<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/skodas-technical-know-how-licence-to-indian-unit-not-consulting-engineer-service-cestat-mumbai-543942</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T19:40:07+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T19:38:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Skoda's Technical Know-How Licence To Indian Unit Not Consulting Engineer Service: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Skoda, CESTAT Mumbai, Service Tax, Consulting Engineer Service, Technical Know-how, Technology Licence, Intellectual Property, Trademark Licence, Reverse Charge, Section 66A, Finance Act, 1994, Foreign Service Provider, Technical Documentation, Licensing Agreement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690990-skoda-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/excise/cestat/cestat-bangalore-allows-acc-cenvat-credit-on-fly-ash-transport-and-pond-maintenance-services-543939</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T19:09:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T19:08:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[CESTAT Bangalore Allows ACC CENVAT Credit On Fly Ash Transport And Pond Maintenance Services]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CENVAT credit, fly ash, input service, transportation, loading and unloading, fly ash pond, ACC Ltd., CESTAT Bangalore]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/05/654280-cestat-02.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/excess-quantity-enhanced-value-alone-dont-establish-misdeclaration-under-customs-act-cestat-mumbai-543937</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:52:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Excess Quantity, Enhanced Value Alone Don't Establish Misdeclaration Under Customs Act: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[RKPS Impex Private Limited, Commissioner of Customs (Import), Import of Goods, Excess Quantity, Misdeclaration, Confiscation, Redemption Fine, Section 125, Section 112(a), Section 111(l), Section 111(m), Customs Valuation Rules, 2007]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684076-cestat-mumbai.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-ahmedabad-orders-shareholder-and-creditor-meetings-fpr-irm-energy-enertech-amalgamation-scheme-543935</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:41:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Orders Shareholder, Creditor Meetings For IRM Energy-Enertech Amalgamation Scheme]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Enertech Distribution Management Pvt. Ltd., IRM Energy Ltd., Amalgamation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690968-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-11157-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/gujarat-high-court-sets-aside-order-restraining-trademark-owners-from-using-own-mark-calls-it-grave-error-543933</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:28:30+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Order Restraining Trademark Owners From Using Own Mark, Calls It 'Grave Error']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court, Trademark, Aditya Jewellers, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 28 Trade Marks Act, Prior User, Registered Proprietor, Commercial Suit, Interim Injunction, Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC, Mini Trial, Evidence Reliability, Gold Jewellery, Rajkot, Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal, Justice D.N. Ray]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690245-high-court-of-gujarat-chief-justice-sunita-agarwal-and-justice-dnray.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-debars-punit-goenka-subhash-chandra-unauthorised-pleadge-zeel-property-secure-promoter-group-loan-543932</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T18:08:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Bars ZEE, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra From Securities Market Over Unauthorised Property Pledge]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, ZEEL, Punit Goenka, Subhash Chandra, Hyderabad property, unauthorised mortgage, promoter group entities, related party transaction, SEBI LODR Regulations, PFUTP Regulations, disclosure violations, audit committee approval, board approval, contingent liability, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, IHFL, securities market debarment, monetary penalty, fraud, corporate governance, Declaration and Acknowledgment, D&A]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690977-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-161112.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/lic-not-liable-to-pay-service-tax-on-premiums-retained-after-policy-lapse-cestat-mumbai-543931</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T17:50:47+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LIC Not Liable To Pay Service Tax On Premiums Retained After Policy Lapse: CESTAT Mumbai]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Life Insurance Corporation of India, LIC, Service Tax, Section 66E(e), Declared Service, Agreeing to Tolerate an Act, Forfeiture of Premium, Insurance Policy Lapse, Non-payment of Premium, Mis-declaration, CBIC Circular 214/1/2023, Double Taxation, Finance Act 1994, Service Tax Demand.