarity With GSK Marks]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, Scott Edil Pharmacia Limited, Justice Jyoti Singh, CS(COMM) 816/2026, NEOSPORIN, CEFTUM, NEXPORIN, ZETUM, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction, Cadila Health Care, Pre Institution Mediation, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Class 05, Cefuroxime Axetil, Neomycin, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Deceptive Similarity]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693161-delhi-hc-scott-edil.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/defences-against-insider-trading-under-2015-sebi-rules-not-exhaustive-but-must-be-similar-supreme-court-545317</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T17:25:04+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:24:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Defences Against Insider Trading Given Under 2015 SEBI Regulations Not Exhaustive, But Must Be Similar: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insider Trading, SEBI, UPSI, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, Tara Jewels Ltd., Ejusdem Generis, Disgorgement, ₹1.38 Crore Loss Avoided]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/07/672274-750x450662037-whatsapp-image-2026-03-17-at-095329.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-proposes-increasing-isin-limit-privately-placed-debt-securities-545314</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:09:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Proposes Raising ISIN Limit For Privately Placed Debt Securities From 14 To 17]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, ISIN, International Securities Identification Number, Debt Securities, Privately Placed Debt Securities, Non-Convertible Debt Securities, NCDs, Debt Market, Asset-Liability Management, Fund Raising, Debt Listing, LODR Regulations, Regulation 62A, ESG Debt Securities, Government Bonds, Extra Budgetary Resources Bonds, NBFCs, SEBI Consultation Paper, Securities Market]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/08/672744-sebi-poster-3.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-mohali-restaurant-from-using-gola-sizzlers-mark-after-franchise-termination-545310</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T17:01:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Mohali Restaurant From Using 'GOLA' Marks After Franchise Termination]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Gola Sizzlers, Trademark, Gola Sizzlers Private Limited, M/S GM Foods, Justice Jyoti Singh, CS(COMM) 745/2026, GOLA SIZZLERS, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Franchise-Owned Franchise-Operated, FOFO Model, Mohali Franchisee, Royalty Default, Naresh Kapoor, Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, Section 29(2)(c) Trade Marks Act, AB Alcobev Pvt Ltd, Sandeep Sethi, Vineet Bhagat, Gola Restaurants, Oral Franchise Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693135-delhi-hc-gola-sizzlers.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/madras-hc-remands-indian-banks-gst-waiver-application-for-maharashtra-operations-545308</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:47:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Directs Reconsideration Of Indian Bank's Maharashtra GST Waiver Claim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 128A of the CGST Act, Form GST SPL-02, CBIC Circular No. 238/32/2024-GST, Section 79 of the CGST Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693177-madras-hc-indian-bank.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/subsequent-liquidation-order-cannot-bar-plea-alleging-fraudulent-cirp-nclt-allahabad-545304</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:31:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Subsequent Liquidation Order Cannot Bar Plea Alleging Fraudulent CIRP: NCLT Allahabad]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Allahabad, Fraudulent Initiation of CIRP, Liquidation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/27/682615-nclt-poster-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/using-fake-rera-registration-number-to-lure-buyers-is-serious-fraud-bihar-rera-imposes-90-lakh-penalty-545302</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T16:38:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:29:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Using Fake Registration Number To Market Unregistered Project Is 'Serious Fraud': Bihar RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bihar RERA, fabricated RERA registration number, unregistered real estate project, Matrichhaya Infrastructure, ₹90 lakh penalty, sale deed ban, misleading advertisement, homebuyer protection]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693136-bihar-rera.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-has-granted-regular-bail-to-two-accused-in-a-gst-fraud-case-involving-an-alleged-loss-of-around-19739-crore-545300</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:29:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Punjab & Haryana HC Grants Bail To Two Accused In ₹197 Cr. GST Fraud Case, Holds Allegations Need Trial]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Fake GST invoices, Section 132(1)(b) of the CGST Act, Section 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act, ITC]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693162-justice-shalini-singh-nagpal-punjab-and-haryana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-punit-goenka-zee-entertainment-enterprises-challenge-sebi-market-ban-hyderabad-property-pledge-545293</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:09:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Zee Entertainment, Punit Goenka Challenge SEBI's Market Ban Over Hyderabad Property Pledge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ZEEL, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra, SAT, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SEBI, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, Essel Group, Hyderabad Property, Unauthorized Pledge, Related Party Transaction, Corporate