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690965-lic-livelawbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-use-of-cobex-mark-in-glaxosmithklines-trademark-suit-over-cobadex-543930</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T17:37:36+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Use Of 'COBEX' Mark In GlaxoSmithKline's Trademark Suit Over 'COBADEX']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Orion Biotech, COBADEX, COBEX, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Multi-vitamin, Paediatric Antibiotic, Deceptive Similarity, Ex-parte Ad-interim Injunction, Section 151 CPC, Order XXXIX CPC, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690960-cobadex-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/custom-excise-service-tax/coal-beneficiation-not-taxable-as-business-auxiliary-service-before-mining-service-was-introduced-june-1-2007-543925</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:35:03+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:34:44+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable As Business Auxiliary Service Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT Delhi]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[coal beneficiation, washing of coal, Business Auxiliary Service, Mining Service, service tax, CESTAT New Delhi, Aryan Coal Benefications, Revenue appeal]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/05/10/417009-cestat.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/effect-of-part-payments-on-dishonoured-cheques-cannot-be-decided-in-revision-against-summoning-order-delhi-high-court-543918</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:21:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Effect of Part Payments On Dishonoured Cheques Cannot Be Decided In Revision Against Summoning Order: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 NI Act, Delhi High Court, Part Payments, Statutory Notice, Cheque Dishonour]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690949-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-154205.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-patna-firm-from-using-nintendo-india-private-limited-name-543916</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:24:18+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T16:05:46+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Patna Firm From Using 'Nintendo India Private Limited' Name]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Nintendo, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Trademark, Nintendo India Private Limited, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 29(4) Trade Marks Act, Interactive Entertainment, Video Games, Real Estate, Deceptive Similarity, Coined Mark, Defensive Marks, Justice Jyoti Singh, Bloomberg Finance LP, ex-parte ad-interim injunction]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690961-nintendo-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-ahmedabad-sanctions-rs-2775-cr-inoxauthum-resolution-plan-for-wind-world-india-543912</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:55:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad Approves ₹2,775 Crore Inox Neo-Authum Resolution Plan For Wind World India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Ahmedabad, Wind World,  Resolution Plan]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690934-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-11157-pm-1.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/builder-cannot-deny-possession-to-subsequent-purchaser-holding-registered-sale-deed-telenga-rera-543910</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T15:43:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:42:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Builder Cannot Deny Flat Possession To Subsequent Purchaser Holding Registered Sale Deed: Telenga RERA]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[subsequent purchaser, allottee, registered sale deed, possession, promoter, title dispute, Telangana RERA, apartment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/13/533750-rera-tamil-nadu.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/others-taxes/stamp-duty-on-loan-assignment-to-arc-must-be-based-on-debt-assigned-not-property-value-mp-high-court-543909</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:29:49+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Stamp Duty On Loan Assignment To ARC Must Be Based On Debt Assigned, Not Property Value: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Stamp Duty, Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company, Madhya Pradesh High Court, SARFAESI Act, Deed of Assignment, Loan Securitisation]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/15/680016-750x450652653-madhya-pradesh-hc-jabalpur.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/sarfaesi-auction-purchaser-cant-be-treated-as-unauthorised-occupant-under-state-eviction-law-mp-high-court-543907</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T15:12:07+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SARFAESI Auction Purchaser Can't Be Treated As Unauthorised Occupant Under State Eviction Law: MP High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[MP HC, SARFAESI, Auction Purchaser, Unauthorised Occupant]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690926-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-20222-pm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/securities-law/sebi/securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-closes-proceedings-against-religare-rashmi-saluja-directors-burman-open-offer-case-543902</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T14:54:26+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:53:51+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[SEBI Closes Proceedings Against Religare, Rashmi Saluja Over Burman Group Open Offer]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SEBI, Religare Enterprises Ltd., Burman Group, Rashmi Saluja, Open offer, SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, SAST Regulations, Committee of Independent Directors, Interim Order-cum-Show Cause Notice, LODR Regulations, Change in control, RBI approval, IRDAI approval, Regulatory approvals, Independent directors, Sections 11 and 11B SEBI Act, Remedial directions, Preventive powers, Proceedings disposed, Securities Appellate Tribunal, SAT]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/13/673763-sebi-rashmi-saluja.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/emden-formula-for-calculating-construction-contract-damages-cant-apply-to-dealership-agreements-madras-high-court-543901</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:46:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Emden Formula For Calculating Construction Contract Damages Can't Apply To Dealership Agreements: Madras High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Emden Formula, dealership agreement, arbitral award, damages, wrongful termination, commercial contract, Hyundai Motor India, patent illegality]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688626-madras-hc-justice-p-velmurugan-and-justice-k-govindarajan-thilakavadi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/msme/though-mandatory-75-pre-deposit-to-challenge-msme-award-need-not-accompany-plea-rajasthan-high-court-543900</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T18:29:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T14:30:35+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Though Mandatory, 75% Pre-Deposit To Challenge MSME Award Need Not Accompany Plea: Rajasthan High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Rajasthan HC, Pre Deposit, MSME Act, Arbitration Act, Objection Application]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690981-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-180822.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/minority-shareholders-move-nclt-kolkata-alleging-oppression-mismanagement-over-2007-sweat-equity-allotment-in-manipal-hospitals-synergie-543899</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T13:58:17+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[US-Based Investors Move NCLT Kolkata Against Manipal Hospitals Synergie Over 2007 Share Dilution]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Minority Shareholders, Manipal Hospitals Synergie, NCLT Kolkata, Oppression and Mismanagement, Sweat Equity Shares, Companies Act, Corporate Governance]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690915-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-122007.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-rejects-third-partys-impleadment-plea-in-ciplas-no-darar-trademark-restoration-case-543895</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T16:22:25+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T13:17:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Rejects Third Party's Impleadment Plea in Cipla's 'NO DARAR' Trademark Restoration Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, Cipla Limited, NO DARAR, Trademark Renewal, Trademark Restoration, Section 151 CPC, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Necessary and Proper Party, Locus Standi, Right in Personam, Trade Marks Registry, Rectification, O-3 Notice, Justice Saurabh Banerjee, Intellectual Property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690959-cipla-no-darar-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-trial-court-cannot-reject-service-of-notice-comparing-signatures-cheque-postal-acknowledgment-section-138-ni-act-543890</loc>
<lastmod>2026-08-01T12:45:36+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T12:44:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NI Act Notice Not Invalid Merely Because Postal Acknowledgment Signature Differs From Cheque: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Kerala High Court, Justice A. Badharudeen, Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Cheque bounce, Statutory demand notice, Service of notice, Section 27 General Clauses Act, Postal acknowledgment card, Signature mismatch, Presumption of service, Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed, Dishonour of cheque, Insufficient funds, Sections 118 and 139 Negotiable Instruments Act, Presumption under NI Act, Financial capacity of complainant, Acquittal reversed, Conviction under Section 138 NI Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/19/674899-kerala-high-court-justice-a-badharudeen.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/recovery-laws/high-court/denying-auction-purchasers-writ-remedy-to-enforce-sarfaesi-possession-orders-would-undermine-rule-of-law-bombay-high-court-543868</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T11:20:26+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Denying Auction Purchasers Writ Remedy To Enforce S.14, SARFAESI Orders Would Be 'Travesty of Justice': Bombay High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act, Bombay High Court, Auction Purchasers, Section 14, Rule of Law, Physical Possession, Writ Petition]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/11/685930-justice-manish-pitale-and-justice-shreeram-v-shirsat-bombay-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/uncrystallised-epfo-interest-and-damages-are-contingent-liabilities-under-ibc-supreme-court-543856</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T09:58:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Uncrystallised EPFO Interest, Damages Are Contingent Liabilities Under IBC: Supreme Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[EPFO, Power Max (India) Pvt. Ltd., Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CIRP, Provident Fund, Supreme Court, Uncrystallised]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/08/01/690873-whatsapp-image-2026-08-01-at-092633.