Approvals, Market Access Ban, PFUTP Regulations, LODR Regulations, Securities Law, Indiabulls Housing Finance, ₹726 Crore Loans, Securities Market, Fraud, SEBI Order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693176-securities-appellate-tribunal-with-punit-goenka-and-logo-of-zee-enterprises-entertainment-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/bombay-high-court-sets-aside-registrar-rejection-of-olympic-committee-faster-higher-stronger-together-trademark-545291</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T16:06:08+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Olympic Committee's 'Faster, Higher, Stronger-Together' Trademark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bombay High Court, Trademark, Olympics, International Olympic Committee, Comite International Olympique, Registrar of Trade Marks, Somasekhar Sundaresan, Faster Higher Stronger Together, Citius Altius Fortius, Trademark Rejection, Trademark Remand, Commercial Miscellaneous Petition L No 9556 of 2025, Olympic Motto, Proposed to be Used, Jehaan Mehta, Kapil Kumar Mahipal, Intellectual Property India, Trademark Application, Arbitrary Trademark Rejection, Lack of Reasoning, Bombay HC Intellectual Property, International Trademark Registration]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693131-bombay-hc-olympic.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/supreme-court/rule-9610-cgst-rules-supreme-court-says-deleted-restriction-on-igst-refunds-cannot-apply-to-pending-claims-545288</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T16:32:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T15:47:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Rule 96(10) CGST Rules | Supreme Court Says Deleted Restriction On IGST Refunds Cannot Apply To Claims Pending On Omission]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CGST Rules, Rule 96(10), IGST Refund, Export Refund, Exporters, Omission Of Rule 96(10), Pending Proceedings, Saving Clause, GST Council, Integrated Goods and Services Tax, Kolhapur Canesugar Works]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652538-supreme-court-of-india-sc-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-mumbai-restores-international-cargo-terminals-cfs-licence-holds-open-ended-suspension-cant-continue-545287</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T15:41:46+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T15:40:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Mumbai Holds CCSP Suspension Must Be Preventive Not Punitive, Restores ICTPL Licence]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[International Cargo Terminal, ICTPL, Globicon CFS, Regulation 11(2), HCCAR 2009, Customs Cargo Service Provider, CCSP licence, immediate suspension, preventive suspension, Container Freight Station, Nhava Sheva, CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/09/06/559850-cestat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/calcutta-hc-quashes-itats-automatic-confirmation-of-123-crore-tax-addition-over-non-payment-of-costs-545282</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T15:23:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[ITAT Cannot Automatically Confirm Adverse Order For Non-Payment Of Costs: Calcutta High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, unsecured loan, violation of natural justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686601-calcutta-hc-the-honble-justice-rajarshi-bharadwaj-and-the-honble-justice-uday-kumar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/tmc-bank-account-freeze-supreme-court-gives-tmc-mla-liberty-to-raise-objections-before-special-officer-545279</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T15:14:42+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T15:12:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With HC Order Governing Use Of TMC Bank Accounts Frozen Under PMLA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[All India Trinamool Congress, TMC, Bank Account Freeze, Enforcement Directorate, Frozen Funds, Calcutta High Court, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/10/692981-whatsapp-image-2026-08-10-at-204430.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitrator-ineligibility-rules-apply-to-pre-2015-contracts-where-arbitration-had-not-commenced-before-amendment-tripura-high-court-545274</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T14:54:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:53:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Employee Named Arbitrator Pre-2015 Ineligible If Arbitration Had Not Yet Commenced: Tripura High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration, Ineligibility of Arbitrator, Section 12(5), Seventh Schedule, Pre-2015 Agreements, Independence and Impartiality, BSNL, Sole Arbitrator]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/09/28/365023-tripura-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-liquidation-of-shriram-cements-holds-pendency-of-land-dispute-cannot-absolve-sra-of-obligations-under-approved-resolution-plan-545272</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T15:02:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:39:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Ahmedabad NCLT Orders Liquidation Of Shriram Cements, Holds SRA Cannot Rewrite Approved Plan]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Shriram Cements Limited, SRA, Liquidation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693157-nclt-ahemdabad-shriram-cement-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/upi-charges-in-future-taxation-amendment-bill-gives-centre-power-to-decide-digital-payment-modes-that-remain-charge-free-545271</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T14:39:01+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:38:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Parliament Passes Taxation And Other Laws Amendment Bill, Amends Statute On Digital Payment Charges]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[UPI charges, digital payments, Taxation and Other Laws Amendment Bill 2026, Payment and Settlement Systems Act, Section 10A, electronic payment modes, banks, payment system providers, Central Government, digital payment charges]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693101-parliament.