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-31-2026-543855</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-08-01T09:52:15+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 31, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658698-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-6.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/bombay-high-court-rejects-it-appeals-over-search-assessment-based-on-regular-books-instead-of-search-material-543842</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T21:20:54+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bombay High Court Rejects IT Appeals Over Search Assessment Based On Regular Books Instead Of Search Material]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 153A, Search Assessment, Incriminating Material, Completed Assessment, Unabated Assessment, Income Tax Act, Section 132 Search, Section 36(1)(iii), Business Income, Sale of Flats, Search and Seizure, Reassessment, Abhisar Buildwell, Bombay High Court, ITAT, Income Tax Appeals, Aurum Ventures, Continental Warehousing, Gurinder Singh Bawa, SKS Ispat & Power, Direct Tax Litigation.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/10/655072-justice-gs-kulkarni-and-justice-aarti-sathe-bombay-hc-llbiz.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/centre-moves-supreme-court-against-hc-order-quashing-one-time-spectrum-charges-on-airtel-vodafone-idea-543839</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T20:45:02+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Centre Moves Supreme Court Against HC Order Quashing One-Time Spectrum Charges On Airtel, Vodafone Idea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Telecom, Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea, Union of India, Bombay High Court, Spectrum Charges, Indian Telegraph Act, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690824-whatsapp-image-2026-07-31-at-193811.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/itat/hcls-corporate-guarantees-for-overseas-subsidiaries-attract-transfer-pricing-provisions-delhi-itat-543838</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T20:36:43+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T20:36:13+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[HCL's Corporate Guarantees For Overseas Subsidiaries Attract Transfer Pricing Provisions: Delhi ITAT]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[corporate guarantee, international transaction, arm's length price, transfer pricing adjustment, guarantee commission, Section 92B, ESOP expenditure, Section 10A deduction, foreign exchange losses, HCL Technologies]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/01/14/407638-hcl-final.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/service-tax/cestat/nbfcs-vcf-investment-profits-not-service-taxable-though-clubbed-with-management-fees-cestat-kolkata-543837</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T20:08:11+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NBFC's VCF Investment Profits Not Service Taxable Though Clubbed With Management Fees: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata, NBFC, Banking and Financial Services, Venture Capital Fund, VCF, Investment Income, Profit on Investment, Return on Investment, Fund Management Services, Accounting Nomenclature, ST-3 Returns, Books of Accounts, Burden of Proof, Copyright, Copyright Royalty, Intellectual Property Service, Intellectual Property Rights, Section 65(55a)]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684077-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/delhi-high-court-gst-appeal-pre-deposit-not-applicable-scn-issued-before-october-2025-543832</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T19:45:09+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[New 10% GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Not Applicable If SCN Issued Before October 1, 2025: Delhi High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court GST judgment, GST appeal pre-deposit, 10% GST pre-deposit, Section 107(6) CGST Act, Section 122(1A) CGST Act, penalty-only GST appeals, GST show cause notice, SCN before October 1 2025, GST appeal rights, vested right of appeal, retrospective amendment]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-restores-deemed-abandonment-of-kangaro-opposition-to-vguard-kangaro-trademark-543812</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T17:58:45+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Sets Aside Order Reviving Kangaro's Trademark Opposition Against V-Guard]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Trademark, V-Guard Industries, Kangaro Industries, Trademark Opposition, Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules 2017, Mandatory vs Directory, Deemed Abandonment, Section 131 Trade Marks Act, Letters Patent Appeal, Clause 15, Evidence in Support of Opposition, Class 16, Registrar of Trade Marks, Division Bench, Justice P. Velmurugan, Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2019/04/29/360401-madras-high-court-advocates-association-express-their-disapproval-of-a-judicial-member-serving-in-central-administrative-tribunal.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclt/national-company-law-tribunal-kochi-fresh-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-maintainable-breach-settlement-right-expressly-reserved-543807</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T17:46:12+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT Kochi Allows Second CIRP After Settlement Breach Where Settlement Preserved Creditor's Right]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, IBC, Section 9 IBC, Section 8 IBC, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CIRP, Operational Creditor, Operational Debt, Settlement Agreement, Settlement Deed, Breach of Settlement, Fresh CIRP, Fresh Insolvency Petition, Maintainability, Limitation, Acknowledgment of Liability, Part Payment, Sections 18 and 19 Limitation Act, Demand Notice, NCLT Kochi, Interim Resolution Professional, Moratorium]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/23/681847-nclt-poster-5.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-restrains-asia-paints-firm-from-infringing-asian-paints-mark-orders-takedown-of-deceptive-social-media-website-543804</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T17:33:47+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T17:26:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Protects 'ASIAN PAINTS' Trademark, Restrains Use Of Similar 'Asia Paints' Mark]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Asian Paints Limited, Trademark, Saroj Arora, Asia Paints, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Section 29(5) Trade Marks Act, Well-known Trademark, Section 12A Commercial Courts Act, Pre-institution Mediation, Murga Brand, Wall Paints, Ad-interim Injunction, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Intellectual Property]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690774-delhi-hc-asian-paints.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/news-updates/mumbai-court-directs-cbi-to-furnish-chargesheet-to-ex-rcfl-ceo-devang-mody-in-7623-crore-fraud-case-543803</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T17:23:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Mumbai Court Directs CBI To Furnish Chargesheet To Ex-RCFL CEO Devang Mody In ₹7,623 Crore Fraud Case]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Former RCFL CEO, Devang Mody, CBI, ₹7,623 Crore Bank Fraud, Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. (RCFL), BNSS Section 230, Chargesheet]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690777-whatsapp-image-2026-07-31-at-161246.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-temporarily-injuncts-antex-pharma-fullhair-udis-marks-in-trademark-suit-by-nava-healthcare-543800</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T17:33:30+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T17:07:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Antex Pharma From Using Similar Marks To Nava Healthcare's HAIRFUL, UDIVIN]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Nava Healthcare, Antex Pharma, HAIRFUL, FULLHAIR, UDIVIN, UDIS, PANTOPRAZ I.V., PANTATOP-IV, Three Arrows Device, Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Cadila Health Care Precedent, Pharmaceutical Trademarks, Justice Jyoti Singh]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690772-delhi-hc-hairful.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ibc/nclt-delhi-orders-dissolution-of-recruitment-and-technology-solutions-provider-lis-studylink-india-pvt-ltd-543796</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T16:53:58+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT New Delhi Orders Dissolution Of Recruitment And Technology Solutions Provider LIS Studylink India]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, LIS Studylink India Pvt. Ltd, Dissolution]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690742-nclt-delhi-lis-studylink-india-pvt-ltd.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-nair-service-society-status-companies-act-must-be-determined-statutory-framework-not-pleadings-543795</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T16:50:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Pleadings Cannot Decide Legal Status Of Nair Service Society: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Nair Service Society, NSS, Kerala High Court, Companies Act 2013, Companies Act 1956, Kerala Non-Trading Companies Act 1961, Registrar of Companies, Inspector General of Registration, Director Identification Number, DIN, Article 129 Constitution, Court of Record, Article 141 Constitution, writ of mandamus, statutory framework, company law, company limited by guarantee, pleadings, admissions in pleadings, Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V, Justice KV Jayakumar]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690728-kerala-hc-nair-service-society.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/rera/compensation-before-adjudicating-officer-premature-until-liability-is-decided-in-parallel-rera-or-criminal-proceedings-bihar-rera-543791</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T16:25:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Bihar RERA Rejects Premature Compensation Claim Against Maa Vindhyavasani Developers, Allows Fresh Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bihar RERA, compensation, Adjudicating Officer, Rainbow Residency, builder dispute, homebuyer, Form-M, criminal proceedings]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/01/29/652621-rera-copy.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclt-delhi-sanctions-amalgamation-of-fybros-moddular-pvt-ltd-with-balar-marketing-pvt-ltd-543784</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T16:03:23+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLT New Delhi Sanctions Fybros Moddular-Balar Marketing Merger, Holds Scheme Fair And Reasonable]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLT Delhi, Amalgamation, Balar Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Fybros Moddular Pvt. Ltd.,]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690736-nclt-delhi-fybros-moddular-private-limited.