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/delhi-high-court-seeks-pan-details-of-sc-hc-judges-who-filed-returns-under-new-tax-regime-amid-judicial-allowance-dispute-545267</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T19:59:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:20:22+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Seeks PAN Details Of Supreme Court, High Court Judges Amid Income Tax Allowances Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Judges, Income Tax Act, New regime, allowances]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/cestat-allahabad-quash-2284-crore-service-tax-demand-against-hcl-infosystems-545265</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:16:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Allahabad CESTAT Sets Aside ₹22.84 Crore HCL Infosystems Service Tax Demand As Time-Barred]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[HCL Infosystems, ₹22.84 crore service tax demand, special audit, limitation, negative list regime, Business Support Services, advertising agency service, CSMC services, Notification No. 12/2003-ST, service tax, CESTAT Allahabad]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/03/01/410935-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/gst-search-powers-do-not-automatically-warrant-criminal-court-intervention-545261</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T14:08:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[GST Search Grievance Cannot Invoke Criminal Jurisdiction Under Section 528 BNSS: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 67(10) of the TNGST Act, Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., Article 226 of the Constitution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/24/682069-justice-d-bharatha-chakravarthy-madras-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/madras-hc-upholds-8622-lakh-award-for-masyc-in-vedanta-conveyor-dispute-modifies-interest-to-9-545256</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T13:40:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Reduces Vedanta's Pre-Arbitration Interest From 14% To 9% In Masyc Projects Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Vedanta Limited, Masyc Projects, arbitral award, conveyor system, Tuticorin, interest reduction, counterclaims, limitation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/copyright/delhi-high-court-issues-notice-on-youtubers-plea-challenging-metas-copyright-strike-mechanism-545254</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T20:29:23+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T13:39:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Issues Notice On YouTuber's Plea Challenging Meta's Copyright Strike Mechanism]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, copyright, copyright strike, Youtube, Meta Platforms, Instagram copyright strikes, cyber extortion, fraudulent copyright complaints, content creator PIL, digital livelihood, automated enforcement, creator economy, IT Rules 2021, SAURABH MAURYA, account suspension scam, copyright, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/28/689897-delhi-hc-meta-insta.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitrator-cannot-treat-whatsapp-exchanges-as-concluded-contract-when-it-was-not-pleaded-bombay-high-court-545248</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T13:17:04+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T13:15:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Arbitrator Cannot Disregard Agreement To Treat WhatsApp Exchanges As Concluded Contract: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Arbitration Act, Section 34, Partnership Dispute, Unpleaded Case, WhatsApp Evidence, Severability of Award, Patent Illegality, Creature of Contract.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2025/07/08/678946-sharmila-deshmukh.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/personality-rights/delhi-high-court-grants-jahnvi-kapoor-relief-against-obscene-content-commercial-misuse-of-persona-545240</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-11T12:56:14+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T12:52:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Grants Jahnvi Kapoor Relief Against Obscene Content, Commercial Misuse Of Persona]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Jahnvi Kapoor, Jhanvi Kapoor, Delhi High Court, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, personality infringement, fan pages, copyright infringement, AI generated deep fake photographs, pornographic content, X Corporation, Meta, Facebook accounts, commercial exploitation, free speech, blanket dynamic injunction, proprietary right in persona, social media influencer, morphed photographs]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693053-delhi-hc-jhanvi-kapoor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sat/securities-appellate-tribunal-stays-order-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-penalty-suzlon-energy-directs-deposit-10-crore-545223</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T11:08:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SAT Stays SEBI's ₹29.15 Crore Penalty Order Against Suzlon Energy, Officials]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Suzlon Energy, SEBI, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT, SEBI Penalty, ₹29.15 Crore Penalty, Intra-Group Transactions, Financial Disclosures, Misleading Disclosures, Contingent Liability, Stand-by Letter of Credit, Suzlon Global Services, Suzlon Structures, Corporate Governance, Listed Companies, Securities Law, Investor Protection, Financial Reporting]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652546-sat.