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/indian-oil-corporation-cannot-withhold-security-deposit-over-unproven-vat-loss-543782</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T18:30:28+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T15:59:24+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[IOCL Can't Retain Security Deposit For Alleged VAT Loss Without Contractual Basis: Karnataka High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Indian Oil Corporation, BSR Infratech, Contractual Breach, contractual work]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690757-chief-justice-vibhu-bakhru-and-justice-ks-hemalekha.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-declines-interim-ban-on-nhms-use-of-patented-sickle-cell-screening-card-543781</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T15:53:25+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Declines Interim Ban On NHM's Use Of Patented Sickle Cell Screening Card]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Dr. Smita Nisanth Nambison, National Health Mission, GIPCI Card, Sickle Cell Anaemia Elimination Mission, Patent No. 419529, Copyright Infringement, MoHFW, Genetic Counselling, Misrepresentation, Public Health, Interim Restraint, Madhya Pradesh, Thalassemia, Article 226]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690760-delhi-hc-nhm.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/amp-expenditure-cant-be-treated-as-international-transaction-without-evidence-of-arrangement-with-ae-543778</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T15:33:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT Holds AMP Spend Can't Be TP Transaction Without AE Understanding, Follows Sony India Ruling]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[AMP expenses, transfer pricing, Bright Line Test, functional intensity, associated enterprise, international transaction, Sony India, tested party]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/06/13/679647-itat-delhi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/return-of-title-deeds-dispute-between-saradhi-lines-and-indian-hotels-remains-arbitrable-despite-mandatory-injunction-relief-kerala-high-court-543777</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T15:21:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Return Of Title Deeds Dispute Remains Arbitrable Despite Mandatory Injunction Relief: Kerala High Court]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[ection 8, Arbitration, Return of Title Deeds, Mandatory Injunction, Ouster of Jurisdiction, Contractual Dispute, Specific Performance, Arbitrability.]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/26/676377-kerala-high-court-justice-tr-ravi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/vat/high-court/mere-absence-of-the-words-wilful-suppression-does-not-invalidate-tnvat-penalty-543776</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T15:17:52+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Rules Omission Of 'Wilful Suppression' In Order Not Fatal, Upholds TNVAT Penalty]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, wilful suppression, Section 27(3)(b) of the TNVAT Act, VAT returns]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/29/690161-madras-hc-with-justice-g-jayachandran-and-justice-n-mala.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-explains-mere-signature-cheque-trigger-presumption-negotiable-instruments-act-section-138-543769</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T14:50:42+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Can A Mere Signature On A Cheque Trigger Presumption Of A Legally Enforceable Debt? Kerala High Court Explains]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 118(a), Section 139, cheque execution, cheque signature, statutory presumption, legally enforceable debt, dishonoured cheque, money recovery suit, promissory note, burden of proof, rebuttable presumption, execution of cheque, issuance of cheque, Kerala High Court, Justice Mohammed Nias CP, Chartered Accountant, payment stopped by drawer]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/11/16/571520-justice-mohammed-nias-cp-kerala-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/arbitration/arbitration-agreement-no-bar-to-fir-in-alleged-fraudulent-business-deal-chhattisgarh-high-court-refuses-to-quash-fir-in-50-crore-corporate-takeover-dispute-543767</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T14:46:06+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Chhattisgarh HC Says Fraud Claims Need Trial Despite Arbitration Clause, Allows Sierra Takeover Dispute]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[arbitration agreement, criminal prosecution, corporate fraud, quashing, commercial dispute, forged board resolutions, Section 482 CrPC, Seirra Group]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2024/04/22/535227-justice-ravindra-kumar-agrawal-chief-justice-ramesh-sinha-chhattisgarh-high-court.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/an-assessee-cannot-claim-deduction-for-alleged-secret-commission-payments-without-substantiating-the-claim-with-adequate-evidence-543765</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T14:45:27+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Karnataka High Court Rules Secret Commission Claims Need Evidence, Upholds ₹53.48 Lakh Disallowance]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, Section 260A of the Income Tax Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690696-karnataka-hc-justice-s-g-pandit-and-dr-justice-k-manmadha-rao.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/delhi-high-court/advocates-should-be-summoned-only-in-rare-and-exceptional-circumstances-delhi-high-court-cautions-dri-543758</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T14:25:40+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Advocates Should Be Summoned Only In Rare And Exceptional Circumstances: Delhi High Court Cautions DRI]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, DRI, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, DRI summons, advocate summons, Section 108 Customs Act, Customs Act 1962, legal professional privilege, advocate-client privilege, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Lalitendra Gulani, legal opinion, customs investigation, writ petition, Delhi High Court order]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/05/04/671745-anil-kshetarpal-amit-mahajan.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/ipr/delhi-high-court-issues-notice-on-times-now-suit-against-network18-sushant-sinha-over-desh-ki-paatshala-543754</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T14:08:22+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T14:05:55+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Times Now Suit Against Network18, Sushant Sinha Over 'Desh Ki Paatshala']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Bennett Coleman and Company Limited, Times Now, Network18, Sushant Sinha, Delhi High Court, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, News Ki Pathshala, Desh Ki Pathshala, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, show format protection, television program copyright, Pathshala mark, interim injunction, digital blackboard, R.G. Anand judgment, anchor intellectual property, news channel legal battle, expression and arrangement copyright, deceptive similarity]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690730-delhi-hc-pathshala.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/delhi-high-court-restrains-gujarat-based-saurashtra-aaj-tak-from-using-tv-today-networks-aaj-tak-mark-543746</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T13:44:52+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T13:28:59+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Restrains Gujarati Newspaper From Using 'Saurashtra Aaj Tak' In TV Today's Suit]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Trademark, TV Today Network, Aaj Tak, Saurashtra Aaj Tak, Trademark Passing Off, Secondary Meaning, Well-known Trademark, Deceptive Similarity, Justice Mini Pushkarna, News Dissemination, PRB Act, Section 34 Trade Marks Act, Permanent Injunction, Mandatory Injunction, Media Trademarks]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690685-delhi-hc-aaj-tak.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/nclat/nclat-dismisses-dot-appeal-against-rolta-india-resolution-plan-cites-its-implementation-543743</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T13:17:57+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T13:16:41+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Dismisses DoT Appeal Against Rolta India Resolution Plan, Cites Its Implementation]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Rolta India, Department of Telecommunications]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690698-nclat-delhi-rolta-india.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/company-law/nclat-admits-appeal-against-nclt-mumbai-order-waiving-membership-requirement-for-imppa-members-oppression-plea-543739</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T13:00:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[NCLAT Admits Appeal Against NCLT Mumbai Order Waiving Membership Requirement For IMPPA Members' Oppression Plea]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[NCLAT, Indian Motion Picture Producers Association, Oppression and Mismanagement]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690677-nclat-delhi-indian-motion-picture-producers-association.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-upholds-nclat-order-setting-aside-30161-crore-cci-penalty-on-grasim-industries-543736</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T12:50:10+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T12:45:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Dismisses CCI Appeal Against NCLAT Order Setting Aside ₹301.61 Crore Penalty On Grasim]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India (CCI), Grasim Industries Ltd., Abuse of Dominant Position, Viscose Staple Fibre (VSF), National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Competition Act, 2002, Principles of Natural Justice]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690605-whatsapp-image-2026-07-25-at-191637.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-stays-delhi-hc-ruling-declaring-nse-a-public-authority-under-rti-act-543725</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T17:52:11+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T12:12:33+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Ruling Declaring NSE A Public Authority Under RTI Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[National Stock Exchange (NSE), Right to Information Act, Section 2(h), Public Authority, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, Delhi High Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/22/688663-whatsapp-image-2026-07-22-at-181957.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/supreme-court-upholds-cirp-against-rana-kapoor-linked-bliss-companies-543721</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T17:55:51+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T11:29:18+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Upholds CIRP Against Rana Kapoor-Linked Bliss Companies]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, JC Flowers Asset Reconstruction, Bindu Kapoor, Rana Kapoor, Yes Bank, Section 7 CIRP, Bliss Abode Pvt Ltd]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690606-bindu-kapoor.