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/us-court-partly-allows-dojs-decision-to-drop-265-million-bribery-case-against-gautam-adani-reserves-decision-on-fcpa-charges-545219</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T11:01:10+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[US Court Dismisses Criminal Charges Against Gautam and Sagar Adani, Raises Concerns Over DOJ Process]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Adani Bribery Case, DOJ Dismissal, Rule 48(a), FCPA, Securities Fraud, Wire Fraud, US District Court, SEC Settlement, Obstruction of Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693034-whatsapp-image-2026-08-11-at-094739.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/lawfirms/saswat-mohanty-joins-kochhar-securities-law-practice-545206</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T10:18:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Saswat Mohanty Joins Kochhar & Co.'s Capital Markets And Securities Law Practice As Partner]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kochhar & Co]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/11/693029-saswat-mohanty-kochhar-co.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/high-court/company-cannot-deny-employee-equity-by-relying-on-its-own-failure-to-frame-esop-scheme-bombay-high-court-545199</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T10:01:57+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Company Cannot Deny Employee Equity By Relying On Its Own Failure To Frame ESOP Scheme: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Employee Stock Options, ESOP Scheme, Arbitral Award, Employee Share Entitlement, Section 34 Arbitration Act, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/03/11/660783-750x450653797-750x450652575-bombay-hc-01.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/high-court/nclt-proceedings-does-not-bar-court-from-granting-interim-protection-under-arbitration-act-bombay-high-court-545191</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T09:43:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mere Filing Of Company Petition In NCLT Does Not Bar Interim Relief Under Arbitration Act: Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 9 Arbitration Act, NCLT Proceedings, Interim Protection, Shareholders’ Agreement, Arbitration, Section 241-242 Companies Act, Bombay High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2023/05/19/684298-justice-amit-borkar.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-august-10-2026-545180</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-11T09:01:19+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: August 10, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658702-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/time-limit-for-post-decisional-hearing-in-customs-broker-licence-suspension-is-mandatory-cestat-mumbai-545166</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-10T21:21:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Time Limit For Post-Decisional Hearing In Customs Broker Licence Suspension Is Mandatory: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Customs Broker, Customs Broker Licence, CBLR 2018, Regulation 16, Suspension of Customs Broker Licence, Post-Decisional Hearing, 15-Day Time Limit, Mandatory Timeline, Immediate Suspension, CESTAT Mumbai, Customs Litigation, CBIC Instructions, Natural Justice, Customs Authorities]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684076-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/assessing-officer-cant-act-as-economist-to-rework-share-valuation-of-a-company-delhi-high-court-545150</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-10T19:28:48+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-10T19:27:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Assessing Officer Can't Become An Economist To Question Expected Return In Share Valuation: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, share valuation, Assessing Officer, AO, DCF method, Discounted Cash Flow, NAV method, Net Asset Value, Section 56(2)(viib), Rule 11UA, Income Tax Act, Income Tax Rules, fair market value, valuation report, Chartered Accountant, expected rate of return, Income Tax Department, ITAT, share premium, valuation methodology]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/14/686449-justices-dinesh-mehta-and-rajneesh-kumar-gupta-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-indirect-tax-weekly-round-up-august-03-august-09-2026-545142</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-10T19:08:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-10T19:07:37+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Indirect Tax Weekly Round-Up: August 03 - August 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Weekly Round-Up, Tax Weekly Digest, Indirect Tax]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652650-weekly-digest-indirect-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/digests/weekly-digests/livelawbiz-direct-tax-weekly-round-up-august-03-august-09-2026-545130</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-10T18:17:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz Direct Tax Weekly Round-Up: August 03 - August 09, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Direct Tax WeeklyDigest, Tax Digest, Weekly Digest]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652649-weekly-digest-direct-taxes.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/director-cannot-be-prosecuted-for-companys-gst-offence-without-arraigning-it-punjab-haryana-high-court-545128</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-10T18:10:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Director Cannot Be Prosecuted For Company's GST Offence Without Arraigning It: Punjab & Haryana High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CGST Act, Section 137, GST prosecution, Director liability, vicarious liability, offences by companies, Section 132 CGST Act, fraudulent Input Tax Credit, fake invoices, DGGI, GST offences, GST fraud, criminal prosecution, company liability, Aneeta Hada, Punjab and Haryana High Court, GST litigation, Input Tax Credit, corporate criminal liability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/04/02/665148-750x450652574-punjab-and-haryana-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