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/tmc-moves-supreme-court-against-calcutta-hc-order-refusing-to-stay-eds-freezing-of-party-bank-accounts-543694</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T10:09:50+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[TMC Moves Supreme Court Against Calcutta HC Order Refusing To Stay ED's Freezing Of Party Bank Accounts]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[All India Trinamool Congress, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Calcutta High Court, PMLA, Bank Account Freeze, Supreme Court]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690629-whatsapp-image-2026-07-31-at-071333.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/delhi-high-court-slams-customs-concor-standoff-over-container-says-dispute-driven-by-ego-not-law-543686</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T09:47:28+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Delhi High Court Slams Customs-CONCOR Standoff Over Container, Says Dispute Driven By 'Ego' Not 'Law']]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Delhi High Court, Customs Department, CONCOR, Container Corporation of India, shipping container dispute, container release]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/15/686794-justice-anil-kshetrapal-and-justice-shail-jain-with-delhi-hc.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-july-30-2026-543682</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-31T09:23:20+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[LiveLawBiz: Corporate Legal News Daily Round-Up: July 30, 2026]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Corporate law news, business law news]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/02/26/658700-livelawbiz-corporate-legal-news-daily-round-up-2.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/cestat/father-employee-cant-be-penalised-solely-for-relationship-with-gold-smuggling-accused-cestat-kolkata-543667</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T20:26:34+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Father, Employee Can't Be Penalised Solely For Relationship With Gold Smuggling Accused: CESTAT Kolkata]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 112 Customs Act, Section 123 Customs Act, Section 121 Customs Act, CESTAT Kolkata, Gold Smuggling, Smuggled Gold, Customs Penalty, Penalty Under Section 112, Confiscation of Gold, Confiscation of Currency, Conscious Participation, Abetment, Independent Evidence, Corroborative Evidence, Employer-Employee Liability, Family Member Liability, Mere Relationship Not Sufficient, Mere Employment Not Sufficient, Vicarious Liability]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/03/684077-cestat-kolkata.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-quashes-criminal-proceedings-deloitte-haskins-and-sells-partner-subhiksha-fraud-mk-ananthanarayan-543666</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T20:14:43+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Madras High Court Quashes SFIO Case Against Deloitte Partner In Subhiksha Fraud Probe]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Madras High Court, Justice Sunder Mohan, Deloitte, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, MK Ananthanarayanan, Serious Fraud Investigation Office, SFIO, Subhiksha Trading Services Limited, STSL, Companies Act 1956, Statutory Auditor, Criminal Proceedings, Quash Petition, Section 211 Companies Act, Section 227 Companies Act, Section 233 Companies Act, Section 628 Companies Act, Wilful Default, Audit Report, Financial Irregularities, Corporate Fraud]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2022/10/08/438369-justice-sunder-mohan-and-madras-hc.jpg</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/liquor-bodies-move-supreme-court-against-nclat-ruling-holding-keralas-jawan-rum-preference-caused-no-harm-to-competition-543659</loc>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T19:56:32+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Liquor Bodies Move Supreme Court Against NCLAT Ruling Holding Kerala's Jawan Rum Preference Did Not Harm Competition]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Supreme Court, NCLAT, Kerala Jawan Rum, Competition Commission of India, CIABC, Abuse of Dominant Position, Competition Act]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/30/690550-whatsapp-image-2026-07-30-at-191908.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
<url>
<loc>https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/trade-promotion-bodies-qualify-as-charitable-institutions-if-dominant-object-is-general-public-utility-543654</loc>
<lastmod>2026-07-31T11:55:01+05:30</lastmod>
<news:news>
<news:publication>
<news:name><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></news:name>
<news:language>en</news:language>
</news:publication>
<news:publication_date>2026-07-30T19:43:04+05:30</news:publication_date>
<news:title><![CDATA[Gujarat High Court Reiterates Trade Associations Can Qualify As Charitable Institutions Under Income Tax Act]]></news:title>
<news:keywords><![CDATA[Section 12AA, Section 2(15), general public utility, trade association, charitable registration, Rule 17A, Gujarat High Court, trade promotion]]></news:keywords>
</news:news>
<image:image>
<image:loc>https://assets.livelawbiz.com/h-upload/2026/07/31/690683-gujarat-hc-with-justice-bhargav-karia-and-pranav-trivedi.webp</image:loc>
</image:image>
</url>
</urlset>
